Ancient Mesopotamian units of measurement

Sumerian Metrology

Ancient Mesopotamian units of measurement originated in the loosely organized city-states of Early Dynastic Sumer. Each city, kingdom and trade guild had its own standards until the formation of the Akkadian Empire when Sargon of Akkad issued a common standard. This standard was improved by Naram-Sin, but fell into disuse after the Akkadian Empire dissolved. The standard of Naram-Sin was readopted in the Ur III period by the Nanše Hymn which reduced a plethora of multiple standards to a few agreed upon common groupings. Successors to Sumerian civilization including the Babylonians, Assyrians, and Persians continued to use these groupings. Akkado-Sumerian metrology has been reconstructed by applying statistical methods to compare Sumerian architecture, architectural plans, and issued official standards such as Statue B of Gudea and the bronze cubit of Nippur.

Archaic system

Gudea Statue I carved diorite

The systems that would later become the classical standard for Mesopotamia were developed in parallel with writing during Uruk Period Sumer (c. 4000 BCE). Studies of protocuneiform indicate twelve separate counting systems used in Uruk.

• Sexagesimal System S used to count slaves, animals, fish, wooden objects, stone objects, containers.
• Sexagesimal System S' used to count dead animals, certain types of beer
• Bi-Sexagesimal System B used to count cereal, bread, fish, milk products
• Bi-Sexagesimal System B^* used to count rations
• GAN₂ System G used to count field measurement
• ŠE system Š used to count barley by volume
• ŠE system Š' used to count malt by volume
• ŠE system Š" used to count wheat by volume
• ŠE System Š^* used to count barley groats
• EN System E used to count weight
• U₄ System U used to count calendrics
• DUG_b System Db used to count milk by volume
• DUG_c System Db used to count beer by volume

In Early Dynastic Sumer (c. 2900–2300 BCE) metrology and mathematics were indistinguishable and treated as a single scribal discipline. The idea of an abstract number did not yet exist, thus all quantities were written as metrological symbols and never as numerals followed by a unit symbol. For example there was a symbol for one-sheep and another for one-day but no symbol for one. About 600 of these metrological symbols exist, for this reason archaic Sumerian metrology is complex and not fully understood. In general however, length, volume, and mass are derived from a theoretical standard cube, called 'gur (also spelled kor in some literature)', filled with barley, wheat, water, or oil. However, because of the different specific gravities of these substances combined with dual numerical bases (sexagesimal or decimal), multiple sizes of the gur-cube were used without consensus. The different gur-cubes are related by proportion, based on the water gur-cube, according to four basic coefficients and their cubic roots. These coefficients are given as:

• Komma = 80⁄81 correction when planning rations with a 360-day year
• Leimma = 24⁄25 conversion from decimal to a sexagesimal number system
• Diesis = 15⁄16
• Euboic = 5⁄6

One official government standard of measurement of the archaic system was the Cubit of Nippur (2650 BCE). It is a Euboic Mana + 1 Diesis (432 grams). This standard is the main reference used by archaeologists to reconstruct the system.

Classical system

Royal Gur Cube of Naram-Sin

A major improvement came in 2150 BCE during the Akkadian Empire under the reign of Naram-Sin when the competing systems were unified by a single official standard, the royal gur-cube. His reform is considered the first standardized system of measure in Mesopotamia. The royal gur-cube (Cuneiform: LU₂.GAL.GUR, 𒈚𒄥; Akkadian: šarru kurru) was a theoretical cuboid of water approximately 6 m × 6 m × 0.5 m from which all other units could be derived. The Neo-Sumerians continued use of the royal gur-cube as indicated by the Letter of Nanse issued in 2000 BCE by Gudea. Use of the same standard continued through the Neo-Babylonian Empire, Neo-Assyrian Empire, and Achaemenid Empire.

Length

Units of length are prefixed by the logogram DU (𒁺) a convention of the archaic period counting system from which it was evolved. Basic length was used in architecture and field division.

Basic Length
Unit	Ratio	Sumerian	Akkadian	Cuneiform
grain	1⁄180	še	uţţatu	𒊺
finger	1⁄30	šu-si	ubānu	𒋗𒋛
foot	2⁄3	šu-du3-a	šīzu	𒋗𒆕𒀀
cubit	1	kuš3	ammatu	𒌑
step	2	ĝiri3	šēpu	𒈨𒊑
reed	6	gi	qanû	𒄀
rod	12	nindan	nindanu	𒃻
cord	120	eše2	aslu	𒂠

Distance units were geodectic as distinguished from non-geodectic basic length units. Sumerian geodesy divided latitude into seven zones between equator and pole.

Distance
Unit	Ratio	Sumerian	Akkadian	Cuneiform
rod	1⁄60	nidan	nindanu	𒃻
cord	1⁄6	eše2	aslu	𒂠
cable	1	uš	uš	𒍑
league	30	da-na	bêru	𒁕𒈾

Area

The GAN₂ system G counting system evolved into area measurements. A special unit measuring brick quantity by area was called the brick-garden (Cuneiform: SIG.SAR 𒊬𒋞; Sumerian: šeg₁₂-sar; Akkadian: libittu-mūšaru) which held 720 bricks.

Basic Area
Unit	Ratio	Dimensions	Sumerian	Akkadian	Cuneiform
shekel	1⁄144	1 kuš3 × 1 kuš3	gin2	šiqlu	𒂆
garden	1	12 kuš3 × 12 kuš3	sar	mūšaru	𒊬
quarter-field	25	60 kuš3 × 60 kuš3	uzalak	?	𒀺
half-field	50	120 kuš3 × 60 kuš3	upu	ubû	𒀹𒃷
field	100	120 kuš3 × 120 kuš3	iku	ikû	𒃷
estate	1800		bur	būru	𒁓

Capacity or volume

Capacity was measured by either the ŠE system Š for dry capacity or the ŠE system Š^* for wet capacity.

Basic Volume
Unit	Ratio	Sumerian	Akkadian	Cuneiform
shekel	1⁄60	gin2	šiqlu	𒂆
bowl	1	sila3	qû	𒋡
vessel	10	ban2	sutū	𒑏
bushel	60	ba-ri2-ga (barig)	parsiktu	𒁀𒌷𒂵
gur-cube	300	gur	kurru	𒄥

A sila was about 1 liter.

Mass or weight

A series of old Babylonian weights ranging from 1 mina to 3 shekels

Mass was measured by the EN system E

Values below are an average of weight artifacts from Ur and Nippur. The ± value represents 1 standard deviation. All values have been rounded to second digit of the standard deviation.

Basic Mass
Unit	Ratio	Mean Value	Sumerian	Akkadian	Cuneiform
grain	1⁄180	46.6±1.9 mg	še	uţţatu	𒊺
shekel	1	8.40±0.34 g	gin2	šiqlu	𒂆
mina	60	504±20 g	ma-na	manû	𒈠𒈾
talent	3,600	30.2±1.2 kg	gun2	biltu or kakaru	𒄘

Time

Main article: Babylonian calendar

In the Archaic System time notation was written in the U₄ System U. Multiple lunisolar calendars existed; however the civil calendar from the holy city of Nippur (Ur III period) was adopted by Babylon as their civil calendar. The calendar of Nippur dates to 3500 BCE and was itself based on older astronomical knowledge of an uncertain origin. The main astronomical cycles used to construct the calendar were the month, year, and day.

Basic Time
Unit	Ratio	Sumerian	Akkadian	Cuneiform
gesh	1⁄360	mu-eš	geš	𒈬𒍑
watch	1⁄12	da-na	bêru	𒂆
day	1	ud	immu	𒌓
month	30	itud	arhu	𒌗
year	360	mu	šattu	𒈬

Relationship to other metrologies

The Classical Mesopotamian system formed the basis for Elamite, Hebrew, Urartian, Hurrian, Hittite, Ugaritic, Phoenician, Babylonian, Assyrian, Persian, Arabic, and Islamic metrologies. The Classical Mesopotamian System also has a proportional relationship, by virtue of standardized commerce, to Bronze Age Harappan and Egyptian metrologies.

See also

• Assyrian lion weights
• Babylonian mathematics
• Historical weights and measures
• Weights and measures

References

Bibliography

• Conder, Claude Reignier (1908). The Rise of Man. University of Michigan: J. Murray. pp. 368. hittite metrology.
• Melville, Duncan J (2006-06-06). "Old Babylonian Weights and Measures". Archived from the original on 13 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-28.
• Powell, Marvin A (1995). "Metrology and Mathematics in Ancient Mesopotamia". In Sasson, Jack M. (ed.). Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. Vol. III. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons. pp. 3024. ISBN 0-684-19279-9.
• Ronan, Colin Alistair (2008). "Measurement of time and types of calendars » Standard units and cycles". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Archived from the original on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-28.
• Whitrow, G.J. (1988). Time in History: Views of Time from Prehistory to the Present Day. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 217. ISBN 0-19-285211-6.

Further reading

• Katz, Victor, J (2007). The Mathematics of Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, India, and Islam: A Sourcebook. Princeton University Press. p. 712. ISBN 978-0-691-11485-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Nissen, Hans Jörg; Peter Damerow; Robert K. Englund; Paul Larsen (1993). Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of Economic Administration. University of Chicago Press. p. 169. ISBN 0-226-58659-6.
• Robson, Eleanor (1999). Mesopotamian Mathematics, 2100–1600 BC: Technical Constants in Bureaucracy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-815246-9.
• Sarton, George (1993). Ancient science through the golden age of Greece. Courier Dover Publications. p. 646. ISBN 0-486-27495-0.

External links

• An online calculator [1] Archived 2017-02-13 at the Wayback Machine
• Robson, Eleanor (2007). "Digital Corpus of Cuneiform Mathematical Texts". Archived from the original on 2009-01-16. Retrieved 2008-08-13.
• Aleff, H. Peter (2008). "Auspicious latitudes". Retrieved 2008-08-13.
• Kreidik, L. G.; T. S. Kortneva; G. P. Shpenkov (2005). "4. Fundamental periods of the World and ancient metrology". Journal of Theoretical Dialectics-Physics-Mathematics. Dialectical Academy, Russia-Belarus. Retrieved 2009-08-20.