McCray v. United States
| McCray v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 2, 1903 Decided May 31, 1904 | |
| Full case name | McCray v. United States |
| Citations | 195 U.S. 27 (more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | White |
| Dissent | Fuller |
McCray v. United States, 195 U.S. 27 (1904), was a 1904 case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that greenlighted the use of the federal taxing power for regulatory purposes.[1] The Court upheld by a 6–3 vote a federal tax on colored oleomargarine, rejecting contentions that it exceeded Congressional authority.[2] The decision, authored by Justice Edward Douglass White, effectively allowed Congress to regulate intrastate commercial activity by levying taxes on the activity. The justices in the majority refused to examine Congress's motives, instead ruling that the tax was valid because, regardless of the intent behind it, its effect was to raise revenue.[3] Chief Justice Melville Fuller dissented from the decision, which curtailed his own previous opinion in the 1895 case of United States v. E. C. Knight Co. and showed that Fuller's support for a limited federal government could not always garner the support of a majority of the Court.[1]
Background
[edit]In the 19th century, chemists in France developed oleomargarine as a substitute for butter. Because oleomargarine was naturally white, which was thought to be unappetizing, manufacturers began adding yellow color to it.[4] Dairy farmers, who were in competition with the product, claimed that coloring it was a deceptive practice, and sought federal legislation to provide competition. Congress enacted a statute to tax colored oleomargarine at a rate of 10 cents per pound, which would effectively destroy the market for that product. McCray, a seller of oleomargarine, sued to have the tax deemed unconstitutional as a deprivation of due process.
See also
[edit]- Canadian Federation of Agriculture v Quebec (AG): Canadian case on banning margarine
- Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Smedt PVBA: European case on margarine packaging
References
[edit]- ^ a b Ely, James W. (1995). The Chief Justiceship of Melville W. Fuller, 1888-1910. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. pp. 140–141. ISBN 1-57003-018-9.
- ^ Margulies, Herbert F. (1997). "Federal Police Power by Taxation: McCray v. United States and the Oleomargarine Tax of 1902". Journal of Southern Legal History. 5: 1–2 – via HeinOnline.
- ^ J. K. M., Jr. (1947). "The Oleomargarine Controversy". Virginia Law Review. 33 (5): 636–637. doi:10.2307/1068654. ISSN 0042-6601. JSTOR 1068654 – via JSTOR.
- ^ Rupp R (August 13, 2014). "The Butter Wars: When Margarine Was Pink". The Plate: National Geographic. Archived from the original on August 1, 2018. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |