Sleipner Газовое поле
| Sleipner Газовое поле | |
|---|---|
 | |
  Location of Sleipner gas field | |
| Country | Norway |
| Region | North Sea |
| Block | 15/6, 15/8, 15/9 |
| Offshore/onshore | Offshore |
| Coordinates | 58°22′N 1°55′E / 58.36°N 1.91°E |
| Operator | Statoil |
| Partners | Statoil ExxonMobil Total S.A. |
| Field history | |
| Discovery | 1974 |
| Production | |
| Current production of gas | 36×106 m3/d (1.3×109 cu ft/d) |
| Year of current production of gas | 2005 |
| Estimated gas in place | 51.6×109 m3 (1.82×1012 cu ft) |
Газовое поле Sleipner - это поле природного газа в блоке 15/9 [ 1 ] Северного моря , около 250 километров (160 миль) к западу от Ставангера , Норвегия . Две части поля находятся в производстве, Sleipner West (доказано в 1974 году) и Sleipner East (1981). [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Поле производит конденсаты с природным газом и легким нефти из песчаных конструкций около 2500 метров (8200 футов) ниже уровня моря. Он работает в Equinor . Поле названо в честь восьминогих Слипнира Скоя Одина , широко уважаемого Бога в скандинавской мифологии .
Резервы и производство
[ редактировать ]По состоянию на конец 2005 года предполагаемые восстанавливаемые резервы для Sleipner West и East Pields составляли 51,6 млрд. Кубических метров природного газа, 4,4 млн. Тонн (4,9 млн. Тонн) жидкостей природного газа и 3,9 млн кубических метров конденсат. [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Ежедневное производство поля в 2008 году составило 300 тысяч баррелей (48 тысяч М 3 ) нефтяные эквиваленты в день, 36 миллионов кубических метров природного газа в день и 14 000 кубических метров конденсата в день. В обновленном отчете за 2017 год Норвежское нефтяное управление оценивает 2,72 млн. Кубических метров нефти, 11,72 млрд. Кубических метров природного газа, 0,67 млн. Тонн жидкостей природного газа и 0,07 млн кубических метров конденсата остаются в резервах. [4]
Sleipner field consists of four platforms. The field is planted with 18 production wells.[5] The Sleipner A platform is located on the Sleipner East and the Sleipner B platform is located on the Sleipner West. Sleipner B is operated remotely from the Sleipner A via an umbilical cable. The Sleipner T carbon dioxide treatment platform is linked physically to the Sleipner A platform by a bridge and to the Sleipner B wellhead platform by 12.5-kilometre (7.8 mi) carbon dioxide flow line.[6][7] The Sleipner Riser platform, serving the Langeled and Zeepipe pipelines, is located on the Sleipner East field.
Carbon capture and storage project
[edit]The Sleipner Vest (West) field is used as a facility for carbon capture and storage (CCS).[1][8][9] It is the world's first offshore CCS plant, operative since September 15, 1996.[10][11] The project, in the initial year, proved insecure due to sinking top sand.[10] However, after a re-perforation and an installation of a gravel layer in August 1997, CCS operations were secure.[10] As of 2018, one million tonnes of CO2 have been transported and injected into the formation yearly since 1996.[7][12] The project summary reports a capacity of up to 600 billion tonnes (~660 billion tons).[7]
The Sleipner West field has up to 9% CO2 concentration; Norway only allows 2.5% CO2 before imposing production export quality penalties, which may have been NOK 1 million/day ( ~$120,000US/ day).[1][13] Operating costs are US$17 / ton of CO2 injected, however, the company does not pay Norway's carbon tax of 1991[13] and receives carbon credit in the EU's emissions trading system.[14] Before the carbon tax, industries released poor quality CO2 into the atmosphere.[1] In a business-as-usual scenario, Norway's emissions would have had a total increase of 3% over 20 years if not for the CCS experiment.[5] Carbon dioxide is treated on the Sleipner T treatment platform. After that carbon dioxide is transported to the Sleipner A platform where it is injected into the Utsira formation through a dedicated well c. 1000 meters under the seabed.[7] Using time-lapse gravity and seismic methods, the pioneering Sleipner carbon capture project confirmed the technological viability of injecting and measuring CO2 in an offshore reservoir, as well as the effectiveness of mitigating emissions through stable storage.[15] To avoid possible leakages that can result in health hazards and environmental destruction,[15] above the Utsira Formation injection site lies 30 seafloor gravity stations for monitoring under the title,[16] Saline Aquifer CO2 Storage.[17] These sites monitor microseismic activity along with gravitational forces and depth metrics.[16] Seafloor height, natural gas production, and tidal shifts determine the gravity measured.[16]
Explicitly regulated under Norway's petroleum law in December 2014 and in line with the EU's 2009/31/EC directive, monitoring objectives focus on assessing gas movement, shell stability, and the effectiveness of remedy scenarios in case of leakage.[10] From 2002 to 2005, measurements identified vertical changes in established metric boundaries, most likely attributed to erosion and marine life.[16] Onsite geochemical and reservoir simulations reveal a main buildup of CO2 under the formation's cap seal.[15] However, when the injections are eventually decommissioned, simulations show accumulation proximate to the cap seal in clay layers saturated with sand, which will result in solubility trapping.[15] This solubility trapping, caused by the multiple layers of clay and sand, prevents CO2 from rising beyond and will ultimately turn to mineral trapping in the substrate.[15] Furthermore, groundwater flow facilitates better distribution of gases and depressurization, lowering the risk of leakage.[15] The composition reaction of the mixture of clay, sand, and carbon is the determining factor of long-term stability in the Sleipner CCS project.[15] As of 2007, measurements from the gravity stations revealed that the injection of CO2 into the Utsira Formation has not resulted in any noticeable seismic activity and that there have been no carbon dioxide leakages in the past 10 years.[15]
Natural gas pipelines' operator Gassco had proposed to build a 240-kilometre (150 mi) carbon dioxide pipeline from Kårstø to transport carbon dioxide from the now decommissioned Kårstø power station.[18] While injection pipelines do not succumb to rusting when transporting CO2,[7] transport pipelines experience low temperatures and high pressures, resulting in dew formation, and subsequently, rust.[12]
Miocene Utsira Formation
[edit]The Miocene Utsira Formation is a large aquifer with a stable, layered clay seal.[15] Distributed through multiple phases as a result of sea-level variations caused by glacial events in the Pliocene period, deposits date back to the late Miocene/ early Pliocene to early Pleistocene times, determined by palynology.[19] Upper Pliocene deltaic sand deposits blanket the formation with the highest top sands located roughly 150 meters below sea level.[15] Measured with 3D seismic data, the Utsira sandstone lies underneath 800–1000 meters of sediment under the sea with a maximum thickness of over 300 meters.[7][15] The Utsira stretches 450 kilometers north to south and 90 kilometers east to west.[15] In the north and south lie deep sand systems, while in the middle region slimmer deposits cover the seafloor.[15] The Tampen area, located in the most northern region, contains lean deposits of glauconitic sand.[15]
See also
[edit]
References
[edit]- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Akervoll, Idar; Lindeberg, Erik; Lackner, Alf (February 2009). "Feasibility of Reproduction of Stored CO2 from the Utsira Formation at the Sleipner Gas Field". Energy Procedia. 1 (1): 2557–2564. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.020. ISSN 1876-6102.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Sleipner West". Scandinavian Oil-Gas Magazine. 2007-07-28. ISSN 1500-709X. Retrieved 2009-12-26. [dead link]
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Sleipner East". Scandinavian Oil-Gas Magazine. 2007-07-28. ISSN 1500-709X. Archived from the original on 2007-05-13. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ "field". factpages.npd.no. Retrieved 2018-11-19.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Baklid, Alan; Korbol, Ragnhild; Owren, Geir (1996). Sleipner Vest CO2 Disposal, CO2 Injection Into A Shallow Underground Aquifer. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/36600-MS. ISBN 9781555634230.
{{cite book}}:|journal=ignored (help) - ^ "Statoil shuts Sleipner B, transit intact". Reuters. 2009-12-18. Archived from the original on February 1, 2013. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "Sleipner Project". IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ Haugan, Bjørn-Erik (2005). "Technology as a driving force in climate policy". Cicerone (6): 8–9. Archived from the original on 2011-07-19. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ "Oil group buries greenhouse gas under sea". CNN. Reuters. 2003-11-19. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Furre, Anne-Kari; Eiken, Ola; Alnes, Håvard; Vevatne, Jonas Nesland; Kiær, Anders Fredrik (July 2017). "20 Years of Monitoring CO2-injection at Sleipner". Energy Procedia. 114: 3916–3926. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1523. ISSN 1876-6102.
- ^ "Sleipner Vest". Statoil. 2007-08-20. Archived from the original on 2009-12-16. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Kvamme, Bjørn; Aromada, Solomon Aforkoghene (2018-02-05). "Alternative Routes to Hydrate Formation during Processing and Transport of Natural Gas with a Significant Amount of CO2: Sleipner Gas as a Case Study". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 63 (3): 832–844. doi:10.1021/acs.jced.7b00983. ISSN 0021-9568.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies @ MIT".
- ^ Gavenas, Ekaterina; Rosendahl, Knut Einar; Skjerpen, Terje (2015-10-01). "CO2-emissions from Norwegian oil and gas extraction" (PDF). Energy. 90: 1956–1966. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.025. hdl:11250/2607427. ISSN 0360-5442.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "CO2 Storage: Case Study on the Sleipner Gas field in Norway - Bellona.org". Bellona.org. Retrieved 2018-11-19.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Alnes, Håvard; Eiken, Ola; Stenvold, Torkjell (November 2008). "Monitoring gas production and C O2 injection at the Sleipner field using time-lapse gravimetry". Geophysics. 73 (6): WA155–WA161. doi:10.1190/1.2991119. ISSN 0016-8033.
- ^ Gale, John; Christensen, Niels Peter; Cutler, Annette; Torp, Tore A. (September 2001). "Demonstrating the Potential for Geological Storage of CO2: The Sleipner and GESTCO Projects". Environmental Geosciences. 8 (1): 160–165. Bibcode:2001EnG.....8..160G. doi:10.1046/j.1526-0984.2001.008003160.x. ISSN 1075-9565.
- ^ Vibeke Laroi (2009-11-19). "Gassco Will Propose Pipeline to Transport CO2 From Kaarstoe". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2009-12-26.
- ^ "Norwegian Journal of Geology". njg.geologi.no. Retrieved 2018-11-19.
