David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters
This biographical article is written like a résumé. (June 2020) |
David and Lucille Packard Foundation Headquarters | |
---|---|
General information | |
Type | Office |
Address | 343 Second Street, Los Altos, California, 94022, United States |
Construction started | November 2009 |
Completed | July 2012 |
Cost | $37.2 million |
Owner | David and Lucile Packard Foundation |
Technical details | |
Floor area | 50,956 sq. ft |
Design and construction | |
Architecture firm | EHDD |
Structural engineer | Tipping Mar |
Civil engineer | Sherwood Design Engineers |
Main contractor | DPR Construction |
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters is the corporate headquarters of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, located in Los Altos, California. The Packard Foundation was created in 1964 by David Packard and his wife Lucile Salter Packard, one of the top 100 grant-making foundations in the United States, with the goals of improving the lives of children, enabling the creative pursuit of science, advancing reproductive health, and conserving and restoring the Earth’s natural systems. The David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters is designed by EHDD to be the largest net zero energy building in California, and it has successfully reduced the energy use by 65% over conventional buildings.
The design of the architecture took advantage of the California climate and environment, and adopted passive and bioclimatic strategies in searching for an integrated net zero energy building design. It was awarded as the top 10 green building in 2014, Net Zero Energy Building by The Living Building Challenge™ 2013, and LEED Platinum 2013. The synergy of the integration design for net zero energy is significant, which includes many aspects, for example, re-development site of brownfield, on-site energy production through photovoltaic, aggressive reduction in plug loads, a triple-element glazing system engineered, fabricated and installed by AGA (Architectural Glass and Aluminum),[1] plus all-electric heating system, chilled beams and radiant panels for cooling, high daylight autonomy, transportation management, and rainwater recycling.
Net Zero Energy Building design
[edit]The design strategies of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters follow this Zero Energy Building Design guideline, and in the following paragraphs, they will be described in detail and in the order of design priority.
Basic building design
[edit]Location and climate
[edit]David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters is located in Los Altos Northern California, on the south end of San Francisco Bay. Los Altos receives about 37 inches of rain annually, 263 sunny days per year. It has moderate temperature and humidity, the average high temperature in the summer is 78 degrees, and the average low temperature in the winter is 39 degrees [1].
Site design
[edit]David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters is orientated 40 degrees off true north to fit in the urban fabric. The site orientation combined with multi-layering shading strategies made access to winter sun and avoid summer sun, at the same time allowed fresh air in the interior spaces through an operable façade. Instead of grouping the programs into one union block, the architect designed a center courtyard to bring sunlight and wind into more spaces.
Building on a previously developed, damaged, or polluted brownfield site, and designing the building so that it restores that site helps to mitigate previous environmental degradation.[2] David and Lucile Packard Foundation Headquarters set a good example for the reuse of brownfield. Before the development, the site was 97% impervious, covered in substandard, mostly unoccupied buildings and asphalt parking lots, and now it has reduced the imperviousness to 35% and the landscape is planted with local Californian vegetation. The design also took account the transportation needs in the community, the team developed a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDMP) to not only reduce the demand for individual car parking but also offers alternatives for commuting.
Insulation, windows, and shading
[edit]The building has high standard insulation design, R-24 walls and roof and triple-element glazing (R-7.7). Occupants are able to adjust and control the environment by operating the windows and doors with a dashboard guidance showing when is the good timing to open and close windows depending on the outdoor temperature, wind speed, wind direction and relative humidity. The dimensions and angles of the shading devices were calculated from the locations of the sun in different seasons. The horizontal shading blocks the high summer sun and allows low winter sun to enter the interior of the building, and other devices are built into the design with elements such as trees, balconies, and trellis, which create a rich layering of lighting shades.
Materials
[edit]- 95% of materials from deconstruction were diverted from landfill
- Wood/steel hybrid structure, wood frame walls and all wood was FSC (Forest Stewardship Council)-certified
- Less embodied energy materials, such as 70% replacement-cement-for-slag concrete
- Material sourcing: wood veneer sourced from Eucalyptus trees felled during the Doyle Drive rebuilding project in San Francisco, California. Exterior wood is FSC-certified western red cedar. Stone is Mt. Moriah from the border of Utah and Nevada, within a 500-mile radius from the site. The exterior copper is 75% recycled, with a long life span and integral finish. Pineapples are a delicacy in Northern Guatemala
Passive systems
[edit]Heating, cooling, and lighting
[edit]The accessibility of the sunlight is one of the key elements affect the positions and shapes of the building. Two 40-foot wide offices were placed apart to create a central zone for sunlight to enter from multiple facades in the building. The narrow plan allows sufficient daylight to reach deeper into the office spaces, and increase the daylight autonomy. Increase in daylight autonomy reduces 30% of the energy consumption from artificial lighting compared to a standard commercial building. The high transmittance of daylight in the winter (shading will block the direct sunlight in the summer) will also increase the heat gain and potentially reduce the demand for heating. Interior blinds are user-controlled to improve visual comfort, and it will rise automatically in the evening. The artificial light will dim or brighten up according to the change of daylighting.
The building is monitored by indoor sensors that send direct reminders to occupants to open the windows when natural ventilation mode is on.
Water recycling
[edit]Rainwater from the roof is routed to a 20,000-gallon underground cistern to meet 90% of toilet flushing and 60% of irrigation demand. The cistern overflows into a detention pond minimize storm water reaching the public storm system, and the storm water peak flow rates and volumes are reduced approximately 50% from pre-project levels.
Mechanical design
[edit]Heating and cooling
[edit]In the winter, when the temperature drops to a certain degree, the building will be preheated to 23 °C (74 °F) in the early morning by the combination of air handlers and heat water beams in specific areas in the office spaces. And during the working hours, the heater will be turned off and the building heating will be fully relied on the internal heat gain from the computers, printers, and heat generated from the human bodies.
Heating demand is larger than cooling, as the summer temperature is pretty moderate in Los Altos. Water is stored and cooled in two 25,000 gallons underground tanks, and in the morning, it is pumped into the chilled beams to spread out to specific interior spaces. Besides chilled beams, there are three air handling units. Chilled beam system is designed with variable speed pumps and 130° angled pipes, which reduce the energy loss due to friction from the water flow compared to chilled beam system with typical angle pipes. This result is 75% reduction in ductwork and 75% reduction in pump energy, and the total cooling energy is reduced 90% from a typical chiller and VAV system.
Renewable energy
[edit]Despite the orientation and slope of the roof is not customized for solar collection, the photovoltaic production most of the time covers 100% of the building consumption. In the first year of operation, the building was energy positive with a net energy use intensity (EUI) of −4 thousand British thermal units per square foot (−45 MJ/m2) per year, and total EUI of 22 thousand British thermal units per square foot (250 MJ/m2) per year.
Occupancy survey report
[edit]The building received 97% in overall comfort satisfaction in the occupancy survey report conducted by the Center for Built Environment. The survey also shows that 92% of the people are satisfied with air quality, 91% in cleanliness and maintenance, 76% in lighting, 86% in office furnishings, 80% in office layout, 73% in thermal comfort, and 60% in acoustic quality [2]. Acoustic satisfaction is comparatively low due to open areas in the office space and hard surfaces of radiant floors and ceilings; people concerned about overhearing private conversation on the phone and with the neighbors. Consistently reflecting the same concern of open areas, the office layout survey also shows that people think the partitions and walls are too low or too transparent and feel the lack privacy in the working spaces.
Awards
[edit]- 2014 Livable Buildings Award
- 2014 Top Ten Green Building
- 2013 Net Zero Energy Building
- 2013 LEED Platinum
- 2013 Honor Award: Sustainability
- 2013 Green Building with Wood Design Award
- 2012 Best Green Project-Structures Awards
- 2012 Best Green Project-ENR California
See also
[edit]- Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
- Zero-energy building
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Santa Clara County, California
- Living Building Challenge
- Sustainable architecture
References
[edit]- ^ Glass Magazine, "Most Innovated Energy Efficient Glass Project ", Mobile Glass Magazine page 30, July 2013
- ^ Allen & Iano, Edward & Joseph. Fundamentals of Building Construction (Sixth ed.). Wiley. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-118-13891-5.
External links
[edit]- 2014 AIA Top Ten Project
- Tipping Structure Engineers case study
- The Packard Foundation’s Headquarters Is a Conservation Success Archived 2014-12-04 at the Wayback Machine
- International Living Future Institute case study
- EHDD Works case study
- Eco Building Pulse April 2014
- Eco Building Pulse June 2014
- Integral Group case study
- The David and Lucile Packard Foundation: "Our Green Headquarters"
- DPR Construction case study
- Green Source case study
- CBE announcement
- gb&d case study
- CEB project submittal