Jump to content

Human Landing System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Human Landing System (HLS) is a spacecraft in the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Artemis program that is expected to land humans on the Moon. These are being designed to convey astronauts from the Lunar Gateway space station in lunar orbit to the lunar surface, sustain them there, and then return them to the Gateway station. As of 2024 NASA intends to use Starship HLS for Artemis III, an enhanced Starship HLS for Artemis IV, and a Blue Origin HLS for Artemis V.

Rather than leading the HLS development effort internally, NASA provided a reference design and asked commercial vendors compete to design, develop and deliver systems based on a NASA-produced set of requirements. Each selected vendor is required to deliver two landers: one for an uncrewed test lunar landing, and one to be used as the first Artemis crewed lander. NASA started the competition process in 2019 with the Starship HLS selected as the winner in 2021. The original timeline called for an uncrewed test flight before a crewed flight in 2024 as part of the Artemis 3 mission, but the crewed flight has been delayed to at least 2025.[1][2][3][needs update]

In addition to the initial contract, NASA awarded two rounds of separate contracts in May 2019 and September 2021 on aspects of the HLS to encourage alternative designs, separately from the initial HLS development effort. It announced in March 2022 that it was developing new sustainability rules and pursuing both a Starship HLS upgrade and a new competing alternative design that would comply with the rules.[4][5][3] In May 2023, Blue Origin was selected as the second provider for lunar lander services.[6][7]

Reference design

[edit]
The Advanced Exploration Lander, a reference HLS design

The Advanced Exploration Lander was a 2018 NASA concept for a three-stage lander, intended to serve as a design reference for the commercial HLS design proposals. After departing from the Lunar Gateway in its lunar near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO), a transfer module would take the lander and embarked crew to a low lunar orbit and then separate. The descent module would then land itself and the ascent module carrying the crew on the lunar surface. A crew of up to four could spend up to two weeks on the surface before using the ascent module to take them back to Gateway. Each of the three modules would have a mass of approximately 12 to 15 metric tons and would be delivered separately by commercial launchers for integration at Gateway.[8] Both the ascent and transfer modules could be designed to be reusable, with the descent module intended to be left on the lunar surface.[8]

Preliminary HLS studies

[edit]
Further information: Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships

In December 2018 NASA announced that it was issuing a formal request for proposals as Appendix E of NextSTEP-2 inviting American companies to submit bids for the design and development of new reusable systems allowing astronauts to land on the lunar surface.[9] On February 14, 2019, NASA hosted an Industry Forum at NASA HQ to provide an overview of the Human Landing System (HLS) Broad Agency Announcement.[10]

In April 2019 NASA announced a formal request for proposals closing on November 15, 2019, for Appendix H of NextSTEP-2 inviting American companies to submit bids for the design and development of the Ascent Element of the Human Landing System (HLS) including the cabin used during landings.[11] This was extended to cover an option for an integrated lander—a single vehicle that performs transfer, descent, and ascent.[12]

Design competition

[edit]
Artist's impression of Artemis program HLS ascending (2019)

Five companies responded to NASA's request for proposal by the November 2019 deadline, and after evaluating the proposals, NASA selected three for further design work.[13] In April 2020, NASA awarded separate contracts totaling US$967 million in design development funding to Blue Origin, Dynetics, and SpaceX to begin a 10-month-long design processes.[14][15][1] The companies/teams selected in the 2020 design awards were the "National Team" led by Blue Origin,[a] with US$579 million in NASA design funding; Dynetics, including SNC and other unspecified companies, with US$253 million in NASA funding; and SpaceX with a modified Starship spacecraft design called Starship HLS, with US$135 million in NASA design funding.[14][16]

Although the HLS initial design phase was planned to be a ten-month program ending in February 2021 with the selection of up to two contractors, NASA delayed the selection process and announcement by two months.[1][15][17]

The companies were bidding on a contract to provide design, development, build, test, and evaluation of an HLS, plus two lunar landings, one uncrewed and one crewed, for a fixed price.[18] NASA evaluated the bids based on three evaluation factors: technical merit, managerial ability, and price, in that order, and found SpaceX better.[18]

NASA evaluation [18]
Company
Factor
 SpaceX Blue Origin Dynetics
Technical Acceptable Acceptable Marginal
Management Outstanding Very good Very good
Bid price
US$ billion
2.94
5.99
9.08

On 16 April 2021, NASA selected only a single lander—Starship HLS—to move on to a full development contract.[19] NASA awarded a US$2.89 billion contract to SpaceX to develop the Starship HLS lander and to provide two operational lunar missions—one uncrewed demonstration mission, and one crewed lunar landing—as early as 2025.[20][21][22] NASA had stated that they would have preferred to award two contracts, but that insufficient funds were appropriated by Congress to allow the awarding of a second contract. This had been stated as a possible outcome in the contract solicitation.[23]

Design and development contracts
Company Vehicles contract award
US$ million
design develop
Boeing The Boeing Lunar Lander concept consisted of a descent and ascent stage, to be launched on an SLS Block 1B rather than assembled in multiple launches. None N/A
Vivace A two-stage HLS concept with an appearance similar[according to whom?] to the Altair LSAM.[13] None N/A
National
Team[a]		 The Integrated Lander Vehicle (ILV), a three-element lunar lander concept (transfer, descent, and ascent elements) with each element intended to be launched via either New Glenn or ULA Vulcan Centaur launch vehicle and assembled in lunar orbit. 579 None
Dynetics Dynetics HLS, an integrated single-stage system concept, intended to launch on either the ULA Vulcan Centaur or NASA's Space Launch System.[24] 253 None
SpaceX Starship HLS, single-stage lunar design variation of the SpaceX Starship spacecraft, launched by the Super Heavy[broken anchor] booster and serving as its own second stage to reach low Earth orbit (LEO). Refueled by multiple Starship tanker spacecraft in LEO before boosting itself to lunar orbit to meet the Gateway and Orion crew capsule. Moves between Gateway and the lunar surface as a lunar single-stage-to-orbit. 135 2890

Post-competition protests and litigation

[edit]
Main article: Blue Origin v. United States & Space Exploration Technologies Corp.

On April 30, 2021, both Blue Origin and Dynetics filed formal protests with the US Government Accountability Office claiming that NASA had improperly evaluated aspects of the proposals.[25][26] On April 30, 2021, NASA suspended the Starship HLS contract and funding until such time as the GAO could issue a ruling on the protests.[27][28] In May 2021, Sen. Cantwell, from Blue Origin's state of Washington, introduced an amendment to the "Endless Frontier Act" that directed NASA to reopen the HLS competition and select a second lander proposal and authorized spending of an additional US$10 billion. This funding would require a separate appropriations act. Sen. Sanders criticized the amendment as a "multibillion dollar Bezos bailout", as the money would likely go to Blue Origin, which was founded by Jeff Bezos.[29][30][31][32] The act, including this amendment, was passed by the U.S. Senate on June 8, 2021.[33][34][needs update]

On July 30, 2021, the GAO rejected the protests and found that "NASA did not violate procurement law" in awarding the contract to SpaceX, who bid a much lower cost and more capable system.[18][35][36] Nevertheless, CNBC reported on August 4 that "Jeff Bezos' space company remains on the offensive in criticizing NASA's decision to award Elon Musk's SpaceX with the sole contract to build a vehicle to land astronauts on the moon" and the company had produced an infographic highlighting several Starship deficiencies compared to the Blue Origin proposal, but noted the infographic avoided showing the Blue Origin bid price as roughly double the SpaceX bid price.[37] Soon after the appeal was rejected, NASA made the contracted initial payment of US$300M to SpaceX.[38]

On August 13, 2021, Blue Origin filed a lawsuit in the US Court of Federal Claims challenging "NASA's unlawful and improper evaluation of proposals."[39][40] Blue Origin asked the court for an injunction to halt further spending by NASA on the existing contract with SpaceX.[41] Reaction to the lawsuit was mostly negative in the space community, at NASA, and among Blue Origin employees according to space journalist Eric Berger.[42] The judge dismissed the suit on November 4, 2021, and NASA was allowed to resume working with SpaceX.[43]

Starship HLS

[edit]
Main article: Starship HLS

The Starship Human Landing System (Starship HLS) was selected by NASA for long-duration crewed lunar landings as part of NASA's Artemis program.[20][22]

The Starship HLS is a modified configuration of SpaceX's Starship spacecraft, optimized to operate on and around the Moon. As a result, the heat shield and flight control surfaces — parts of the main Starship design needed for atmospheric re-entry — are not included in Starship HLS. The entire spacecraft will land on the Moon and will then launch from the Moon. If needed, the variant will use high-thrust CH4/O2 RCS thrusters located mid-body on Starship HLS during the final "tens of meters" of the terminal lunar descent and landing, and will be powered by a solar array located on its nose below the docking port. Elon Musk stated that Starship HLS would be able to deliver "potentially up to 200 tons" to the lunar surface.[citation needed]

Starship HLS would be launched to Earth orbit using the SpaceX Super Heavy booster, and would use a series of tanker spacecraft to refuel the Starship HLS vehicle in Earth orbit for lunar transit and lunar landing operations. Starship HLS would then act as its own transit vehicle to reach lunar orbit for rendezvous with Orion. In the mission concept, a NASA Orion spacecraft would carry a NASA crew to the lander, where they would depart and descend to the surface of the Moon. After lunar surface operations, Starship HLS would lift off from the lunar surface acting as a single-stage to orbit and return the crew to Orion.[citation needed]

NASA highlighted two weaknesses with SpaceX's proposal. Starship's propulsion systems were described as "notably complex", and the report referred to prior delays under the Commercial Crew program and Falcon Heavy launch vehicle development as evidence of potential threats to their development schedule.[14]

Blue Origin selected as second provider

[edit]

In May 2023, Blue Origin was selected as a second provider for lunar lander services with a $3.4 billion contract.[44][45] NASA stated that it decided to add another human landing system partner to: "increase competition, reduce costs to taxpayers, support a regular cadence of lunar landings, further invest in the lunar economy."[44]

Unselected proposals

[edit]

Integrated Lander Vehicle

[edit]
Main article: Integrated Lander Vehicle

The Integrated Lander Vehicle (ILV) or National Human Landing System (NHLS) was a lunar lander design concept proposed by the "National Team" led by Blue Origin, along with Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Draper Laboratory as major partners.

The main selling point[according to whom?] of the lander was that all the components had been in development in one form or another for some time.[citation needed] The transfer stage was based on the Cygnus spacecraft, the Blue Moon was to be used as the descent stage, and the ascent stage was based on the Orion spacecraft.[citation needed] It was to be launched in three parts on either the New Glenn and Vulcan Centaur but could also be launched on a single SLS Block 1B.[citation needed]

In the April 2020 HLS source selection statement, NASA stated that the vehicle passed all requirements but faced risks with its power, propulsion, and communications systems which posed a significant risk to the developmental timeline.[14][1]

Dynetics ALPACA HLS

[edit]
Main article: Dynetics HLS

The Dynetics ALPACA (Autonomous Logistics Platform for All-Moon Cargo Access) Human Landing System design concept was proposed by Dynetics and Sierra Nevada Corporation with support from a number of subcontractors. The vehicle design consisted of a single-stage lander powered by methalox engines, although an earlier design used drop tanks. ALPACA was proposed to launch on a Vulcan Centaur or SLS Block 1B rocket, and be refueled by up to three Vulcan Centaur tanker flights. Ultimately, NASA did not select the proposal, citing negative mass margins and an experimental thrust structure, which could pose threat to development time.[46][47]

Boeing HLS

[edit]
Main article: Boeing Lunar Lander

The Boeing Human Landing System proposal was submitted to NASA in early November 2019. The primary solution was a two-stage lander designed to launch on a single SLS Block 1B, with Intuitive Machines working with Boeing to provide engines,[48] and reusing technologies from their Starliner spacecraft.[49] To cover the possibility that the SLS Block 1B was not ready by 2024, Boeing proposed a solution where the descent stage was launched on an SLS Block 1 while the ascent stage would be launched by a commercial launcher and assembled in lunar orbit.[50] The Boeing proposal was not selected for design funding by NASA in the April 2020 design funding announcements.[51]

Altair lunar lander design as of 2011, similar in appearance to Vivace HLS.

Vivace HLS

[edit]

The Vivace Human Landing System was a lunar landing concept by aerospace firm Vivace. Little is known about the vehicle other than its resemblance to NASA's Altair lunar lander from the Constellation program. Vivace's concept was not selected for full design funding.[13]

Alternative design studies

[edit]

In addition to the design and development RFP for Appendix H of NextSTEP-2, NASA announced 11 contracts worth US$45.5 million in total for Appendix E of NextSTEP-2 in May 2019. These were short-term studies on transfer vehicles, descent elements, descent element prototypes, refueling element studies and prototypes. One of the requirements was that selected companies would contribute at least 20% of the total cost of the project "to reduce costs to taxpayers and encourage early private investments in the lunar economy".[4]

A second set of contracts totaling $146 million was awarded on September 14, 2021.[5] These contracts were for studies of a second-generation HLS that is to be used for missions after Artemis 3. As with the first set of contracts, NASA intends to award more than one HLS if there is sufficient funding.

On March 23, 2022, NASA announced it intended to initiate a formal request for proposals for second-generation HLS designs, drafting new sustainability rules to support it with a 2026–2027 delivery date for the design. NASA stated it would solicit designs from the broader aerospace industry out of a need for redundancy and competition. Under the current HLS contract, NASA also exercised an option calling for a second Starship HLS demonstration mission to the Moon, with the Starship design updated to meet the new sustainability rules. In addition, NASA announced a target date of April 2025 for Artemis 3, likely using the first-generation Starship HLS design. Space.com journalist Mike Wall speculated that, based on statements from NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, NASA had gained enough congressional and presidential support to make the requests.[3][23]

Additional studies
Date Company Amount
US$ million		 Contract
May
2019		 Aerojet Rocketdyne One transfer vehicle study
Blue Origin One descent element study, one transfer vehicle study, and one transfer vehicle prototype
Boeing One descent element study, two descent element prototypes, one transfer vehicle study, one transfer vehicle prototype, one refueling element study, and one refueling element prototype
Dynetics One descent element study and five descent element prototypes
Lockheed Martin Space Systems One descent element study, four descent element prototypes, one transfer vehicle study, and one refueling element study
Masten Space Systems One descent element prototype
Maxar (formerly SSL) One refueling element study and one refueling element prototype
Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems One descent element study, four descent element prototypes, one refueling element study, and one refueling element prototype
OrbitBeyond Two refueling element prototypes
Sierra Nevada Corporation One descent element study, one descent element prototype, one transfer vehicle study, one transfer vehicle prototype, and one refueling element study
SpaceX One descent element study, one descent element prototype
September
2021		 Blue Origin
25.6
Dynetics
40.8
Lockheed Martin
35.2
Northrop Grumman
34.8
SpaceX
9.4

Follow-on programs

[edit]

In 2021, NASA began studies on the future Lunar Exploration Transportation Services (LETS) for regular trips between the Gateway station, lunar orbits, and the lunar surface; for sustainable HLS operations.[52]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b the "National Team" was led by Blue Origin with partners Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Draper

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Potter, Sean (30 April 2020). "NASA Names Companies to Develop Human Landers for Artemis Missions". nasa.gov. NASA. Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 12 June 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  2. ^ Mahoney, Erin (22 October 2020). "NASA, Human Lunar Lander Companies Complete Key Artemis Milestone". NASA. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  3. ^ a b c McGuinness, Jackie; Russell, Jimi; Sudnik, Janet; Potter, Sean (23 March 2022). "NASA Provides Update to Astronaut Moon Lander Plans Under Artemis". NASA. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  4. ^ a b "NASA awards US$45.5 million to 11 American companies to "advance human lunar landers"". mlive.com. 22 May 2019. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 3 July 2020.
  5. ^ a b "NASA Selects Five U.S. Companies to Mature Artemis Lander Concepts". NASA. 14 September 2021. Archived from the original on 15 September 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2021.
  6. ^ O’Shea, Claire (2023-05-19). "NASA Selects Blue Origin as Second Artemis Lunar Lander Provider". NASA. Archived from the original on 2023-05-19. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
  7. ^ Roulette, Joey (2023-05-19). "Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin wins NASA contract to build astronaut lunar lander". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2023-05-19. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
  8. ^ a b Foust, Jeff (20 November 2018). "NASA studying three-stage approach to human-class lunar landers". SpaceNews. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  9. ^ Shanessa Jackson (12 December 2018). "NASA Seeks US Partners to Develop Reusable Systems to Land Astronauts on Moon". NASA. Archived from the original on 14 December 2018. Retrieved December 13, 2018.
  10. ^ "NextSTEP E: Human Landing System Studies...". 3 July 2018. Archived from the original on 2021-08-27. Retrieved 2021-09-12.
  11. ^ "Human Landing System – Ascent Element". Federal Business Opportunities. NASA. Archived from the original on June 10, 2019. Retrieved April 9, 2019.
  12. ^ "NextSTEP H: Human Landing System – Integrated Lander". NASA. 4 April 2019. Archived from the original on 8 December 2020. Retrieved April 28, 2019.
  13. ^ a b c D'Zio, Bill (1 May 2020). "NASA picks who will land people on the Moon... sort of..." westeastspace.com. Archived from the original on 17 May 2020. Retrieved 3 July 2020.
  14. ^ a b c d Burghardt, Thomas (1 May 2020). "NASA Selects Blue Origin, Dynetics, and SpaceX Human Landers for Artemis". NASASpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  15. ^ a b Berger, Eric (30 April 2020). "NASA awards lunar lander contracts to Blue Origin, Dynetics and Starship". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 13 May 2020. Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  16. ^ Potter, Sean (30 April 2020). "NASA Names Companies to Develop Human Landers for Artemis Missions". NASA. Archived from the original on 11 May 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  17. ^ "NextSTEP H: Human Landing System". NASA. 2021-01-27. Archived from the original on 8 December 2020. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  18. ^ a b c d "GAO finding denying the protest of the award". 30 July 2021. Archived from the original on 29 August 2021. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  19. ^ Brown, Katherine (2021-04-16). "NASA Picks SpaceX to Land Next Americans on Moon". NASA. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 2021-04-22.
  20. ^ a b Berger, Eric (16 April 2021). "NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander – "We looked at what's the best value to the government."". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
  21. ^ Davenport, Christian. "Elon Musk's SpaceX wins contract to develop spacecraft to land astronauts on the moon". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  22. ^ a b Brown, Katherine (2021-04-16). "As Artemis Moves Forward, NASA Picks SpaceX to Land Next Americans on Moon". NASA.gov. Archived from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
  23. ^ a b Wall, Mike (23 March 2022). "NASA wants another moon lander for Artemis astronauts, not just SpaceX's Starship". Space.com. Archived from the original on 16 September 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  24. ^ "Dynetics To Develop Nasas Artemis Human Lunar Landing System". Dynetics. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  25. ^ "Blue Origin protests NASA Human Landing System award". SpaceNews. 26 April 2021. Archived from the original on October 20, 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
  26. ^ "Dynetics protests NASA HLS award". SpaceNews. 27 April 2021. Archived from the original on October 20, 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
  27. ^ "NASA suspends SpaceX's $2.9 billion moon lander contract after rivals protest". 30 April 2021. Archived from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
  28. ^ "NASA tells SpaceX to halt lunar lander work pending contract challenges". CNBC. May 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-07-13. Retrieved 2021-09-12.
  29. ^ Sirota, Sara; Grim, Ryan (25 May 2021). "Senate Preparing $10 Billion Bailout Fund for Jeff Bezos Space Firm". The Intercept. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  30. ^ Ferreira, Becky (26 May 2021). "Bernie Sanders Is Fighting a Massive "Bailout" to Jeff Bezos' Space Company". Vice. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  31. ^ Berger, Eric (24 May 2021). "Bernie vs. Blue – Bernie Sanders wants to stop NASA funding for Blue Origin". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  32. ^ Hamilton, Isobel (25 May 2021). "Bernie Sanders is trying to block Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin from getting $10 billion NASA funding for a moon-landing mission". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 1 June 2021. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  33. ^ "S.1260 – Endless Frontier Act". Congress.gov. 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 9 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  34. ^ Berger, Eric (10 June 2021). "NASA doesn't need to test SLS anymore, but the Senate mandates it anyway". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  35. ^ Foust, Jeff (30 July 2021). "GAO denies Blue Origin and Dynetics protests of NASA lunar lander contract". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 2 August 2021.
  36. ^ "Statement on Blue Origin-Dynetics Decision". 30 July 2021. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
  37. ^ Sheetz, Michael (4 August 2021). "Bezos' Blue Origin calls Musk's Starship 'immensely complex & high risk' for NASA moon missions". CNBC. Archived from the original on 4 August 2021. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  38. ^ "WORK REQUIRED FOR THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, MANUFACTURE, TEST, LAUNCH, DEMONSTRATION, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT OF THE HUMAN LANDING SYSTEM (HLS) INTEGRATED LANDER". usaspending.gov. 30 July 2021. Archived from the original on 4 September 2021. Retrieved 4 September 2021.
  39. ^ "Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin sues NASA, escalating its fight for a Moon lander contract". The Verge. 16 August 2021. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021. protest prevented SpaceX from starting its contract for 95 days while the GAO adjudicated the case.
  40. ^ Sheetz, Michael (16 August 2021). "Bezos' Blue Origin takes NASA to federal court over award of lunar lander contract to SpaceX". CNBC. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
  41. ^ "Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin takes its lunar rivalry with Elon Musk's SpaceX to claims court - the Washington Post". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2021-08-17. Retrieved 2021-09-12.
  42. ^ Berger, Eric (16 August 2021). "Here's why Blue Origin thinks it is justified in continuing to protest NASA". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 18 August 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
  43. ^ Sheetz, Michael (November 4, 2021). ""Bezos' Blue Origin loses NASA lawsuit over SpaceX $2.9 billion lunar lander contract"". CNBC. Archived from the original on January 4, 2022. Retrieved November 4, 2021.
  44. ^ a b O’Shea, Claire (2023-05-19). "NASA Selects Blue Origin as Second Artemis Lunar Lander Provider". NASA. Archived from the original on 2023-05-19. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
  45. ^ Roulette, Joey (2023-05-19). "Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin wins NASA contract to build astronaut lunar lander". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2023-05-19. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
  46. ^ Mahoney, Erin (30 April 2020). "NASA Selects Blue Origin, Dynetics, SpaceX for Artemis Human Landers". NASA. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 9 June 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  47. ^ Sheetz, Michael (19 August 2020). "Meet Dynetics, the company racing against SpaceX and Blue Origin to return astronauts to the Moon". cnbc.com. CNBC. Archived from the original on 30 August 2020. Retrieved 27 August 2020.
  48. ^ "Intuitive Machines selected to build engines for Boeing's Human Lander System Technology Development". intuitivemachines.com. 24 October 2019. Archived from the original on 9 November 2019. Retrieved 9 November 2019.
  49. ^ "Boeing Proposes "Fewest Steps to the Moon" for NASA's Human Lander". boeing.mediaroom.com. 5 November 2019. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 6 November 2019.
  50. ^ Clark, Stephen. "Boeing proposes SLS-launched lunar lander". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 11 November 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
  51. ^ Sheetz, Michael (30 April 2020). "NASA awards contracts to Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk to land astronauts on the Moon". cnbc.com. Archived from the original on 30 April 2020. Retrieved 30 April 2020.
  52. ^ NASA (27 April 2021). "NextSTEP N: Sustainable Human Landing System Studies and Risk Reduction". NASA. Archived from the original on 17 September 2021. Retrieved 14 September 2021.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_Landing_System&oldid=1231269423"