✖


Jump to content

Болезнь цитрусовых

Цитрусовый прокроз (CL) является экономически важным вирусным заболеванием, влияющим на цитрусовые культуры. Эта новая болезнь широко распространена в Южной и Центральной Америке, от Аргентины до Мексики . Заболевание связано с тремя различными несистемными вирусами, которые вызывают сходные симптомы у хозяев цитрусовых и передаются одним и тем же вектором, клещами рода Brevipalpus ; Хотя они имеют совершенно разные геномы. Ядерный тип вируса цитрусового прокроза (CILV-N) обнаруживается в ядрах и цитоплазме инфицированных клеток, в то время как цитоплазматический тип вируса цитрусового прокроза (CILV-C) обнаруживается в эндоплазматическом ретикулуме. был обнаружен новый вирус, вызывающий сходные симптомы В 2012 году в Колумбии , и он был назван цитрусовым вирусом лепроза цитоплазматического типа 2 (Cilv-C2) из-за его тесного сходства с Cilv-C. Вирусы цитоплазматического типа являются наиболее распространенными и широко распространенными от трех видов.

Структура и геном

[ редактировать ]

Cilv-N имеет короткие стержнеобразные частицы, длиной от 120 до 130 нанометров (NM) и шириной от 35 до 40 нм, встречающихся в ядре или цитоплазме инфицированных клеток, и связанная с присутствием вироплазмы в ядре. [ 1 ] Геном Cilv-N представляет собой двухпартийную, отрицательную сингла, одноцепочечную РНК ((-) SSRNA). Оба РНК имеют 3'-концевые поли (а) хвосты. Cilv-n RNA1 (6268 нуклеотидов (NT)) содержит пять открытых рамков считывания (ORF), кодирующих белок нуклеокапсид (N), предполагаемый фосфопротеин (P), белок движения клеток-клеток (MP), матричный белок (M), и гликопротеин (G). Cilv-N RNA2 (5847 NT) содержит один ORF, кодирующий модуль репликации РНК-зависимой РНК (RDRP). Размер и структура генома Cilv-N очень напоминает организацию генома вируса орхидейного пята (OFV) [ 2 ] и, вероятно, будет членом недавно предложенного рода Dichorhavirus .

CiLV-C has short, membrane-bound bacilliform particles, 120 to 130 nm long and 50 to 55 wide; it is found in the endoplasmic reticulum in the cytoplasm of infected cells, and large electron dense viroplasm is observed in the cytoplasm.[3] CiLV-C has a bipartite, positive-sense, single stranded, RNA ((+)ssRNA) genome. Both RNAs had 3'-terminal poly(A) tails. CiLV-C RNA1 (8,729 to 8,730 nt) contains two ORFs, encoding a 286 kilodaltons (kDa) polyprotein, putatively involved in virus replication, with four conserved domains: methyltransferase, protease, helicase, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp); and a 29 kDa protein, of unknown function. CiLV-C RNA2 (4,969 to 4,975 nt) contains four ORFs, encoding 15, 61, 32, and 24 kDa proteins. The 32-kDa protein is apparently involved in cell-to-cell movement of the virus (MP), but none of the other proteins showed any conserved protein domain.[4][5]

CiLV-C2 is associated with short bacilliform virions, 100 to 110 nm long and 40 to 50 nm wide[6] The genome of CiLV-C2 is composed of RNA1 (8,717) and RNA2 (4,989 nt). Both RNAs also had 3'-terminal poly(A) tails. The structure of the CiLV-C2 genome closely resembles the genome organization of CiLV-C. CiLV-C2 RNA1 have two ORFs encoding a large polyprotein (285 kDa), putative involve in virus replication, with five conserved domains (two methyltransferase, protease, helicase and RdRp); and a putative coat protein (CP) of 29 kDa. CiLV-C2 RNA2 contains five ORFs that potentially encoded five proteins: 15, 7, 61, 32, and 24 kDa, similar to those predicted protein masses for CiLV-C. The 32 kDa protein has a conserved cell-to-cell movement protein domain, and the small hypothetical protein (7 kDa), that is not present in CiLV-C, has a putative trans-membrane domain.[6]

Taxonomic position

[edit]

CiLV-N probably belongs to the proposed genus Dichorhavirus, related to the family Rhabdoviridae, which has Orchid fleck virus (OFV) as the type member.[7] CiLV-C is the type member of the new accepted genus Cilevirus.[8] CiLV-C2 has been proposed as a new member of the genus Cilevirus.[6]

Transmission

[edit]
The Brevipalpus phoenicis carries the Leprosis Citrus leprosis disease, a disease currently in South America but moving North

CiLV-N, CiLV-C, and CiLV-C2 are transmitted by false spider mites or flat mites, belonging to the genus Brevipalpus (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Three mites species within this genus have been reported as CiLV vectors: B. californicus Banks, B. obovatus Donnadieu, and B. phoenicis Geijskes, the latter is considered the main vector.[9] The three mites species have a broad host range and are widely distributed.[10] All active stages of the mite (larvae, nymph, and adult) can acquire and transmit the virus,[11] although it has been reported that larvae transmit the virus more efficiently.[12] It is known that there is no transovarial transmission from female to its descendants,[13] and that after acquisition (an acquisition access period of 2 days), the mite remains viruliferous during entire life-span (persistent transmission), but it is not clear if the virus replicates inside the vector.[9]

Agricultural importance

[edit]

CiLV produces localized symptoms in leaves, stems, and fruits. In leaves, characteristic lesions are often circular (from 5 to 12 millimetres (3⁄16 to 15⁄32 in) in diameter), chlorotic or necrotic, colored light yellow to dark brown. In older lesions, a darker central point can also be observed.[14] In young stems, lesions are small, chlorotic and shallow; with time they become darker brown or reddish and prominent. In old stems lesions can join together and appearing larger.[14] In fruits, dark and depressed lesions are found in large numbers and affecting only the external part.[15] Commercial losses result from undesirable appearance and fruits falling. Some differences in symptoms produced by CiLV-C and CiLV-N have been reported; in leaves and fruits, lesions caused by the nuclear type are smaller and more numerous than those caused by the cytoplasmic type. Lesions caused by CiLV-C shows additional halos, making them look larger.[16][17] This disease is considered an important problem in citriculture in countries where it has been established, and is considered the major viral disease in citrus in Brazil.[9] Damage by leprosis in plants and in orange production has caused an annual cost of approximately US$90 million for miticides to control the disease, this represents about 40% of fertilizer and pesticide expenses and about 16% of the total costs of a grove.[18] Because of its widespread occurrence and potential for high damage, the disease can cause 100% yield losses, depending on the susceptibility of the citrus variety, isolate and control of the vector.[19] Because CL is considered a quarantine disease, international marketing is restricted to those regions where the disease is not reported.[20]

CiLV-C was long considered restricted to the genus Citrus, where species exhibit different grades of susceptibility, with sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) being highly susceptible, mandarins (C. reticulata Blanco) and grapefruits (C. paradisi Macfad.) moderately susceptible, and lemons (C. limon (L.) Osbeck) practically immune.[9] Nevertheless, CiLV-C was also found naturally infecting non-Citrus species as Swinglea glutinosa Merr., used as hedgerows around citrus orchards in Villavicencio, Colombia,[21] and Commelina benghalensis L., a weed present in citrus orchards in Brazil.[22] Mechanical transmission experiments have showed that CiLV-C could be transmitted to other species, causing localized lesions,[23] and it also can be mite transmitted to a quite wide range of experimental plant species.[24] B. phoenicis transmission to the common bean was also demonstrated[25] and this species has been proposed as an experimental indicator.[26]

Diagnosis

[edit]

Citrus leprosis is principally detected by the observation of local lesions with characteristic symptoms. Presence of CiLV-N and CiLV-C particles in affected tissue can be confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).[1][3] Other laboratory detection methods are also available, as double antibody sandwich-enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay (DAS-ELISA), indirect ELISA, dot-blot immunoassay, and immunocapture-reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using monoclonal and polyclonal;[27][28][29] and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).[6][30][31][32]

Epidemiology

[edit]

CL was initially described in what is now Philippe Park, Florida in 1907 by Fawett who called it "scaly bark" and "nail-head rust".[33][34] However, the disease appears to have disappeared from Florida since the 1960s,[35][33] perhaps due to reduction of vector population caused by freezing weather and intensive sulfur application.[36] There is evidence that CL was caused by the nuclear type.[37] The first report of CL in South America was in 1920 in Paraguay,[38] later it was reported in Brazil,[39] Argentina and Uruguay.[40] CiLV-C has been detected in Bolivia, Venezuela, and Colombia, and it is spreading northward through Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and Mexico.[9][41] CiLV-N has also been reported from the states of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, and Minas Gerais in Brazil, Boquete in Panama, and in the state of Querétaro, Mexico.[2][9] Recently, a mixed infection of the same plant with the two viruses CiLV-N and CiLV-C2, was reported in Casanare, Colombia.[32] The recent establishment of citrus leprosis in Central America represents a potential threat to citriculture in North America, where the vector is also present.

Management

[edit]

CL is mainly controlled through the management of mites. Most of the currently available miticides are effective,[42] although mite resistance has already been detected.[43][44] Biological alternatives as mite predators and entomopathogenic fungi have been reported with promising results.[41][45] Virus inoculum can be reduced implementing some cultural practices as remove affected branches, use of windbreaks to decrease vector wind spread, control of weeds (alternative mite hosts), use of healthy plants sources, and controlling the movement of people and material in orchard.[41] Although resistance has been observed between different Citrus species, few studies have been conducted in this area in order to identify commercial resistant varieties. One study developed using a hybrid population suggests that inheritance of resistance to leprosis may be controlled by only a few genes.[46]

Resources

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jump up to: a b Kitajima, E. W.; Müller, G. W.; Costa, A. S.; Yuki, W. (1972). "Short, rodlike particles associated with citrus leprosis". Virology. 50 (1): 254–258. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(72)90366-2. PMID 4117125.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b Roy, A.; Stone, A.; Otero-Colina, G.; Wei, G.; Choudhary, N.; Achor, D.; Shao, J.; Levy, L.; Nakhla, M.K; Hollingsworth, C.R; Hartung, J.S.; Schneider, W.L.; Brlansky, R.H. (2013). "Genome assembly of Citrus leprosis virus nuclear type reveals a close association with orchid fleck virus". Genome Announcements. 1 (4): e00519–e613. doi:10.1128/genomea.00519-13. PMC 3735072. PMID 23887919.
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b Kitajima, E.W.; Chagas, C.M.; Rodrigues, J.C.V (2003). "Brevipalpus transmitted plant virus and virus-like diseases: cytopathology and some recent cases". Exp. Appl. Acarol. 30 (1–3): 135–160. doi:10.1023/b:appa.0000006546.55305.e3. PMID 14756414. S2CID 45072508.
  4. ^ Locali-Fabris, E.C.; Freitas-Astu, J; Souza, A A; Takita, M.A.; Astua-Monge, G.; Antonioli-Luizon, R; Rodrigues, V.; Targon, M.L.P.N.; Machado, M.A. (2006). "Complete nucleotide sequence, genomic organization and phylogenetic analysis of Citrus leprosis virus cytoplasmatic type". J. Gen. Virol. 87 (9): 2721–2729. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82038-0. PMID 16894213.
  5. ^ Pascon, R.C.; Kitajima, J.P.; Breton, M.C.; Assumpcao, L.; Greggio, C.; Zanca, A.S.; Okura, V.K.; Alegria, M.C.; Camargo, M.E.; Silva, G.G.; Cardozo, J.C.; Vallim, M.A.; Franco, S.F.; Silva, V.H.; Junior, H.J.; Oliveira, F.; Giachetto, P.F.; Ferrari, F.; Aguilar-Vildoso, C.I.; Franchiscini, F.J.B.; Silva, J.M.F.; Arruda, P.; Ferro, J.A.; Reinach, F.; Silva, A.C.R. (2006). "The complete nucleotide sequence and genomic arganization of Citrus leprosis associated virus, cytoplasmatic type (CiLVC)". Virus Genes. 32 (3): 289–298. doi:10.1007/s11262-005-6913-1. PMID 16732481. S2CID 22217705.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Roy, A.; Choudhary, N.; Guillermo, L.M.; Shao, J.; Govindarajulo, A.; Anchor, D.; Wei, G.; Picton, D.D.; Levy, L.; Nakhla, M.K.; Hartung, J.S.; Brlansky, R.H. (2006). "A novel virus of the genus Cilevirus causing symptoms similar of citrus leprosis". Phytopathology. 103 (5): 488–500. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-07-12-0177-R. PMID 23268581.
  7. ^ Kondo, H; Maeda, T; Shirako, Y; Tamada, T (2006). "Orchid fleck virus is a rhabdovirus with an unusual bipartite genome". Journal of General Virology. 87 (Pt 8): 2413–2421. doi:10.1099/vir.0.81811-0. PMID 16847138.
  8. ^ Locali-Fabris, E.C.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Machado, M.A. (2012). "Genus Cilevirus". Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth Rep. Int. Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier, San Diego, CA.: 1139–1142.
  9. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Bastianel, M.; Noveli, V.M.; Kubo, K.S.; Kitajima, E.M.; Bassanezi, R.; Machado, M.A.; Freitas-Astúa, J. (2010). "Citrus leprosis:centennial of an unusual mite-virus pathosystem". Plant Disease. 94 (3): 284–292. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-3-0284. PMID 30754248.
  10. ^ Childers, C.C.; Rodrigues, J.C.V.; Welbourn, W.C. (2003). "Host plants of Brevipalpus californicus, B. obovatus, and B. phoenisis (Acari:Tenuipalpidae) and their potential involvement in the spread of one or more viral disease vectored by these mites". Experimental and Applied Acarology. 30 (1–3): 29–105. doi:10.1023/b:appa.0000006544.10072.01. PMID 14756412. S2CID 29730760.
  11. ^ Chiavegato, L. (1996). "Aspectos biológicos e transmissao de leprose pelo acaro Brevipalpus phoenicis Geijskes em citros". Laranja. 17 (1): 229–235.
  12. ^ Chagas, M; Rosseti, V; Chiavegato, L (1983). "Influence of the biological cycle of Brevipalpus phoenicis on leprosis transmission". Annals IX Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists. Riverside, CA: 69.
  13. ^ Boaretto, M.A.C.; Chiavegato, L:G; Silva, C:A:D (1993). "Transmissao da leprose através de fêmeas de Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes, 1939) (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) e de seus descendentes, em condiçoes de laboratório". Científica, Sao Paulo. 21 (2): 245–253.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b Bastianel, M; Freitas-Astúa, J; Kitajima, E.W.; Machado, M.A (2006). "The citrus leprosis pathosystem". Summa Phytopathologica. 32 (3): 211–220. doi:10.1590/s0100-54052006000300001.
  15. ^ Rodrigues, J.C.V.; Kitajima, E.W.; Childers, C.C; Chagas, C.M. (2003). "Citrus leprosis virus vectored by Brevipalpus Phoenisis (Acari: Tenuipalpirae) on citrus in Brazil". Experimental and Applied Acarology. 30 (1–3): 161–179. doi:10.1023/b:appa.0000006547.76802.6e. PMID 14756415. S2CID 13542435.
  16. ^ Kitajima, E.W.; Ferrereira, P.T.O; Freitas-Astúa, J; Machado, M.A (2004). "Ocorrencia da leprose dos citros, tipo nuclear (CiLV-N) nos municipios paulistas de Montealegre do Sul e Amparo". Summa Phythopathologica. 30: 68.
  17. ^ Marques, J.P.R.; Kitajima, E.W.; Freitas-Atúa, J.; Appezzato-Da-Gloria, B (2010). "Comparative morpho-anatomical studies of the lesion caused by citrus leprosis virus on sweet orange". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 82 (2): 501–511. doi:10.1590/s0001-37652010000200025. PMID 20563430.
  18. ^ Ayres, A. "Citrus disease control in Brazil". www.fao.org. Retrieved 29 November 2014.
  19. ^ Rodrigues, J.C.V (2000). The relationships among the pathogen, vector and plant in the citrus leprosis system. PhD dissertation. Piracicaba, SP, Brazil: Sao Paulo University.
  20. ^ Leon, G (2012). "Current status of the Citrus leprosis virus (CiLV-C) and its vector Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes)". Agronomia Colombiana. 30 (2): 242–250.
  21. ^ León, G.A.; Becerra, C.H.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Salaroli, R.B.; Kitajima, E.W. (2008). "Natural infection of Swinglea glutinosa by the Citrus leprosis virus, citoplsmatic type (CiLV-C) in Colombia". Plant Disease. 92 (9): 1364. doi:10.1094/pdis-92-9-1364c. PMID 30769432.
  22. ^ Nunes, M.A.; Bergamini, M.P.; Coerini, L.F.; Bastianel, M.; Novelli, V.M.; Kitajima, E.W.; Freitas-Astúa, J. (2012). "Citrus leprosis virus C naturally infecting Commelina benghalensis, a prevalent monocot weed of citrus orchards in Brazil". Plant Disease. 96 (5): 770. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-11-0925-pdn. PMID 30727543.
  23. ^ Colariccio, A.; Lovisolo, O.; Chagas, C.M.; Galleti, S.R.; Rossetti, V.; Kitajima, E.W. (1995). "Mechanical transmission and ultrastructural aspects of citrus leprosis disease". Fitopatol. Bras. 20: 208–213.
  24. ^ Nunes, M.A.; Oliveira, C.A.; Oliveira, M.L.; Kitajima, E.W.; Hilf, M.E.; Gottwald, R.T.; Freitas-Astúa, J. (2012). "Transmission of Citrus leprosis virus, cytoplamatic type by Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) to alternate host plants found in citrus orchards". Plant Disease. 96 (7): 968–972. doi:10.1094/pdis-06-11-0538. PMID 30727203.
  25. ^ Groot, T.V.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Kitajima, E.W. (2006). "Brevipalpus phoenicis transmits citrus leprosis virus, cytoplasmatic type (CiLV-C) to common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under experimental conditions". Virus Rev. Res. 11: 67–68.
  26. ^ Garita, L.C.; Tassi, A.D.; Calegario, R.F.; Kitajima, E.W.; Carbonell, S.A.M.; Freitas-Astúa, J. (2013). "Common bean: Experimental indicator plant for Citrus leprosis virus C and some other cytoplasmatic type Brevipalpus-trinsmitted viruses". Plant Disease. 97 (10): 1346–1351. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-12-1143-re. PMID 30722150.
  27. ^ Calegario, R.F.; Locali, E.C.; Stach-Machado, D.R.; Peroni, L.A.; Caserta, R.; Salaroli, R.B.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Machado, M.A.; Kitajima, E.W. (2013). "Polyclonal antibodies to the putative coat protein of Citrus leprosis virus C expressed in Escherichia coli: Production and use in immunodiagnosis" (PDF). Trop. Plant Pathol. 38 (3): 188–197. doi:10.1590/s1982-56762013005000005.
  28. ^ Choudhary, N.; Roy, A.; León, M.G.; Picton, D.D.; Wei, G.; Nakhla, M.K.; Levy, L.; Brlan-Sky, R.H. (2013). "Immunodiagnosis of Citrus leprosis virus C using a polyclonal antibody to an expressed putative coat protein". J. Virol. Methods. 193 (2): 548–553. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.07.035. PMID 23911294.
  29. ^ Choudhary, N.; Roy, A.; Govindarajulu, A.; Nakhla, M.K.; Levy, L.; Brlansky, R.H. (2014). "Production of monoclonal antibodies for detection of Citrus leprosis virus C in ezyme-linked immuno-assays and immunocapture reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction". Journal of Virological Methods. 206: 144–149. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.06.010. PMID 24956418.
  30. ^ Kubo, K.S.; Novelli, V.M.; Bastianel, M.; Locali-Fabris, E.C.; Antonioli-Luizon, R.; Machado, M.A.; Freitas-Astúa, J. (2011). "Detection of Brevipalpus-transmitted viruses in their mite vectors by RT-PCR". Exp. Appl. Acarol. 54 (1): 33–39. doi:10.1007/s10493-011-9425-9. PMID 21279538. S2CID 31600294.
  31. ^ Locali, E.C.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Souza de, A.A.; Takita, M.A.; Astúa-Monge, G.; Antonioli, R.; Kitajima, E.W.; Machado, M.A. (2003). "Development of a molecular tool for the diagnosis of leprosis, a major threat to citrus production in the Americas". Plant Disease. 87 (11): 1317–1321. doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.11.1317. PMID 30812546.
  32. ^ Jump up to: a b Roy, A.; León, M.G.; Stone, A.L.; Schneider, W.L.; Hartung, J.S.; Brlansky, R.H. (2014). "First report of Citrus leprosis virus nuclear type in sweet orange in Colombia". Plant Disease. 98 (8): 1162. doi:10.1094/pdis-02-14-0117-pdn. PMID 30708809.
  33. ^ Jump up to: a b Childers, Carl C.; Rodrigues, José C. V. (2011-12-20). "An overview of Brevipalpus mites (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) and the plant viruses they transmit". Zoosymposia. 6. Magnolia Press: 180–192. doi:10.11646/zoosymposia.6.1.28. ISSN 1178-9913.
  34. ^ Fawcett, Howard Samuel (1911). "Scaly Bark or "Nail-Head Rust" of Citrus". Bulletin of the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station (106). Gainesville FL, USA: Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Florida: 41. ASIN B00089SF00. ISSN 0096-607X. OCLC 18160315. OCLC 903637507. Google Books. AGRIS id US201300451845. AGRIS id US201300067868.
  35. ^ Childers, C.C.; Rodrigues, J.C.V.; Derrick, K.S.; Achor, D.S.; French, J.V.; Welbourn, W.C.; Ochoa, R.; Kitajima, E.W. (2003). "Citrus leprosis and its status in Florida and Texas: Past and present". Experimental and Applied Acarology. 30 (1–3): 181–202. doi:10.1023/b:appa.0000006548.01625.72. PMID 14756416. S2CID 19178892.
  36. ^ Childers, C.C.; Rodriguez, J.C.V.; Kitajima, E.W.; Derrick, K.S.; Rivera, C.; Welbourn, W. (2001). "A control strategy for breaking the virus vector cycle of Brevipalpus spp. and Rhabdovirus disease, citrus leprosis". Manejo Integrado de Plagas (Costa Rica). 60: 76–79.
  37. ^ Kitajima, E.W.; Chagas, C.M.; Harakava, R.; Calegario, R.F.; Freitas-Astúa, J.; Rodrigues, J.C.V.; Childers, C.C. (2011). "Citrus leprosis in Florida, USA, apperars to have been caused by the Nuclear Type of Citrus Leprosis Virus (CiLV-N)". Virus Rev Res. 16 (1–2): 1–5. doi:10.17525/vrr.v16i1-2.51.
  38. ^ Spegazzini, C (1920). "Sobre algunas enfermedades y hongos que afectan las plantas de ¨agrios¨ en el Paraguay". Ann. Soc. Cient. 90: 155–188.
  39. ^ Битанкур, А.А. (1934). «Взаимосвязь паразитических заболеваний и грибков наблюдается в разделе фитопатологии в течение 1931 и 1932 годов». Арк. Институт Биол . 5 : 39–45.
  40. ^ Bitancourt, AA (1940). "Прокатная DOS Citrus" O Biológico 6 : 39–4
  41. ^ Jump up to: а беременный в Каби « Вирус цитрусового лепроза C. У инвазивных видов кратких» . www.cabi.org . Получено 28 ноября 2014 года .
  42. ^ Практика, HS; Rodrigues, JCV (1996). "Лепраз citris" Кати, Саа, Булл. Campinas, sp .
  43. ^ Omoto, C.; Альбес, EB; Ribeiro, PC (2000). «Обнаружение и мониторинг сопротивления у Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijkes) (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) к дикофолу» . Труды энтомологического общества Бразилии . 29 (4): 757–764. Doi : 10.1590/s0301-80592000000400016 .
  44. ^ Omoto, C.; Алвес, Э. (2004). «Устойчивость акаро к акарицидам в цитрусовых». Сельскохозяйственная виза . 2 : 82–86.
  45. ^ Magalhaes, BP; Родригес, JC; Boucias, DG; Childers, DG (2005). «Патогенность метархизиума анизоплаей var accridum к ложному пауковому клещам Brevipalpus phoenicis (acari: tenuipalpidae)» . Флорида Энтомолог . 88 (2): 195–198. Doi : 10.1653/0015-4040 (2005) 088 [0195: pomava] 2.0.co ;
  46. ^ Bastianel, M.; de Oliveira, AC; Cristofani, M.; Filho, Og; Фрейтас-Астуа, Дж.; Rodrigues, v.; ASTúa-Monge, G.; Мачадо, Массачусетс (2006). «Наследство и наследичность устойчивости к цитрусовому прокрозу». Фитопатология . 96 (10): 1092–1096. doi : 10.1094/phyto-96-1092 . PMID   18943497 .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citrus_leprosis_disease&oldid=1192243151"
Arc.Ask3.Ru: конец переведенного документа.
Arc.Ask3.Ru
Номер скриншота №: 83ab75c99d11d24dfc7bf25532745f78__1703751420
URL1:https://arc.ask3.ru/arc/aa/83/78/83ab75c99d11d24dfc7bf25532745f78.html
Заголовок, (Title) документа по адресу, URL1:
Citrus leprosis disease - Wikipedia
Данный printscreen веб страницы (снимок веб страницы, скриншот веб страницы), визуально-программная копия документа расположенного по адресу URL1 и сохраненная в файл, имеет: квалифицированную, усовершенствованную (подтверждены: метки времени, валидность сертификата), открепленную ЭЦП (приложена к данному файлу), что может быть использовано для подтверждения содержания и факта существования документа в этот момент времени. Права на данный скриншот принадлежат администрации Ask3.ru, использование в качестве доказательства только с письменного разрешения правообладателя скриншота. Администрация Ask3.ru не несет ответственности за информацию размещенную на данном скриншоте. Права на прочие зарегистрированные элементы любого права, изображенные на снимках принадлежат их владельцам. Качество перевода предоставляется как есть. Любые претензии, иски не могут быть предъявлены. Если вы не согласны с любым пунктом перечисленным выше, вы не можете использовать данный сайт и информация размещенную на нем (сайте/странице), немедленно покиньте данный сайт. В случае нарушения любого пункта перечисленного выше, штраф 55! (Пятьдесят пять факториал, Денежную единицу (имеющую самостоятельную стоимость) можете выбрать самостоятельно, выплаичвается товарами в течение 7 дней с момента нарушения.)