Jump to content

Tritone paradox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The tritone paradox is an auditory illusion in which a sequentially played pair of Shepard tones[1] separated by an interval of a tritone, or half octave, is heard as ascending by some people and as descending by others.[2] Different populations tend to favor one of a limited set of different spots around the chromatic circle as central to the set of "higher" tones. Roger Shepard in 1963 had argued that such tone pairs would be heard ambiguously as either ascending or descending. However, psychology of music researcher Diana Deutsch in 1986 discovered that when the judgments of individual listeners were considered separately, their judgments depended on the positions of the tones along the chromatic circle. For example, one listener would hear the tone pair C–F♯ as ascending and the tone pair G–C♯ as descending. Yet another listener would hear the tone pair C–F♯ as descending and the tone pair G–C♯ as ascending. Furthermore, the way these tone pairs were perceived varied depending on the listener's language or dialect.

Each Shepard tone consists of a set of octave-related sinusoids, whose amplitudes are scaled by a fixed bell-shaped spectral envelope based on a log frequency scale. For example, one tone might consist of a sinusoid at 440 Hz, accompanied by sinusoid at the higher octaves (880 Hz, 1760 Hz, etc.) and lower octaves (220 Hz, 110 Hz, etc.). The other tone might consist of a 311 Hz sinusoid, again accompanied by higher and lower octaves (622 Hz, 155.5 Hz, etc.). The amplitudes of the sinusoids of both complexes are determined by the same fixed-amplitude envelope—for example, the envelope might be centered at 370 Hz and span a six-octave range.

Shepard predicted that the two tones would constitute a bistable figure, the auditory equivalent of the Necker cube, that could be heard ascending or descending, but never both at the same time. Diana Deutsch later found that perception of which tone was higher depended on the absolute frequencies involved: an individual will usually find the same tone to be higher, and this is determined by the tones' absolute pitches. This is consistently done by a large portion of the population, despite the fact that responding to different tones in different ways must involve the ability to hear absolute pitch, which was thought to be rare. This finding has been used to argue that latent absolute-pitch ability is present in a large proportion of the population. In addition, Deutsch found that subjects from the south of England and from California resolved the ambiguity the opposite way.[3] Also, Deutsch, Henthorn and Dolson found that native speakers of Vietnamese, a tonal language, heard the tritone paradox differently from Californians who were native speakers of English.[4]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ R. N. Shepard. Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36(12):2346–2353, 1964.
  2. ^ Deutsch, D. A musical paradox. Music Perception, 3:275–280, 1986.
  3. ^ Deutsch, D. The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception. Music Perception, 8:335–347, 1991.
  4. ^ Deutsch, D., Henthorn T. and Dolson, M. Speech patterns heard early in life influence later perception of the tritone paradox. Music Perception, 21:357–372, 2004.

References[edit]

  • Deutsch, D. (1986). "A musical paradox". Music Perception. 3 (3): 275–280. doi:10.2307/40285337. JSTOR 40285337. S2CID 6909819. Weblink PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D. (1986). "An auditory paradox". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 80 (S1): s93. Bibcode:1986ASAJ...80...93D. doi:10.1121/1.2024050. Weblink
  • Deutsch, D. (1987). "The tritone paradox: Effects of spectral variables". Perception & Psychophysics. 41 (6): 563–575. doi:10.3758/BF03210490. PMID 3615152. PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D., North, T. and Ray, L. (1990). "The tritone paradox: Correlate with the listener's vocal range for speech". Music Perception. 7 (4): 371–384. doi:10.2307/40285473. JSTOR 40285473. S2CID 41891423.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D. (1991). "The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception". Music Perception. 8 (4): 335–347. doi:10.2307/40285517. JSTOR 40285517. S2CID 2255520. PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D. (1992). "Paradoxes of musical pitch". Scientific American. 267 (2): 88–95. Bibcode:1992SciAm.267b..88D. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0892-88. PMID 1641627. PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D. (1992). "Some new pitch paradoxes and their implications. In Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 336 (1278): 391–397. doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0073. PMID 1354379. PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D. (1997). "The tritone paradox: A link between music and speech". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 6 (6): 174–180. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772951. S2CID 145677671. PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D., Henthorn T. and Dolson, M. (2004). "Speech patterns heard early in life influence later perception of the tritone paradox". Music Perception. 21 (3): 357–372. doi:10.1525/mp.2004.21.3.357. S2CID 38512389.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) PDF Document
  • Deutsch, D. (2007). "Mothers and their offspring perceive the tritone paradox in closely similar ways". Archives of Acoustics. 32: 3–14. PDF Document

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tritone_paradox&oldid=1228728661"