Jump to content

Interventions of political parties in Venezuela

Several interventions of political parties in Venezuela have occurred during Nicolás Maduro's government. The interventions are mandated by the pro-government Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ by its initials in Spanish). During these interventions, the leadership or most of the political party members end up suspended, expelled or replaced by members appointed by the TSJ.

The interventions have replaced the directive boards of historically important Venezuelan political parties like Copei and Democratic Action who have opposed Chavismo, but also interventions have been acted on some pro-Chavismo leaning parties like the Communist Party of Venezuela (PCV).

History

[edit]

Background

[edit]

On May 15, 2013, when an ad-hoc board led by Pedro Celestino Veliz was appointed as leader of the Red Flag Party, ignoring an internal party assembly in which Gabriel Puerta Aponte he was re-elected as secretary general[1] In 2014, the old leadership was restored.[2] In 2015, the rights on the electoral symbol was given to Pedro Veliz Acuña.[3]

On 27 August 2019, the TSJ suspended the board of directors of the Copei to appoint a board of directors chaired by Miguel Salazar.[4] Previously, the National Social Christian Assembly elected Mercedes Malavé on March 27, 2019.

In May 2020, Tarek William Saab, the Attorney General appointed by the National Constituent Assembly, requested that the TSJ declare Popular Will as a "terrorist organization," which would lead to the prohibition of the party.[5] Popular Will rejected said accusations.[6]

2015 parliamentary election

[edit]

On July 17, 2015, the TSJ dismissed the national board of the People's Electoral Movement, replacing the then Secretary General Wilmer Nolasco with Gilberto Jesús Jiménez Prieto.[7] As a result of this fact, part of the militancy of the MEP decides to carry out the initiative that they called "MEP-Originario", splitting from the MEP appointed by the TSJ.[8] In May 2017, they participated in the process of renewing the political parties of the National Electoral Council;[9] however, the MEP was not re-legitimized.[10]

Prior to the 2015 Venezuelan parliamentary election, the pro-government TSJ designated new leaders of COPEI, leading some to state that the party was infiltrated by the PSUV.[11] By 2017, Caracas Chronicles said the party was "dying an undignified death" as infighting among leaders could not agree on a path for the party.[4] Similar happened to the Ecological Movement of Venezuela.

Symbols of Democratic Unity Roundtable (left) and National Integrity Movement-Unity (right). A variation of the MUD symbol includes a small MUD label in the top left-hand corner.[12]

On August 6, 2015 the TSJ issues and executes a judicial decision by which it suspends the National Directorate that existed before the measure and replaced by a new directive.[13][non-primary source needed] The president of MIN-Barinas filed a lawsuit against the directive headed by Manuel Pérez Soto accused of disregarding regulations and the organs of the party. The Constitutional Chamber would appoint "an ad hoc board headed by Luz María Álvarez, Ramón Eduardo Odremán and the complainant himself as directors."[14] The Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD) opposition coalition, of which MIN Unidad was a member, unanimously decided to suspend the party as a member of the referred coalition.[12] In the 2015 parliamentary elections, the party was suspended.

For the 2015 parliamentary elections, the MIN was the subject of controversy for, among other things, running Chavista candidates, having as slogan "We are the opposition" and highlighting the word "Unity", which was also highlighted by the then Democratic Unity Roundtable main opposition coalition. The party even ran a candidate in the state of Aragua with the same name as the MUD candidate.[12]

Likewise, the then president of the party appointed by the TSJ, Luz María Álvarez assured that the nomination of William Ojeda [es] for the 2015 parliamentary elections was apparently the following: "The decision of the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), with barely 12 hours before the closing of the presentation of nominations, forced us to make alliances with other organizations and William Ojeda 'snuck' in. When we made the corresponding claim and demanded his withdrawal, the factor that presented him threatened to withdraw all the candidates in that entity. That would have left us at a disadvantage because, with the withdrawal of Miranda, we would no longer be a national party. So we had to accept that contingency. We had to get the guy on board".[15]

2020 parliamentary election

[edit]

On 15 June 2020, the TSJ suspended the directive board of Democratic Action to appoint a new one presided by José Bernabé Gutiérrez, days after his brother José Luis Gutiérrez was appointed by the high court as rector of the National Electoral Council. The former was expelled from the party the following day.[16][17]

On 17 June, the TSJ proceeded to take the same measure with the Justice First party and appointed an ad hoc directive board presided by José Brito, who would be responsible for the appointment of the rest of the positions of Justice First, as well as the regional, municipal and local authorities.[18]

On 7 July, the TSJ also suspended the directive board of Popular Will, becoming the third political organization judicially intervened in the last month, appointing an ad hoc directive board presided by José Gregorio Noriega, previously expelled from the party. The high court sentenced that Noriega "could use the electoral card, logo, symbols, emblems, colors and any other own concept" of the party and suspended the expulsions of both Noriega as Guillermo Luces and Lucila Pacheco, members of the new board.[19]

On 20 July, the TSJ suspended the directive board of Republican Movement and appointed an ad hoc directive board presided by Manuel Rivas. The ad hoc board of directors of the party may use the electoral card, logo, symbols, emblems, colors and any other concept of the party.[20]

On 18 August, the TSJ additionally intervened in the far-left party Tupamaro, giving the party directive to an ad hoc board to use the seats, name, electoral card, symbols and electoral emblems of the party.[21] The intervention took place after the party announced an electoral alliance without the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV).[22] On 21 August, the TSJ did the same with the left-wing party Fatherland for All, which also announced an electoral alliance without the PSUV by dissolving the board of directors headed by Rafael Uzcátegui and replacing it with one headed by Medina.;[23][24][25][26] the high court also intervened in the Red Flag and Compromiso País parties, handing over the party to an ad hoc board.[27] On 22 August, New Vision of my Country (NUVIPA) got a new leadership appointed by the TSJ.[28]

Symbols of Justice First (left) and Venezuela First (right)

After Henrique Capriles encouraged participation in the elections, the TSJ reverted the intervention of the Justice First party, stripping the directive board from José Brito. Justice First ratified after the sentence that they would not participate in the elections.[29] Soon after, Venezuela First was founded by members who took the party over after the intervention, which uses a similar logo and name to Justice First and ran in the election.

After the election

[edit]

In March 2022, the leadership of Progressive Advance was disputed between Luis Augusto Romero, who claimed the highest authority of the organization,[30] and Henri Falcón who was ratified president of the party in an assembly not recognized by the National Electoral Council,[31] said assembly was declared null and void by the National Electoral Council, a body that recognized the National Executive Committee as the sole authority of AP,[32][33] while Falcón announced the creation of a new movement, called "Futuro", composed mainly of former progressives, thus ceasing the internal dispute which joined the opposition Unitary Platform.[34][35][36]

2024 presidential election

[edit]

In August 2023, the TSJ intervened the directive board of the Communist Party of Venezuela (PCV), appointing a new ad hoc board with Henry Parra as president and Sixto Rodríguez as general secretary to "democratize" the party.[37][38][39] Parra and Rodríguez have been linked to the ruling PSUV,[40] and the PCV joined the list of parties intervened for political reasons by the questioned Venezuelan judiciary, along with several parties of the so-called dissident Chavismo and of the traditional opposition itself.[41]

Timeline of ad-hoc leaderships

[edit]
Communist Party of VenezuelaProgressive AdvanceTupamaro (Venezuela)Popular WillJustice FirstDemocratic Action (Venezuela)CopeiEcological Movement of VenezuelaPeople's Electoral Movement (Venezuela)Red Flag PartyFor Social DemocracyFatherland for All

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Para Bandera Roja nueva intervención del TSJ es una reedición de lo que ya pasó en 2013". Cronica Uno. 26 August 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2021.
  2. ^ "TSJ restituyó autoridad de Tarjeta Electoral de Bandera Roja en sus autoridades legítimas - la Voz". 10 November 2014.
  3. ^ "Decisión del TSJ "arrebataría" la opción de tarjeta electoral a Bandera Roja | el Diario de Caracas". Archived from the original on 2016-03-05.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b "Sala Constitucional del TSJ designó nueva junta directiva Ad Hoc de Copei". 2 December 2019.
  5. ^ Singer, Florantonia (27 May 2020). "El Supremo chavista invalida a Juan Guaidó como presidente del Parlamento". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 20 June 2020.
  6. ^ "VP rechazó las acusaciones de Tarek William Saab". El Nacional (in Spanish). 25 May 2020. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  7. ^ "8 historias del intervencionismo del TSJ del régimen en detrimento de los partidos políticos". El Nacional. 2020-06-17. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  8. ^ Quijada, Reinaldo (25 August 2017). "Ante el retiro de la candidatura de Oswaldo Rodríguez León a la gobernación del Estado Falcón". Aporrea. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  9. ^ Quijada, Reinaldo (25 August 2017). "Ante el retiro de la candidatura de Oswaldo Rodríguez León a la gobernación del Estado Falcón". Aporrea. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  10. ^ "Después de posturas sumisas o ambiguas: PPT, REDES, MEP y NCR del Polo Patriótico no fueron relegitimados como partidos". Punto de Corte. 5 August 2017. Archived from the original on 5 August 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  11. ^ "Enrique Mendoza: Candidatos de Copei deben tener el aval de las direcciones regionales". Efecto Cocuyo. 2015-07-31. Retrieved 2019-09-13.
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b c Pardo, Daniel (5 November 2015). "Venezuela: MIN-Unidad, el partido que no se sabe si es chavista u opositor". BBC. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  13. ^ "Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo de Justicia contra Alguno de los miembros de la Direccion Nacional del partido MIN Unidad". Tribunal Supremo de Justicia.
  14. ^ Alonso, Juan Francisco (6 August 2015). "TSJ nombra nueva directiva para el Movimiento de Integridad Nacional". El Universal. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  15. ^ "Luz María Álvarez de MIN-Unidad: "No votaría por William Ojeda"". El Fortín de Guayana. 7 November 2015. Archived from the original on 11 December 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  16. ^ "Acción Democrática expulsará de sus filas a Bernabé Gutiérrez". 16 June 2020.
  17. ^ "Rafael Poleo anuncia salida de Bernabé Gutiérrez de Acción Democrática". 13 June 2020. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
  18. ^ "El Supremo suspende también a la cúpula de Primero Justicia en su ofensiva contra la oposición venezolana". Europa Press. 17 June 2020. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
  19. ^ "El Supremo venezolano suspende a la directiva del partido de Leopoldo López". RTVE. EFE. 7 July 2020. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
  20. ^ "TSJ interviene partido Movimiento Republicano y nombra directiva ad hoc". versionfinal.com.ve. 27 July 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  21. ^ Lozano, Daniel (19 August 2020). "El Supremo de Venezuela interviene la directiva del partido chavista Tupamaro". El Mundo.
  22. ^ "PCV denuncia presencia del SEBIN en su sede de Puerto Cabello". Runrun.es (in Spanish). 19 August 2020.
  23. ^ "Ilenia Medina logró arrebatarle el PPT a Rafael Uzcategui tras decisión del TSJ". Crónica Uno. 2020-08-22. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  24. ^ "TSJ ordena al PPT entregar sedes a la junta ad hoc de Ilenia Medina". Runrunes (in Spanish). 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  25. ^ "Ilenia Medina: PPT es parte del GPP y continúa en el proceso electoral para las parlamentarias". Contrapunto. 2023-08-21. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  26. ^ Martínez, Deisy (22 August 2020). "TSJ ordena la intervención de la directiva de Patria Para Todos". Efecto Cocuyo (in Spanish).
  27. ^ "La Justicia chavista intervino otros dos partidos políticos de izquierda en Venezuela". Infobae. 26 August 2020.
  28. ^ García, Yorvi (2020-08-22). "TSJ del régimen intervino el partido Nuvipa". El Impulso (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  29. ^ "Tribunal Supremo de Justicia le quita Primero Justicia a José Brito". Efecto Cocuyo (in Spanish). 4 September 2020. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  30. ^ "División de AP abre la puerta a la judicialización del partido". Efecto Cocuyo. 2022-03-12. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  31. ^ "▷ Henri Falcón denuncia que el CNE pretende despojar a Avanzada Progresista de su dirigencia #15Mar". El Impulso (in Spanish). 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  32. ^ "CNE dejó a Avanzada Progresista en manos de directivos enfrentados a Falcón y pone a la organización al borde de una división". Crónica Uno (in Spanish). 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  33. ^ "Henri Falcón acusa al CNE de despojar Avanzada Progresista". TalCual (in Spanish). 2022-03-15. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  34. ^ "Henri Falcón se deslinda de Avanzada Progresista tras división del partido". Efecto Cocuyo. 2022-03-22. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  35. ^ "Henri Falcón presentó Futuro, su nuevo movimiento político". EL NACIONAL (in Spanish). 2022-03-30. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  36. ^ "Henri Falcón presenta su nuevo movimiento político: Futuro". Efecto Cocuyo. 2022-03-30. Retrieved 2022-03-30.
  37. ^ Singer, Florantonia (2023-08-12). "El Tribunal Supremo de Venezuela interviene el Partido Comunista y nombra una nueva dirección". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-08-18.
  38. ^ Venezuela, Transparencia (2023-08-15). "PCV se suma a la lista de partidos políticos intervenidos por el TSJ". Transparencia Venezuela (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-08-18.
  39. ^ "Venezuela: justicia interviene al opositor Partido Comunista – DW – 12/08/2023". dw.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-08-18.
  40. ^ Cocuyo | @efectococuyo, Efecto (2023-08-12). "Quiénes integran la junta ad hoc del PCV". Efecto Cocuyo (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-08-18.
  41. ^ "El TSJ lleva una docena de partidos políticos intervenidos: La Sala Constitucional le cierra el pico al PCV al imponerle una ju". Suprema Injusticia (in Spanish). 2023-08-14. Retrieved 2023-08-18.
Arc.Ask3.Ru: конец переведенного документа.
Arc.Ask3.Ru
Номер скриншота №: a98ebe8a11172e30bc58f8c8febedf1e__1722528960
URL1:https://arc.ask3.ru/arc/aa/a9/1e/a98ebe8a11172e30bc58f8c8febedf1e.html
Заголовок, (Title) документа по адресу, URL1:
Interventions of political parties in Venezuela - Wikipedia
Данный printscreen веб страницы (снимок веб страницы, скриншот веб страницы), визуально-программная копия документа расположенного по адресу URL1 и сохраненная в файл, имеет: квалифицированную, усовершенствованную (подтверждены: метки времени, валидность сертификата), открепленную ЭЦП (приложена к данному файлу), что может быть использовано для подтверждения содержания и факта существования документа в этот момент времени. Права на данный скриншот принадлежат администрации Ask3.ru, использование в качестве доказательства только с письменного разрешения правообладателя скриншота. Администрация Ask3.ru не несет ответственности за информацию размещенную на данном скриншоте. Права на прочие зарегистрированные элементы любого права, изображенные на снимках принадлежат их владельцам. Качество перевода предоставляется как есть. Любые претензии, иски не могут быть предъявлены. Если вы не согласны с любым пунктом перечисленным выше, вы не можете использовать данный сайт и информация размещенную на нем (сайте/странице), немедленно покиньте данный сайт. В случае нарушения любого пункта перечисленного выше, штраф 55! (Пятьдесят пять факториал, Денежную единицу (имеющую самостоятельную стоимость) можете выбрать самостоятельно, выплаичвается товарами в течение 7 дней с момента нарушения.)