This article
needs attention from an expert in mathematics . The specific problem is:
article requires a gentler encyclopedic introduction for the general reader. WikiProject Mathematics may be able to help recruit an expert. (March 2019 )
In representation theory of mathematics, the Waldspurger formula relates the special values of two L -functions of two related admissible irreducible representations . Let k be the base field, f be an automorphic form over k , π be the representation associated via the Jacquet–Langlands correspondence with f . Goro Shimura (1976) proved this formula, when
k
=
Q
{\displaystyle k=\mathbb {Q} }
and f is a cusp form ; Günter Harder made the same discovery at the same time in an unpublished paper. Marie-France Vignéras (1980) proved this formula, when
k
=
Q
{\displaystyle k=\mathbb {Q} }
and f is a newform . Jean-Loup Waldspurger , for whom the formula is named, reproved and generalized the result of Vignéras in 1985 via a totally different method which was widely used thereafter by mathematicians to prove similar formulas.
Let
k
{\displaystyle k}
be a number field ,
A
{\displaystyle \mathbb {A} }
be its adele ring ,
k
×
{\displaystyle k^{\times }}
be the subgroup of invertible elements of
k
{\displaystyle k}
,
A
×
{\displaystyle \mathbb {A} ^{\times }}
be the subgroup of the invertible elements of
A
{\displaystyle \mathbb {A} }
,
χ
,
χ
1
,
χ
2
{\displaystyle \chi ,\chi _{1},\chi _{2}}
be three quadratic characters over
A
×
/
k
×
{\displaystyle \mathbb {A} ^{\times }/k^{\times }}
,
G
=
S
L
2
(
k
)
{\displaystyle G=SL_{2}(k)}
,
A
(
G
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}(G)}
be the space of all cusp forms over
G
(
k
)
∖
G
(
A
)
{\displaystyle G(k)\backslash G(\mathbb {A} )}
,
H
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}}
be the Hecke algebra of
G
(
A
)
{\displaystyle G(\mathbb {A} )}
. Assume that,
π
{\displaystyle \pi }
is an admissible irreducible representation from
G
(
A
)
{\displaystyle G(\mathbb {A} )}
to
A
(
G
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}(G)}
, the central character of π is trivial,
π
ν
∼
π
[
h
ν
]
{\displaystyle \pi _{\nu }\sim \pi [h_{\nu }]}
when
ν
{\displaystyle \nu }
is an archimedean place,
A
{\displaystyle {A}}
is a subspace of
A
(
G
)
{\displaystyle {{\mathcal {A}}(G)}}
such that
π
|
H
:
H
→
A
{\displaystyle \pi |_{\mathcal {H}}:{\mathcal {H}}\to A}
. We suppose further that,
ε
(
π
⊗
χ
,
1
/
2
)
{\displaystyle \varepsilon (\pi \otimes \chi ,1/2)}
is the Langlands
ε
{\displaystyle \varepsilon }
-constant [ (Langlands 1970 ); (Deligne 1972 ) ] associated to
π
{\displaystyle \pi }
and
χ
{\displaystyle \chi }
at
s
=
1
/
2
{\displaystyle s=1/2}
. There is a
γ
∈
k
×
{\displaystyle {\gamma \in k^{\times }}}
such that
k
(
χ
)
=
k
(
γ
)
{\displaystyle k(\chi )=k({\sqrt {\gamma }})}
.
Definition 1. The Legendre symbol
(
χ
π
)
=
ε
(
π
⊗
χ
,
1
/
2
)
⋅
ε
(
π
,
1
/
2
)
⋅
χ
(
−
1
)
.
{\displaystyle \left({\frac {\chi }{\pi }}\right)=\varepsilon (\pi \otimes \chi ,1/2)\cdot \varepsilon (\pi ,1/2)\cdot \chi (-1).}
Comment. Because all the terms in the right either have value +1, or have value −1, the term in the left can only take value in the set {+1, −1}.
Definition 2. Let
D
χ
{\displaystyle {D_{\chi }}}
be the discriminant of
χ
{\displaystyle \chi }
.
p
(
χ
)
=
D
χ
1
/
2
∑
ν
archimedean
|
γ
ν
|
ν
h
ν
/
2
.
{\displaystyle p(\chi )=D_{\chi }^{1/2}\sum _{\nu {\text{ archimedean}}}\left\vert \gamma _{\nu }\right\vert _{\nu }^{h_{\nu }/2}.}
Definition 3. Let
f
0
,
f
1
∈
A
{\displaystyle f_{0},f_{1}\in A}
.
b
(
f
0
,
f
1
)
=
∫
x
∈
k
×
f
0
(
x
)
⋅
f
1
(
x
)
¯
d
x
.
{\displaystyle b(f_{0},f_{1})=\int _{x\in k^{\times }}f_{0}(x)\cdot {\overline {f_{1}(x)}}\,dx.}
Definition 4. Let
T
{\displaystyle {T}}
be a maximal torus of
G
{\displaystyle {G}}
,
Z
{\displaystyle {Z}}
be the center of
G
{\displaystyle {G}}
,
φ
∈
A
{\displaystyle \varphi \in A}
.
β
(
φ
,
T
)
=
∫
t
∈
Z
∖
T
b
(
π
(
t
)
φ
,
φ
)
d
t
.
{\displaystyle \beta (\varphi ,T)=\int _{t\in Z\backslash T}b(\pi (t)\varphi ,\varphi )\,dt.}
Comment. It is not obvious though, that the function
β
{\displaystyle \beta }
is a generalization of the Gauss sum .
Let
K
{\displaystyle K}
be a field such that
k
(
π
)
⊂
K
⊂
C
{\displaystyle k(\pi )\subset K\subset \mathbb {C} }
. One can choose a K-subspace
A
0
{\displaystyle {A^{0}}}
of
A
{\displaystyle A}
such that (i)
A
=
A
0
⊗
K
C
{\displaystyle A=A^{0}\otimes _{K}\mathbb {C} }
; (ii)
(
A
0
)
π
(
G
)
=
A
0
{\displaystyle (A^{0})^{\pi (G)}=A^{0}}
. De facto, there is only one such
A
0
{\displaystyle A^{0}}
modulo homothety. Let
T
1
,
T
2
{\displaystyle T_{1},T_{2}}
be two maximal tori of
G
{\displaystyle G}
such that
χ
T
1
=
χ
1
{\displaystyle \chi _{T_{1}}=\chi _{1}}
and
χ
T
2
=
χ
2
{\displaystyle \chi _{T_{2}}=\chi _{2}}
. We can choose two elements
φ
1
,
φ
2
{\displaystyle \varphi _{1},\varphi _{2}}
of
A
0
{\displaystyle A^{0}}
such that
β
(
φ
1
,
T
1
)
≠
0
{\displaystyle \beta (\varphi _{1},T_{1})\neq 0}
and
β
(
φ
2
,
T
2
)
≠
0
{\displaystyle \beta (\varphi _{2},T_{2})\neq 0}
.
Definition 5. Let
D
1
,
D
2
{\displaystyle D_{1},D_{2}}
be the discriminants of
χ
1
,
χ
2
{\displaystyle \chi _{1},\chi _{2}}
.
p
(
π
,
χ
1
,
χ
2
)
=
D
1
−
1
/
2
D
2
1
/
2
L
(
χ
1
,
1
)
−
1
L
(
χ
2
,
1
)
L
(
π
⊗
χ
1
,
1
/
2
)
L
(
π
⊗
χ
2
,
1
/
2
)
−
1
β
(
φ
1
,
T
1
)
−
1
β
(
φ
2
,
T
2
)
.
{\displaystyle p(\pi ,\chi _{1},\chi _{2})=D_{1}^{-1/2}D_{2}^{1/2}L(\chi _{1},1)^{-1}L(\chi _{2},1)L(\pi \otimes \chi _{1},1/2)L(\pi \otimes \chi _{2},1/2)^{-1}\beta (\varphi _{1},T_{1})^{-1}\beta (\varphi _{2},T_{2}).}
Comment. When the
χ
1
=
χ
2
{\displaystyle \chi _{1}=\chi _{2}}
, the right hand side of Definition 5 becomes trivial.
We take
Σ
f
{\displaystyle \Sigma _{f}}
to be the set {all the finite
k
{\displaystyle k}
-places
ν
∣
π
ν
{\displaystyle \nu \mid \ \pi _{\nu }}
doesn't map non-zero vectors invariant under the action of
G
L
2
(
k
ν
)
{\displaystyle {GL_{2}(k_{\nu })}}
to zero},
Σ
s
{\displaystyle {\Sigma _{s}}}
to be the set of (all
k
{\displaystyle k}
-places
ν
∣
ν
{\displaystyle \nu \mid \nu }
is real, or finite and special).
Theorem [1] — Let
k
=
Q
{\displaystyle k=\mathbb {Q} }
. We assume that, (i)
L
(
π
⊗
χ
2
,
1
/
2
)
≠
0
{\displaystyle L(\pi \otimes \chi _{2},1/2)\neq 0}
; (ii) for
ν
∈
Σ
s
{\displaystyle \nu \in \Sigma _{s}}
,
(
χ
1
,
ν
π
ν
)
=
(
χ
2
,
ν
π
ν
)
{\displaystyle \left({\frac {\chi _{1,\nu }}{\pi _{\nu }}}\right)=\left({\frac {\chi _{2,\nu }}{\pi _{\nu }}}\right)}
. Then, there is a constant
q
∈
Q
(
π
)
{\displaystyle {q\in \mathbb {Q} (\pi )}}
such that
L
(
π
⊗
χ
1
,
1
/
2
)
L
(
π
⊗
χ
2
,
1
/
2
)
−
1
=
q
p
(
χ
1
)
p
(
χ
2
)
−
1
∏
ν
∈
Σ
f
p
(
π
ν
,
χ
1
,
ν
,
χ
2
,
ν
)
{\displaystyle L(\pi \otimes \chi _{1},1/2)L(\pi \otimes \chi _{2},1/2)^{-1}=qp(\chi _{1})p(\chi _{2})^{-1}\prod _{\nu \in \Sigma _{f}}p(\pi _{\nu },\chi _{1,\nu },\chi _{2,\nu })}
Comments:
The formula in the theorem is the well-known Waldspurger formula. It is of global-local nature, in the left with a global part, in the right with a local part. By 2017, mathematicians often call it the classic Waldspurger's formula. It is worthwhile to notice that, when the two characters are equal, the formula can be greatly simplified. [ (Waldspurger 1985 ), Thm 6, p. 241 ] When one of the two characters is
1
{\displaystyle {1}}
, Waldspurger's formula becomes much more simple. Without loss of generality, we can assume that,
χ
1
=
χ
{\displaystyle \chi _{1}=\chi }
and
χ
2
=
1
{\displaystyle \chi _{2}=1}
. Then, there is an element
q
∈
Q
(
π
)
{\displaystyle {q\in \mathbb {Q} (\pi )}}
such that
L
(
π
⊗
χ
,
1
/
2
)
L
(
π
,
1
/
2
)
−
1
=
q
D
χ
1
/
2
.
{\displaystyle L(\pi \otimes \chi ,1/2)L(\pi ,1/2)^{-1}=qD_{\chi }^{1/2}.}
Let p be prime number,
F
p
{\displaystyle \mathbb {F} _{p}}
be the field with p elements,
R
=
F
p
[
T
]
,
k
=
F
p
(
T
)
,
k
∞
=
F
p
(
(
T
−
1
)
)
,
o
∞
{\displaystyle R=\mathbb {F} _{p}[T],k=\mathbb {F} _{p}(T),k_{\infty }=\mathbb {F} _{p}((T^{-1})),o_{\infty }}
be the integer ring of
k
∞
,
H
=
P
G
L
2
(
k
∞
)
/
P
G
L
2
(
o
∞
)
,
Γ
=
P
G
L
2
(
R
)
{\displaystyle k_{\infty },{\mathcal {H}}=PGL_{2}(k_{\infty })/PGL_{2}(o_{\infty }),\Gamma =PGL_{2}(R)}
. Assume that,
N
,
D
∈
R
{\displaystyle N,D\in R}
, D is squarefree of even degree and coprime to N , the prime factorization of
N
{\displaystyle N}
is
∏
ℓ
ℓ
α
ℓ
{\textstyle \prod _{\ell }\ell ^{\alpha _{\ell }}}
. We take
Γ
0
(
N
)
{\displaystyle \Gamma _{0}(N)}
to the set
{
(
a
b
c
d
)
∈
Γ
∣
c
≡
0
mod
N
}
,
{\textstyle \left\{{\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}}\in \Gamma \mid c\equiv 0{\bmod {N}}\right\},}
S
0
(
Γ
0
(
N
)
)
{\displaystyle S_{0}(\Gamma _{0}(N))}
to be the set of all cusp forms of level N and depth 0. Suppose that,
φ
,
φ
1
,
φ
2
∈
S
0
(
Γ
0
(
N
)
)
{\displaystyle \varphi ,\varphi _{1},\varphi _{2}\in S_{0}(\Gamma _{0}(N))}
.
Definition 1. Let
(
c
d
)
{\displaystyle \left({\frac {c}{d}}\right)}
be the Legendre symbol of c modulo d ,
S
L
~
2
(
k
∞
)
=
M
p
2
(
k
∞
)
{\displaystyle {\widetilde {SL}}_{2}(k_{\infty })=Mp_{2}(k_{\infty })}
. Metaplectic morphism
η
:
S
L
2
(
R
)
→
S
L
~
2
(
k
∞
)
,
(
a
b
c
d
)
↦
(
(
a
b
c
d
)
,
(
c
d
)
)
.
{\displaystyle \eta :SL_{2}(R)\to {\widetilde {SL}}_{2}(k_{\infty }),{\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}}\mapsto \left({\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}},\left({\frac {c}{d}}\right)\right).}
Definition 2. Let
z
=
x
+
i
y
∈
H
,
d
μ
=
d
x
d
y
|
y
|
2
{\displaystyle z=x+iy\in {\mathcal {H}},d\mu ={\frac {dx\,dy}{\left\vert y\right\vert ^{2}}}}
. Petersson inner product
⟨
φ
1
,
φ
2
⟩
=
[
Γ
:
Γ
0
(
N
)
]
−
1
∫
Γ
0
(
N
)
∖
H
φ
1
(
z
)
φ
2
(
z
)
¯
d
μ
.
{\displaystyle \langle \varphi _{1},\varphi _{2}\rangle =[\Gamma :\Gamma _{0}(N)]^{-1}\int _{\Gamma _{0}(N)\backslash {\mathcal {H}}}\varphi _{1}(z){\overline {\varphi _{2}(z)}}\,d\mu .}
Definition 3. Let
n
,
P
∈
R
{\displaystyle n,P\in R}
. Gauss sum
G
n
(
P
)
=
∑
r
∈
R
/
P
R
(
r
P
)
e
(
r
n
T
2
)
.
{\displaystyle G_{n}(P)=\sum _{r\in R/PR}\left({\frac {r}{P}}\right)e(rnT^{2}).}
Let
λ
∞
,
φ
{\displaystyle \lambda _{\infty ,\varphi }}
be the Laplace eigenvalue of
φ
{\displaystyle \varphi }
. There is a constant
θ
∈
R
{\displaystyle \theta \in \mathbb {R} }
such that
λ
∞
,
φ
=
e
−
i
θ
+
e
i
θ
p
.
{\displaystyle \lambda _{\infty ,\varphi }={\frac {e^{-i\theta }+e^{i\theta }}{\sqrt {p}}}.}
Definition 4. Assume that
v
∞
(
a
/
b
)
=
deg
(
a
)
−
deg
(
b
)
,
ν
=
v
∞
(
y
)
{\displaystyle v_{\infty }(a/b)=\deg(a)-\deg(b),\nu =v_{\infty }(y)}
. Whittaker function
W
0
,
i
θ
(
y
)
=
{
p
e
i
θ
−
e
−
i
θ
[
(
e
i
θ
p
)
ν
−
1
−
(
e
−
i
θ
p
)
ν
−
1
]
,
when
ν
≥
2
;
0
,
otherwise
.
{\displaystyle W_{0,i\theta }(y)={\begin{cases}{\frac {\sqrt {p}}{e^{i\theta }-e^{-i\theta }}}\left[\left({\frac {e^{i\theta }}{\sqrt {p}}}\right)^{\nu -1}-\left({\frac {e^{-i\theta }}{\sqrt {p}}}\right)^{\nu -1}\right],&{\text{when }}\nu \geq 2;\\0,&{\text{otherwise}}.\end{cases}}}
Definition 5. Fourier–Whittaker expansion
φ
(
z
)
=
∑
r
∈
R
ω
φ
(
r
)
e
(
r
x
T
2
)
W
0
,
i
θ
(
y
)
.
{\displaystyle \varphi (z)=\sum _{r\in R}\omega _{\varphi }(r)e(rxT^{2})W_{0,i\theta }(y).}
One calls
ω
φ
(
r
)
{\displaystyle \omega _{\varphi }(r)}
the Fourier–Whittaker coefficients of
φ
{\displaystyle \varphi }
.
Definition 6. Atkin–Lehner operator
W
α
ℓ
=
(
ℓ
α
ℓ
b
N
ℓ
α
ℓ
d
)
{\displaystyle W_{\alpha _{\ell }}={\begin{pmatrix}\ell ^{\alpha _{\ell }}&b\\N&\ell ^{\alpha _{\ell }}d\end{pmatrix}}}
with
ℓ
2
α
ℓ
d
−
b
N
=
ℓ
α
ℓ
.
{\displaystyle \ell ^{2\alpha _{\ell }}d-bN=\ell ^{\alpha _{\ell }}.}
Definition 7. Assume that,
φ
{\displaystyle \varphi }
is a Hecke eigenform . Atkin–Lehner eigenvalue
w
α
ℓ
,
φ
=
φ
(
W
α
ℓ
z
)
φ
(
z
)
{\displaystyle w_{\alpha _{\ell },\varphi }={\frac {\varphi (W_{\alpha _{\ell }}z)}{\varphi (z)}}}
with
w
α
ℓ
,
φ
=
±
1.
{\displaystyle w_{\alpha _{\ell },\varphi }=\pm 1.}
Definition 8.
L
(
φ
,
s
)
=
∑
r
∈
R
∖
{
0
}
ω
φ
(
r
)
|
r
|
p
s
.
{\displaystyle L(\varphi ,s)=\sum _{r\in R\backslash \{0\}}{\frac {\omega _{\varphi }(r)}{\left\vert r\right\vert _{p}^{s}}}.}
Let
S
~
0
(
Γ
~
0
(
N
)
)
{\displaystyle {\widetilde {S}}_{0}({\widetilde {\Gamma }}_{0}(N))}
be the metaplectic version of
S
0
(
Γ
0
(
N
)
)
{\displaystyle S_{0}(\Gamma _{0}(N))}
,
{
E
1
,
…
,
E
d
}
{\displaystyle \{E_{1},\ldots ,E_{d}\}}
be a nice Hecke eigenbasis for
S
~
0
(
Γ
~
0
(
N
)
)
{\displaystyle {\widetilde {S}}_{0}({\widetilde {\Gamma }}_{0}(N))}
with respect to the Petersson inner product . We note the Shimura correspondence by
Sh
.
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Sh} .}
Theorem [ (Altug & Tsimerman 2010 ), Thm 5.1, p. 60 ]. Suppose that
K
φ
=
1
p
(
p
−
e
−
i
θ
)
(
p
−
e
i
θ
)
{\textstyle K_{\varphi }={\frac {1}{{\sqrt {p}}\left({\sqrt {p}}-e^{-i\theta }\right)\left({\sqrt {p}}-e^{i\theta }\right)}}}
,
χ
D
{\displaystyle \chi _{D}}
is a quadratic character with
Δ
(
χ
D
)
=
D
{\displaystyle \Delta (\chi _{D})=D}
. Then
∑
Sh
(
E
i
)
=
φ
|
ω
E
i
(
D
)
|
p
2
=
K
φ
G
1
(
D
)
|
D
|
p
−
3
/
2
⟨
φ
,
φ
⟩
L
(
φ
⊗
χ
D
,
1
/
2
)
∏
ℓ
(
1
+
(
ℓ
α
ℓ
D
)
w
α
ℓ
,
φ
)
.
{\displaystyle \sum _{\operatorname {Sh} (E_{i})=\varphi }\left\vert \omega _{E_{i}}(D)\right\vert _{p}^{2}={\frac {K_{\varphi }G_{1}(D)\left\vert D\right\vert _{p}^{-3/2}}{\langle \varphi ,\varphi \rangle }}L(\varphi \otimes \chi _{D},1/2)\prod _{\ell }\left(1+\left({\frac {\ell ^{\alpha _{\ell }}}{D}}\right)w_{\alpha _{\ell },\varphi }\right).}
Waldspurger, Jean-Loup (1985), "Sur les valeurs de certaines L-fonctions automorphes en leur centre de symétrie", Compositio Mathematica , 54 (2): 173–242
Vignéras, Marie-France (1981), "Valeur au centre de symétrie des fonctions L associées aux formes modulaire", Séminarie de Théorie des Nombres, Paris 1979–1980 , Progress in Math., Birkhäuser, pp. 331–356
Shimura, Gorô (1976), "On special values of zeta functions associated with cusp forms", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 29 : 783–804, doi :10.1002/cpa.3160290618
Altug, Salim Ali; Tsimerman, Jacob (2010). "Metaplectic Ramanujan conjecture over function fields with applications to quadratic forms". International Mathematics Research Notices . arXiv :1008.0430 . doi :10.1093/imrn/rnt047 . S2CID 119121964 .
Langlands, Robert (1970). On the Functional Equation of the Artin L-Functions (PDF) . pp. 1–287.
Deligne, Pierre (1972). "Les constantes des équations fonctionelle des fonctions L". Modular Functions of One Variable II . International Summer School on Modular functions. Antwerp. pp. 501–597.