Jump to content

World Anti-Doping Agency

Coordinates: 45°30′03″N 73°33′43″W / 45.50083°N 73.56194°W / 45.50083; -73.56194
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

World Anti-Doping Agency
Agence mondial antidopage
AbbreviationWADA
Formation10 November 1999; 24 years ago (1999-11-10)
TypeNon-profit
PurposeAnti-doping in sport
HeadquartersMontreal, Quebec, Canada
Coordinates45°30′03″N 73°33′43″W / 45.50083°N 73.56194°W / 45.50083; -73.56194
Official languages
President
Witold Bańka
AffiliationsInternational Olympic Committee
Websitewada-ama.org Edit this at Wikidata
Part of a series on
Doping in sport
White pillsA Hypodermic needle
Substances and types
Terminology
History
Doping-related lists
Anti-doping bodies

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA; French: Agence mondiale antidopage, AMA) is a foundation initiated by the International Olympic Committee based in Canada to promote, coordinate, and monitor the fight against drugs in sports. The agency's key activities include scientific research, education, development of anti-doping capacities, and monitoring of the World Anti-Doping Code, whose provisions are enforced by the UNESCO International Convention Against Doping in Sport. The aims of the Council of Europe Anti-Doping Convention and the United States Anti-Doping Agency are also closely aligned with those of WADA.

WADA is responsible for the World Anti-Doping Code, adopted by more than 650 sports organisations, including international sports federations, national anti-doping organisations, the IOC, and the International Paralympic Committee.

History

[edit]

The World Anti-Doping Agency is a foundation created through a collective initiative led by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). It was set up on 10 November 1999 in Lausanne, Switzerland, nearly a year after meetings[1] that resulted in what was called the "Declaration of Lausanne",[2] to promote, coordinate and monitor the fight against drugs in sports. Since 2002, the organisation's headquarters have been located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The Lausanne office became the regional office for Europe. Other regional offices have been established in Africa, Asia/Oceania and Latin America. WADA is responsible for the World Anti-Doping Code, adopted by more than 650 sports organisations, including international sports federations, national anti-doping organisations, the IOC, and the International Paralympic Committee. As of 2020, its president is Witold Banka.[3]

Initially funded by the International Olympic Committee,[4] WADA receives half of its budgetary requirements from them, with the other half coming from various national governments. Its governing bodies are also composed in equal parts by representatives from the sporting movement (including athletes) and governments of the world. The Agency's key activities include scientific research, education, development of anti-doping capacities, and monitoring of the World Anti-Doping Code.[citation needed]

McLaren Report

[edit]
Bereg Kit urine sample container
Main article: McLaren Report

In 2016, academic Richard McLaren, an independent investigator working on behalf of WADA, published a second part of his report (the first having been published in July 2016) showing that more than 1,000 Russian athletes in over 30 sports had been involved in or benefited from state-sponsored doping from 2011 to 2015.[5][6][7][8] As a result of the report, many Russian athletes were barred from participating in the 2018 Winter Olympics.[9] Despite widely accepted evidence, in 2018 WADA lifted its ban on Russian athletes.[10] The reinstatement was strongly criticised by, among others, Russian whistleblower Grigory Rodchenkov,[11] and his lawyer, James Walden.[12]

Organisation and governance

[edit]

WADA is an international organisation. It delegates work in individual countries to Regional and National Anti-Doping Organisations (RADOs and NADOs) and mandates that these organisations are compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code.[13][14] WADA also accredits around 30 laboratories to perform the required scientific analysis for doping control.[15]

The statutes of WADA and the World Anti-Doping Code mandate the Court of Arbitration for Sport's ultimate jurisdiction in deciding doping-related cases.[16]

Foundation Board

[edit]

The highest decision-making authority in WADA is the 38-member Foundation Board, which is comprised equally of IOC representatives and representatives of national governments.[17] The Foundation Board appoints the agency's president.[18] Most day-to-day management is delegated to the executive committee.[17]

Executive Committee

[edit]

The executive committee, comprising 16 members, is delegated the Foundation Board to manage the day-to-day operations of the WADA. They are also responsible for all decisions not reserved by WADA's Statutes to the Board. Representatives are appointed by the IOC and governments. Many are current or former athletes. As of April 2024 Witold Bańka is president, and Yang Yang is vice-president of the committee.[19]

List of presidents

[edit]
Nr Dates Name Country of origin
1 10 November 1999 – 31 December 2007 Dick Pound  Canada
2 1 January 2008 – 31 December 2013 John Fahey  Australia
3 1 January 2014 – 31 December 2019 Craig Reedie  United Kingdom
4 1 January 2020 – present Witold Bańka  Poland

Other committees

[edit]

The Nominations Committee was created in September 2019 in order to ensure that the right people are recruited to serve in senior governance roles within the organisation. Independent Australian business executive Diane Smith-Gander was appointed as inaugural chair of the committee. Other independent members appointed are German human resources expert Regine Buettner and British business executive Simon Gillham. The sports movement nominee is Kelly Fairweather from South Africa, and Maja Makovec Brenčič of Slovenia is the public authority (government) nominee.[20]

There also exist several sub-committees with narrower remits, including a Finance and Administration Committee[21] and an Athlete Committee peopled by athletes.[22]

World Anti-Doping Code

[edit]
See also: List of drugs banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency

The World Anti-Doping Code is a document published by WADA that approximately 700 sports organisations across the world are signatories to.[23] The code "harmonizes anti-doping policies, rules, and regulations within sport organisations and among public authorities" for the purpose of "protect[ing] the athletes' fundamental right to participate in doping-free sport".[23][24] The code is supplemented by eight international standards published by WADA covering the topics of prohibited substances, testing and investigations, laboratories, Therapeutic Use Exemptions, protection of privacy and personal information, code compliance by signatories, education, and results management.[25] The most recent version of the code took effect on 1 January 2021.[24][26]

In 2004, the World Anti-Doping Code was implemented by sports organisations prior to the Olympic Games in Athens, Greece. In November 2007, more than 600 sports organisations (international sports federations, national anti-doping organisations, the International Olympic Committee, the International Paralympic Committee, and a number of professional leagues in various countries of the world) unanimously adopted a revised Code at the Third World Conference on Doping in Sport, to take effect on 1 January 2009.[27]

In 2013, further amendments to the Code were approved, doubling the sanction for a first offence where intentional doping is established, but allowing for more lenient sanctions for inadvertent rule violations or for athletes co-operating with anti-doping agencies. The updated code came into effect on 1 January 2015.[28][29]

On 16 November 2017, WADA's Foundation Board initiated the 2021 Code Review Process, which also involved simultaneous review of the International Standards. During this time, stakeholders had multiple opportunities to contribute and make recommendations on how to further strengthen the global anti-doping program. Following the review process, stakeholders were invited to intervene publicly on the proposed Code and Standards during the Agency's Fifth World Conference on Doping in Sport in Katowice, Poland – an opportunity which was taken up by over 70 stakeholder organisations – before the Code and the full suite of Standards were approved by the Foundation Board and executive committee respectively.

Whereabouts rule

[edit]
See also: Biological passport § Whereabouts rules

The anti-doping code revised the whereabouts system in place since 2004, under which, as of 2014, athletes are required to select one hour per day, seven days a week to be available for no-notice drugs tests.[30]

This was unsuccessfully challenged at law in 2009 by Sporta, the Belgian sports union, arguing that the system violated article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights;[31] and by FIFPro, the international umbrella group of football players' unions, basing its case on data protection and employment law.[31]

A significant number of sports organisations, governments, athletes, and other individuals and organisations have expressed support for the "whereabouts" requirements. The International Association of Athletics Federations[32] and UK Sport[33] are two of the most vocal supporters of this rule. Both FIFA and UEFA have criticised the system, citing privacy concerns,[citation needed] as has the BCCI.[34]

WADA has published a Q&A explaining the rationale for the change.[35]

Controversies

[edit]

Statistical validity of tests

[edit]

Professor Donald A. Berry has argued that the closed systems used by anti-doping agencies do not allow statistical validation of the tests.[36] This argument was seconded by an accompanying editorial in the journal Nature (7 August 2008).[37] The anti-doping community and scientists familiar with anti-doping work rejected these arguments. On 30 October 2008, Nature (Vol 455) published a letter to the editor from WADA countering Berry's article.[38] There has been at least one case where the development of statistical decision limit used by WADA in HGH use testing was found invalid by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.[39]

Chinese doping allegations

[edit]
Further information: Doping in China, Sun Yang § Doping allegation and controversies, and Concerns and controversies at the 2024 Summer Olympics § Chinese swimmers doping controversy

In 2018, the exterior case containing samples from an anti-doping test, but not the vials themselves, was smashed by the security guards of Chinese swimmer Sun Yang. In justification, the Doping Control Assistant (DCA) in charge of the testing mission was later criticised by Sun Yang, Chinese media, journalists, and scholars for not following the proper protocols.[40] Sun argued the DCA in question lacked proper identification, a situation that he said had happened previously with the same assistant.[41][40] FINA's Doping Panel issued Sun with a warning but imposed no penalty. WADA appealed the FINA decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.[42]

The Sunday Times reported on January 27, 2019[43] that FINA's Doping Panel issued Sun with a warning but imposed no penalty on Sun despite the heavy criticism levelled at the swimmer and his entourage by the International swimming federation's Doping Panel. As a result of that newspaper report, WADA investigated the matter and appealed the FINA decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.[44] Later, in July 2019, News Corp in Australia, part of the same media group as The Sunday Times in London, published in full the report FINA had kept secret.[45]

A three-member CAS panel found Sun guilty of refusing to co-operate with sample testers and banned him from competitive swimming until February 2028.[46][47] However, Sun's lawyers appealed the ruling, which was widely celebrated but also criticised in some quarters.[48][49] On December 22, 2020, the Swiss Federal Tribunal set the CAS award aside due to the perceived bias of the president of the panel, who before the Sun Yang case came to light had tweeted comments in opposition to videos showing animal cruelty in China that included a racial slur.[50] In addition, another arbitrator, Romano Subiotto, had been sitting on a WADA's working group,[51] though this was no impediment to him serving on a CAS panel. After a second hearing, which unlike the first was not held in public, Sun's suspension was reduced to four years and three months, opening up the possibility of the swimmer being able to participate in the 2024 Olympics, even though it would turn out that his ban would not end until after China's Olympic swimming trials for the Paris Games.[52]

On 20 April 2024, The New York Times revealed that 23 members of the Chinese swimming team tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug called trimetazidine (TMZ) seven months prior to the start of the 2020 Summer Games and were allowed to participate in the games with some of the swimmers winning medals. Following the publication of the report, Travis Tygart, CEO of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, accused the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the Chinese Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) of covering up doping by Chinese swimmers.[53]

WADA argued the amount detected was too low to enhance performance, and CHINADA, who had reported the results to WADA and FINA (now World Aquatics), blamed them on contamination from a hotel kitchen, a rationale that potentially exempts findings from being made public.[54] WADA released a statement, explaining that "[it] was not possible for WADA scientists or investigators to conduct their enquiries on the ground in China given the extreme restrictions in place due to a COVID-related lockdown. WADA ultimately concluded that it was not in a position to disprove the possibility that contamination was the source of TMZ and it was compatible with the analytical data in the file."[55] World Aquatics's investigation agreed with WADA.[56]

After the story was leaked, WADA was criticised by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and athletes for not being transparent about the findings and keeping "clean athletes in the dark". WADA's choice of a Swiss attorney to lead an investigation into the matter also drew criticism because he was hand-picked by the agency.[57] Experts interviewed by The New York Times said trace amounts of TMZ can be detected near the end of a doping excretion period but could not rule out contamination either.[58]

WADA was also accused of having a double-standard as Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva tested positive for TMZ and used the same excuse, but was subsequently banned for four years. WADA argued, based on non-published information and pharmacokinetics, that contamination would not have been possible in Valieva's case. In the case of the Chinese swimmers, that no international competition was occurring around the time of the positive tests, only athletes who stayed at one of the hotels tested positive, and some individuals alternated between positive and negative results all point to contamination, not doping.[59][60]

In May 2024, WADA announced that it hold an extraordinary meeting to discuss the doping case of the Chinese swimmers.[61][62] WADA said it asked USADA to produce the whistleblowers alleging doping by the Chinese but has received no response, adding that American athletes had "some of the most elaborate and surprising contamination scenarios" in the past. USADA in response criticised WADA for attacking the messenger and its lack of transparency.[63][64] The United States has threatened to stop funding WADA and called the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) to look into the matter.[54]

Eleven of the 23 swimmers involved in the controversy were named to the 2024 Chinese Olympic swimming team.[65] In June 2024, US Olympic swimmers Michael Phelps and Allison Schmitt criticized the WADA in a Congressional hearing.[66][67] In July, the International Olympic Committee accepted Salt Lake City's bid to host the 2034 Winter Olympics under the condition that the contract could be terminated "in cases where the supreme authority of the WADA in the fight against doping is not fully respected or if the application of the world antidoping code is hindered or undermined."[68] NPR described the move as an attempt to crush the ongoing DOJ investigation in the United States.[69] According to The New York Times, the demand would "allow the I.O.C. to pull the Games if any effort was made to undermine the authority of the World Anti-Doping Agency". The agreement was signed off by the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) and Salt Lake City officials but criticized by USADA.[69][68] In response, U.S. lawmakers proposed a bill to give the Office of National Drug Control Policy permanent authority to withhold U.S. funding for WADA if it deems WADA's anti-doping actions sub-standard.[70]

Database leaks

[edit]

In August 2016, the World Anti-Doping Agency reported the receipt of phishing emails sent to users of its database claiming to be official WADA communications requesting their login details. After reviewing the two domains provided by WADA, it was found that the websites' registration and hosting information were consistent with the Russian hacking group Fancy Bear.[71] According to WADA, some of the data the hackers released had been forged.[72]

Due to evidence of widespread doping by Russian athletes, WADA recommended that Russian athletes be barred from participating in the 2016 Rio Olympics and Paralympics. Analysts said they believed the hack was in part an act of retaliation against whistleblowing Russian athlete Yuliya Stepanova, whose personal information was released in the breach.[73] In August 2016, WADA revealed that their systems had been breached, explaining that hackers from Fancy Bear had used an IOC-created account to gain access to their Anti-doping Administration and Management System (ADAMS) database.[74] The hackers then used the website fancybear.net to leak what they said were the Olympic drug testing files of several American athletes who had received therapeutic use exemptions, including gymnast Simone Biles for methylphenidate, tennis players Venus Williams (for prednisone, prednisolone, triamcinolone, and formoterol), and Serena Williams (for oxycodone, hydromorphone, prednisone, prednisolone, and methylprednisolone), and basketball player Elena Delle Donne (for an amphetamine and hydrocortisone).[75] The hackers focused on athletes who had been granted exemptions by WADA for various reasons. Subsequent leaks included athletes from many other countries.[74]

Council of Europe Anti-Doping Convention

[edit]

The Anti-Doping Convention of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg was opened for signature on 16 December 1989 as the first multilateral legal standard in this field. It has been signed by 52 states including all 47 member states of the Council of Europe and non-member states Australia, Belarus, Canada, Morocco, and Tunisia.[76] The convention is open for signature by other non-European states. It does not claim to create a universal model of anti-doping, but sets a certain number of common standards and regulations requiring parties to adopt legislative, financial, technical, educational and other measures. In this sense the Convention strives for the same general aims as WADA, without being directly linked to it.

The main objective of the convention is to promote the national and international harmonisation of the measures to be taken against doping. Furthermore, the Convention describes the mission of the monitoring group set up in order to monitor its implementation and periodically re-examine the list of prohibited substances and methods which can be found in an annex to the main text. An additional protocol to the Convention entered into force on 1 April 2004 with the aim of ensuring the mutual recognition of anti-doping controls and of reinforcing the implementation of the Convention using a binding control system.

UNESCO International Convention Against Doping in Sport

[edit]
Main article: International Convention Against Doping in Sport

Given that many governments cannot be legally bound by a non-governmental document such as the World Anti-Doping Code, they are implementing it by individually ratifying the UNESCO International Convention against Doping in Sport, the first global international treaty against doping in sport, which was unanimously adopted by 191 governments at the UNESCO General Conference in October 2005 and came into force in February 2007. As of April 2020, 189 states had ratified the convention, setting a UNESCO record in terms of speed.

The UNESCO Convention is a practical and legally binding tool enabling governments to align domestic policy with the World Anti-Doping Code, thus harmonizing the rules governing anti-doping in sport. It formalizes governments' commitment to the fight against doping in sport, including by facilitating doping controls and supporting national testing programs; encouraging the establishment of "best practice" in the labelling, marketing, and distribution of products that might contain prohibited substances; withholding financial support from those who engage in or support doping; taking measures against manufacturing and trafficking; encouraging the establishment of codes of conduct for professions relating to sport and anti-doping; and funding education and research.

National Football League

[edit]

It was revealed in May 2011 that the American National Football League (NFL), which had previously resisted more stringent drug testing, might allow WADA to conduct its drug tests instead of doing it in-house. This could lead the way to testing for HGH, which had previously been without testing in professional American football.[77] However, as of September 2013, cooperation was stalemated because "blood-testing for human growth hormone in the NFL had been delayed by the NFL's players union, who had tried 'every possible way to avoid testing'".[78] As American football players do not participate in international sporting events, that issue is not a top priority for WADA.[79]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Wilson, Stephen (27 November 1998). "Federations seek common ground on sanctions for banned drug use". Newspapers.com. Lebanon Daily News. Associated Press. p. 5C. Archived from the original on 10 June 2023. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
  2. ^ "Lausanne Declaration on Doping in Sport". Sportunterricht.de. 4 February 1999. Archived from the original on 26 April 2013. Retrieved 19 November 2009.
  3. ^ Executive Committee Archived 13 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine at WADA official website, June 2014
  4. ^ Hunt, Thomas M. (15 January 2011). Drug Games: The International Olympic Committee and the Politics of Doping, 1960–2008. University of Texas Press. ISBN 9780292739574. Archived from the original on 30 April 2024. Retrieved 21 October 2020.
  5. ^ "McLaren Independent Investigation Report - Part I". World Anti-Doping Agency. 18 July 2016. Archived from the original on 6 December 2017. Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  6. ^ "McLaren Independent Investigation Report - Part II". World Anti-Doping Agency. 9 December 2016. Archived from the original on 8 November 2017. Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  7. ^ Ingle, Sean (9 December 2016). "Russian state doped more than 1,000 athletes and corrupted London 2012". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 February 2022. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  8. ^ Ruiz, Rebecca R. (9 December 2016). "Report Shows Vast Reach of Russian Doping: 1,000 Athletes, 30 Sports". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 March 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  9. ^ Mather, Victor; Ruiz, Rebecca R. (25 January 2018). "Russia Is Barred From Winter Olympics. Russia Is Sending 169 Athletes to Winter Olympics". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 March 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  10. ^ Pells, Eddie. "Despite protests, Russia's anti-doping agency reinstated". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on 25 September 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  11. ^ "Whistleblower warns WADA of 'catastrophe' if Russia ban eased". France 24. 19 September 2018. Archived from the original on 25 September 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  12. ^ Ingle, Sean (20 September 2018). "Wada lifts Russia's three-year doping suspension and faces its biggest crisis". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 January 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  13. ^ "National Anti-Doping Organizations (NADO)". World Anti-Doping Agency. 14 November 2013. Archived from the original on 29 August 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  14. ^ "Regional Anti-Doping Organizations (RADO)". World Anti-Doping Agency. Archived from the original on 3 March 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  15. ^ "Accredited and approved laboratories". wada-ama.org. WADA. Archived from the original on 13 November 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  16. ^ World Anti-Doping Agency: 2009 World Anti-Doping Code Archived 24 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  17. ^ a b "Governance". wada-ama.org. WADA. 14 November 2013. Archived from the original on 13 November 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  18. ^ "Briton Sir Craig Reedie elected World Anti-Doping Agency President". UK Anti-Doping. 15 November 2013. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  19. ^ "Executive Committee". World Anti Doping Agency. 22 March 2024. Archived from the original on 28 March 2024. Retrieved 10 April 2024.
  20. ^ "WADA outlines composition of inaugural Nominations Committee". World Anti Doping Agency. 1 December 2021. Archived from the original on 10 April 2024. Retrieved 10 April 2024.
  21. ^ "Finance and Administration Committee". wada-ama.org. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  22. ^ "Athlete Committee". wada-ama.gov. WADA. 15 November 2013. Archived from the original on 13 November 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  23. ^ a b "The Code". wada-ama.org. 14 November 2013. Archived from the original on 2 December 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
  24. ^ a b "World Anti-Doping Code" (PDF). World Anti-Doping Agency. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
  25. ^ "International Standards". wada-ama.org. 14 November 2013. Archived from the original on 2 August 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
  26. ^ "2021 Code Review". World Anti-Doping Agency. 6 December 2017. Archived from the original on 8 August 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  27. ^ Zorea, Aharon (2014). Steroids (Health and Medical Issues Today). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp. 77–83. ISBN 978-1440802997.
  28. ^ "Drugs in sport: Wada doubles doping ban in new code". BBC Sport. 15 November 2013. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  29. ^ 2015 World Anti-Doping Code - Final Draft Archived 1 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine WADA. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  30. ^ "Athletes air issues over testing". BBC News. 16 February 2009. Archived from the original on 18 February 2009. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  31. ^ a b Slater, Matt (22 January 2009). "Legal threat to anti-doping code". BBC News. Archived from the original on 25 January 2009. Retrieved 16 February 2009.
  32. ^ "IAAF: IAAF opinion on "new" whereabouts requirements- News - iaaf.org". Archived from the original on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
  33. ^ Whereabouts Archived 12 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine at UK Anti-Doping, 2014
  34. ^ "BCCI opposes doping clause". The Hindu. 3 August 2009. Archived from the original on 4 August 2009. Retrieved 15 November 2016.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)"BCCI opposes doping clause". The Hindu. 3 August 2009. Archived from the original on 4 August 2009.
  35. ^ "What we do". 14 November 2013. Archived from the original on 16 July 2014. Retrieved 28 June 2014.
  36. ^ Berry DA (August 2008). "The science of doping". Nature. 454 (7205): 692–3. Bibcode:2008Natur.454..692B. doi:10.1038/454692a. PMID 18685682. S2CID 205040220. Full access is restricted to subscribers
  37. ^ "A level playing field?". Nature. 454 (7205): 667. August 2008. Bibcode:2008Natur.454Q.667.. doi:10.1038/454667a. PMID 18685647. S2CID 158157049.
  38. ^ Ljungqvist, Arne; Horta, Luis; Wadler, Gary (2008). "Doping: World agency sets standards to promote fair play". Nature. 455 (7217): 1176. Bibcode:2008Natur.455.1176L. doi:10.1038/4551176a. PMID 18971999.
  39. ^ "Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2566. Andrus Veerpalu v. International Ski Federation (ISF)" (PDF). Bulletin TAS - CAS Bulletin. Court of Arbitration for Sport. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 April 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  40. ^ a b "The Sun Yang Case, Explained - Xinhua | English.news.cn". www.xinhuanet.com. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019.
  41. ^ Holmes, Tracey (8 March 2020). "Sun Yang has been painted as a 'drug cheat'. Let's look at it in context". ABC News. Archived from the original on 8 March 2020. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
  42. ^ Group, Dorier (14 November 2019). "CAS 2019/A/6148 - Part 1". Archived from the original on 25 February 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2019 – via Vimeo.
  43. ^ Lord, Craig (27 January 2019). "Olympic champion Sun Yang abuses drug testers". The Sunday Times. Archived from the original on 1 February 2019. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  44. ^ Group, Dorier (14 November 2019). "CAS 2019/A/6148 - Part 1". Archived from the original on 25 February 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2019 – via Vimeo.
  45. ^ "Australia's Sunday Telegraph Publishes Sun Yang FINA Doping Panel Report In Full, English - & Mandarin". 13 July 2019. Archived from the original on 10 December 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  46. ^ "Chinese swimmer Sun Yang banned for eight years for breaking anti-doping rules". ABC News. 28 February 2020. Archived from the original on 30 April 2024. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  47. ^ Lord, Craig (28 February 2020). "Sun Yang Vs WADA Verdict: Damning Eight-Year Ends Career Of Chinese Controversy". Swimming World Magazine. Archived from the original on 28 February 2020. Retrieved 28 February 2020.
  48. ^ "Why the Sun Yang decision should be overturned". 15 May 2020. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  49. ^ "Should changes follow Sun Yang's eight year ban?". 12 June 2020. Archived from the original on 25 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  50. ^ Panja, Tariq (23 December 2020). "Chinese Swimmer's Doping Ban is Lifted After Accusation of Racism". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  51. ^ "Working Group on the Review of WADA Governance Reforms". 26 November 2020. Archived from the original on 26 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
  52. ^ "Sun Yang's Ban Reduced to Four Years & 3 Months, Still Out of Tokyo Olympics". 22 June 2021. Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
  53. ^ Mann, Brian (22 April 2024). "'Ban them all.' With Paris Games looming, Chinese doping scandal rocks Olympic sport". NPR. Archived from the original on 22 April 2024. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
  54. ^ a b MacInnes, Paul (22 April 2024). "Wada defends its actions over Chinese swimmers' doping allegations". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 April 2024. Retrieved 22 April 2024.
  55. ^ "WADA statement on case of 23 swimmers from China". WADA. 20 April 2024. Archived from the original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
  56. ^ Rieder, David (30 April 2024). "WADA Releases Fact Sheet on Chinese Doping Violations". Swimming World News. Archived from the original on 19 May 2024. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
  57. ^ Auerbach, Nicole. "Chinese doping scandal roils Olympic swimming: The latest, and what it means for Paris". The Athletic. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 15 June 2024. Retrieved 25 May 2024.
  58. ^ Schmidt, Michael S.; Vrentas, Jenny; Panja, Tariq (12 May 2024). "Ahead of Olympics, World Anti-Doping Agency Faces a Trust Crisis". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 12 May 2024. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  59. ^ "WADA publishes Fact Sheet/Frequently Asked Questions in relation to contamination case involving swimmers from China". World Anti Doping Agency. 29 April 2024. Archived from the original on 2 May 2024.
  60. ^ "As Paris Olympics approach, concerns continue after doping watchdog cleared Chinese swimmers in 2021". CBC News. 24 May 2024. Archived from the original on 24 May 2024.
  61. ^ McCarthy, Simone (21 April 2024). "World Anti-Doping Agency defends handling of elite Chinese swimmers who tested positive for banned drug". CNN. Archived from the original on 16 May 2024. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  62. ^ "Wada calls extraordinary meeting over China swimmers". BBC. 14 May 2024. Archived from the original on 22 May 2024. Retrieved 16 May 2024.
  63. ^ Byrnes, Liz (17 May 2024). "Richard Pound Wants Legal Action Taken Against USADA For "Outrageous Conduct" Over China Drug Positives: Tygart Hits Back". Swimming World News. Archived from the original on 17 May 2024.
  64. ^ "House committee calls on DOJ, FBI to investigate doping by Chinese swimmers". NBC News. 22 May 2024. Archived from the original on 22 May 2024.
  65. ^ "Eleven swimmers in doping scandal named to Chinese Olympic team". The Japan Times. 19 June 2024. Archived from the original on 19 June 2024. Retrieved 19 June 2024.
  66. ^ Nuchols, Ben (25 June 2024). "Olympic champion swimmers tell Congress U.S. athletes have lost faith in anti-doping regulator". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 26 June 2024. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
  67. ^ Mann, Brian (26 June 2024). "Swimmer Michael Phelps says China doping scandal threatens the Olympic movement". NPR. Archived from the original on 26 June 2024. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
  68. ^ a b Longman, Jeré; Panja, Tariq; Schmidt, Michael S. (24 July 2024). "Salt Lake Awarded 2034 Olympics Under I.O.C. Pressure Over Doping Inquiries". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 25 July 2024. Retrieved 25 July 2024.
  69. ^ a b Mann, Brian (24 July 2024). "Olympic officials try to crush U.S. probes of China doping, threaten Salt Lake Games". NPR. Archived from the original on 25 July 2024. Retrieved 24 July 2024.
  70. ^ Pells, Eddie (30 July 2024). "US lawmakers accuse Olympic leaders of blackmail over their fight with IOC, World Anti-Doping Agency". Associated Press. Retrieved 30 July 2024.
  71. ^ "What we know about Fancy Bears hack team". BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  72. ^ Gallagher, Sean (6 October 2016). "Researchers find fake data in Olympic anti-doping, Guccifer 2.0 Clinton dumps". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 14 July 2017. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  73. ^ Thielman, Sam (22 August 2016). "Same Russian hackers likely breached Olympic drug-testing agency and DNC". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 15 December 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
  74. ^ a b Meyer, Josh (14 September 2016). "Russian hackers post alleged medical files of Simone Biles, Serena Williams". NBC News. Archived from the original on 23 February 2018. Retrieved 23 December 2017.
  75. ^ "American Athletes Caught Doping". Fancybear.net. 13 September 2016. Archived from the original on 24 December 2017. Retrieved 23 December 2017.
  76. ^ "Anti-Doping Convention". Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 18 February 2022.<-- Counted manually. Non-CoE members aren't in the list for some reason, but they are on the map, which is hidden if you're using a phone in portrait mode -->
  77. ^ WADA to test NFL Archived 15 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  78. ^ Ingle, Sean "NFL faces battle with Wada over transparency of drug-testing" Archived 16 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian, 28 September 2013
  79. ^ "Football". 3 April 2023. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2020.

Further reading

[edit]
  • David, Paul (2018). A Guide to the World Anti-Doping Code: The Fight for the Spirit of Sport. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108717014.
[edit]

Media related to World Anti-Doping Agency at Wikimedia Commons

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Anti-Doping_Agency&oldid=1237645069"