In mathematics the Jacobian ideal or gradient ideal is the ideal generated by the Jacobian of a function or function germ.
Let
denote the ring of smooth functions in
variables and
a function in the ring. The Jacobian ideal of
is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8076f/8076fdcdc4631f04732bf3ef5375ad5f8877ec88" alt="{\displaystyle J_{f}:=\left\langle {\frac {\partial f}{\partial x_{1}}},\ldots ,{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x_{n}}}\right\rangle .}"
Relation to deformation theory[edit]
In deformation theory, the deformations of a hypersurface given by a polynomial
is classified by the ring
![{\displaystyle {\frac {\mathbb {C} [x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n}]}{(f)+J_{f}}}.}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/6972a9a7f3258ff0cbb12639f05baf31cacf0d69)
This is shown using the
Kodaira–Spencer map.
Relation to Hodge theory[edit]
In Hodge theory, there are objects called real Hodge structures which are the data of a real vector space
and an increasing filtration
of
satisfying a list of compatibility structures. For a smooth projective variety
there is a canonical Hodge structure.
Statement for degree d hypersurfaces[edit]
In the special case
is defined by a homogeneous degree
polynomial
this Hodge structure can be understood completely from the Jacobian ideal. For its graded-pieces, this is given by the map[1]
![{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} [Z_{0},\ldots ,Z_{n}]^{(d(n-1+p)-(n+2))}\to {\frac {F^{p}H^{n}(X,\mathbb {C} )}{F^{p+1}H^{n}(X,\mathbb {C} )}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/7a3c74ad275fcadc66d597df63ced72c7e470058)
which is surjective on the primitive cohomology, denoted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dce8/7dce87bfdf7c87bbce85fc8455a56874f919cc6e" alt="{\displaystyle {\text{Prim}}^{p,n-p}(X)}"
and has the kernel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84a3e/84a3e2fdf39744f99aa8b59b1cd5235a8926f9aa" alt="{\displaystyle J_{f}}"
. Note the primitive cohomology classes are the classes of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69fe1/69fe1ffe3278c6961e5ce78e393652af67962b48" alt="{\displaystyle X}"
which do not come from
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f6b/e3f6b3f08ca3cd1a4853d16f433b9835f0047758" alt="{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}"
, which is just the Lefschetz class
![{\displaystyle [L]^{n}=c_{1}({\mathcal {O}}(1))^{d}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/86cae552667c39560f0999fa1bd3a5e67f4ee5b5)
.
Sketch of proof[edit]
Reduction to residue map[edit]
For
there is an associated short exact sequence of complexes
![{\displaystyle 0\to \Omega _{\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}^{\bullet }\to \Omega _{\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}^{\bullet }(\log X)\xrightarrow {res} \Omega _{X}^{\bullet }[-1]\to 0}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a54960e2be1eda4e37d2635f2a7e72b2d4a08513)
where the middle complex is the complex of sheaves of
logarithmic forms and the right-hand map is the
residue map. This has an associated long exact sequence in cohomology. From the
Lefschetz hyperplane theorem there is only one interesting cohomology group of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69fe1/69fe1ffe3278c6961e5ce78e393652af67962b48" alt="{\displaystyle X}"
, which is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e2c4/0e2c4c92363861146300d84fe93a92c40c445439" alt="{\displaystyle H^{n}(X;\mathbb {C} )=\mathbb {H} ^{n}(X;\Omega _{X}^{\bullet })}"
. From the long exact sequence of this short exact sequence, there the induced residue map
![{\displaystyle \mathbb {H} ^{n+1}\left(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1},\Omega _{\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}^{\bullet }(\log X)\right)\to \mathbb {H} ^{n+1}(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1},\Omega _{X}^{\bullet }[-1])}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/dada9c0a74c16a576e568ded7b41eefb2d529597)
where the right hand side is equal to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ccf5/8ccf58fc2106ab46fe2f855ec1abf93b78f8dec7" alt="{\displaystyle \mathbb {H} ^{n}(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1},\Omega _{X}^{\bullet })}"
, which is isomorphic to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/333aa/333aac4af707e3892a939ebb9e6d789943177200" alt="{\displaystyle \mathbb {H} ^{n}(X;\Omega _{X}^{\bullet })}"
. Also, there is an isomorphism
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76086/76086f9b0a869b42a19173e45d2f10dc3a113363" alt="{\displaystyle H_{dR}^{n+1}(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}-X)\cong \mathbb {H} ^{n+1}\left(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1};\Omega _{\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}^{\bullet }(\log X)\right)}"
Through these isomorphisms there is an induced residue map
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bdad/6bdada04e1a5dd6e318c902ca9902d1c788888db" alt="{\displaystyle res:H_{dR}^{n+1}(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}-X)\to H^{n}(X;\mathbb {C} )}"
which is injective, and surjective on primitive cohomology. Also, there is the Hodge decomposition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0550/a0550a9fa9470cdfe9202debeba378b93d009110" alt="{\displaystyle H_{dR}^{n+1}(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}-X)\cong \bigoplus _{p+q=n+1}H^{q}(\Omega _{\mathbb {P} }^{p}(\log X))}"
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76cb3/76cb3b0ce86ffb89ceeadb628a9ed468c752c0b0" alt="{\displaystyle H^{q}(\Omega _{\mathbb {P} }^{p}(\log X))\cong {\text{Prim}}^{p-1,q}(X)}"
.
Computation of de Rham cohomology group[edit]
In turns out the de Rham cohomology group
is much more tractable and has an explicit description in terms of polynomials. The
part is spanned by the meromorphic forms having poles of order
which surjects onto the
part of
. This comes from the reduction isomorphism
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d2fa/7d2fa64e0f01f26e87c36e1ce691106a88c9a588" alt="{\displaystyle F^{p+1}H_{dR}^{n+1}(\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}-X;\mathbb {C} )\cong {\frac {\Gamma (\Omega _{\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}(n-p+1))}{d\Gamma (\Omega _{\mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}(n-p))}}}"
Using the canonical
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a076a/a076abf3d8cccdbe0a9a30d38906b18289fb22ca" alt="{\displaystyle (n+1)}"
-form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c53e/2c53ef030f8b93b7c15d6f8e8f315774dfd6f467" alt="{\displaystyle \Omega =\sum _{j=0}^{n}(-1)^{j}Z_{j}dZ_{0}\wedge \cdots \wedge {\hat {dZ_{j}}}\wedge \cdots \wedge dZ_{n+1}}"
on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f6b/e3f6b3f08ca3cd1a4853d16f433b9835f0047758" alt="{\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{n+1}}"
where the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8299e/8299e20cf5d7f55ce1cfe334f0bcc07406ead93c" alt="{\displaystyle {\hat {dZ_{j}}}}"
denotes the deletion from the index, these meromorphic differential forms look like
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45989/459891e33b62be1e198756d94539688cdd535d41" alt="{\displaystyle {\frac {A}{f^{n-p+1}}}\Omega }"
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66610/66610bd057595e83e62e12e86798341041323145" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\text{deg}}(A)&=(n-p+1)\cdot {\text{deg}}(f)-{\text{deg}}(\Omega )\\&=(n-p+1)\cdot d-(n+2)\\&=d(n-p+1)-(n+2)\end{aligned}}}"
Finally, it turns out the kernel
[1] Lemma 8.11 is of all polynomials of the form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3017/b301799908a8c73fe6f7db26cb410b34edcea124" alt="{\displaystyle A'+fB}"
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c241/4c24172311645fdce6242e863029034112af7646" alt="{\displaystyle A'\in J_{f}}"
. Note the Euler identity
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd9c1/bd9c196d5cbc4c8e1c2c6d5ee253bc6feecd6a3c" alt="{\displaystyle f=\sum Z_{j}{\frac {\partial f}{\partial Z_{j}}}}"
shows
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a733b/a733b587c02f7632457f8cd1705e56a10079231a" alt="{\displaystyle f\in J_{f}}"
.
References[edit]
See also[edit]