Список фильмов, считающихся худшими
Перечисленные ниже фильмы . были названы многими известными критиками в различных средствах массовой информации одними из худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных Примеры таких источников включают Metacritic , Роджера Эберта список самых ненавистных фильмов , The Golden Turkey Awards , Movie Guide Леонарда Малтина , Rotten Tomatoes , поп-культуры » писателя Натана Рабина « Мой мир провалов , Stinkers Bad Movie Awards , культовый сериал « Таинственный научный театр 3000» (наряду с дополнительными доходами Cinematic Titanic , The Film Crew и RiffTrax ) и премию «Золотая малина» (также известная как «Razzies»). Фильмы в этих списках, как правило, представляют собой полнометражные фильмы , коммерческие / художественные по своей природе (предназначенные для получения прибыли, выражения личных заявлений или того и другого), профессионально или независимо созданные (в отличие от любительской продукции, такой как домашнее кино ) и выпущенные в прокат. в кинотеатрах, затем на домашнем видео.
1930-е годы
Маньяк (1934)
«Маньяк» , также известный как «Секс-маньяк» , «Кодекса» до появления — фильм ужасов , снятый Дуэйном Эспером . Эта история представляет собой свободную адаптацию рассказа Эдгара Аллана По « Черная кошка » и повествует о подражателе водевиля , который становится помощником сумасшедшего ученого . Рекламируемый как документальный фильм о психических заболеваниях , «Маньяк» подвергся критике за беспричинные кадры раздевающихся женщин и за плагиат сцен ужасов из немого фильма 1922 года «Хаксан» . Дэнни Пири считает, что Маньяк» — худший фильм, когда-либо созданный, а Чарли Джейн Андерс из Gawker Media назвала io9 « его «возможно, худшим фильмом в истории». [2] [3] Компания Rotten Tomatoes включила «Маньяка» в свой список фильмов «Настолько плохи, что их нельзя пропустить». [4] Vanity Fair включил этот фильм в список 20 худших фильмов всех времен, и он включен в Джона Дж. Б. Уилсона книгу «Официальный путеводитель по фильмам Раззи: наслаждаясь лучшим из худших фильмов Голливуда» . [5]
Рефрижераторное безумие (1936)
«Reefer Madness» (первоначально выпущенный под названием «Расскажи своим детям» и иногда озаглавленный или имеющий подзаголовки «Жгучий вопрос» , «Наркоман» , «Допинговая молодежь » и «Любовное безумие» ) — американский фильм об эксплуатации и пропагандистской работе 1936 года , вращающийся вокруг мелодраматических событий, которые происходят, когда старшеклассники их заманили торговцы попробовать марихуану , и они стали зависимыми и были вовлечены в различные преступления, такие как наезд и побег , непредумышленное убийство , убийство , попытка изнасилования и впадение в безумие, связь с организованной преступностью и самоубийство.
Pacific Standard написала, что «Reefer Madness» было «одним из первых фильмов, которые когда-либо считались трансцендентно плохими». [1] а Леонард Малтин назвал его «дедушкой всех худших фильмов». [6] Лас-Вегас CityLife назвал этот фильм «худшим» за всю историю, занявшим второе место после « Плана 9 из космоса» . [7] и News.com.au сочли его «катастрофическим провалом, ставшим культовой классикой» из-за «ужасной игры и преувеличенных стереотипов о наркозависимости». [8] Наталли Амато из Daily Dot включила «Рефрижераторное безумие» в свой список лучших худших фильмов, написав, что это «может быть один из худших фильмов всех времен, поскольку он достиг полной противоположности своей намеченной цели», став культовым. классика среди стоунеров. [9] Leafly Данте Джордан из также написал, что это может быть «худший фильм всех времен», раскритиковав многочисленные неточности в отношении употребления марихуаны и назвав его «одним из самых нетворческих и глухих произведений пропаганды против каннабиса». [10]
Террор крошечного городка (1938)
«Ужас крошечного городка» , поставленный Сэмом Ньюфилдом и продюсером Джедом Бьюэллом , остается единственным музыкальным вестерном , в котором актерский состав состоит исключительно из гномов . [11] Фильм вышел из безвестности как лагерная классика после появления на студенческих и полуночных показах в начале 1970-х годов. [12] В 1978 году он был включен в Михаила Медведя книгу «Пятьдесят худших фильмов всех времён» . [11] и с тех пор был назван Flavorwire одним из худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных . [13] Гнилые помидоры, [4] и премия «Золотая Турция» . [11] Мелвин Дефлер назвал его «Возможно, худшим фильмом всех времен». [14] а критик Габриэль Рикар назвал его худшим фильмом из когда-либо созданных; заявив: «Это не только ужасно, но и Tiny Town еще и очень мило». [15] В 1986 году «Ужас крошечного городка» стал первым фильмом, представленным на фестивале Canned Film Festival , ночном телешоу , в котором представлены худшие фильмы, когда-либо созданные. [16]
1940-е годы
История Бэйб Рут (1948)
«История Бэйба Рута» — бейсбольный фильм- биография Бэйба Рута в главных ролях 1948 года с Уильямом Бендиксом , Клэр Тревор и Сэмом Левином . [17] The New York Times описывает его как « План 9 из космоса из биографических фильмов о бейсболе». [18] Его срочно выпустили, пока Рут была еще жива. В одной печально известной сцене Рут обещает умирающему ребенку, что он сделает два хоумрана . Впоследствии ребенок излечивается от недугов после того, как Рут выполняет обещание. [19]
Член Зала бейсбольной славы Тед Уильямс считал, что это худший фильм, который он когда-либо видел. Газета Washington Times заявила, что это «возможно, худший фильм из когда-либо созданных». [20] [21] The Spokesman-Review включил этот фильм в список худших фильмов всех времен, а Пол Ньюберри из Associated Press написал, что место фильма «почти в каждом списке худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных» было «не без оснований». [22] [23] Newsday Джек Мэтьюз из также написал, что «История Бэйб Рут» была «то, что многие люди считают худшим спортивным фильмом всех времен». [24] назвали его одним из худших фильмов о спорте за всю историю Newsday и The AV Club . [25] [19] и назван одним из худших биографических фильмов по версии Moviefone и Spike . [26] [27] Писатель развлекательных программ Майкл Заутер включил этот фильм в свою книгу «Худшие фильмы всех времен» , а Леонард Малтин назвал его «совершенно ужасным». [6]
Никаких орхидей для мисс Бландиш (1948)
Никаких орхидей для мисс Блэндиш — британский гангстерский фильм, адаптированный по роману Джеймса Хэдли Чейза 1939 года , — был встречен прессой весьма враждебно. Это произошло главным образом из-за высокого (на тот момент) уровня сексуального и жестокого содержания в фильме, а также из-за того, что в нем была попытка изобразить американцев с использованием преимущественно британского актерского состава (включая раннюю роль Сида Джеймса ). [28] было воспринято как неубедительное. [29]
Британский киножурнал Monthly Film Bulletin назвал это «самой отвратительной демонстрацией жестокости, извращений, секса и садизма, когда-либо показанной на экране кинотеатра». [29] Кинообозреватель Sunday Express назвал мисс Блэндиш «Нет орхидеям» «худшим фильмом, который я когда-либо видел». [30] Австралийская газета The Age также дала резкую рецензию: « Нет орхидей для мисс Блэндиш — это не только позор для студии, которая ее сделала, но и отражается на британской индустрии в целом… Вся постановка непростительна». [31]
Клифф Гудвин, обсуждая «Никаких орхидей» на первом приеме мисс Блэндиш , отмечает, что его «единогласно назвали «худшим фильмом, когда-либо созданным » ». [28] Более поздние рецензии на фильм были столь же антипатичны. «Нет орхидеям для мисс Блэндиш» охарактеризовал Британский кинообозреватель Лесли Холливелл как «уморительно ужасный гангстерский фильм… один из худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных». [30] В «Путеводителе по классическому кино» Леонарда Малтина говорится, что мисс Блэндиш «Нет орхидеям » «стремится стать голливудским фильмом-нуар и промахивается на милю». [32]
1950-е годы
Глен или Гленда (1953)
В фильме «Глен или Гленда» сыграл Эд Вуд Глена, трансвестита, который переодевается как Гленда. Вуд также снял фильм. После сна Глен проходит психотерапию, чтобы помочь ему «вылечить» его от трансвестизма .
Леонард Малтин писал, что «Глен или Гленда» Вуда были хуже, чем более поздний «План 9 из космоса» , и считал его «возможно, худшим фильмом, когда-либо созданным». [6] Жюльен Аллен из Reverse Shot также написал, что это «широко считалось злодеянием» и «самым катастрофическим провалом в исключительно плохой карьере [Вуда]». [33] Ричард Барриос охарактеризовал «Глена или Гленду» как «один из самых смешных и худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных». [34]
Робот-монстр (1953)
Робот-монстр — научно-фантастический фильм, снятый и снятый Филом Такером и первоначально снятый и показанный в 3D . Его главный герой, «мужчина в костюме гориллы, носящий что-то похожее на водолазный шлем с телевизионными антеннами», был удостоен награды «Самый нелепый монстр в истории экрана» на церемонии вручения наград Golden Turkey Awards . [35] Он также включен в список 10 худших фильмов Книги списков . [36] «Пятьдесят худших фильмов всех времен» и книга Майкла Сотера «Худшие фильмы всех времен» . [37] [35] Робот-монстр был показан в эпизоде насмешливого телешоу Mystery Science Theater 3000 . [35] а также Фестиваль консервированных фильмов . [16] Этот фильм с любовью вспоминает писатель ужасов Стивен Кинг , который цитирует и соглашается с рецензией в журнале Castle of Frankenstein («определенно один из лучших ужасных фильмов, когда-либо созданных», «один из самых смехотворных фильмов о бедности »). [38] Крис Барсанти в «Путеводителе по научно-фантастическим фильмам» пишет: «[ Робот-монстр ] называет «План 9 из космоса» худшим фильмом всех времен». [39]
Завоеватель (1956)
Говард Хьюз профинансировал «Завоеватель » эпический фильм с Джоном Уэйном в роли монгольского вождя Чингисхана и рыжеволосой Сьюзен Хейворд в роли татарской принцессы. Фильм был снят недалеко от Сент-Джорджа, штат Юта , с подветренной стороны от ядерного полигона в Неваде , и его часто обвиняют в смерти от рака многих актеров и съемочной группы, включая Хейворда, Уэйна, Агнес Мурхед , Педро Армендариса и режиссера Дика. Пауэлл . [41] Помимо съемок возле полигона, грузовики с красным песком возили обратно в студии для съемок внутренних сцен. [42] а к 1980 году у 91 из 220 (более 41%) актеров и членов съемочной группы был диагностирован рак. [43]
Фильм вошел в десятку худших в «Книге списков» . [36] появляется в фильме Майкла Саутера «Худшие фильмы всех времён » [44] и вошел в число пятидесяти худших фильмов всех времен . Кроме того, газета Aldergrove Star назвала «Завоевателя» худшим из когда-либо созданных, а Complex назвал его худшим биографическим фильмом из когда-либо созданных. [45] [46] The Guardian назвала выбор Уэйна на роль Хана - роль, изначально написанная для Марлона Брандо , - «одним из худших кастинговых решений всех времен». [43] Уэйн посетовал на эту роль, заявив: «Не выставляйте себя дураком, пытаясь играть роли, для которых вы не подходите». [42] Газета Daily Telegraph пишет: «Абсолютно по всем мыслимым показателям – финансовым, критическим, историческим, этническим и даже количеству жертв – это станет известно как одна из величайших катастроф в истории кинематографа». [42] Журнал Rolling Stone назвал этот фильм худшим решением в истории кино. [47]
Хьюз, один из самых богатых людей в мире того времени, ранее был продюсером успешных драматических фильмов « Ангелы ада» , «Лицо со шрамом» и «Преступник» . [48] После просмотра «Завоевателя » Хьюз купил все существующие копии за 12 миллионов долларов и отказался разрешать показ фильма по телевидению до 1974 года, как сообщается, из-за чувства вины за решение снимать в таком опасном месте. [49] Это был последний фильм, снятый Хьюзом. [42]
Огненные девы из космоса (1956)
«Девы огня из космоса» , малобюджетный британский фильм о космической опере (известный в США как « Девы огня из космоса »), рассказывает о группе астронавтов, посещающих женское общество на луне Юпитера . [50] Этот фильм заработал негативную репутацию из-за плохих спецэффектов (включая сцену на чужой планете, в которой виден проезжающий мимо автомобиль). [51] Лесли Холливелл охарактеризовала «Дев огня из космоса» как «сильного претендента на звание худшего фильма, когда-либо созданного, в котором прозрачно одетые английские девушки принимают смущенные позы на фоне картонных декораций». [52] Британский историк кино IQ Hunter включил его в свой список кандидатов на звание «худшего британского фильма, когда-либо созданного». [53] В обзоре веб-сайта DVD Talk говорится, что этот фильм «может быть одним из худших научно-фантастических фильмов, когда-либо созданных профессионально». [51] Пол Уэлш из Borehamwood & Elstree Times написал, что это «вероятно, худший [фильм] из когда-либо созданных». [54] В своей книге « Операция Голливуд: как Пентагон формирует и подвергает цензуре фильмы » Дэвид Л. Робб написал, что режиссер фильма Сай Рот «широко считается одним из худших режиссеров всех времен», добавив, что из трех фильмов он Сделал: «Худшим был фильм « Девы огня из космоса … который часто называют одним из десяти худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных». [55]
План 9 из космоса (1957)
фильм Эда Вуда « План 9 из космоса » Научно-фантастический об инопланетянах, воскрешающих мертвых, был назван «худшим фильмом всех времен» по версии премии Golden Turkey Awards в 1980 году. [56] Перед своей смертью Вуд снял лишь небольшое количество несвязанных между собой кадров с участием знаменитой звезды Белы Лугоши . Вуд включил отснятый материал в фильм и выбрал Тома Мэйсона на роль дублера Лугоши; Мейсон, личный знакомый Вуда, мало походил на Лугоши и играл свои сцены, держа плащ персонажа перед лицом. Хотя автор Golden Turkey Awards Майкл Медвед считает, что лучшие достижения Лугоши являются его непреходящим наследием, [57] Газета Independent перечислила и другие недостатки: « НЛО , висящее в небе, по-разному называют либо колпаком автомобиля, либо бумажной тарелкой. Актеры читают сценарии на коленях; звуковые микрофоны раскачиваются в кадре. Искусственные деревья и кладбище. надгробия раскачиваются, когда актеры проходят мимо них. Персонажи выходят на сцену в ночное время и уходят через пять минут при дневном свете... сам сюжет кажется продуктом безумия». [58]
Эмануэль Леви отмечает, что фильм был назван «воплощением фильма «настолько плохо, что это хорошо»» и стал культовым после появления на премии Golden Turkey Awards . [59] книги «Мой год провалов» Автор Натан Рабин написал: «Трудно переоценить роль, которую «План 9 из космоса» и его эксцентричный создатель сыграли в зарождении и развитии культуры плохого кино… «План 9» изначально был лучшим худшим фильмом». [56] Писатель BBC Николас Барбер написал, что «он является воплощением кинематографического ужаса. И именно поэтому он так нравится многим людям». [60] Гленн Кенни из RogerEbert.com и The Radio Times Guide to Films назвали его худшим фильмом из когда-либо созданных: [61] [62] и IGN написали: « План 9 из космоса был бесспорным лучшим худшим фильмом, когда-либо созданным за десятилетия, пока такие фильмы, как Тролль 2 и Комната , не приобрели дурную славу, и он по-прежнему является законным претендентом». [63]
Он имеет рейтинг 66% на Rotten Tomatoes на основе 38 обзоров, при этом все согласны с тем, что он «заслуженно отмечен своей ошеломляющей неумелостью». [64] Фил Холл из Film Threat утверждает, что фильм «слишком интересен, чтобы его можно было считать худшим фильмом из когда-либо созданных». [65] а Ким Ньюман заявляет: «Худшее, что можно сказать о фильме, это то, что он скучный, а «План 9 » - довольно интересный фильм». [58] Хотя Flavorwire включил его в свой список 50 худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных (заняв 50-е место), писатель Джейсон Бэйли охарактеризовал на церемонии вручения премии Golden Turkey Awards оценку этого фильма как «приклеившийся ярлык» и выразил мнение, что он не считает, что это так. даже худший фильм Вуда. [13] Точно так же Джон Вирт из «Адвоката» даже называет его «настоящим культовым фильмом». [65] а в «Полном руководстве по культовым фильмам и мусорным фотографиям» Videohound говорится: «На самом деле, фильм стал настолько известным из-за своей плохости, что теперь он не подлежит критике». [66] Барбер приписывает культовый характер «Плана 9 » тем, что в фильме есть некоторые «наполовину приличные» элементы, такие как название фильма и присутствие на экране актеров Тора Джонсона и Майлы Нурми , в то время как историк кино Родни Ф. Хилл считает фильм «манерным». , культовый шедевр» с «минималистской авангардной эстетикой». [60]
1960s
The Creeping Terror (1964)
The science-fiction/horror film The Creeping Terror was directed, produced, and edited by Vic Savage (under the pseudonym A.J. Nelson or Arthur Nelson,[67] but kept his name when credited as an actor). The movie is about a large slug-like alien that lands on Earth and terrorizes a small town in California.[68] The film is memorable for its use of some bargain-basement effects: stock footage of a rocket launch played in reverse to depict the landing of an alien spacecraft, and the "monster" appears to be composed of a length of shag carpet draped over several actors. Notably, the creature's victims inexplicably stand perfectly still as the slow-moving monster approaches them.
ComingSoon.net declared it "widely considered the worst picture ever made", calling Plan 9 From Outer Space "a bona fide magnum opus" compared to The Creeping Terror.[69] Montreal Gazette and Dread Central also report that it has a reputation as being one of the worst films ever made.[70][71] The film was featured in The Golden Turkey Awards,[72] and its follow-up book, Son of Golden Turkey Awards.[70] Mystery Science Theater 3000 featured The Creeping Terror in its sixth season and British film magazine Total Film included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made.[73][74]
A documentary directed by Pete Schuermann about the making of the film, The Creep Behind The Camera, was released in 2014.[70]
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)
The sci-fi movie Santa Claus Conquers the Martians was the creation of TV director Nicholas Webster.[76] Because Martian children only get to see Santa Claus on TV signals beamed from Earth, their parents decide to abduct Santa to make them happy. The film was criticized for its oddity and poor special effects. It is also known for starring a very young Pia Zadora.[77] BBC critic Nick Cramp described it as "possibly the worst film ever made".[78] The film is cited on a 10-worst list in The Book of Lists and in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time.[36] It has been featured in Mystery Science Theater 3000,[79] Canned Film Festival, Rifftrax and Cinematic Titanic (another spin-off of MST3K that revisited the film in 2008).[16][80][81]
The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (1964)
The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (sometimes shortened to The Incredibly Strange Creatures) is a 1964 American monster movie written and directed by Ray Dennis Steckler. Steckler also starred in the film, billed under the pseudonym "Cash Flagg". In the film, three friends visit a carnival and stumble onto a group of occultists and disfigured monsters. Produced on a $38,000 budget, much of it takes place at The Pike amusement park in Long Beach, California, which resembles Brooklyn's Coney Island. The film was billed as the first "monster musical", beating out The Horror of Party Beach by a mere month in release date. The music critic Lester Bangs wrote an appreciative 1973 essay about Incredibly Strange Creatures in which he tries to explain and justify the movie's value: "This flick doesn't just rebel against, or even disregard, standards of taste and art. In the universe inhabited by The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, such things as standards and responsibility have never been heard of. It is this lunar purity which largely imparts to the film its classic stature. Like Beyond the Valley of the Dolls and a very few others, it will remain as an artifact in years to come to which scholars and searchers for truth can turn and say, 'This was trash!'"[82] The 2004 DVD The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made listed this film as the worst film of all time.[83] Time Out and Flavorwire included it on their respective worst film lists.[84][13]
Monster a Go-Go! (1965)
Monster a Go-Go! began as Terror at Halfday by Bill Rebane. The production ran out of money and the film was abandoned. Herschell Gordon Lewis, who reportedly needed a second feature to comprise a double bill, purchased and completed it for a minimal amount of money. Several of the film's actors were unable to return, so Lewis simply replaced their parts with new characters who mysteriously appear and fill the roles of the missing characters. One of the actors Lewis managed to rehire had gained weight, gone bald, and grown a goatee, so Lewis recast him as the brother of the original character.[85] The picture consists mostly of lengthy dialogue sequences concerning the apparent mutation of an astronaut into a monster portrayed by the 231-cm-tall (7 ft 6¾ in) Henry Hite. Poor audio quality makes much of the dialogue unintelligible, and when the film is overexposed, several characters' faces appear as bright white, glowing circles. During the climax of the movie, as soldiers prepare to confront the mutated astronaut, he abruptly vanishes and the narrator informs the audience, "there was no monster", and that the astronaut has, in fact, been in the Atlantic Ocean the entire time. All Movie Guide calls the film a "surreal anti-masterpiece".[86] It was also featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000, where writer Paul Chaplin called the dialogue "garbled beyond recognition".[87] The entire cast of the show later stated it was officially the worst movie they had ever seen.[88]
Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)
The low-budget horror film Manos: The Hands of Fate, made by El Paso insurance and fertilizer salesman Hal P. Warren,[89] concerns a vacationing family kidnapped by a polygamous cult of pagans. The film was conceived after Warren bet Academy Award-winning screenwriter Stirling Silliphant[90] that anyone could make a horror movie.[91] Warren was convinced by the film's cinematographer and stunt coordinator that most of its glaring mistakes could be fixed in a Dallas post-production studio, when in reality the two wanted to quickly wrap the production because they were not being paid.[91] Several technical gaffes made it into the film, including scenes filmed out of focus, a marking slate being seen in one shot, the scarf on the female lead's head disappearing and reappearing, and an insect bumping the camera lens.[91][92] The film was shot with a camera that could not record sound and had a 32-second maximum shot length. All dialogue was later dubbed by Warren and four others, including a grown woman who dubbed the voice for a seven-year-old girl.[92][93] It opens with a nine-minute driving scene that the filmmakers intended to use for cast and crew credits, but failed to do so.[93]
The movie includes dialogue spoken while all characters are facing away from the camera, a character complaining about it getting dark while the sun is brightly shining, and the character Torgo, a satyr with overly large thighs, that three women attempt to massage to death.[91][93][94] The film gained notoriety and cult popularity by being featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000,[95] and was the show's most popular episode.[91] The film has a rare 0% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes,[96] and Entertainment Weekly says the movie is "widely regarded as, quite simply, the worst movie ever made".[91] Even Warren himself would later admit his film was one of the worst ever, suggesting it might make a passable comedy if redubbed.[97] The film was later restored[98] and released on Blu-ray in 2015.[99][100]
A Place for Lovers (1968)
A Place for Lovers is a French-Italian romantic film directed by Vittorio De Sica (a filmmaker known for acclaimed neorealist works, such as Umberto D and The Bicycle Thieves), starring Faye Dunaway as a terminally ill American fashion designer in Venice, Italy, and Marcello Mastroianni as a race car driver who has a whirlwind affair with her. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times called it the "most godawful piece of pseudo-romantic slop I've ever seen!"[101] and Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times referred to it as "the worst movie I have seen all year and possibly since 1926".[102] Leonard Maltin noted Ebert's comments in his review, and offered that the film was "low points for all concerned".[6] A Place for Lovers was included as one of the choices in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time, and Vanity Fair listed it as one of the 20 worst movies ever made.[5]
They Saved Hitler's Brain (1968)
They Saved Hitler's Brain is a science fiction film directed by David Bradley.[103] It was adapted for TV from a shorter 1963 theatrical feature film, Madmen of Mandoras, and was lengthened by about 20 minutes with additional footage shot by UCLA students at the request of the distributor. In the film, Adolf Hitler's head was severed from his body at the end of World War II and the head plans to rule over a new Third Reich from South America. It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on five reviews from critics, with an average rating of 1.3/10.[104] TV Guide called it "One of the all-time worst",[104] while Danny Peary said it was "A legitimate candidate for Worst Film Ever Made title."[105] In 1979, it won the World's Worst Film Festival in Ottawa, Canada, which reportedly delighted Bradley.[106] It has been featured in The Golden Turkey Awards and Canned Film Festival,[16] and has been spoofed on The Simpsons multiple times.[106]
1970s
Bat Pussy (circa 1973)
A loose spoof of the 1966 Batman television series cited as one of the earliest examples of a pornographic parody film, the presumably-1970s pornographic film Bat Pussy has been described as the worst pornographic film ever made due to "some incredibly unarousing sex and a general attitude of awfulness".[107][108] Possessing no credits or copyright information, there is no known record of Bat Pussy's existence prior to the mid-1990s, when it was discovered in the storeroom of an adult movie theater in Memphis, Tennessee, and subsequently released on home video by exploitation film distributor Something Weird Video. Gawker Media's io9 proclaimed the film to be "the absolute nadir of pornography, period. Not just Batman-themed pornography. ALL pornography", deriding its "obese redneck" cast as rendering the film "wank-proof".[109] PornParody.com, a website dedicated to the genre, acknowledged its status as "the worst adult movie of all time", describing Bat Pussy as "renowned for its technical ineptness and anti-eroticism" due to its "physically unappealing" actors.[110] AV Maniacs contested Bat Pussy's categorization as pornography on the grounds of the lead actor's visible erectile dysfunction and instead labeled the film "anti-porn", asking "How else do you categorize an adult film that completely and utterly fails to elicit even the minutest amount of arousal in its viewers?"[111] The book The Many More Lives of Batman by William Uricchio and Will Brooker also labeled Bat Pussy "the worst porn film ever made", criticizing its poor adaptation of the source material.[112]
Myra Breckinridge (1970)
The 1970 comedy film Myra Breckinridge, based on the book of the same name by Gore Vidal, directed by Michael Sarne and starring Raquel Welch, Rex Reed, Mae West, John Huston and Farrah Fawcett,[113] provoked controversy due to a scene in which Welch forcibly sodomizes a bound man while clips from various classic films play onscreen. The film was initially rated X before edits and an appeal to the MPAA brought it down to an R. It also used the technique of inserting clips from Golden Age movies in such a way that the dialogue took on sexual undertones. The film was a critical failure, with Time magazine saying, "Myra Breckinridge is about as funny as a child molester."[114] Leonard Maltin gave it a BOMB (the lowest score possible) and stated that it was "as bad as any movie ever made".[6] The Miami News critic Herb Kelly nominated Myra Breckinridge as the worst film ever made.[115] It was also included in The Book of Lists' worst movies of all time, which claimed that there was something in it to offend absolutely everyone.[36] Likewise, The Fifty Worst Films of All Time and Vanity Fair also listed it as one of the worst movies ever made.[5] Gore Vidal disowned it, calling it "an awful joke",[116] and blamed the movie for a decade-long drought in the sale of the original book.[117]
Zaat (1971)
Directed by Don Barton,[118] Zaat was also known under various titles including Hydra, Attack of the Swamp Creatures, Legend of the Zaat Monster, and The Blood Waters of Dr. Z (the name under which it was lampooned on Mystery Science Theater 3000). The film follows a Nazi mad scientist who injects himself with a formula that turns him into a mutated catfish. Florida Times-Union critic Matt Soergel quipped that Zaat "could very well be the best film ever made about a mutated catfish".[119] Critic Jeffrey Kauffman said, "this is the sort of film Ed Wood, Jr. might have made—on a bad day" and added, "Lovers of fantastically bad films rate Zaat one of the worst".[120] Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "The acting in Zaat is below subpar. Actors seem to be whispering their lines and trying hard not to fully comprehend that they're in one of the worst films ever made", while Michael Rubino of DVD Verdict also claimed, "Zaat may be one of the worst films ever created".[121][122] NPR called it a "sci-fi fiasco" when it became "the winner — er, loser —" on IMDb's Bottom 100.[123] Zaat appeared on Mystery Science Theater 3000, which gave it significant exposure,[124] and was also featured on RedLetterMedia's show Half in the Bag where the hosts called it one of their favorite "so bad it's good" films.[125] Total Film included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.[73]
An American Hippie in Israel (1972)
The 1972 Israeli film An American Hippie in Israel is about an American hippie traveling to Israel after being involved with the Vietnam War, befriending Israeli flower children, and encountering "menacing" mimes along the way. The film was presumed lost, but after resurfacing 38 years after its production, it became a "midnight sensation" in Tel Aviv and developed a cult following[126] akin to The Rocky Horror Picture Show. It was then released internationally on home video by Grindhouse Releasing. Gil Shefler of The Jewish Daily Forward described it as "perfectly awful", offering that it "probably is the worst Israeli movie ever made, and a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time".[127] Its description as "a serious candidate for the worst movie of all time" was echoed by Josh Olson in IndieWire.[128] Ben Hartman of The Jerusalem Post stated the film was "surely one of the worst films ever made in Israel, or beyond".[129] Nana 10 said it claims the title of "worst Israeli film and most amusing".[130]
At Long Last Love (theatrical version, 1975)
At Long Last Love was renowned director Peter Bogdanovich's musical homage to great 1930s Hollywood musicals. It features songs by Cole Porter and stars Cybill Shepherd and Burt Reynolds. Film Threat wrote that it received "the most withering reviews any film ever received", while The Guardian reported that it was "savaged by critics at the time and viewed as one of the worst films ever".[131][132] Richard Brody of The New Yorker compared it to the later critical failures of Heaven's Gate and Ishtar, writing: "critics of the time heaven's-gated [At Long Last Love], leaving Bogdanovich ishtarred and feathered".[133] Such reviews included Hollis Alpert's, in which he said that "This failure is so dismal that it goes beyond failure",[134] and Esquire critic John Simon's, who said that "it may be the worst movie musical of this – or any – decade".[135] Meanwhile, Buffalo News film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time."[136] Bogdanovich, who was also the screenwriter, sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for the film.[137]
CNN later noted that it had attained a legacy as being "the worst musical extravaganza in Hollywood history",[138] and Jay Cocks has said the film was "regarded as the great white elephant catastrophe of its time".[137] Lester J. Keyser wrote that it was "justly included on most lists of the ten worst films ever made",[139] as it was included in Michael Sauter's The Worst Films of All Time, The Golden Turkey Awards and Vanity Fair's worst film list.[140][141][5]
Bogdanovich lamented being influenced by studio previews to cut the film before its theatrical release. Unbeknownst to Bogdanovich, a studio editor who preferred the director's first cut constructed his own based on the test screening version that he once had access to. This version subsequently aired on cable TV and streamed on Netflix in place of the theatrical cut. When news of this reached Bogdanovich, he contacted Fox and made a few finishing touches, resulting in a better received director's cut that debuted on home video in 2013.[142][138]
Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977)
Exorcist II: The Heretic is the sequel to William Friedkin's Oscar-winning 1973 film, this time directed by John Boorman. Friedkin opted not to return to direct the sequel and The Daily Telegraph states that Boorman "hated the original" and intended The Heretic to be an "antidote ... to wash away the evil of Friedkin's film."[143] Set four years after the first film, Linda Blair reprised her role as Regan MacNeil, who is revealed to have healing powers, and Richard Burton stars as Father Philip Lamont, who believes that the demon Pazuzu targets those with healing abilities.[144] Blair agreed to return for the sequel as long as she did not have to wear the possession make-up from the first film, leading to the use of an unconvincing stand-in, while Burton read his lines off cue cards.[143] Despite his character dying in the original film, Max von Sydow returned for flashback sequences set in Africa, where Lamont flies to on the back of a locust.[143]
The Daily Telegraph notes that some consider it the worst film ever made.[143] British film critic Mark Kermode called the original film his favorite film of all time but he believes the sequel to be the worst film ever made, stating: "This is a film that trashes a work of art. It's like someone deciding to do a Mona Lisa 2, but with a moustache."[144] The Golden Turkey Awards named it the second-worst film ever made, after Plan 9 from Outer Space and it also appeared in The Official Razzie Movie Guide. The A.V. Club listed it as the worst sequel of all time and critic Bill Chambers stated it was "Possibly the worst film ever made and surely the worst sequel ever made."[145][146] Friedkin believed the sequel diminished the value of the original film and called it "the worst piece of shit I've ever seen" and "a fucking disgrace."[147][148] Eventually, the film garnered so much hate that Boorman disowned it. In an interview with Bob McCabe for the book The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows, he confessed, "The sin I committed was not giving the audience what it wanted in terms of horror."[149] A third installment into the Exorcist franchise, The Exorcist III: Legion, was released in 1990 and ignored this film, with author Nat Segaloff writing that, "The first rule of Exorcist III is: you do not talk about Exorcist II."[143]
The Swarm (1978)
The Swarm is a 1978 horror film about a killer bee invasion of Texas, directed and produced by Irwin Allen. Despite its all-star cast (including Michael Caine, Henry Fonda, Richard Widmark and Olivia de Havilland), it was a box-office failure and was excoriated by reviewers.[150] On its UK release, The Sunday Times described The Swarm as "simply the worst film ever made".[151] Leslie Halliwell described it as a "very obvious disaster movie with risible dialogue".[150] The Guardian article on The Swarm stated, "You could pass it all off as a sick joke, except it cost twelve million dollars, twenty-two million bees, and several years of someone's life."[150] Barry Took, reviewing it for Punch, stated, "the story is of a banality matched only by the woodenness of the acting".[150] Time Out magazine called The Swarm a "risibly inadequate disaster movie".[152] The Swarm is included in several "worst movie" books, including the Medved brothers' The Golden Turkey Awards,[153] and The Official Razzie Movie Guide.[154] It soon gained a cult status (enough so that Warner Archive released the extended version on Blu-ray).[155][156]
I Spit on Your Grave (1978)
I Spit on Your Grave became controversial for its graphic violence and lengthy depictions of gang rape.[157] It was initially unable to find a distributor until 1980 when it received a wider release. Luke Y. Thompson of the New Times stated, "Defenders of the film have argued that it's actually pro-woman, due to the fact that the female lead wins in the end, which is sort of like saying that cockfights are pro-rooster because there's always one left standing".[158] Critic David Keyes named I Spit on Your Grave the worst film of the 1980s and James Livingston wrote in The World Turned Inside Out that it was "a terrifically bad movie".[159][158] Scott Tobias of The A.V. Club called it "one of the era's most abhorrent pieces of exploitation trash"[160] and Patrick Naugle of DVD Verdict stated, "It's one of the most soulless, vile, and morally reprehensible things I've ever had to sit through."[161] Roger Ebert gave the film no stars, referring to it as "A vile bag of garbage ... without a shred of artistic distinction," adding, "Attending it was one of the most depressing experiences of my life"[162] and considered it the worst movie ever made.[163][164] Gene Siskel also considered it one of the worst films ever made.[165] Film Racket featured it as their first entry in to their "Worst Movie Ever?" series,[166] while Vanity Fair and Flavorwire included it in their worst film lists.[5][13] Despite the intense negative reception from some critics, the film has a 53% rating on Rotten Tomatoes,[158] with IGN critic R.L. Shaffer arguing that whether the film is repulsive and exploitative or ingenious depends on what the viewer wants from the movie: "Admittedly, I Spit on Your Grave is a gruesome, deplorable little exploitation picture that, on the surface, seems to enjoy its rape sequences just as much, if not more, than the vengeance-filled finale. But on a more subtle level, the film is a surprisingly well-executed revenge story that plays like a brutally raw nerve – a terrifyingly stark view of the real horror of rape, painted by bizarre, skewed cinematography, gory violence, and a keen sense of creeping atmosphere and dread."[167]
Caligula (1979)
The 1979 erotic/historical drama Caligula, directed by Tinto Brass about the infamous Roman Emperor Caligula, was in part financed by Penthouse founder Bob Guccione. The film, featuring a prestigious cast (Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O'Toole, and John Gielgud) has explicit scenes of sex and violence, including six minutes of hardcore porn footage filmed by Guccione and another editor. Caligula earned some pre-release controversy after Gore Vidal, who had written the script, distanced himself from the film,[168] and actress Maria Schneider, who objected to the nude scenes, walked off the set and was replaced with then-unknown Teresa Ann Savoy.[169] Upon its release, Vidal stated that it was "easily one of the worst films ever made".[169]
Caligula also received strongly hostile reviews from critics, who denounced its extreme scenes of sex and violence and lack of narrative coherence.[170] Roger Ebert gave Caligula a zero-star rating, dubbing it "sickening, utterly worthless, shameful trash", accusing it of being artistically vulgar in its depiction of sex and violence, and of having technically incompetent direction and structure.[170] It was one of the few films Ebert ever walked out on (two hours into its 170-minute running time), after describing himself as feeling "disgusted and unspeakably depressed".[170][171] Ebert also placed it on his "Most Hated" list and Michael Sauter selected it for The Worst Movies of All Time.[172][173] Australian newspaper The Age stated that Caligula was being "billed by critics everywhere as one of the worst films ever made".[174] The Hamilton Spectator later referred to Caligula as "possibly the worst movie ever made".[175] Joe Holleman, in an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch discussing historical films set in Ancient Rome, argued, "two of the worst movies made in the 20th century were ancient Rome pieces ... Cleopatra and Caligula".[176] Christopher Armstead, reviewing Caligula for the website Film Critics United, stated, "Dollar for dollar, this could very well be the worst movie ever made."[177] In 2011, Sean Bell of PopMatters wrote of its enduring legacy: "in the same way much of our attention-deficit civilisation may go through life vaguely aware that Citizen Kane is a masterpiece without ever seeing it, ... we know that Caligula is awful, usually without ever finding out for ourselves."[178]
1980s
Heaven's Gate (theatrical version, 1980)
The Western epic Heaven's Gate, loosely based on the Johnson County War in 1890s Wyoming, was plagued by massive cost and time overruns, largely due to director Michael Cimino's extreme attention to detail. He demanded 50 takes of at least one scene and refused to start shooting for another until a cloud he liked rolled across the sky. It cost over $44 million, but brought in only $3.5 million at the box office.[179] The original version ran at nearly four hours, but was pulled from release after only one week due to scathing reviews. It later resurfaced in a 149-minute version, but by then the damage was done. The film effectively ended not only the existence of United Artists as an independent Hollywood studio (its parent firm sold the company to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, where it operated until 2019), but also, largely, Cimino's career; initially considered a director on the rise after directing The Deer Hunter (which won five Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director), his reputation never recovered after Heaven's Gate.[47] The production is also notorious for the cruelty to animals that occurred both on screen and on site, including deliberately killing a horse with explosives.[180] The controversies surrounding Heaven's Gate's failure are credited for having a role in ending the "auteur period" of the 1970s, with studios subsequently taking control back from directors.[47]
Vincent Canby called it "an unqualified disaster", among other things. Roger Ebert called it "the most scandalous cinematic waste I've ever seen".[181] After word of his grandiose spending and defiant nature toward studio United Artists got out (detailed in Final Cut by Steven Bach, a studio executive involved with the film from the beginning),[182] Cimino was awarded the 1980 Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director, and the film was nominated for four more Razzies, including Worst Picture.[183] In 1999, Time placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century, and Rolling Stone ranked it as one of the worst decisions in movie history.[184][47] In 2008, Joe Queenan of The Guardian called it the worst film ever made, saying that it "defies belief".[185] Readers of film magazine Empire later voted Heaven's Gate the sixth-worst film of all time, and Vanity Fair included it in its list of the worst films ever made.[186][5]
Despite the vicious reviews, the film's reputation improved over time.[187][188][189] In fall of 2012, the New York Film Festival, the venue for its infamous opening, premiered the restored director's cut. In stark contrast, The Times called the restored version "a modern masterpiece" and its 1980 cut "one of the greatest injustices of cinematic history".[190] The film has also been released on Blu-ray and DVD by the Criterion Collection.[191] Manohla Dargis of The New York Times said that the film "has been called a disaster and a disgrace, yet also anointed a masterpiece."[192]
The Apple (1980)
The Apple (also called Star Rock) is a 1980 science fiction musical comedy film written and directed by Menahem Golan.[193] It stars Catherine Mary Stewart as a young singer named Bibi, who, in a futuristic 1994, signs to an evil label named Boogalow International Music. It deals with themes of conformity versus rebellion, and makes use of Biblical allegory, including that of Adam and Eve and the rapture.[194]
Common criticism from both reviews that appeared in trade publications and major news outlets and the audience were a lack of originality,[195] a weak script,[195] uninspired music,[195] poor execution,[195] and Golan's inexperienced take on the 1960s hippie movement.[196] During the 1980 Montreal World Film Festival, some members of the audience threw vinyl records of music from the film at the screen.[196] At the 1980 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, the film received seven nominations (including Worst Picture) and won two awards: Worst Director (Golan) and Least "Special" Special Effects.[197] Stinkers co-founder Mike Lancaster later selected The Apple as the worst film he had ever seen.[198] The Saturday Evening Post listed it as the worst movie musical ever,[199] and critic Tim Brayton described it as "A completely unadulterated bundle of the worst of cinema all spun up into one ball of madness. It cannot be described, and it can barely be experienced."[200] Sean Burns in Philadelphia Weekly wrote: "The Apple isn't just the worst disco musical ever made; it could very well be the worst movie ever made, period."[201] The Apple was included in Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column, where critic Kenneth Lowe described it as "without a doubt the most cringe-inducing, the most mortifying, the absolutely most embarrassing feature we've ever watched."[202] It has also been covered by the How Did This Get Made? podcast and Flavorwire's Bad Movie Night column and Mental Floss listed it as one of the "Ten Really Bad Movies that Define 'Bad Movies'".[196][194][203]
Inchon (1981)
The war film Inchon, directed by Terence Young and starring Laurence Olivier as General Douglas MacArthur,[204] was meant to depict the Battle of Inchon during the Korean War. Producer Mitsuharu Ishii was a senior member of the Japanese branch of the Unification Church, whose leader, Sun Myung Moon,[205] claimed he had the film made to show MacArthur's spirituality and connection to God and the Japanese people.[206] Its eventual production cost of $46 million resulted in a $5 million box-office gross, and The New York Times review written by Vincent Canby calls the movie "the most expensive B-movie ever".[207] The Washington Post described Inchon as "one of the biggest commercial disasters in film history".[208] Every conceivable kind of problem plagued production, including labor issues, the U.S. military withdrawing support due to the film's Unification Church connection, weather and natural disasters, customs difficulties, expensive directorial blunders, and the original director (Andrew McLaglen) quitting before the start of production. Olivier's performance was criticized, and he was awarded the 1982 Golden Raspberry award for Worst Actor.[209] The film itself took the 1982 Razzies for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and Young's direction earned him a tie for Worst Director of 1982. A number of reviewers at various media outlets described Inchon as the worst film ever made, including The Washington Post,[210] Newsweek,[211] TV Guide,[212] and the Canadian Press.[213] Inchon was later profiled in multiple books on worst in film, including The Hollywood Hall of Shame by Harry and Michael Medved,[214] and The Worst Movies of All Time by Michael Sauter.[215] To date, Inchon has never been released on home video in the United States although it was aired on the church's Good Life TV Network.
Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981)
The adventure film Tarzan, the Ape Man, loosely based on the novel Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs, stars Miles O'Keeffe (who would later star in the 1982 Conan the Barbarian knock-off Ator the Invincible, which alongside its sequel featured in two episodes of the TV series Mystery Science Theater 3000) in the title role and Bo Derek as his partner Jane Parker, and is told from Jane's point of view. Despite being a box-office success, critics poorly received it upon its release due to its poor screenplay, bad acting, and unintentional humor. Leonard Maltin, writing for his Movie Guide, stated that the film "lacks action, humor and charm", and considered it so bad that it "nearly forced editors of this book to devise a rating lower than BOMB".[6] Leslie Halliwell was equally harsh; he described Tarzan, the Ape Man as "certainly the worst of the Tarzan movies and possibly the banalest film so far made; even the animals give poor performances".[216] Writer Thomas S. Hischak described it thus: "Produced and directed without a shred of talent by John Derek, Tarzan, the Ape Man often ranks high in the lists of the worst movies ever made."[217] Film critic John Nesbit considered it "my pick for worst film ever",[218] while Matt Brunson of Creative Loafing wrote, "this cinematic atrocity truly is one of the all-time worsts".[219] Tarzan, the Ape Man was nominated for six awards at the 2nd Golden Raspberry Awards, winning one for Worst Actress (Bo Derek). It holds a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 20 reviews.[220]
Mommie Dearest (1981)
Mommie Dearest, directed by Frank Perry,[222] was based on the memoir of the same name by Christina Crawford, about her upbringing by Joan Crawford.[223][224][225] It was the first film to sweep the Golden Raspberry Awards nominations, winning a total of five Razzies out of the nine nominations, including "Worst Picture" and Worst Actress (Faye Dunaway, shared with Bo Derek).[226] The same organization also named it "Worst Picture of the Decade" in 1989/90, and was nominated for "Worst Drama of Our First 25 Years" in 2004/05.[227] The film is part of the "100 most awful" in The Official Razzie Movie Guide and Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time.[228][229][230] It earned, as film critic and TV host Richard Crouse put it, "some of the nastiest reviews ever".[231] Eric Henderson of CBS Minneapolis named it at the top of his "Best 'Worst Movies Ever'" list.[232] Roger Ebert wrote of this film, "I can't imagine who would want to subject themselves to this movie. 'Mommie Dearest' is a painful experience that drones on endlessly, as Joan Crawford's relationship with her daughter, Christina, disintegrates from cruelty through jealousy into pathos."[233] Of the performance of Faye Dunaway, Variety said "Dunaway does not chew scenery. Dunaway starts neatly at each corner of the set in every scene and swallows it whole, co-stars and all."[234] Vanity Fair and Rotten Tomatoes subsequently included Mommie Dearest on their worst film lists.[5][4]
Despite the reviews at the time,[235] the film was a box-office success, grossing $39 million worldwide on a $5 million budget. It has a 50% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 46 reviews. The site's consensus reads, "Mommie Dearest certainly doesn't lack for conviction, and neither does Faye Dunaway's legendary performance as a wire-wielding monster; unfortunately, the movie is too campy and undisciplined to transcend guilty pleasure".[236]
Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam (The Man Who Saves the World) (1982)
The Turkish science-fiction adventure Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam (also commonly known as Turkish Star Wars) was directed by Çetin İnanç and starred Cüneyt Arkın. It is notorious for illegally using footage from well-known science fiction films and shows, most notably Star Wars, along with stealing the music score from films such as Moonraker and Raiders of the Lost Ark. The film is also criticized for its nonsensical plot, badly written dialogue, and crude special effects.[237][238] It is also a fantasy martial arts film, heavily influenced by 1970s Hong Kong martial arts films from Golden Harvest.[239]
Jos Kirps of ArticlesBase called it "The Worst Movie Ever", and stated, "There are many bad sci-fi movies, and for many years movie addicts even considered Ed Wood's Plan 9 From Outer Space the worst movie of all times. But Plan 9 is still a pretty good movie when compared to Dünyayi Kurtaran Adam."[240] Sabah called it the "world's worst film".[241] Hürriyet described the film as "sitting on the throne of the king" when compared to other "so bad it's good" cult films.[242] Toronto Standard called it a "dollar-store Star Wars" and compared it to the works of Ed Wood.[243] When it became apparent that the film had inspired an enthusiastic international cult, a sequel, The Son of the Man Who Saved the World (Dünyayı Kurtaran Adam'ın Oğlu), was shot in 2006 and featured many returning members of the original cast and crew.[244] The film was included on Time Out's 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.[84]
Howard the Duck (1986)
Directed by Willard Huyck, written by Huyck and Gloria Katz, and produced by George Lucas, it is based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name. Howard the Duck received overwhelmingly negative reviews from film critics. Orange Coast Magazine writer Marc Weinberg and Leonard Maltin criticized the decision to shoot the film in live action.[245][246] The appearance of Howard was criticized as being unconvincing due to his poorly functioning mouth and expressionless face. Reviewers also criticized the acting and humor and found the film boring.[247][248] Dave Kehr of the Chicago Tribune said the movie's "crude, often embarrassing, sex jokes" seemed "out of place" with the more innocent aspects of the film.[249] Jay Carr of The Boston Globe claimed that "They Don't Get Much Worse Than Howard",[250] Glenn Heath Jr. of Slant Magazine wrote that it "has a rightful place in the canon of worst films ever",[251] and TV Guide states it is "one of the worst big-budget movies ever made".[252]
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a score of 15% based on 48 reviews, making it the lowest-rated Lucasfilm production of those reviewed on the site. The site's consensus states: "While it has its moments, Howard the Duck suffers from an uneven tone and mediocre performances."[253] It received seven Golden Raspberry Award nominations in 1987 including Worst Supporting Actor (Tim Robbins), Worst Director (Willard Huyck) and Worst Original Song ("Howard the Duck"). It won four trophies for Worst Screenplay, Worst New Star ("the six guys and gals in the duck suit"), Worst Visual Effects, and Worst Picture, tied with Under the Cherry Moon.[254] The movie also won a Stinkers Bad Movie Awards for Worst Picture.[255]
It was featured in Empire's poll of the 50 worst films ever made,[186] and Screen Rant and Vanity Fair have included it on their worst film lists.[256][5] The negative reaction to the film took its toll on the cast, who found themselves unable to work on other projects as a result.[257]
Over time, the film has remained a source of fascination and developed "a small, but loyal fanbase."[258][259][260] Howard the Duck has appeared in several Marvel Cinematic Universe movies and series beginning in 2014's Guardians of the Galaxy, in which he was voiced by Seth Green.[261][262]
Ishtar (1987)
Ishtar was written and directed by Elaine May[264] and starred Oscar-winning duo Warren Beatty and Dustin Hoffman as an ode to the Road to... film series featuring Bing Crosby and Bob Hope. Beatty and Hoffman star as Rogers and Clarke, two untalented lounge singers who travel to Morocco in hopes of finding a gig.[265] Due to unanticipated problems with filming in the desert—which resulted in numerous reshoots—the film ran over budget by $30 million. While its final budget cost was $55 million, Ishtar earned only $14,375,181 at the North American box office, leading Ishtar to become synonymous with "box-office flop". It was also subject to harsh reviews from critics. The film was nominated for Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay in the 8th Golden Raspberry Awards, winning one for Worst Director. The San Jose Mercury News claimed that "Time has not improved this film's reputation as being one of the worst ever made."[266] Time Out suggested it was "so bad it could have been deliberate", and called it "one of the worst films ever made",[267] while Ed Morrissey referred to it as "The Citizen Kane of big-budget, A-list vehicular homicides."[268] It was included in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time book, Rotten Tomatoes placed it amongst "25 Moves So Bad They're Unmissable" and Richard Roeper included it on his list of the 40 worst films he had seen.[269][270][4] In 1999, Time placed the film on a list of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century.[184]
The film has since become a cult classic.[271] Ishtar has seen a minor critical re-evaluation from some critics like Richard Brody,[265] and directors Quentin Tarantino, Edgar Wright, and Martin Scorsese have praised it in interviews.[272] Gary Larson, who initially lampooned the movie in The Far Side, said he regrets writing that cartoon because he based it solely on Ishtar's reputation, and that he enjoyed the film when he later watched it. To date it is the only cartoon he has publicly admitted to regretting.[273] Defenders argue that the studio did not back May, resulting in a public relations disaster before it was released in theaters.[263] Joe Queenan compared the film to another comedy film considered the worst, Gigli, and wrote that although it was considered one of the worst films ever made at the time of its release, it "has several comic moments" and does not get worse on subsequent viewings, unlike Gigli.[185]
Leonard Part 6 (1987)
Leonard Part 6, starring (as well as written and produced by) Bill Cosby, was intended as a parody of spy movies. Leonard Parker, a former CIA spy, is brought out of retirement to save the world from an evil vegetarian who brainwashes animals to kill people. Rita Kempley at The Washington Post noted the large number of Coca-Cola product placements and said "The only good thing about Bill Cosby's Leonard Part 6 is that we didn't have to see Parts 1 through 5."[275] Scott Weinberg at DVD Talk noted the film as "truly one of the worst movies you'll ever see ... movies this bad should be handled with Teflon gloves and a pair of tongs".[276] By 1990, Dennis King of the Tulsa World wrote that the film had "become synonymous with 'bomb.'"[277] Total Film and Vanity Fair subsequently included Leonard Part 6 on their respective worst film lists.[73][5] Cosby himself disowned the film, and when it was released to theaters he publicly advised people not to see it. It earned Golden Raspberrys for Worst Actor (Cosby), Worst Picture, and Worst Screenplay. It was also nominated for two more Razzie Awards, for Worst Supporting Actress and Worst Director.[278] Cosby became the first person to accept a Golden Raspberry Award,[279] and said "It was the worst movie I ever made – the worst movie anyone ever made".[280]
Nukie (1987)
Nukie is a 1987 South African film directed by Sias Odendaal (credited as Sias Odendal) and Michael Pakleppa, and starring Steve Railsback, Ronald France, and Glynis Johns. The plot concerns an alien, Nukie, who crash lands on Earth and seeks help from two children to reunite with his brother, Miko, who has been captured by the United States government. The film is considered to be a knock-off of Steven Spielberg's 1982 film E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Witney Seibold of /Film writes that "Nukie is only remarkable for how undeniably terrible it is", noting that it appears on lists of the worst films ever made.[281] Comic Book Resources note that it is "regarded as one of the worst movies ever made",[282] with critic Brad Jones selecting Nukie as the worst film he has ever seen,[283] and Red Letter Media calling it "Possibly one of the worst films ever made."[284] Total Film write that it is considered by some to be the "most painful movie ever made";[285] they listed Nukie the worst kids movie ever made and one of the worst science-fiction films ever made.[285][286] The film's co-director, Michael Pakleppa, referred to Nukie as "the most wrong-gone thing [he had] ever done in [his] life" and feared that the final product was "the worst film on Earth."[287]
The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987)
The Garbage Pail Kids Movie is a 1987 live-action adaptation of the then-popular trading card series of the same name, itself a gross-out parody of the then-popular Cabbage Patch Kids dolls co-created by Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Art Spiegelman. The film is often criticized for its gross-out humor, nonsensical plot, poor explanations, bad acting, and the unsettling appearance of the Garbage Pail Kids (the title characters are depicted by dwarf actors in low-budget costumes, with poorly functioning mouths and expressionless faces). It has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.[288] On Metacritic, the film holds a score of 1, making it tied for the lowest scoring film on the site.[289] Caryn James of The New York Times said the movie is "too repulsive for children or adults of any age" and is "enough to make you believe in strict and faraway boarding schools".[290] Carlos Coto of the Sun-Sentinel called it "one of the worst ever made".[291] Internet critic Doug Walker, best known for the series Nostalgia Critic, stated that it was not only the worst film he had ever reviewed as the Nostalgia Critic, but the worst movie he had ever seen overall, deeming that the film served to undermine its own moral.[292]
Much of the film's content is said to be inappropriate for children, its intended audience. Throughout the movie, the Garbage Pail Kids steal, get in fights, bite toes off people, flatulate in people's faces, threaten others with switchblades, urinate upon themselves, and run over cars. In addition to scatological behavior, the movie has several scenes that feature sexual images, violence, and drinking. Offended parents launched a nationwide protest of the movie that successfully resulted in the movie being withdrawn from circulation.[293] The shortened release contributed to the movie's poor gross of only $1,576,615.[294] It was nominated for three Razzies at the 8th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Visual Effects, Worst New Star for the Garbage Pail Kids collectively, and Worst Original Song.
Hobgoblins (1988)
Hobgoblins, by Rick Sloane, is widely considered a low-budget knock-off that capitalizes on the popularity of the 1984 film Gremlins.[295] It gained popularity in 1998 after being featured on an episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000. MST3K writer Paul Chaplin later commented on Hobgoblins, saying, "Oh, man. You have no idea the torture it was to watch this movie several times in the space of a week. It shoots right to the top of the list of the worst movies we've ever done." Specific points of the film that were lampooned were the extreme misogyny and atrocious treatment of women; the film's technical incompetence and repetitive scenes; its asinine, poorly conceived plot; its dreadful acting; and its ugly look and gratuitous vulgarity, particularly in regards to its characters and subject matter.[296] David Cornelius of DVD Talk stated, "There's not one aspect of this movie that isn't the Worst Thing Ever."[297] After seeing the MST3K episode himself, Sloane was inspired to direct a sequel, which was released in 2009.[298]
Mac and Me (1988)
Mac and Me is about a young boy in a wheelchair who meets and befriends an alien who has crash-landed on Earth. A box-office failure,[299] the film grossed $6,424,112 in the United States[300] on a $13 million budget.[301] It used to have a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, whose critical consensus notes that it is "duly infamous" as both an imitation of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), and a marketing vehicle for McDonald's and Coca-Cola[302] (the filmmakers had admitted a profit-sharing arrangement with the former).[303] Leonard Maltin described the film as being "more like a TV commercial than a movie",[6] and Marjorie Baumgarten of the Austin Chronicle called it a "shameless E.T. knockoff".[302] Mac and Me is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made,[304][305] with The Telegraph reporting that it is "frequently pulled out in 'worst film of all time' arguments".[306] Filmmaker Morgan Spurlock (responsible for the 2004 Oscar-nominated Super Size Me) declared it the "worst thing you'll ever see in your entire life", as well as the most egregious example of product placement in cinema history.[307] The film was also named the worst ever in the San Francisco Chronicle,[308] as well as by broadcaster Simon Mayo[309] and writer/producer Damon Lindelof.[310] Michael Hayden of GQ India referred to it as "hands down the worst family movie in Hollywood history".[311] The film was nominated for four Razzie Awards including Worst Picture and Worst Screenplay, and won two trophies: Worst Director for Stewart Raffill (tied with Blake Edwards for Sunset) and Worst New Star for Ronald McDonald in a cameo. Mac and Me has however gained a cult following and was featured on the second season of the Mystery Science Theater 3000 revival (the only Razzie-winning film ever to be riffed in the history of the show).[312][313][314][315]
Things (1989)
Things, a 1989 Canadian low budget, independent, horror exploitation film, was written and produced by Andrew Jordan & Barry J. Gillis. It cost approximately $35,000 in total to make[316] and marked the mainstream film debut of porn star Amber Lynn. It was ostensibly made as homage to horror icons and films, such as George A. Romero and his Night of the Living Dead franchise.[317] Adam Symchuk of Screen Rant writes: "While films like The Room and Birdemic seem to be constant contenders for the best 'so bad it's good' movie, [Things] is the true unheralded champion among many cinephiles."[318] Likewise, Jeff Kirschner of Dread Central nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Will Pfeifer opined that "It's so terrible I can't think of another movie that even comes close."[319][320] In 2022, RiffTrax concluded that Things was the worst movie that they had ever spoofed.[321]
1990s
Troll 2 (1990)
Despite its title, Troll 2 does not feature any trolls (the antagonists are actually goblins) and has no relation to the original 1986 film, which was also poorly reviewed (Troll 2 was produced under the title "Goblins", but the title was changed by American distributors).[322] NPR reports that it is "known as the worst movie of all time"[323] while The A.V. Club calls it "a popular candidate for the worst film ever made".[324] Rumsey Taylor of Not Coming to a Theater Near You opined that it was "one of the worst films I've ever seen".[325] Ken Hanke of Mountain Xpress gave it one-half star out of five, and stated in his review, "There are movies that are bad. There are movies that are so-bad-they're-good. And then there's Troll 2—a movie that's so bad that it defies comprehension."[326] In addition, TV Guide proclaimed that "Troll 2 is really as bad as they come."[327] Nearly twenty years after its release, the movie's child star, Michael Stephenson, made a documentary about its production and fanbase titled Best Worst Movie, released to critical success in 2009.[328] The bad acting and dialogue have become notorious for their camp value; the scene in which the character Arnold (portrayed by Darren Ewing) yells that he will be eaten next has become an Internet meme.[329]
Highlander II: The Quickening (theatrical version, 1991)
The French-British film Highlander II: The Quickening is a sequel to the 1986 cult film Highlander, which transitions the fantasy of the original film into science fiction, and retcons the mystical warriors of the first film into aliens. It received a harsh reception from both critics and audiences, as it has a 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes and appears on its 100 Worst Movies of All Time.[330] Common criticisms included the lack of motivation for the characters, blatant disregard for backstory from the first film (such as the new and seemingly incongruent origin for the Immortals and the unexplained resurrection of Ramirez), glaring plot holes, a messy and nonsensical story structure, the filmmaker's inability to balance unrelated plots and subplots, and obvious contradictions in the film's internal logic.[331] In selecting it as the worst movie sequel of all time, Comic Book Resources also wrote that "it is typically considered one of the worst films of all time."[332] Roger Ebert named it the worst film of 1991, stating: "If there is a planet somewhere whose civilization is based on the worst movies of all time, Highlander 2: The Quickening deserves a sacred place among their most treasured artifacts."[333] An IGN review said: "How bad is this movie? Well, imagine if Ed Wood were alive today, and someone gave him a multi-million dollar budget. See his imagination running rampant, bringing in aliens from outer space with immensely powerful firearms, immortals who bring each other back to life by calling out their names, epic duels on flying skateboards, and a blatant disregard for anything logical or previously established—now you are starting to get closer to the vision of Highlander II."[334] Screen Rant has since included it on its list of the 25 worst films of all time.[256]
In 1995, the film's director Russell Mulcahy made a director's cut version known as Highlander 2: Renegade Version and then later released another version simply known as Highlander 2: The Special Edition for its 2004 DVD release. The film was reconstructed on both occasions largely from existing material, with certain scenes removed and others added back in, and the entire sequence of events changed. The reconstructed film's reception was far better than the original's; it was elevated to a mixed reception.[335]
Super Mario Bros. (1993)
The first feature-length live-action film based on a video game, Super Mario Bros. was directed by the husband-and-wife team of Rocky Morton and Annabel Jankel (known for their work on Max Headroom). It follows the brothers Mario (Bob Hoskins) and Luigi (John Leguizamo), plumbers who venture into a parallel universe to rescue Princess Daisy (Samantha Mathis) from the villainous King Koopa (Dennis Hopper). The Super Mario series' publisher, Nintendo, believed the Mario franchise was strong enough for experimentation and gave the filmmakers free creative license.[336] The finished film bears little resemblance to the games,[63] trading their colorful Mushroom Kingdom for a dystopic world populated by humanoid dinosaurs.[336][337] SyFy Wire wrote: "Some movies are so bad that they're secretly good. Super Mario Bros. is so bad it crushes your spirit. It's unfathomably terrible."[338] The film was criticized for its inconsistent tone, complex narrative, and lack of faithfulness to the source material.[339][340] According to Variety, Super Mario Bros. is a mainstay on lists compiling the worst films of all time.[341] It was voted the sixth worst film of all time by RiffTrax in 2012,[337] and IGN ranked it among the "best worst movies ever made" in 2021.[63] Author David Bodanis, in his 2020 book The Art of Fairness, called Super Mario Bros. "the worst movie ever made".[342]
In addition to scathing reviews, Super Mario Bros. was a box-office bomb, and Morton and Jankel were "blacklisted" as directors in Hollywood.[338] In a 2007 interview, Hoskins said: "The worst thing I ever did? Super Mario Bros. It was a fuckin' nightmare. The whole experience was a nightmare. It had a husband-and-wife team directing, whose arrogance had been mistaken for talent. After so many weeks their own agent told them to get off the set! Fuckin' nightmare. Fuckin' idiots."[343] In a 2011 interview, he was asked, "What is the worst job you've done?", "What has been your biggest disappointment?", and "If you could edit your past, what would you change?" His answer to all three was Super Mario Bros.[344] The film made Nintendo wary of licensing its works to film studios,[345] and it did not license Mario again until it collaborated with Illumination for The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023).[338][40] Seth Rogen, who voiced Donkey Kong in the 2023 film, called Super Mario Bros. one of the worst films ever made and what "made me realize that movies, like, could be bad. That never occurred to me until that moment."[346]
North (1994)
The Rob Reiner film North is an adaptation of the novel North: The Tale of a 9-Year-Old Boy Who Becomes a Free Agent and Travels the World in Search of the Perfect Parents by Alan Zweibel, who also wrote the screenplay and has a minor role in the film. North, which stars Elijah Wood in the title role and also marked Scarlett Johansson's film debut, was a critical and commercial failure, earning only $7,138,449 worldwide despite its budget of over $40 million. It was widely criticized for its plot, its all-star cast of insensitive characters, lack of humor and portrayal of numerous ethnic stereotypes (especially Alaskan Inuit). It has a 14% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes.[347] Roger Ebert gave it zero stars and, in his review, infamously wrote, "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it."[348][349] He continued saying "North is a bad film – one of the worst movies ever made",[350] and it is also on his list of most hated films.[172] Both Ebert and Gene Siskel named North as the worst film of 1994.[351] Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle said in his review that "North is director Rob Reiner's first flat-out failure, a sincerely wrought, energetically made picture that all the same crashes on takeoff. It's strange and oddly distasteful, at its best managing to be bad in some original and unexpected ways."[352] Richard Roeper named North as one of the 40 worst movies he has ever seen, saying that, "Of all the films on this list, North may be the most difficult to watch from start to finish."[270] The film was nominated for the following awards at the 15th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Actor (Bruce Willis, also for Color of Night), Worst Supporting Actress (Kathy Bates), Worst Supporting Actor (Dan Aykroyd, also for Exit to Eden), Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay (Andrew Scheinman and Alan Zweibel).
Dis – en historie om kjærlighet (A Story About Love) (1995)
The Norwegian romantic film Dis – en historie om kjærlighet was directed by Aune Sand. The film follows different couples and their love stories around the world, in Cairo, Normandy, Oslo and New York City. Dis received universally poor reviews by critics, and has been called the most poorly reviewed Norwegian film in history.[353][354] Critic Harald Kolstad of Dagsavisen gave it a score of zero, refused to acknowledge Dis as a film, and claimed to have never seen anything worse.[355] Aftenposten referred to the film as "the largest turkey" and "the most reviled film",[354] and Total Film included it on its list of the 66 worst films ever made.[73] Despite being a critical disaster it became a commercial success, gaining cult film status with a following akin to The Rocky Horror Picture Show, with fans embracing its "so bad it's good" qualities.[354] Director Aune Sand insists that Dis is a masterpiece.[356]
Showgirls (1995)
Hype for Paul Verhoeven's erotic drama Showgirls focused on the sex and nudity in this NC-17 French-American film with a $45 million budget, but the final result was critically derided. Much hype revolved around the film's star, Elizabeth Berkley, who only two years before had starred in the lighthearted and chaste teen sitcom Saved by the Bell. The film won seven Razzie Awards, a record at that time, and received 13 nominations, a record that still stands. It received an additional award at the 20th Golden Raspberry Awards, where it was awarded Worst Picture of the Decade. Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times called it, "a film of thunderous oafishness that gives adult subject matter the kind of bad name it does not need or deserve".[358] Michael Dequina of TheMovieReport.com also criticized the film, claiming that it was "the best bad filmmaking Hollywood has to offer".[359] Adam White wrote in The Independent that it was "the worst movie ever made" but also a masterpiece.[360] Stephen Lynch of the Knight Ridder/Tribune similarly named it the worst movie ever made, calling it "so bad it may be brilliant".[361] Various sources have since included Showgirls in their respective lists of the worst films ever made, including: Rotten Tomatoes, Empire, Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, and Flavorwire.[13][256][5][4][186] Showgirls was also featured in Michael Sauter's The Worst Movies of All Time as well as The Official Razzie Movie Guide. Despite being a critical failure and failing at the box office initially, Showgirls found success as a camp cult film, particularly among the LGBT community, but whether the film was intended to be satirical remains subject to debate.[360] On the home video market, the film was MGM's most profitable release for years.[360]
The Scarlet Letter (1995)
A "freely adapted" version of the 1850 romantic novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne, directed by Roland Joffé and starring Demi Moore and Gary Oldman.[362] The film met with universally negative reviews[363] and was a box-office bomb, grossing $10.4 million against a production budget of $46 million.[364] Multiple critics named the film the worst of 1995.[365][366][367]
Chris Hicks of the Deseret News argued that its deviation from the source material represents "Hollywood's arrogance in its purest form".[365] The Washington Post's Amy E. Schwartz reported that the "nutty" film was described by numerous reviewers as the worst they had ever seen.[368] Kevin Williamson of National Review observed a "combination of awfulness and inexplicability", and claimed that "any objective and authoritative analysis will reveal that the worst film ever made is Demi Moore's version of The Scarlet Letter".[369] Sadie Trombetta of Bustle wrote that it "has earned an almost permanent spot on every 'Worst Movie of All Time' list",[370] while author Libby Fischer Hellmann noted that it is "widely cited as the worst film adaptation ever made".[371] The film was nominated for seven Golden Raspberry Awards, winning "Worst Remake or Sequel". Furthermore, Roger Ebert placed the film on his "most hated" list.[172]
Bio-Dome (1996)
The 1996 comedy film Bio-Dome focuses on two moronic stoner best friends, played by Pauly Shore and Stephen Baldwin, who accidentally get trapped inside of the Bio-Dome owned by Henry Gibson, a hermetically sealed ecological system, after mistaking it for a mall while looking for a bathroom.
For MTV News, Eric Snider wrote in 2008 that "nothing can account for...the movie Bio-Dome, which is–and I do not make this assertion lightly–the worst crime ever perpetrated against humanity throughout all of recorded history". Snider went on to call it "quite bad" and "certainly one of the worst comedies" he had ever seen, criticizing Pauly Shore's performance as unfunny and the film's writing as stupid.[372] Syfy Wire's Cassidy Ward described Bio-Dome as "one of the best-worst movies of all time", stating that its plot "strains credulity", while Jon O'Brien of Inverse called it "one of the worst movies ever made" and wrote that it "has nothing to offer but unconvincing pratfalls...tumbleweed one-liners...and some unashamed sexism, too".[373][374] It was described as "almost unwatchably awful" and "a baffling piece of work" by Charles Bramesco of Uproxx, who wrote that it was a "perennial contender in the battle for the title of Worst Movie Ever".[375] The A.V. Club's Nathan Rabin wrote, "Critics and audiences alike found the Bio-Dome to be an abomination unto the Lord, an affront to the gods of cinema, and also a very bad movie, bad enough to be considered the gold standard of crapitude in Shore's oeuvre," noting that it had the lowest Metacritic score of any movie, with 1 out of 100.[376] Bio-Dome was named one of the worst movies of the 1990s in a poll conducted by RiffTrax.[377]
Kylie Minogue, who starred in the film as oceanographer Petra von Kant, called appearing in the film the worst decision of her career.[374] For his performance in the movie, Shore won the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor at the 17th Golden Raspberry Awards, tying with Tom Arnold for his performance in Big Bully.[378]
Batman & Robin (1997)
Batman & Robin is a superhero film based on the DC character Batman and is the fourth and final installment of the Burton/Schumacher Batman film series. It is directed by Joel Schumacher and stars George Clooney as Batman/Bruce Wayne, Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Freeze, Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy, Chris O'Donnell as Robin/Dick Grayson, Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl/Barbara Wilson and Michael Gough as Alfred Pennyworth. This film was largely criticized for its toyetic and camp approach, and Mr. Freeze's approach and one-line jokes.
As of June 2017[update], review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that 11% of critics have given the film a positive review based on 89 reviews, certifying it "Rotten" with an average rating of 3.7/10, and the critics' consensus: "Joel Schumacher's tongue-in-cheek attitude hits an unbearable limit in Batman & Robin, resulting in a frantic and mindless movie that's too jokey to care much for."[379] By comparison Metacritic collected an average score of 28/100, based on 21 reviews.[380] Michael J. Nelson, of Mystery Science Theater 3000 fame, wrote of the movie in his book, Movie Megacheese, "Batman & Robin is not the worst movie ever. No, indeed. It's the worst thing ever. Yes, it's the single worst thing that we as human beings have ever produced in recorded history."[381] Batman & Robin also came in first in an Empire poll of the 50 worst films ever.[186] Joel Schumacher apologized to disappointed fans on the 2005 DVD release of Batman & Robin.[382] In 2021, Clooney stated that he refused to let his wife watch the film, saying, "There are certain films I just go, 'I want my wife to have some respect for me'".[383] Clooney however would reprise his role as Bruce Wayne from the film in 2023's The Flash.[384]
Le Jour et la Nuit (The Day and the Night) (1997)
The French romance film Le Jour et la Nuit was directed by philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy. It follows a French author who fled to Mexico for a quiet life and an actress who is willing to seduce him to get a part in a film adapted from one of his books. Before its release, Le Jour et la Nuit was heavily promoted in many French newspapers and magazines.[385] When the film premiered at the Berlin International Film Festival in 1997, hundreds of journalists walked out of the screening and those that stayed ridiculed it.[386] Following its release, Le Jour et la Nuit was harshly criticized by the French media, with overwhelmingly negative reviews appearing in publications such as Libération, Le Monde and Le Nouvel Observateur.[385] L'Humanité called it an "Absolute debacle" and Michel Houellebecq referred to it as the "most preposterous film in history".[387][388] The film also did poorly commercially, with only 73,147 seats for Le Jour et la Nuit having been sold two months after its release.[385] Le Jour et la Nuit was considered the worst French film since 1945 by film magazine Cahiers du cinéma, and its status as the "worst film in history" was discussed by the French version of Slate.[389] Likewise, English-language film site /Film described its status as "one of the worst foreign language movies ever made", and filmmaker Claude Chabrol selected it as one of the worst movies ever made.[390][391] An original documentary, Anatomy of a Massacre, was released with the Le Jour et la Nuit DVD, and focused on its intense negative reception and failure.[392]
The Avengers (1998)
An adaptation of the popular 1960s British TV series of the same name, The Avengers starred Ralph Fiennes as John Steed and Uma Thurman as Emma Peel, with Sean Connery as their antagonist, Sir August de Wynter. It was directed by Jeremiah S. Chechik. The Avengers began to receive negative publicity after Warner Bros., the film's distributor, refused to allow any early press-screenings for movie reviewers.[393] After early test screenings, The Avengers was heavily edited by the studio.[394] On its release, The Avengers was savaged by film critics, with the Birmingham Post stating "The Avengers is being slated by critics as the worst film ever made" and adding that one reviewer had joked the film was such a "turkey" that the makers should have handed distribution to the poultry chain Bernard Matthews.[395] Several reviewers disparaged The Avengers for lacking the wit and excitement of its source material.[396][397] Janet Maslin strongly criticized The Avengers: "With pseudo-suave repartee that would make Austin Powers blush and with so many shades of Howard the Duck that one scene depicts man-size pastel teddy bears sitting around a conference table, it's a film to gall fans of the old TV series and perplex anyone else. I can't remember another Friday morning show where I heard actual cries of "Ugh!" on the way out the door" and finished her review with, "At a pared-down, barely rational 100 minutes, The Avengers is short but not short enough."[394]
David Bianculli said, "This Avengers film is so horrendously, painfully and thoroughly awful, it gives other cinematic clunkers like Ishtar and Howard the Duck a good name."[397] Alan Jones in The Radio Times stated "The cult 1960s TV series gets royally shafted by Hollywood in this stunningly designed blockbuster that's stunningly awful in every other department ... Terrible special effects and zero chemistry between Fiennes and Thurman make this notorious disaster a total waste of everyone's time and energy."[396] The Avengers also shared a Razzie Award for "Worst Remake or Sequel" with the 1998 adaptations of Psycho and Godzilla at the 19th Golden Raspberry Awards. Total Film magazine later voted Fiennes and Thurman in The Avengers as "The Worst Movie Double Act Of All Time".[398] The film also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.[289]
Fatal Deviation (1998)
Fatal Deviation is often credited as being the first martial arts film to be filmed in Ireland. It stars martial artist James Bennett and Michael Graham, who is best known for being a member of the boy band Boyzone. The Irish Post and Den of Geek write that it is a mainstay of worst film lists.[399][400] Luke McKinney of Cracked.com called it the worst film ever made, writing: "There are so many things about making a movie that Jimmy doesn't know, that you could replace film school with this movie alone--just screening it once for students and asking them to list all the things it did wrong. Anyone who doesn't write 'everything' instantly fails."[401] The Irish Post named it the worst Irish film of all time,[399] the Irish Independent wrote that it is "regarded as one of the worst films ever made" and Comic Book Resources called it " one of the worst commercial movies ever made".[402][403] Entertainment.ie placed it on its list of "10 So Bad They're Good Movies You Need To See Before You Die" and it was covered in Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column.[404][405]
Parting Shots (1999)
The British black comedy Parting Shots was the last film directed by Michael Winner. It starred rock musician Chris Rea as a man who, after being told he has only six months to live, begins murdering people who have wronged him. Andrew Collins took a very negative view of the film: "Parting Shots ... is going to set the course of British film-making back 20 years. It is not only the worst British film produced in this country since Carry On Emmannuelle (quite a feat in itself), it is a thoroughbred contender for the crown of Worst Film Ever Made."[406] In an interview about the film, Charlotte O'Sullivan, the Independent's film editor, claimed Parting Shots was "the worst film I've ever seen". O'Sullivan also criticized it for glorifying vigilantism: "It's Michael Winner and you know, he doesn't have any sense of irony. He seems to be saying it is okay to go and kill people."[407] The journalist Miles Kington later claimed "Parting Shots ... was directed by Michael Winner and despite the glittering cast, was possibly the worst film ever made."[408] I. Q. Hunter listed Parting Shots as one of the candidates for "the Worst British film ever made".[53] Parting Shots was also featured in a poll of Empire magazine readers' "50 Worst Movies Ever" poll.[186]
The Underground Comedy Movie (1999)
The Underground Comedy Movie is based on a cable access show from 1988. Director and lead actor Vince Offer constructed the film out of a series of tasteless, lowbrow skits (including Gena Lee Nolin loudly using the restroom and a superhero named Dickman who dresses in a giant penis costume and defeats his enemies by squirting them with semen). In 1999, Offer filed a suit against 20th Century Fox and the co-directors of There's Something About Mary (1998), Bobby and Peter Farrelly, claiming that 14 scenes in Mary were stolen from his film.[409] The Farrellys released this statement: "We've never heard of him, we've never heard of his movie, and it's all a bunch of baloney."[410] Lawrence Van Gelder of The New York Times referred to it as a "wretched film" and stated that "The Underground Comedy Movie stands as a monument to ineptitude and self-delusion."[411] Rod Dreher of the New York Post said it "may be the least amusing comedy ever made".[412] Dave Shulman of L.A. Weekly described it as a "serious contender for the single worst movie ever made",[413] while Stinkers Bad Movie Awards co-founder Mike Lancaster said that it was the worst film that he had ever paid to see.[198] Nathan Rabin covered the film in his column detailing terrible films and stated that: "nothing I've covered for this column was quite as soul-crushingly, brain-meltingly terrible as ... The Underground Comedy Movie."[414] Thom Bennett at Film Journal International, wrote "Anyone offended by unbearably bad films, jokes that are not funny and wasting 90 minutes of their lives is, as promised, guaranteed to be offended. In fact, to even call this mess a comedy is giving it far too much credit", and "The Underground Comedy Movie may well be the worst film I have ever seen."[415] Writing in Central Western Daily, Peter Young said, "I am pretty sure that I can declare this The Worst Film I Have Ever Seen."[416]
2000s
Battlefield Earth (2000)
Battlefield Earth is based on the first half of L. Ron Hubbard's novel of the same name, and stars John Travolta, Barry Pepper and Forest Whitaker. Although a sequel covering the second half of the book was planned, the panning from critics, poor box-office performance, and financial ruin of Franchise Pictures killed off such plans. It was criticized for a poor script, hammy acting, overuse of Dutch angles, repetitive dialogue, and several inconsistencies and plot holes. The movie's producer, Franchise Pictures, was later forced out of business after it emerged that it had fraudulently overstated the film's budget by $31 million. It has a 3% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,[417] where it is included in the top 100 worst-reviewed movies of all time.[330][418] Roger Ebert predicted that the film, "for decades to come will be the punch line of jokes about bad movies".[419] Ebert also wrote, "The director, Roger Christian, has learned from better films that directors sometimes tilt their cameras, but he has not learned why".[419] It is also on his "most hated" list.[172] Nathan Rabin covered the film as part of his My World of Flops column for The A.V. Club, calling it "a fiasco that occupies a distinguished place high atop the pantheon of widely reviled crap" and said, "A legendary disaster well before it finished completion, Battlefield Earth hit theaters with a "Kick Me" sign on it so massive it could be detected from outer space."[420]
It won seven Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture and Worst Screen Couple (John Travolta and "anyone on the screen with him"). In 2005, an eighth Razzie (for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years) was awarded to the film,[421][better source needed] and in 2010 it won a ninth Razzie at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for Worst Picture of the Decade.[422] Listing the film as one of the worst decisions in movie history, Rolling Stone quipped that, "If Earth sticks around long enough for the Golden Raspberry Awards to hand out a “worst movie of the century" at their 2100 ceremony, it'll probably win that, too."[47] It won more Razzies than any film in the history of the awards at the time,[423] until Jack and Jill surpassed its record with 10 wins in 2012.[424]
The movie appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,[289] and is on the Movie Review Query Engine's (MRQE) 50 Worst Movies list,[425] as well as worst film lists from Screen Rant, Vanity Fair, Flavorwire, Digital Trends and the New York Daily News.[13][256][5][426][427] Empire named it the second worst movie ever made after Batman & Robin and The Register listed it as the worst movie ever made.[186][428] Pepper and Whitaker both expressed regret for their involvement in Battlefield Earth, while film screenwriter J. David Shapiro later apologized for making "the suckiest movie ever".[429][428]
Titanic: The Legend Goes On (2000)
Titanic: The Legend Goes On (also known as Titanic, mille e una storia, Titanic: La leggenda continua and Titanic: The Animated Movie) is an Italian animated mockbuster about the sinking of the RMS Titanic. It features a similar romantic storyline to James Cameron's 1997 Titanic film, but also has a number of talking animals (most notably, a rapping dog).[430] Reviews condemned the quality of the animation and criticized the plot for being insensitive to the memory of the victims of the Titanic.[430]
Total Film named Titanic: The Legend Goes On as "officially the worst film ever made", after it topped a list of the 66 worst films ever.[73] An article from Collider also described it as one of the worst films ever made, but notes that it "[lacks] the cult following that other bad films often acquire," stating: "Titanic: The Legend Goes On is too heinous for such fond pleasures."[431] Critic Tim Brayton said that "It is one of the most surreally bad films I have ever encountered", adding: "For sheer mesmerising grotesqueness, there's almost nothing I can name that beats it, and no fan of bad movies can say that their life is complete till they've been exposed to it."[432][433] Total Film also included the film on a list of the worst kids' movies, describing it as being "widely considered one of the worst animated films ever made",[285] while Spanish film magazine Fotogramas selected it as one of the 20 worst films ever made.[434] Screen Rant included it on a list of the 12 worst animated films of all time, and it topped a Showbiz Cheat Sheet list of the top 10 worst animated films ever, with author Will Roberts commenting that "[any] list of the worst animated films of all time begins with ... Titanic: The Legend Goes On".[430][435] In 2012, Titanic: The Legend Goes On became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's Bottom 100 list.[436]
Freddy Got Fingered (2001)
The comedy film Freddy Got Fingered stars Tom Green, who also wrote and directed it, featuring largely gross-out and shock humor similar to that featured in The Tom Green Show. In the film, Green stars as a 28-year-old slacker and cartoonist who falsely accuses his father of child molestation when he questions his son's life goals. Freddy Got Fingered received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with CNN critic Paul Clinton declaring it "quite simply the worst movie ever released by a major studio in Hollywood history."[437] Warren Epstein of The Gazette described Freddy Got Fingered as "the worst movie ever made".[438] A review in The Washington Post said: "If ever a movie testified to the utter creative bankruptcy of the Hollywood film industry, it is the abomination known as Freddy Got Fingered."[439] Roger Ebert included the film on his "most hated" list,[172] gave it zero out of four stars and wrote: "This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels."[440]
Freddy Got Fingered was nominated for eight awards at the 2001 Razzies, and won for Worst Picture, Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay, and Worst On-Screen Couple.[441][442] Razzies founder John J. B. Wilson called it "offensive, stupid and obnoxious" and said it had "no redeeming value".[441] Green accepted his awards in person, traveling to the ceremony in a white Cadillac, wearing a tuxedo and rolling out his own red carpet to the presentation. The movie has an 11% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.[443] In 2010, the film was nominated at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for Worst Picture of the Decade,[422] though it lost to Battlefield Earth.[444] Freddy Got Fingered also appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,[289] was featured in Empire's list of the 50 Worst Movies Ever poll,[186] and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.[425]
Glitter (2001)
Starring Mariah Carey[447] in the lead role as an aspiring singer in 1980s New York City, the romantic musical drama Glitter was intended to be her breakthrough role but was a critical failure and a box-office bomb. Hindustan Times claimed that Glitter "was slammed by almost all critics for being the worst film ever".[448] Fade In stated that "Glitter isn't just one of the worst music-themed films ever — it's one of the worst films ever made, period."[449] Author Bob McCann wrote in Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television that it's "rightfully in the running as one of the worst films ever made".[450] News.com.au,[451] Hi,[452] Flavorwire,[13] Screen Rant,[256] Vanity Fair,[5] Metacritic,[289] and Empire are amongst those who have listed it as one of the worst films ever made.[186]
Glitter received six Razzie nominations, and Carey won for Worst Actress.[453] It was also featured in The Official Razzie Movie Guide, and in 2005, it was nominated for "Worst Musical of Our First 25 Years", but lost to From Justin to Kelly. In an interview in 2010, Carey stated that she believed that the film's failure at the box office was largely due to the soundtrack being released the same day as the September 11 attacks.[454] It has a 6% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 87 reviews.[455]
Swept Away (2002)
A remake of a 1974 Italian film of the same name, the romantic comedy film Swept Away was directed by Guy Ritchie and starred his then-wife Madonna and Adriano Giannini. It received overwhelmingly negative reviews, with most of the criticism going towards Madonna's bad acting, the original film being considered superior and the remake being considered just a star vehicle for Madonna.[457] Rex Reed of The New York Observer said: "If there is one thing worse than a Guy Ritchie movie, it's a Guy Ritchie movie with Madonna in it."[458] Newsday critic John Anderson said, "New ways of describing badness need to be invented to describe exactly how bad it is."[459] Joe Queenan of The Guardian discussed the movie in an article on what makes a movie the worst of all time and said, "[...] Showgirls has a certain campy allure that grows a bit each time I see it. Madonna's Swept Away doesn't; it seems more amateurish on each viewing, like a morass that starts out as a quagmire, then morphs into a cesspool and finally turns into a slime pit on the road to its ultimate destination in the bowels of Hell."[185] Julie Burchill, also from The Guardian, selected it as her pick for the worst film ever made.[144]
Swept Away was also a box-office bomb; against a $10 million budget, it grossed $598,645 in the United States and around $437,875 from foreign territories for a worldwide total gross of $1,036,520.[460] It received five awards at the 23rd Golden Raspberry Awards and became the first film to win both Worst Picture and Worst Remake or Sequel. At the 25th Golden Raspberry Awards, it was nominated for Worst "Drama" of Our First 25 Years, and at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards, it was nominated for Worst Picture of the Decade, but 'lost' to Battlefield Earth at both ceremonies. Empire ranked it #20 in its list of "The 50 Worst Movies Ever",[186] and After Ellen ranked it #7 in its list of "The worst movies ever to grace the screen".[461]
The Master of Disguise (2002)
The comedy film The Master of Disguise was produced in part by Adam Sandler and stars Dana Carvey as Pistachio Disguisey, an undercover Italian waiter who must save his father Fabbrizio (James Brolin) from the evil Devlin Bowman (Brent Spiner) by using his inherent skills in disguise. Although the film was a box office success, it received scathing reviews from critics upon its release, many of which pointed out its sophomoric plot, unfunny humor (in particular, its flatulence gags) and disguises that would clearly not be recognized by children (such as Tony Montana from Scarface). Many critics also pointed out the short running time, consisting of 72 minutes of the film itself and over ten minutes of end credits juxtaposed with outtakes (including two post credit scenes, the first of which consists of Pistachio and a diminutive actor from earlier in the film asking why the audience was still watching before saying goodbye; rather hypocritically, it would not even be the final scene, even with two fade-to-blacks at the end of it). Roger Ebert gave it one star out of four, claiming, "The movie is a desperate miscalculation. It gives poor Dana Carvey nothing to do that is really funny, and then expects us to laugh because he acts so goofy all the time."[462] Alan Morrison, writing for Empire, proclaimed that The Master of Disguise was "the worst film ever made: a film about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots",[186] while Matthew Turner of ViewLondon remarked, "This is a serious contender for the title of The Worst Film Ever Made."[463] The film holds a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 104 reviews,[464] and is featured on the site's list of the top 100 worst-reviewed films of all time.[330] It also appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,[289] and is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.[425] A cameo appearance by Bo Derek landed her a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the 23rd Golden Raspberry Awards, but she lost to Madonna for Die Another Day.
Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002)
The action film Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever stars Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu as opposing secret agents. Critics panned it, generally regarding it as having no redeeming features, not even the unintentional comedic value normally associated with bad films. They variously described the film as "A picture for idiots", "Boring to an amazing degree", "A fine achievement in stupidity and dullness", "Dreadful", "[Giving] new meaning to the word incoherent", and "bad on just about every level". One critic suggested an alternative title as "Simplistic: Bullets Vs. Humans".[465]
Stephen Hunter of The Washington Post wrote, "You could run this film backward, soundtrack included, and it would make no less sense."[466] Roger Ebert called the movie "a chaotic mess, overloaded with special effects and explosions, light on continuity, sanity and coherence."[467] In addition to being lambasted by critics, it was a disaster financially, recouping just over $19.9 million of its $70 million budget. In March 2007, Rotten Tomatoes ranked it #1 among "The Worst of the Worst" movie list, with 108 "rotten" reviews and no "fresh" ones.[468] Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever remains the worst reviewed film on Rotten Tomatoes, as it is at the top of their 100 Worst Films of All time list.[330] Mental Floss has also nominated it as the worst movie ever made and Ebert included it in his "most hated" list.[469][172]
Ben and Arthur (2002)
A low-budget 2002 American romantic drama film about the titular gay couple who come into conflict with Arthur's religious brother, Ben and Arthur was written, directed, produced, edited, and scored by Sam Mraovich, who also played the character Arthur. Ben and Arthur received strong criticism (especially from the LGBT community) for its low budget and poor plotting. BuzzFeed described it as the "worst gay movie of all time".[470] The gay popular culture site Queerty described Ben and Arthur as "unintelligible" and ended its review by calling it the "Worst. Movie. Ever."[471] The gay movie review site Cinemaqueer likewise stated: "Ben and Arthur is so terrible that it has awoken the dormant Bette Davis in me. It is so painfully bad that it wouldn't even make good fodder on Mystery Science Theater 3000. This just might possibly be the worst movie I have ever seen ... Unless you get a kick out of mocking bad films, avoid this one at all costs."[472] Michael Adams, reviewing the film for his book Showgirls, Teen Wolves, and Astro Zombies, describes it thus: "Ben & Arthur is as over-the-top insane as it is ludicrously executed ... the production values, from biscuits on plates comprising the main course of a candlelit dinner to a church literally having a cardboard cross and a cartoon Jesus on the wall, are as bad as anything I've seen."[473] A Rotten Tomatoes article placed Ben and Arthur on their list of "Films So Bad They're Unmissable", saying "If Tommy Wiseau's The Room is the over-wrought, melodramatic and self-pitying heterosexual camp classic of choice, then Sam Mraovich's Ben & Arthur is its gay equivalent." Rotten Tomatoes also stated "Every scene, every line, every hissy fit is simultaneously hilariously amateur and hysterically fever-pitched."[4] Total Film ranked Ben and Arthur at No. 58 in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.[73] Mraovich finds Ben and Arthur's placement among the canon of worst films to be a blessing as the film has received more attention than he ever anticipated.[470]
From Justin to Kelly (2003)
The romantic-comedy musical From Justin to Kelly stars Kelly Clarkson and Justin Guarini,[474] the winner and runner-up, respectively, of the first season of American Idol. The film was a critical and commercial disaster, earning only $4.9 million at the North American box office and achieving a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 63 reviews.[475] Josh Tyrangiel of Time Magazine described From Justin to Kelly as "a monstrous Idol movie musical that in the most generous light is the worst film so far this century",[476] while The Free Lance–Star referred to it as "the world's worst movie".[477] Nathan Rabin, reviewing the film for his "My Year of Flops" series, stated, "All films require suspension of disbelief. From Justin To Kelly requires something more like a temporary lobotomy. Nothing about the main characters or their relationships makes sense."[478] It won a special Razzie—"Governor's Award – Distinguished Under-Achievement in Choreography"—at the 24th Golden Raspberry Awards.[479] It was nominated for eight additional Razzies (including a second special award, "Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie"), and a year later it won for Worst "Musical" of Our First 25 Years. Total Film, Screen Rant and Digital Trends included From Justin to Kelly on their worst film lists.[426][256][73] In a later interview, Clarkson expressed regret over From Justin to Kelly, stating she only did it because she was contractually obligated to do so: "I knew when I read the script it was going to be real, real bad, but when I won, I signed that piece of paper, and I could not get out of it."[476]
The Room (2003)
The independently produced The Room, about an amiable banker whose friends betray him one by one, has been called "the Citizen Kane of bad movies" by some critics.[480][481][482] The Guardian, Vox, The Washington Post, ABC Australia and Süddeutsche Zeitung called it the worst film ever made.[483][484][485][486][487] Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of The A.V. Club called it "the greatest bad movie of our time" and said, "The Room is nearly an anti-film—an inane and unintentionally surreal soap opera, filled with non-sequiturs, confused characters, and gratuitous, anatomically incorrect sex."[488] Though the film's star, writer, producer, and director Tommy Wiseau has claimed it is a black comedy and its numerous flaws are intentional, other actors involved in the production have denied this, saying that Wiseau intended it as a melodramatic romance.[489]
The Room has been noted for its bizarre and non-sequiturial dialogue, protracted sex scenes, various subplots that are inadequately resolved or simply disappear altogether (most notably, a character announces that she has been diagnosed with breast cancer, but this is never mentioned again throughout the entire film), and infamous use of green-screen for "outdoor" rooftop scenes. It made its broadcast premiere as an April Fools' Day special in 2009 on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim block, edited down from its original R rating to a TV-14/DSLV rating; it would prove so popular the network continued to air the film on April 1 as a tradition for several years, to the point the 2012 prank for the network consisted of playing the first few minutes before suddenly cutting off for an unannounced one-night revival of their Toonami block, with block host T.O.M first greeting the audience as Wiseau's character does, declaring "Oh, hai, Adult Swim". The day after its appearance, its DVD became the top-selling independent film on Amazon.com. In June 2010, The Room started playing at the American Film Institute Silver Theatre in Silver Spring, Maryland.[490] Mystery Science Theater 3000 alumni Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through their site RiffTrax.com. In 2013, the book The Disaster Artist, written by Greg Sestero and Tom Bissell, was published; the book is Sestero's memoir of his involvement in the production of the movie. The book was adapted into an Oscar-nominated film[491][492] of the same name, directed by and starring James Franco as Wiseau (winning a Best Actor Golden Globe Award for his performance)[493][494] and his brother Dave Franco as Sestero. A remake starring Bob Odenkirk was set to be released in June 2023 to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the film's release, but was delayed.
Gigli (2003)
The Martin Brest movie Gigli features Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck, with appearances by Al Pacino and Christopher Walken.[495] Gigli was originally a black comedy with no romantic subplot, but the producers demanded script rewrites throughout filming, hoping to cash in on the Lopez–Affleck romance that was then big news in celebrity-watching publications such as Us and People. This film cost $54 million to make but grossed only $6 million, making it one of the biggest box-office bombs of all time. The Times gave the film a zero, making Gigli the lowest-scored film review in the publication's history at that time. The Wall Street Journal stated that it was "[t]he worst movie—all right, the worst allegedly major movie—of our admittedly young century",[496] while Roger Friedman of Fox News claimed it was "[t]he worst movie ever made".[497] It was also the winner of seven Razzies (including 2005's Worst "Comedy" of Our First 25 Years),[498] and in 2010 the film was nominated at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards for "Worst Picture of the Decade".[422] It is in Rotten Tomatoes' Top 100 worst-reviewed movies of the 2000s,[418] where it has a 6% rating.[499] AfterEllen ranked Gigli number 1 in its list of the worst films of all time.[461] Empire, Screen Rant, and Digital Trends also listed it as one of the worst films ever made.[426][186][256]
Sex Lives of the Potato Men (2004)
The 2004 British sex comedy Sex Lives of the Potato Men is about the sex lives of a group of potato delivery men in Birmingham. The film received strongly hostile reviews from the British media. Reviews claimed Sex Lives of the Potato Men was unfunny, disgusting, and depressing.[500] Writing in the Daily Mirror, film critic Kevin O'Sullivan called Sex Lives of the Potato Men "one of the worst films ever made".[501] Novelist Will Self, in his review for The Evening Standard, called Sex Lives of the Potato Men "mirthless, worthless, toothless, useless".[500] The Times reviewer James Christopher dubbed Sex Lives of the Potato Men "one of the two most nauseous films ever made ... a masterclass in film-making ineptitude".[500] The Sunday Express film critic, Henry Fitzherbert, also strongly condemned the film: "Sex Lives is so awful it left me slack-jawed in disbelief ... it must be one of the worst British comedies."[502] Catherine Shoard, in a critique in The Sunday Telegraph, stated "It's hard to know what to say to this – it's like finding the right words at a nasty accident ... Sex Lives of the Potato Men is probably the lewdest Brit-com since Confessions of a Window Cleaner, and certainly the worst." Shoard also described the film as "Less a film than an appetite suppressant."[503] Alan Morrison in the Scottish Daily Record described it as "puerile smut of the very worst kind ... Sex Lives of the Potato Men should never have been made".[504] The Irish Times later noted that "Sex Lives of the Potato Men attracted some of the worst reviews in living memory."[505] The Birmingham Post described Sex Lives of the Potato Men as "quite possibly the worst film ever made",[506] while The Independent on Sunday stated that the film was "a strong contender for the title of worst film of all time".[507] It was also featured in Empire's 50 Worst Movies Ever poll.[186] The film has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 14 reviews.[508]
Catwoman (2004)
Nominally based on the DC Comics character, Catwoman stars Halle Berry as the title character. The film was the result of various rewrites by a total of 28 different screenwriters, though only four were credited after arbitration with the Writers Guild of America. It has a 9% rating at Rotten Tomatoes,[510] and was declared "arguably the worst superhero film ever made" by the Orlando Sentinel. Jean Lowerison of the San Diego Metropolitan said in her review that Catwoman "goes on my 'worst' list for the year, and quite possibly for all time".[511] Sadaf Ahsan of the National Post went further, calling it the worst movie ever made.[512] The Village Voice summed up reviews of the film under the title "Me-Ouch".[513] The movie was the winner of four Razzies for Worst Picture, Worst Actress, Worst Director (Pitof) and Worst Screenplay.[498] Berry arrived at the ceremony to accept her Razzie in person (with her Best Actress Oscar for Monster's Ball in hand), saying: "First of all, I want to thank Warner Bros. Thank you for putting me in a piece of shit, god-awful movie ... It was just what my career needed."[509] Roger Ebert included it in his "most hated" list,[172] being joined by Screen Rant and Flavorwire, who also included it in their worst film lists.[256][13]
Daniel – Der Zauberer (Daniel – The Wizard) (2004)
The German film Daniel – Der Zauberer was directed by Ulli Lommel and stars pop singer and ex-Deutschland sucht den Superstar contestant Daniel Küblböck, who appeared as a fictionalized version of himself. The Daily Dot wrote that it is considered to be the worst German film,[514] while n-tv said it was "possibly the worst movie ever made".[515] The website filmstarts.de states that Daniel – Der Zauberer was "unbearable for non-fans of Küblböck", adding that "the performances of the actors were some of the worst in the history of German cinema", and alleging that Ulli Lommel and producer Peter Schamoni had "damaged their reputation".[516] Years after its release, Küblböck admitted that, in retrospect, "[Y]ou have to say this is the worst movie of all time really".[517]
The film also performed extremely poorly at the box office, having only 13,834 viewers altogether, which led to it being withdrawn from screening at most cinemas within the first week,[518] with RP Online referring to it as a "super-flop".[519] It is consistently listed at IMDb's Bottom 100 list and became the lowest-rated film at one point.[427] Total Film listed it as the third worst film of all time, after Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 and the direct-to-video animated mockbuster Titanic: The Legend Goes On,[73] while Fotogramas and New York Daily News included it on their worst film lists.[427][434] Filmstarts.de ranked it number 4 in its list of the 25 worst movies ever made,[520] and on the German movie rating site Moviepilot.de, it is the lowest-rated film with an average rating of 0.4/10.[521] In 2016, it was showcased on SchleFaZ, a German television show featuring the worst film ever made.[522]
Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 (2004)
The family-oriented comedy Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 was the last film directed by Bob Clark (of A Christmas Story fame) before his death. It is a sequel to the 1999 film Baby Geniuses and like its predecessor, it received negative reviews from film critics.[330] Following the plot of the first film, four babies can communicate with each other using 'baby talk', and have knowledge of many secrets. The "baby geniuses" become involved in a scheme by media mogul Bill Biscane (Jon Voight), a notorious kidnapper of children, who intends to use a satellite system to brainwash the world's population and force them to watch TV for the rest of their lives.
The film was a box-office bomb, only receiving $9 million from its $20 million budget. Entertainment Weekly writer Joshua Rivera stated that it was the worst movie he had ever sat through,[523] and Tom Long of The Deseret News said "It is perhaps the most incompetent and least funny comic film ever made."[524] It was nominated for four Golden Raspberry Awards including Worst Picture, Worst Director (Bob Clark), Worst Supporting Actor (Jon Voight) and Worst Screenplay (Steven Paul (story) & Gregory Poppen).[525] Total Film named it the runner-up to Titanic: The Legend Goes On in its list of the worst films ever made,[73] and Mental Floss selected it as the second worst movie ever made after Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever.[469] It was ranked as the worst sequel of all time by Rotten Tomatoes and, with a score of 0%, it is included in their list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.[330][526]
Alone in the Dark (2005)
Loosely based on a series of video games by Infogrames and directed by Uwe Boll, the German-Canadian-American film Alone in the Dark was panned by critics for a multitude of reasons, including poor script and production values, quick cuts to optimize the gory content, almost no connection to the game, and bad acting.[527] The movie received a 1% rating at Rotten Tomatoes, was the second worst reviewed movie of the 2000s,[418] and appears in their top 100 worst-reviewed movies list.[330] It appeared on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,[289] which they gave a 9/100 to,[528] is on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list,[425] and is one of the few films to have received an F rating on CinemaScore.[529]
Roger Moore of The Orlando Sentinel stated: "Alone in the Dark shows just how tenuous Plan 9 from Outer Space's hold on that 'worst movie ever' title really is."[530] Likewise, Peter Hartlaub, the San Francisco Chronicle's pop culture critic, called the film "the best Ed Wood movie ever made ... a film so mind-blowingly horrible that it teeters on the edge of cinematic immortality."[531] In 2009, he named it the worst film of the decade.[532] Jeffrey Lyles of The Gazette considered it so bad that "other legendary bad films ... await a film of this magnitude because it gets awfully lonely on the island of misfit movies",[533] while Scott Nash of Three Movie Buffs dubbed it "one of the worst movies ever made."[527]
Screenwriter Blair Erickson wrote about his experience dealing with Boll and his original script, which was closer to the actual game itself, and Boll's script change demands on the comedy website Something Awful.[534] It received two 2005 Golden Raspberry Awards nominations for Worst Director (Uwe Boll) and Worst Actress (Tara Reid), and won three 2005 Stinkers Awards, for Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Special Effects.[535] Empire, Flavorwire and Screen Rant all later included the film on their respective lists for the worst films ever made.[256][13][186]
Aag (2007)
Aag is a remake of one of the most successful Bollywood films, Sholay, directed by Ram Gopal Varma. Rajeev Masand gave it a zero out of five.[536] Times of India stated that Aag "destroyed Bollywood's greatest film" and acknowledged that some "consider it the world's worst film".[537] Hindustan Times awarded it the "Lifetime's Worst Ever Movie Award".[538] It came in first in a FHM India list of the 57 worst movies ever made.[539] Total Film included it in their list of the 66 worst films of all time.[73] Amitabh Bachchan, who appeared in the original film and returned for the remake, later admitted that the film was "a mistake".[540]
Epic Movie (2007)
Epic Movie is a parody film by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer that mainly parodies epic and fantasy movies, most notably The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and the Harry Potter films, but also contains references to all kinds of other then-popular films. Like most works of Friedberg and Seltzer, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes,[541] and a Metacritic score of 17/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[542]
Harry Fletcher of the Standard said: "Filmmakers and trash-peddlers Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer have been responsible for some of the most pointless, lazy and unforgivable movies of the past decade and frankly, they need to be stopped. Disaster Movie, 300 spoof Meet the Spartans and awful Hunger Games mickey-take The Starving Games could easily have made this list of the worst movies ever made, but Epic Movie might be the worst of the lot. It offers the most uninspired, unfunny film pastiches imaginable, sometimes repeating entire sections of dialogue verbatim from the movies they're supposedly satirising."[543]
Nathan Rabin gave it an F score and said, "Epic Movie [...] strays so far from the solid fundamentals of filmmaking that it calls the very foundation of humor into question."[544] Josh Rosenblatt of The Austin Chronicle said: "I've rarely seen a movie as hostile as this one, both to its audience and to its protagonists, and I don't think I realized before just how mean-spirited comedy can get (and I was raised on the Three Stooges)."[545] Jamie Russell of the BBC called it "the most excruciating, unfunny film you'll see this year... if not your entire lifetime."[546]
At the 28th Golden Raspberry Awards, it received three nominations, for Worst Remake or Rip-off, Worst Screenplay and Worst Supporting Actress (Carmen Electra). It is included in Rotten Tomatoes' list of the 100 Worst Movies of All time,[330] Empire's and Flavorwire's lists of the 50 worst movies ever made,[186][13] Standard's list of the 12 worst films ever made, MRQE's 50 worst movies list[425] and Newsweek's list of the 50 worst comedy movies of all time.[547]
I Know Who Killed Me (2007)
I Know Who Killed Me is a psychological thriller film directed by Chris Sivertson and starring Lindsay Lohan as identical twins, one of whom insists her identity is that of another woman after being abducted by a serial killer. At the 28th Golden Raspberry Awards, it set a record for most awards won in a single year by winning eight awards and it received two further nominations at the 30th Golden Raspberry Awards.[548]
The How Did This Get Made? podcast questioned, "Is this the worst movie Lindsay Lohan has ever been in or flat out the worst movie ever?"[549] Richard Roeper selected the film as the worst of the 2000s.[550] Gabe Delahaye of Stereogum reviewed I Know Who Killed Me as part of his search for the worst movie ever made, writing that: "Out of all the possible Worst Movies of All Time so far, none has been as painful to actually watch as I Know Who Killed Me".[551] It was named the 34th worst movie ever made in Empire's 50 Worst Movies Ever poll[186] and After Ellen named it the second worst ever made, after Gigli.[461] MRQE includes it on its 50 Worst Movies list,[425] and it has a rare F rating on CinemaScore.[529]
Disaster Movie (2008)
Disaster Movie is a parody film written and directed by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, spoofing films in the disaster film genre. The film, like most films by Friedberg and Seltzer, received extremely negative reviews and has a 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 73 reviews. The site's consensus states: "Returning to their seemingly bottomless well of flatulence humor, racial stereotypes, and stale pop culture gags, Friedberg and Seltzer have produced what is arguably their worst Movie yet."[552] It was ranked by Rotten Tomatoes as one of the worst-reviewed films of all time.[330] Jason Solomons of The Guardian stated that "Nothing can convey the grimness of Disaster Movie, which would be the Worst Movie Ever Made were it actually a movie at all."[553] Adam Tobias of Watertown Daily Times claimed that "I just don't see how anyone could not find Disaster Movie one of the worst films of all time." Tobias went on to write that the title was appropriate because the film is "a disaster."[554] It was featured in Empire's 50 Worst Movies Ever poll,[186] Total Film's 66 Worst Movies Ever list,[73] Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,[289] and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list (where it holds a score of 17, the lowest score on the site).[425] Disaster Movie also received a rare F rating on CinemaScore.[529] The film is also notable for being the motion picture debut of Kim Kardashian, whose performance garnered a nomination for Worst Supporting Actress at the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards alongside five additional nominations.[555]
Meet the Spartans (2008)
Another 2008 parody movie by Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, Meet the Spartans mainly parodied the movie 300, but references to numerous other films as well. Like most Friedberg and Seltzer projects, it received extremely negative reviews, holding an approval rating of 2% on Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus reading: "A tired, unfunny, offensive waste of time, Meet the Spartans scrapes the bottom of the cinematic barrel.",[556] and a Metacritic score of 9/100, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[557] Josh Levin of Slate called it the worst movie he had ever seen.[558] It is included in Empire's[186] and Flavorwire's[13] lists of the 50 worst movies ever made, News.com.au's list of the 15 worst films of all time,[451] Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films[289] and MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.[425] At the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards, it received five nominations, including Worst Picture.
The Hottie and the Nottie (2008)
The romantic comedy The Hottie and the Nottie starring Paris Hilton, Joel Moore, Christine Lakin, and The Greg Wilson opened to poor box-office takings and strongly negative reviews with a 5% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.[559] The British newspaper The People, reviewing The Hottie and the Nottie, claimed "Paris Hilton is the world's worst actress and she's starring in the worst movie ever made."[560] Nathan Lee of The Village Voice called it "crass, shrill, disingenuous, tawdry, mean-spirited, vulgar, idiotic, boring, slapdash, half-assed, and very, very unfunny".[561] Online film critic James Berardinelli described the film's comedy as "about as funny as the anal rape scene in The War Zone".[562] Richard Roeper called it "excruciatingly, painfully, horribly, terribly awful", and argued that "nobody in this movie really should have a career in movies".[563] Connie Ogle in the Miami Herald described The Hottie and the Nottie thus: "Imagine the worst movie you've ever seen. Got it? Now try to think of something worse. That something is this movie – wretched, embarrassing and a waste of the time and energy of everyone involved."[563] The film appears on Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films,[289] and the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.[425]
Álom.net (2009)
Álom.net (also known as Dream Well or Dream.net) is a Hungarian film that emulates tropes found in American teen films. 444.hu wrote that it is "the worst movie of all time, and that's why it became a cult film".[564] Furthermore, 24.hu and Index.hu each named it the worst Hungarian film ever made and The Irish Times reported its status as "the worst film of all time" when it became the lowest-rated film on IMDb.[565][566][567] Total Film named it the fourth worst film ever made and FMC.hu included it on their list of the ten worst films ever made.[73][568]
2010s
Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2010)
An independently produced film that is an apparent homage to Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds, Birdemic: Shock and Terror tells the story of a romance between the two leading characters, played by Alan Bagh and Whitney Moore, as their small town is attacked by birds. Written, directed, and produced by James Nguyen, it was intended as a "romantic thriller"[569] but is notable due to its poor quality, with reviewers calling out its wooden acting, bad dialogue, amateurish sound and editing, nonsensical plot and, in particular, its special effects, consisting primarily of poorly rendered computer generated eagles and vultures that perform physically awkward aerial maneuvers and explode upon impact with the ground.[570]
The film, which cost $10,000 to make,[571] was called by the Huffington Post "truly, one of the worst films ever made"[572] and by The Village Voice as "one more in the pantheon of beloved trash-terpieces".[573] Flavorwire ranked it number 1 in its list of the 50 worst films ever made.[13] Slate deemed it among the worst movies ever made,[574] while Salon referred to it as "a cult hit among bad-movie fans"[575] and Variety stated that the film displayed "all the revered hallmarks of hilariously bad filmmaking".[576] Following the home media release of Birdemic, Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett of Mystery Science Theater 3000 fame produced an audio commentary track to accompany the movie through Rifftrax. They later riffed upon the film again theatrically.[577] In response to the cult status of the first film, a sequel—Birdemic 2: The Resurrection—was released in 2013, and included many returning members of the cast and crew.[578] Another sequel was released on several streaming platforms on January 24, 2023 titled Birdemic: Sea Eagle.
The Last Airbender (2010)
The Last Airbender is a fantasy adventure film written, produced, and directed by M. Night Shyamalan[40] and is based on the acclaimed Nickelodeon animated TV series Avatar: The Last Airbender.[447] Upon release, the film was widely panned with critics pointing out the bad acting, numerous plot holes, screenplay, dialogue, poor special effects (despite its reported $150 million budget), and especially Shyamalan's directing. It was also ridiculed for the poor quality of its post-converted 3-D, and the casting of white and Indian actors to portray characters who were interpreted as East Asian or Inuit in the source material triggered accusations of racism and whitewashing.[579] Further criticism came from fans of the original cartoon series, who said the film differed tremendously from its critically acclaimed source material. David Onda of Comcast wrote that it "has been called one of the worst ever made. The movie was universally panned by critics and failed to make back its production budget domestically."[580] Roger Ebert wrote, "The Last Airbender is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented. The laws of chance suggest that something should have gone right. Not here. It puts a nail in the coffin of low-rent 3D, but it will need a lot more coffins than that."[581] When asked if Last Airbender had been the worst film he has ever seen, Mike Ryan of Vanity Fair answered, "Yes."[582]
It garnered nine nominations at the 31st Golden Raspberry Awards, and won five, including Worst Picture and Worst Director.[583][584] Hi highlighted the film in their "Worst Films Ever" series,[585] and Rotten Tomatoes, Screen Rant and Digital Trends included it in their worst film lists.[330][256][426] Dev Patel would later express regret and dislike for his role and his experience with the film. He described his performance as Prince Zuko as being as though he "saw a stranger on the screen that I couldn't relate to."[586][587]
Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star (2011)
Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star was produced by Adam Sandler's Happy Madison Productions and featured Nick Swardson in the titular role as a small-town manchild who pursues a career in the pornographic film industry after learning that his parents were porn stars in the 1970s. On Rotten Tomatoes, Bucky Larson has a 3% rating, and it appears on the site's list of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.[330] Linda Cook of the Quad-City Times described the film as "the worst of the worst",[588] while ScreenCrush critic Matt Singer picked it as the worst film ever made.[589] Jim Vorel of Paste's Bad Movie Diaries column suggested that Bucky Larson was the worst film covered by the column.[590] In listing it as one of the ten worst comedies ever, Michael Musto stated that Bucky Larson was "a badness the world had forgotten was capable of existing".[591] Screen Rant included it in its list of the 25 worst movies in film history and Mental Floss named it the fifth worst movie ever.[256][469] Bucky Larson also appears on MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list,[425] and Metacritic's list of the all-time lowest-scoring films.[289] The film earned six nominations at the 32nd Golden Raspberry Awards, but lost in every category to Jack and Jill, which was also produced by Happy Madison Productions.[424]
Jack and Jill (2011)
Jack and Jill is a comedy film starring Adam Sandler as Jack, a commercial director, who is visited by his "identical" twin sister, Jill (played by Sandler, in drag),[447] during the holidays. Salon stated that Jack and Jill "received some of the worst reviews of any movie ever" upon its release.[592] In the film, Jill is wooed by Al Pacino, whom Jack wants to be in his Dunkin' Donuts commercial. Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times noted the irony of Pacino's presence, as the actor is best known for playing Michael Corleone in The Godfather, which is widely considered one of the best films ever made, in this film, which he called "one of the worst movies in the history of cinema!"[593] Ramin Setoodeh of The Daily Beast and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone reviewed it together in an article entitled "Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Is the Worst Movie Ever Made".[594] After an hour-long critique, RedLetterMedia claimed that it was "so egregious that it ceased to be a film", and the site also later called it "the worst thing in the world".[595] Mike McGranaghan wrote, on his website The Aisle Seat: "Howard the Duck, Gigli, Showgirls, From Justin to Kelly. What do they all have in common? They're all widely considered among the worst big studio movies ever made. You know what else they have in common? They're all better than Jack and Jill."[596][597] Jack and Jill won a record 10 awards at the 32nd Golden Raspberry Awards, sweeping every category. It broke the record previously held by Battlefield Earth for having the most Razzies earned by a single film and is the only film to win every possible award.[424] The film holds a 3% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, where it ranks as being one of the 100 Worst Movies of All Time.[330] Vanity Fair and Screen Rant have also included it on their respective worst film lists.[256][5]
That's My Boy (2012)
Another comedy film starring Adam Sandler, That's My Boy concerns a middle school student named Donny Berger who has sex with his teacher, gets her pregnant, and in turn, earns a lifestyle of a minor celebrity, something he never intended to happen. Years later, Donny (played by Sandler) crashes his now-adult son's (Andy Samberg) wedding and bachelor party to get money to pay his taxes, therefore avoiding prison. The film has been widely panned due to its comedic portrayal of incest, hebephilia, statutory rape, and gerontophilia,[598][599][600] with film critic Andrew O'Hehir of Salon stating, "[Sandler's] new movie about a rape survivor and his estranged son is supposed to be funny, but radiates pain and rage."[601] Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times proclaimed, "To say That's My Boy is one of the worst movies of the year is to insult 2012. This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen",[602] while Richard Haridly of Quickflix called it "one of the saddest and most exhausting" films he has ever seen.[603] MaryAnn Johanson of Flick Filosopher outright panned the film for its inability to generate laughs as well as its depraved content, calling it "a disgusting excuse for a comedy" and possibly "the most repulsive movie I've ever seen",[604][605] and Jonathan Lack of We Got This Covered declared, "That's My Boy isn't just the worst film of 2012, it's one of the most morally reprehensible comedies of all time, a disgusting movie you should stay far, far away from."[604][606] Furthermore, Ed Whitfield of The Ooh Tray stated, "It may be the worst film, in any genre, ever made".[604][607] In addition to the movie's overwhelmingly negative reviews, That's My Boy earned eight nominations at the 33rd Golden Raspberry Awards, such as Worst Picture and Worst Director, and won the awards for Worst Actor (Sandler) and Worst Screenplay.[608] It holds a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of April 17, 2019[update] based on 115 reviews.[609]
Foodfight! (2012)
The animated comedy Foodfight!, directed by Larry Kasanoff, features a cast of celebrity voice actors, including Charlie Sheen, Wayne Brady, Hilary Duff, and Eva Longoria.[610] The film revolves around brand mascots, known as "Ikes", who come to life in a supermarket after closing time, and their struggles against the forces of Brand X. Several actual corporate mascots make cameos in the movie, such as Mrs. Butterworth, Charlie the Tuna, and the California Raisins. Development for the movie began as early as 2000, but troubled production, including an incident where the hard drives had supposedly been stolen, and financial difficulties delayed its release several times.[611] The film eventually received a limited theatrical release in Europe in 2012,[612] and it became a box-office bomb, earning just $74,000 against its reported $65 million budget.[613] Foodfight! was also critically panned for its animation, humor, use of product placement as a central theme (and being aimed towards children), and content inappropriate for its target audience, such as sexual innuendo and references to Nazism.[611]
A New York Times article condemned the film, saying: "The animation appears unfinished ... And the plot ... is impenetrable and even offensive." The article also reported that Foodfight! had been "seized upon by Internet purveyors of bad cinema".[614] One such Internet critic was Nathan Rabin of The A.V. Club, who included the film in his My World of Flops column, describing it as "one of those fall-of-civilization moments" and "This is the kind of movie so unbelievably, surreally and exquisitely terrible that you want to share it with the rest of the world. I was put on earth to suffer through abominations like Foodfight! so that society as a whole might benefit from my Christ-like sacrifice."[612][615] Meanwhile, a review in Esquire described it as "The Room, rendered in horribly sharp polygons" and Hollywood News called it "by far the crappiest piece of crap I have ever had the misfortune to watch".[616][617] Likewise, critic Tim Brayton described it as "the absolute ugliest animated feature that has ever been released by something resembling an actual animation studio ... one of the very worst movies I have ever seen."[618][619] Digital Trends, Time Out, Mental Floss and MSN have since included Foodfight! in their worst film lists.[426][84][203][620] Rebecca Hawkes of The Daily Telegraph described Foodfight! as "the worst animated children's film ever made",[611] while IndieWire, Comic Book Resources and Screen Rant have each described it as being one of the worst animated films ever made.[621][430][622]
Run for Your Wife (2012)
A British comedy film based on the stage farce of the same name, Run for Your Wife starred Danny Dyer as John Smith, a bigamist, and Denise van Outen and Sarah Harding as his wives. Run for Your Wife was directed by the author of the play, Ray Cooney (who also makes an uncredited cameo appearance). Upon release, Run for Your Wife was savaged by film critics, with the South African newspaper Daily News saying "Run for Your Wife could be the worst film in history",[623] the Studio Briefing website reporting that "Some writers are making the case that the British comedy may be 'the worst film ever'",[624] and The Daily Mirror claiming Run for Your Wife "was branded the worst British film ever".[625] Run for Your Wife met with such overwhelmingly negative reviews upon release that the reviews themselves were widely reported in the UK media.[624][626] The film was variously described as "a catastrophe", "as funny as leprosy" and "30 years past its sell-by-date", with The Guardian reviewer Peter Bradshaw saying that it "makes The Dick Emery Show look edgy and contemporary".[627] The Independent's Anthony Quinn wrote, "The stage play ran for nine years – it [the film] will be lucky to run for nine days. Perhaps never in the field of light entertainment have so many actors sacrificed so much dignity in the cause of so few jokes ... From the look of it, Cooney hasn't been in a cinema for about 30 years".[628]
The cast featured numerous British celebrities in cameo roles, which was commented upon by several reviewers. The Metro commented that "no one emerges unscathed among the cameo-packed cast that reads largely like a roll-call for Brit TV legends you'd previously suspected deceased".[629] The Daily Record described the film as "an exasperating farce containing not one single, solitary laugh. Comprised of people losing their trousers and falling over, the film looks like a pilot for a (mercifully) never-commissioned 70s sitcom".[630] An article in the Independent described Run for Your Wife (along with the similarly panned Movie 43) as contenders for the title of the "worst film in history".[631] The Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette reported "critics have been queuing up to batter recent release Run for Your Wife, with general agreement that it ranks among the worst British comedies of all time".[632] Run for Your Wife was also a box office bomb, earning only £602 in its opening weekend at the British box office to its £900,000 budget.[633][634] Run for Your Wife has a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of July 29, 2015[update] based on 15 reviews.[635]
Fateful Findings (2012)
Fateful Findings is a 2012 independent techno-thriller written, directed and produced by Neil Breen. Breen also starred in the film and took on most of the crew roles, including film editor, sound editor, accountant, caterer, set designer, wardrobe, makeup and casting.[427] The film follows an author-turned-hacker with supernatural powers who uses his abilities to reveal vague "government and corporate secrets", while beset by numerous relationship dramas, and ends with an extended sequence at a press conference where politicians and businesspeople confess to corruption and kill themselves before an applauding crowd.
Writing for Film Threat, reviewer Mike Hodges described it as "the worst movie ever made", comparing it unfavorably to Troll 2 and The Room.[636] Nathan Rabin, writing for Rotten Tomatoes, said Fateful Findings threatens The Room's position as "best worst movie",[637] while reviewers of the podcast The Flop House said "Move over The Room, move over Birdemic" and Mystery Science Theater 3000 head writer Elliott Kalan described it as the "good-est bad movie, maybe, I've ever seen".[638] Paste Magazine said Fateful Findings sits "right next to [The Room] on the Mt. Rushmore of bad movies", and noted that while Tommy Wiseau had eventually embraced and encouraged mockery of The Room, Breen doesn't "pretend to be 'in on it'" and the film maintains a "magic" as sincere outsider art.[639] Screen Rant and the New York Daily News later listed it as one of the worst films of all time.[256][427]
Movie 43 (2013)
Produced and co-directed by Peter Farrelly, among others, Movie 43 is a gross out[474] sex comedy film consisting of several vignettes each by a different director and a sizable cast of recognizable actors and actresses including Dennis Quaid, Greg Kinnear, Hugh Jackman, Kate Winslet, Liev Schreiber, Naomi Watts, Anna Faris, Emma Stone, Richard Gere, Uma Thurman, Chloë Grace Moretz, Gerard Butler, Halle Berry, Stephen Merchant, Kristen Bell, Terrence Howard, Elizabeth Banks, Kate Bosworth, Johnny Knoxville, Justin Long, Chris Pratt, Josh Duhamel, and Jason Sudeikis. Holding a score of 5% on Rotten Tomatoes, it is included on the site's 100 Worst Movies of All Time list,[330] and is also on the MRQE's 50 Worst Movies list.[425] Movie 43 won three awards at the 34th Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director, and Worst Screenplay. In the Worst Director category, all 13 directors won the award.[640]
Several critics have called it one of the worst films ever made, including Peter Howell of the Toronto Star, who said, "There's just one use for Movie 43, apart from it being ground into the landfill that it deserves to become sooner rather than later. It provides me with a handy new answer to a question I'm often asked: 'What's the worst film you've ever seen?'"[641] Brady Murphy of Murphy Reviews wrote that the movie "had no heart" and gave it the site's first zero out of ten rating.[642] Meanwhile, Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times voiced similar hatred, calling it "aggressively tasteless" and "the Citizen Kane of awful."[643] Lou Lumenick stated, "If you mashed-up the worst parts of the infamous Howard the Duck, Gigli, Ishtar and every other awful movie I've seen since I started reviewing professionally in 1981, it wouldn't begin to approach the sheer soul-sucking badness of the cringe-inducing Movie 43."[644] Elizabeth Weitzman of the New York Daily News also considered it the worst movie she ever saw.[645]
Humshakals (2014)
A Bollywood comedy film directed by Sajid Khan, Humshakals featured Indian actors Saif Ali Khan, Ram Kapoor and Riteish Deshmukh. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on six reviews, with an average rating of 2/10.[646] Mihir Fadnavis wrote in his Firstpost review, "sexual tomfoolery, shrieking and hamming aside, there's much more to hate about this 'family movie'. It's disturbing to see such an atrocious, regressive, misogynistic, sexist, homophobic cinematic product force-fed to paying audiences. I can understand that a comedy need not be 'safe', but what goes on in Humshakals is simply too horrifying to bear."[647] Saurabh Dwivedi of India Today stated "I can only say that Humshakals will be listed in one of the worst films of the century."[648] Writing in Emirates 24/7, Sneha May Francis said that it succeeded Khan's previous endeavor, Himmatwala, in becoming the worst Bollywood film ever.[649] Fadnavis went further, writing that it displaced Himmatwala as the "worst possible product any film industry in the world can offer".[647] Itrath Syed of The Georgia Straight stated that Humshakals was "the absolute bottom of the cinematic barrel".[650] The film received five Golden Kela Award nominations,[651] and won the "award" for Worst Film.[652] It also won two Ghanta Awards; the film won Worst Picture and Ram Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan and Riteish Deshmukh shared the Worst Actor award.[653]
Several of the cast members also lamented their involvement in the film. Despite being the film's leading actress, Bipasha Basu did not participate in the film's promotions because she was "extremely disturbed by the end result" and stated that "Humshakals was the worst experience of my life".[654][655] Another cast member, actress Esha Gupta, warned her family to not watch the film.[656] After the release of the film, leading actor Saif Ali Khan lamented that "I've been introspecting a lot and will never repeat a mistake that was Humshakals."[657]
Saving Christmas (2014)
Saving Christmas is a faith-based Christmas comedy film starring Kirk Cameron, who plays a fictionalized version of himself attempting to convince his brother-in-law (played by the film's director, Darren Doane) that Christmas is still a Christian holiday.[658] On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 0% rating, based on 19 reviews, with an average rating of 2.40/10.[659] Critic David Keyes described Saving Christmas as "The worst holiday movie ever made",[659] Billings Gazette selected the film as the worst Christmas movie of all time,[660] and Will Nicol of Digital Trends included it on his list of the ten worst movies ever made.[426] Christy Lemire picked Saving Christmas as the worst film she has ever reviewed and called it "The Room of Christmas movies" (while adding that she found The Room to be more enjoyable) and gave it a score of zero stars out of four.[661][662] Bill Zwecker of the Chicago Sun-Times said: "This may be one of the least artful holiday films ever made."[659] The film's history after release was further marred by widespread vote brigading; Cameron asked fans to give the film positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes,[663] which resulted in a backlash of Internet users instead travelling to the Rotten Tomatoes page to review bomb the film.[664] Three weeks after its release, Saving Christmas became the lowest-rated film on IMDb's bottom 100 list. Cameron blamed the low rating on a Reddit campaign by "haters and atheists" to purposely lower the film's ratings.[665] The film won four awards, including Worst Picture, at the 35th Golden Raspberry Awards.[666]
United Passions (2014)
A 2014 English-language French drama film about the origins of the football world governing body Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), United Passions starred Tim Roth (as FIFA President Sepp Blatter), Gérard Depardieu and Sam Neill and was directed by Frédéric Auburtin. United Passions' release in the U.S. occurred simultaneously with the 2015 FIFA corruption case, in which several current and former members of FIFA's executive committee were arrested on charges of corruption,[669] and Blatter himself resigned following repeated accusations of corruption at FIFA under his leadership.[670] United Passions was accused of ignoring these long-running claims.[669][671][672] London Evening Standard's Des Kelly wrote that United Passions was "the worst movie ever made" and "the most extraordinary vanity exercise; a vile, self-aggrandizing, sugar-coated pile of manure".[673] Sean Mahoney of Inquisitr called it the "worst movie ever".[674] Daniel Gold of The New York Times claimed United Passions is "one of the most unwatchable films in recent memory, a dishonest bit of corporate-suite sanitizing that's no good even for laughs",[675] later stating it would make the top three of his list of all time bad films.[676] Several critics noted the irony of the film's depiction of Blatter as an anti-corruption campaigner. Paul Field of the Daily Mirror said that this created "unintentional comedy gold".[672] On Rotten Tomatoes, United Passions has an approval rating of 0% based on 16 reviews,[677] while on Metacritic, the film holds a score of 1 out of 100, based on 9 critics, and is tied for the lowest scoring film on the site.[289] Screen Rant subsequently included it on its list of the 25 worst movies of all time.[256]
United Passions was also a box-office bomb, becoming the second-lowest-grossing film ever in American history, with a total take of $918, surpassed only by the 2006 thriller Zyzzyx Road.[678] The film additionally went directly to DVD in France and was not distributed in a number of other European countries.[679][680] Several of the people involved in United Passions later expressed regret over the film. Director Auburtin called United Passions "a disaster" and added: "Now I'm seen as bad as the guy who brought AIDS to Africa or the guy who caused the financial crisis ... apparently I am a propaganda guy making films for corrupt people."[680][681] Roth apologized for taking part in the film and admitted that he took the job in United Passions for the money.[681] It also received the first Barry L. Bumstead Award during the 36th Golden Raspberry Awards,[682] a special category for critical and financial failures that were not given an eligible release.[668]
Dirty Grandpa (2016)
Dirty Grandpa, a 2016 comedy film starring Robert De Niro and Zac Efron as a grandfather and grandson going to Florida during spring break, received negative reviews for its gross-out and shock humor that was also considered as sexist,[683] homophobic, and racist.[684] Mike Ryan of Uproxx said: "Dirty Grandpa is the worst movie I've ever seen in a movie theater. Burn it."[685] He later also picked it as the worst film he had ever both reviewed[661] and seen.[686] Pete Hammond of Deadline Hollywood said: "... Dirty Grandpa, is not just the worst movie [De Niro] has ever been in, but it may be the worst movie anyone has ever been in."[687] Glenn McDonald of Indy Week said: "The awful, ugly Dirty Grandpa is the comedy equivalent of torture porn ... In fact, in the dizzying moments after being bludgeoned by this miserable specimen, I was convinced it's among the worst movies ever made."[688] Richard Roeper gave the film zero stars, writing, "If Dirty Grandpa isn't the worst movie of 2016, I have some serious cinematic torture in my near future."[689] On his YouTube channel, Roeper also said: "I'm not ready to say Dirty Grandpa is the worst movie I've ever seen, but I'm also not ready to say it's not the worst movie I've ever seen."[690] Mark Kermode, on his BBC Radio 5 Live show (Kermode and Mayo's Film Review), said that he found the film "truly, genuinely horrible" and went on to say, "after Dirty Grandpa I did feel genuinely unclean, I wanted to go and have a shower, because it's just so revolting. Somewhere in hell there is a multiplex playing this on a double bill, with Movie 43 and Entourage."[691] He would later go on to brand it his least favorite film of 2016.[692]
Glenn Kenny of RogerEbert.com said: "The actor Bela Lugosi appeared in some landmark, perhaps even great, films at the beginning of his Hollywood career in the 1930s. ... Lugosi's final film was 1957's Plan 9 from Outer Space, frequently cited as the worst film ever made. The cinematic landmarks of De Niro's career include films such as Coppola's The Godfather Part II and Scorsese's Raging Bull. He has been featured in a good number of very bad films in the years since. But this? This might just be his own Plan 9."[62] The film has an approval rating of 10% at Rotten Tomatoes based on 135 reviews, with an average rating of 3.1/10,[693] while on Metacritic it has a score of 21 out of 100 based on 27 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".[694] At the 37th Golden Raspberry Awards it received five nominations, for Worst Picture, Worst Actor (De Niro), Worst Screenplay, and two nominations for Worst Supporting Actress (Julianne Hough and Aubrey Plaza), but did not win in any category.
Guardians (2017)
Guardians is a 2017 Russian superhero film[695][696] about a team of Soviet superheroes created during the Cold War.[697] It was criticized for having a derivative plot, bad acting and direction, cheap CGI, plot holes, and overall low quality. Kg-portal.ru wrote that "Guardians is a film from which Russian cinema should be protected. It's like a sequel to Plan 9 from Outer Space, filmed by Uwe Boll, with the screenplay by Tommy Wiseau and with him in the lead role."[698] Rossiyskaya Gazeta commented that the film was "Worse than you can imagine."[699] Meduza compared the film's director, Sarik Andreasyan, to Plan 9 from Outer Space's director, Ed Wood, and said that Guardians "is a convincing answer to the eternal question of why we can never catch up with Hollywood even in our own box office".[700] Afisha said that it was the Russian answer to Howard the Duck,[701] and Ivi, Inc. commented that "a more talentless film is hard to imagine".[702] RIA Novosti placed it at the top of their worst film list[703] and Russian review aggregator Kritikanstvo listed it among the all-time lowest-scoring films.[704] Critics outside of Russia generally panned the film but were not as harsh, as it has a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 12 reviews.[705] A sequel was planned,[706] but the film was a box-office bomb, which resulted in the film's production company, Enjoy Movies, subsequently filing for bankruptcy, and the Cinema Foundation of Russia, which provided part of the budget, suing the company and demanding a return of the investment.
Loqueesha (2019)
The 2019 comedy film Loqueesha stars Jeremy Saville, who also independently wrote, directed, and produced the film, as Joe, who needs money to pay for his son's private school education and, after getting rejected for a job as a radio host, the listing for which encourages women and minorities to apply, gets the job by pretending to be a sassy black woman named Loqueesha who gives out advice on air.[707] The film's trailer and poster were panned online as racist and stereotypical upon their release,[708] with Entertainment.ie's Brian Lloyd writing that it was "one the [sic] worst fucking things we have ever seen, and we still can't believe it's actually real".[709][710] Upon seeing the actual film, Nathan Rabin said that the film was "somehow much worse" than the trailer led people to believe.[707]
The film received universally negative reception from critics, as it garnered a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.[711] Joel Golby of The Guardian called the plot "one of the more offensive in history", also criticizing its lighting, sound design, and acting, among other aspects of the film, and writing, "The worst film ever made. Worse than The Room, in every way. The one-star rating it currently has on IMDb is actively generous. I cannot believe this film got made."[712] Dan Kahan of Popdust called it "genuinely the worst movie [he had] ever watched", calling Saville an "unbelievable racist" and deeming the movie "grotesque", "abhorrent", and "criminal".[713] For Decider, Kay-B wrote that she "wouldn't recommend this film to anyone, living or dead" as it was "painfully hard to watch" while also dubbing it "the year's most reviled movie".[714]
Cats (2019)
Cats is a film adaptation of the popular musical penned by Andrew Lloyd Webber[717][718] (based on the works of T. S. Eliot) and directed by Academy Award-winning filmmaker Tom Hooper (The King's Speech).[719] The film is about a tribe of cats called the Jellicles as they hold their Jellicle Ball, an annual ceremony where the cats compete for the chance to enter the Heaviside Layer, where the chosen Jellicle will be granted a new life as a god.[720]
Lloyd Webber condemned the film as "ridiculous" stating, "The problem with the film was that Tom Hooper decided that he didn't want anybody involved in it who was involved in the original show."[721]It was criticized for CGI "digital fur technology",[447] which depicted the film's actors as bipedal cats. An updated version of the film, with a refined CGI patch, was sent to theaters after its premiere.[722] Describing the experimentation with digital fur as one of the worst decisions in movie history, Rolling Stone wrote: "There are many, many other problems with Cats, ... but it was hard for anyone to focus on any of them when it just looked so shitty and disturbing."[47] Other critics also panned the performances of some of the actors, with James Corden and Rebel Wilson (who parodied themselves at the 92nd Academy Awards) receiving the most criticism.[723][724] As of June 2024[update], Cats sits at a 19% on Rotten Tomatoes.[725] The film won six awards out of nine nominations at the 40th Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Director for Hooper, Worst Supporting Actress for Wilson, Worst Supporting Actor for Corden, and Worst Picture overall.[726]
Early reviews for Cats were embargoed.[727][728] Manohla Dargis from The New York Times commented that "[a] doctoral thesis could be written about how this misfire sputtered into existence".[729] British newspaper The Daily Telegraph called the film an "all-time disaster" with reviewer Tim Robey giving the film "zero stars" in his review.[730][731][732] Critics from The Washington Post, Rolling Stone and The Detroit News wrote that it was a candidate for the worst film of the 2010s, with The Detroit News reviewer Adam Graham writing: "Cats is the biggest disaster of the decade, and possibly thus far in the millennium. It's Battlefield Earth with whiskers."[733][734][735] Graham later selected Cats as the worst movie he had ever seen.[589] Wade Major of CineGods.com slammed it as "Showgirls with fur", while Battlefield Earth screenwriter J. David Shapiro (who previously won the Razzie for Worst Screenplay) said Cats had usurped his film as the worst ever made.[736][737] Cats was included on Time Out's 40 Best Bad Movies Ever Made list.[84]
2020s
365 Days (2020)
365 Days (Polish: 365 Dni) is a 2020 Polish erotic romantic drama film directed by Barbara Białowąs and Tomasz Mandes.[738] It is based on the first novel of a trilogy by Blanka Lipińska. The plot follows a young woman from Warsaw in a spiritless relationship falling for a dominant Sicilian man, who imprisons and imposes on her a period of 365 days for which to fall in love with him. It stars Michele Morrone as Don Massimo Torricelli and Anna-Maria Sieklucka as Laura Biel. The film was released theatrically in Poland on February 7, 2020, and was later made available on Netflix on June 7, 2020, where, despite extremely negative critical response, it became one of the most-watched films, for a time being the fourth-most-watched media on Netflix UK and the third-most-watched media on Netflix US, and gained global attention.[739] It was also a box-office success at Polish cinemas, grossing an estimated $8,964,000.[740] The film received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics, who heavily criticized its softcore themes, sexual violence and Mafia glorification. Rotten Tomatoes collected 16 reviews and identified 0% of them as positive, with an average rating of 1.9/10.[741] Polish English-language news website The First News says that it has been dubbed one of the worst films ever.[740] Taylor Andrews of Cosmopolitan called it the worst thing he had ever seen.[742] Kevin Maher of The Times said "There haven't been line readings this poor since the third act of The Room" and "It makes the bonking puppets in Team America: World Police look like straight-faced documentary".[743] Maddy Mussen of The Tab called it "the worst thing Netflix has ever produced" and said "If you have watched 365 Days on Netflix, there will not be a doubt in your mind that it's the worst thing you've ever seen."[744] Jessica Kiang of Variety called it "a thoroughly terrible, politically objectionable, occasionally hilarious Polish humpathon".[745]
In March 2021, the film was nominated for six Golden Raspberry Awards, for Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst Actor (Michele Morrone), Worst Actress (Anna-Maria Sieklucka), Worst Screenplay and Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel,[746] becoming the second foreign-language film to be nominated for Worst Picture after Italy's Pinocchio (2002; albeit the dubbed version),[747] and won only one for Worst Screenplay.[748]
Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey (2023)
Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey is a 2023 low-budget British horror film which reimagines the characters of the series of children's books by A.A. Milne as mutant slasher villains, released after Milne's work entered the public domain a year prior.[750][751] It was widely criticized for its premise, alongside lack of humor, poor acting, low grade special effects, incoherent screenplay, poorly lit scenes and lack of interesting characters.[752][753] Nathan Rabin stated that the film was "the regrettable product of a loophole in copyright law that allowed these vultures to twist and distort and corrupt A.A. Milne's beloved icons of gentleness and childhood innocence to their own mercenary ends."[754] Rabin issued his first zero star review for the film, in which he referenced Roger Ebert's 1994 review of North[350] by stating: "I Hated, Hated, Hated Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey."[754] With a score of 3%, it appears on Rotten Tomatoes' Worst Film of All Time list.[330] Screen Rant later placed it at the top of their 10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have to See to Know They're Bad list.[40]
Shawn Paul Wood of The Cinema Spot wrote "As anyone can tell, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey is one of the worst movies ever made. And, by the looks of its dazzling lack of antipathy for protecting its copyright, Disney knew it."[755] Matt Villei of Collider wrote "If these reviews are anything to go by, the film might find itself in a spot of bother as it is being called one of the worst horror movies ever, though some predicted that, from its low quality, the film could garner a cult following similar to Tommy Wiseau's disasterpiece, ... The Room."[756] Scott Campbell of We Got This Covered titled his review "Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey officially – and deservedly – named one of the worst movies ever made."[757] It received all five Razzies that it was nominated for at the 44th Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture, Screenplay and Director (Rhys Frake-Waterfield).[758]
See also
- List of films considered the best
- List of box-office bombs
- List of films with a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes
- Z movie
- Cinephilia
References
- ^ Jump up to: a b Lincoln, Kevin (July 2, 2014). "The Benefits of Being the Worst Movie Ever Made". Pacific Standard. Archived from the original on October 23, 2017. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
- ^ Peary, Danny (2014). Cult Midnight Movies: Discover the 37 Best Weird, Sleazy, Sexy, and Crazy Good Cinema Classics. Workman Publishing Company. ISBN 9780761181699. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
- ^ Anders, Charlie Jane (February 26, 2009). "Did The Worst Movie Of All Time Come Out 75 Years Ago?". io9. Archived from the original on February 18, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Adams, Michael (January 30, 2010). "25 Movies So Bad They're Unmissable". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved January 25, 2015.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m Pellegrini, Francesca (February 25, 2018). "I 20 film più brutti di sempre". Vanity Fair (in Italian). Archived from the original on January 8, 2022. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Maltin, Leonard (2003). Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide 2004. Signet. ISBN 0-451-20940-0.
- ^ McKee, David (September 24, 2009). "What's the Worst Movie Ever?". Las Vegas CityLife. Archived from the original on September 3, 2013. Retrieved November 17, 2013.
- ^ Lennon, Troy (December 7, 2017). "When Hollywood's worst films become cult classics". News.com.au. Archived from the original on January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
- ^ St-Amand, Vanessa (March 29, 2022). "Ranked: The best worst movies you need to watch". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on June 19, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- ^ Jordan, Danté (January 27, 2020). "We watched 'Reefer Madness' to confirm it's still complete garbage". Leafly. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "The Terror of Tiny Town (DVD)". Film Threat. June 17, 2005. Archived from the original on March 24, 2020. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
- ^ "The Terror of Tiny Town (1938)". Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on June 14, 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2020.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l Bailey, Jason (September 17, 2014). "The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made". Flavorwire. Archived from the original on March 30, 2019.
- ^ Defleur, Melvin (1998). Understanding Mass Communication: A Liberal Arts Perspective (6 ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 160.
- ^ Richard, Gabriel (June 5, 2019). "20 Best Worst Movies Of All Time". Cultured Vultures. Archived from the original on December 9, 2019. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Terry, Clifford (June 20, 1989). "A 'Terror' Kicks Off World's Worst Film Festival". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on May 7, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
- ^ Del Ruth, Roy; Considine, Bob; Callahan, George; Bendix, William; Trevor, Claire; Bickford, Charles; Frawley, William; Levene, Sam; Allied Artists Productions (2010), The Babe Ruth story, Warner Home Video, OCLC 694103117
- ^ Hal Erickson (2013). "The Babe Ruth Story (1948)". Movies & TV Dept. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Mincher, Chris; Bahn, Christopher; Modell, Josh; Gillette, Amelie; Tobias, Scott; Murray, Noel; Pierce, Leonard (October 6, 2008). "The home run that cured cancer: 16 Amazing Movie Sports Feats". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ Dan Shaughnessy (April 3, 1986). "Duke as Williams? A Prince of an Idea". Spokane Chronicle. Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ Heller, Dick (July 23, 2000). "Clinic and reception in the works to honor NBA pioneer Lloyd". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on November 1, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ Apple, Charles (September 22, 2020). "Some of the worst movies of all-time". The Spokesman-Review. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Newberry, Paul (August 10, 2019). "Counting down baseball's worst movie locales". The Providence Journal. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Dunne, Michael (October 1996). "Post-War Cultural Construction in "The Babe Ruth Story"". Studies in Popular Culture. 19 (1). Popular Culture Association in the South: 1–7. JSTOR 23413739. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Isaacs, Stan (February 26, 1989). "Out ofLeft Field – The 10 Worst Sports Movies Of All Time". Newsday. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ "Worst Movie Biopics: Real-Life Catastrophes". Moviefone. November 5, 2009. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2013.
- ^ Marshall, Kevin (August 16, 2013). "Blockbuster Hollywood Bios: The Good, the Bad, and the "Jobs"". Spike. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Goodwin, Cliff (2011). Sid James: A Biography. Random House. pp. 67–68. ISBN 978-0-7535-4682-6.
- ^ Jump up to: a b McFarlane, Brian (1999). "Outrage: No Orchids for Miss Blandish". In Chibnall, Steve; Murphy, Robert (eds.). British Crime Cinema. Routledge. pp. 37–50. ISBN 0-415-16870-8.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Halliwell's Film Guide. HarperPerennial. 1994. p. 781. ISBN 978-0-06-273318-4.
- ^ "The Chiel's Film Review". The Age. November 27, 1948. p. 5.
- ^ Maltin, Leonard (2011). Leonard Maltin's Classic Movie Guide: From The Silent Era Through 1965 (Second ed.). Penguin. p. 474. ISBN 978-0-452-29577-3.
- ^ Allen, Julien (September 7, 2011). "Simply the Worst: Edward D. Wood Jr.'s 'Glen or Glenda?'". IndieWire. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
- ^ Richard Barrios, Screened Out: Playing Gay in Hollywood from Edison to Stonewall, Psychology Press, 2003, ISBN 0-415-92328-X, Page 235.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Cerabona, Ron (October 30, 2012). "So bad it's good: retro sci-fi's monster appeal". The Newcastle Herald. Archived from the original on July 22, 2022. Retrieved July 22, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Book of Lists, p. 208.
- ^ Sauter, p. 326.
- ^ King, Stephen (1981). Danse Macabre. New York: Everest House. ISBN 978-0-89696-076-3.
- ^ Barsanti, Chris (2014). The Sci-Fi Movie Guide: The Universe of Film from Alien to Zardoz. Visible Ink Press. p. 312. ISBN 978-1578595334.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Walters, Jack (July 26, 2023). "10 Terrible Movies You Don't Have To See To Know They're Bad". Screen Rant. Retrieved March 29, 2024.
- ^ Adams, Cecil (October 26, 1984). "Did John Wayne die of cancer caused by a radioactive movie set?". The Straight Dope. Archived from the original on July 3, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Bell, Chris (January 17, 2017). "The movie so toxic it killed John Wayne: the tragedy of The Conqueror". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on July 8, 2022. Retrieved July 23, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b von Tunzelmann, Alex (May 3, 2013). "The Conqueror: Hollywood gives Genghis Khan a kicking he won't forget". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on June 23, 2013. Retrieved December 12, 2016.
- ^ Sauter, p. 68–71.
- ^ Grewal, Joti (September 27, 2021). "Former Aldergrove Star editor releases book, soon-to-be documentary about 'worst movie ever made'". Aldergrove Star. Archived from the original on March 7, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- ^ Barone, Matt (November 12, 2012). "The 10 Worst Biopic Movies Of All Time". Complex. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved July 7, 2017.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Greene, Andy (September 25, 2023). "The 50 Worst Decisions in Movie History". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
- ^ "BBC On This Day | 5 | 1976: Billionaire Howard Hughes dies". BBC News. April 7, 1976. Archived from the original on December 16, 2017. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ Rubin, Nathan (2010). My Year of Flops. Scribner. ISBN 978-1-4391-5312-3.
- ^ "Fire Maidens of Outer Space". dvddrive-in.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2021. Retrieved July 18, 2021.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Fire Maidens Of Outer Space". DVD Talk. August 13, 2013. Archived from the original on August 12, 2020. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
- ^ John Walker (ed.) Halliwell's Film and Video Guide 2000, London and New York; HarperCollins, 1999, ISBN 0-06-273645-0 (p.287).
- ^ Jump up to: a b I. Q Hunter, "From Window Cleaner to Potato Man" in British Comedy Cinema, edited by I.Q. Hunter and Laraine Porter. Routledge, 2012. ISBN 0-415-66667-8. (p.154)
- ^ Welsh, Paul (November 28, 2021). "The worst film ever made?". Borehamwood & Elstree Times. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Robb, David L. (2004). Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. p. 321. ISBN 9781591021827. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Rabin, Nathan (September 16, 2020). "Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #126 Plan 9 From Outer Space (1957)". Nathan Rabin's Happy Place. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Liebenson, Donald (May 7, 2021). "Plan 9 from Outer Space Lands in TCM Classic Film Festival". Turner Classic Movies. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved July 10, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Barnett, David (March 31, 2017). "In defence of the so-called Worst Movie Ever Made". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 3, 2022. Retrieved August 3, 2022.
- ^ Levy, Emanuel (February 1, 2021). "Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959)". emanuellevy.com. Archived from the original on July 11, 2022. Retrieved July 11, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Barber, Nicholas (January 10, 2022). "Is this the worst film ever made?". BBC. Archived from the original on July 20, 2022. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
- ^ Radio Times Guide to Films 2014. Radio Times, London, 2013. ISBN 0-9567523-6-5 (p.947).
- ^ Jump up to: a b Kenny, Glenn. "Dirty Grandpa Movie Review & Film Summary (2016)". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Bibbiani, William (December 27, 2021). "The Best Worst Movies Ever Made: The Room, Super Mario Bros. and More". IGN. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ "Plan 9 From Outer Space". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on November 14, 2016. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Plan 9 from Outer Space – Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ Schwartz, Carol (1995). Videohound's Complete Guide to Cult Flicks and Trash Pics. Visible Ink Press. ISBN 978-0-7876-0616-9.
- ^ "Schlock Value: The Creeping Terror (1964)". Talk Film Society. September 11, 2017. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- ^ Medved, Harry and Michael (1986). Son of Golden Turkey Awards. New York: Random House/Villard Books. ISBN 0-394-74341-5. p. 197.
- ^ Alexander, Chris (September 12, 2017). "Creep Behind the Camera Blu-ray Review". ComingSoon.net. Archived from the original on February 2, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "Fantasia 2014: The Creep Behind the Camera was scarier than the carpet monster from outer space". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- ^ "Synapse Films Getting Creepy This September with Dario Argento's Creepers, The Creep Behind the Camera, and The Creeping Terror Blu-rays". Dread Central. June 21, 2017. Archived from the original on February 2, 2022. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
- ^ Golden Turkey Awards, pp. 18.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l "66 Worst Movies Of All Time". Total Film. GamesRadar. February 15, 2012. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ "The Creeping Terror (Dangerous Charter) (The Crawling Monster)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on October 14, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ "RiffTrax: A Guide to Christmas and Holiday Episodes". Den of Geek. December 18, 2020. Archived from the original on July 18, 2021. Retrieved July 18, 2021.
- ^ "SANTA CLAUS CONQUERS THE MARTIANS (Nicholas Webster, 1964)". December 1, 2011. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved May 10, 2020 – via Vimeo.
- ^ "Film Threat – The Bootleg Files: "Santa Claus Conquers The Martians"". Filmthreat.com. Archived from the original on November 30, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.
- ^ Cramp, Nick (December 11, 2020). "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians (1964)". BBC. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020. Retrieved March 25, 2020.
- ^ "Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Santa Claus Conquers the Martians". TV.com. Archived from the original on August 22, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ "Cinematic Titanic | The Store". Cinematictitanic.twinvision.com. October 11, 2012. Archived from the original on October 15, 2013. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ "Shout! Factory Store". Shout! Factory. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved October 1, 2023.
- ^ Bangs, Lester (1987). "The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, or, The Day The Airwaves Erupted". In Greil Marcus (ed.). Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung. New York: Random House. p. 122. ISBN 0-394-53896-X.
- ^ Grobaty, Tim (2012). Location Filming in Long Beach. Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 978-1614237754. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved March 27, 2023.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Singer, Matthew; McGeady, Sean (September 7, 2022). "The 40 best bad movies ever made". Time Out. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- ^ "Recap: Monster A-Go Go (1965)". The Agony Booth. June 16, 2003. Archived from the original on October 23, 2006. Retrieved January 21, 2007.
- ^ Beldin, Fred. "Monster A Go-Go!". Allmovie.com. Archived from the original on August 2, 2012. Retrieved September 12, 2012.
- ^ "Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Monster A Go-Go". Castle Forrester. Archived from the original on November 20, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ "Hi-keeba!'s MST3K Episode Guide". Angelfire.com. March 1, 2001. Archived from the original on August 20, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ The Joy of Trash: Nathan Rabin's Happy Place's Definitive Guide to the Very Wortst of Everything. Independently published. December 16, 2021. p. 154. ISBN 979-8-7859-1421-6. Archived from the original on December 29, 2021. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ "Exploiting our Archives: Control Nathan Rabin 4.0 #69 Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)". Nathan Rabin's Happy Place. May 13, 2023. Archived from the original on December 29, 2021. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Ross, Dalton (June 6, 2005). "The Worst Movie Ever Made". Entertainment Weekly. p. 2. Archived from the original on January 4, 2022. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Adams, pp. 91–2.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Fashingbauer Cooper, Gael (August 13, 2012). "Torgo lives! 'Mystery Science' alums revisit worst movie ever, 'Manos: The Hands of Fate'". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 3, 2013. Retrieved March 4, 2013.
- ^ Betty Pierce (November 11, 1966). "Hero Massaged to Death in 'Manos-- The Hands of Fate'". El Paso Herald-Post. Archived from the original on December 17, 2005. Retrieved March 1, 2013.
- ^ "Mystery Science Theater 3000 – Manos: The Hands of Fate". TV.com. Archived from the original on June 28, 2011. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ Manos – the Hands of Fate at Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ Brandt, Richard (May 1996). "The Hand That Time Forgot". Mimosa. pp. 35–38. Archived from the original on October 6, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2006.
- ^ Heller, Chris (December 12, 2011). "'Manos: The Hands Of Fate': Carefully Restoring The Opposite Of A Masterpiece". NPR. Archived from the original on May 29, 2020. Retrieved March 16, 2020.
- ^ "Read this: The battle over the infamous cult classic Manos: The Hands of Fate". The A.V. Club. September 25, 2015. Archived from the original on August 15, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ "Manos: The Hands of Fate [Special Edition] [Blu-ray] – Synapse Films". October 13, 2015. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (December 16, 1969). "A Place for Lovers". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved October 19, 2013.
- ^ Champlin, Charles (December 18, 1969). "A Place For Lovers Film 'Worst' One Critic's Seen". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on July 9, 2022. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- ^ "They Saved Hitler's Brain (1964)". TCM.com. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved March 27, 2020.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "They Saved Hitler's Brain". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on October 21, 2019. Retrieved March 26, 2020.
- ^ Peary, Danny (1986). Guide for the Film Fanatic. Simon & Schuster. p. 430. ISBN 0671610813.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Slide, Anthony (2018). Magnificent Obsession: The Outrageous History of Film Buffs, Collectors, Scholars, and Fanatics. University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1496810533. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
- ^ Merz, Theo (February 23, 2015). "The rise of parody porn, 'the Chaucer of our times'". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022.
- ^ Anders, Charlie Jane (May 30, 2012). "The Bizarre History of Superhero Porn [NSFW]". io9. Archived from the original on March 27, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- ^ Lamar, Cyriaque (May 22, 2010). "A brief history of Batman-themed pornography (NSFW)". io9. Archived from the original on March 7, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- ^ "Bat Pussy – the first superhero porn parody?". PornParody.com. October 6, 2014. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014.
- ^ Allison, Matthew. "Deep Inside Bat Pussy". AV Maniacs. Archived from the original on October 26, 2015. Retrieved March 24, 2016.
- ^ Pearson, Rebecca; Brooker, Will; Uriccho, William (2015). The Many More Lives of Batman. British Film Institute. ISBN 978-1844577644. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- ^ "Myra Breckinridge". Variety. January 1, 1970. Archived from the original on September 24, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- ^ "Cinema:Some Sort of Nadir". Time. July 6, 1970. Archived from the original on May 13, 2008. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ Kelly, Herb (August 29, 1970). "'Breckinridge' Worst Ever". The Miami News. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2013.
- ^ Hoberman, J.; Rosenbaum, Jonathan (1991). Midnight Movies. Da Capo Press. p. 268. ISBN 0-306-80433-6.
- ^ Conner, Floyd (2002). Hollywood's Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Lucky Breaks, Prima Donnas, Box Office Bombs, and Other Oddities. Brassey's. p. 65. ISBN 1-57488-480-8.
- ^ "One and Done: 8 Filmmakers Who Have Only Directed a Single Movie – Collider on msn.com". MSN. Archived from the original on July 30, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- ^ "Locally made sci-fi thriller is all 'Zaat' and then some". June 12, 2001. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Kauffman, Jeffrey (February 21, 2012). "Zaat Blu Ray". Archived from the original on July 11, 2018. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Naugle, Patrick (February 12, 2012). "DVD Verdict Review – Zaat (Blu Ray)". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on October 2, 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Rubino, Michael (February 22, 2010). "DVD Verdict Review – Mystery Science Theater 3000". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on February 25, 2010. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Weeks, Linton (February 24, 2009). "10 Reasons Why We Love Making Lists". NPR. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Sampo (May 20, 2010). "Season 10 Episode Guide!". MST3Kinfo. Archived from the original on December 18, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- ^ "Half in the Bag:Zaat!". RedLetterMedia. April 30, 2012. Archived from the original on March 27, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ Cork International Film Festival (October 10, 2013). "An American Hippie in Isreal". Archived from the original on February 2, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2020 – via Vimeo.
- ^ Shefler, Gil (January 26, 2011). "Finding New Life As a Cult Classic". The Jewish Daily Forward. Archived from the original on October 18, 2015. Retrieved August 14, 2013.
- ^ Olson, Josh (December 9, 2013). "Trailers from Hell: Josh Olson on Little Known Comedy 'An American Hippie in Israel'". IndieWire. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Harman, Ben (January 9, 2011). "'Horrendous' Israeli '70s film becomes a cult favorite". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on August 30, 2018. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- ^ "News article from Nana 10" (in Hebrew). Archived from the original on August 8, 2017. Retrieved August 26, 2013.
- ^ "The Bootleg Files: At Long Last Love". Film Threat. May 5, 2006. Archived from the original on July 19, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
- ^ "Peter Bogdanovich: a life in pictures". The Guardian. January 6, 2022. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Brody, Richard (January 7, 2022). "How Peter Bogdanovich Shaped the Backstory of Modern Cinema". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on May 30, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Tookey, Christopher (2010). Named and Shamed: The World's Worst and Wittiest Movie Reviews from Affleck to Zeta-Jones. Troubador Publishing. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-84876-560-3.
- ^ Yule, Andrew (1992). Picture shows: the life and films of Peter Bogdanovich. Hal Leonard Corporation. p. 90. ISBN 0-87910-153-9.
- ^ Simon, Jeff (May 24, 1996). "Wisecrack Addicts Laughing at the Not-So-Bad". The Buffalo News. Archived from the original on November 1, 2018. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Muir, John Kenneth (2005). Singing a new tune:the rebirth of the modern film musical, from Evita to De-lovely and beyond. Hal Leonard Corporation. p. 58. ISBN 1-55783-610-8.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Leopold, Todd (July 11, 2013). "Picking up the pieces on Hollywood's biggest bombs". CNN. Archived from the original on August 18, 2013. Retrieved August 23, 2013.
- ^ Keyser, Lester J. (1981). Hollywood in the Seventies. Los Angeles, California: A.S. Barnes. p. 85. ISBN 0498025454.
- ^ Medved, Harry (1978). The fifty worst films of all time: (and how they got that way). Popular Library. p. 37. ISBN 0-445-04139-0.
- ^ Medved, Michael (1980). The Golden Turkey Awards. G. P. Putnam's Sons. p. 209. ISBN 0-399-50463-X.
- ^ McWeeny, Drew (January 9, 2012). "Peter Bogdanovich screens new cut of At Long Last Love and tells story behind it". Hitfix. Archived from the original on February 17, 2012. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Fordy, Tom (October 3, 2023). "'The worst film ever made'? Why Exorcist II: The Heretic is truly the sequel from hell". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on October 28, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2023.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "'If I'd made that, I'd change my name'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- ^ "Exorcist II – The Heretic Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ "The 25 worst sequels of all time". The A.V. Club. September 8, 2023. Archived from the original on October 28, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2023.
- ^ Libbey, Dirk (January 9, 2019). "Original Exorcist Director Says The Sequel Was The Worst Movie He's Ever Seen". CinemaBlend. Archived from the original on January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
- ^ Don Kaye (April 15, 2013). "Exorcist director says sequel is 'one of the worst films I've ever seen'". Blastr. Archived from the original on August 4, 2013. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- ^ John Boorman, cited in Bob McCabe, The Exorcist: Out of the Shadows (Omnibus Press, 1999), p.164
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d Halliwell's film and video guide 2002 edited by John Walker. London. HarperCollins Entertainment, 2001. ISBN 0-00-712265-9 (p. 804).
- ^ "The worst movie ever?". The Guardian. April 26, 2001. Archived from the original on November 11, 2013. Retrieved March 29, 2014.
- ^ "The Swarm". September 10, 2012. Archived from the original on November 15, 2019. Retrieved March 29, 2014.
- ^ Mikel J. Koven, Film, Folklore and Urban Legends. Scarecrow Press, 2008 ISBN 0-8108-6025-2 (p. 91)
- ^ Wilson, John (2005). The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst. Grand Central Publishing. ISBN 0-446-69334-0.
- ^ Squires, John (August 22, 2018). "Warner Archive Releasing Extended Version of 1978's 'The Swarm' on Blu-ray". Archived from the original on January 12, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- ^ "On This Day in Horror History: The Mind Boggling 'The Swarm' Hit Theaters". July 14, 2017. Archived from the original on January 11, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- ^ Floorwalker, Mike (June 7, 2018). "Roger Ebert's Most Brutal Movie Takedowns Of All Time". Grunge.com. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "I Spit on Your Grave (Day of the Woman)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 14, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ Livingston, James (2011). The World Turned Inside Out: American Thought and Culture at the End of the 20th Century. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 189. ISBN 978-0742535428. Archived from the original on September 24, 2021. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
- ^ Tobias, Scott (March 21, 2011). "I Spit On Your Grave (2010)". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
- ^ Naugle, Patrick (February 15, 2002). "Don't Mess With My Sister". DVD Verdict. Archived from the original on April 26, 2004.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (July 16, 1980). "Review of I Spit on Your Grave". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 24, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Lord, Steve (November 7, 2010). "Movie, journalism fans queue up to see Ebert". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2010. Retrieved March 20, 2007.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (May 28, 1998). "Video Q&A". The Ledger. Archived from the original on February 13, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2013.
- ^ Siskel, Gene (August 17, 1983). "'Man Who Wasn't There' would best be left unseen". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on January 3, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
- ^ Croatto, Pete (May 1, 2013). "Worst Movie Ever? I Spit On Your Grave". Film Racket. Archived from the original on September 11, 2015. Retrieved July 31, 2015.
- ^ Shaffer, R. L. (February 4, 2011). "I Spit on Your Grave (1978) Blu-Ray Review". IGN. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved February 1, 2022.
- ^ "The Worst Movies of 1980 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Show Business: Will the Real Caligula Stand Up?". Time. January 3, 1977. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Ebert, Roger (September 22, 1980). "Caligula movie review & film summary (1980)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2020. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (October 16, 2008). "Don't read me first!". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 18, 2008. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Ebert, Roger (August 11, 2005). "Ebert's Most Hated". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ Sauter, p. 266.
- ^ "News Diary". The Age. June 8, 1981. p. 2.
- ^ "Lowest: 100 Really Bad Moments in 20th Century Entertainment". The Hamilton Spectator. July 24, 1999. p. W17.
- ^ Holleman, Joe (May 5, 2000). "Roman Warriors roam the big screen again". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. p. E1.
- ^ Armstead, Christopher. "Caligula". Film Critics United. Archived from the original on January 10, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
- ^ Bell, Sean (December 1, 2011). "'Caligula's Ghost: Why Cinema Needs Epic Failure More than Mediocre Success, PopMatters". PopMatters. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
- ^ Bukszpan, Daniel (March 20, 2012). "The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs -> 8. Heaven's Gate (1980)". CNBC. Archived from the original on June 10, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Corry, John (March 24, 1986). "'Cruel, Camera,' About Animal Abuse". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1981). "Heaven's Gate movie review & film summary (1981)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 17, 2019. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Bach, Steven (1999). Final Cut: Art, Money, and Ego in the Making of Heaven's Gate, the Film that Sank United Artists. Newmarket Press. p. 6. ISBN 9781557043740.
heaven's gate april 16 1979.
- ^ "Summary of 1981 Razzies". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: a b August, Melissa; Barovick, Harriet; Derrow, Michelle; Gray, Tam; Levy, Daniel S.; Lofaro, Lina; Spitz, David; Stein, Joel; Taylor, Chris (June 14, 1999). "The 100 Worst Ideas Of The Century". Time. Archived from the original on October 21, 2018. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Queenan, Joe (March 21, 2008). "Joe Queenan on the worst movie of all time". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved December 28, 2018.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q "The 50 Worst Movies Ever". Empire. February 4, 2010. Archived from the original on February 1, 2020. Retrieved March 17, 2014.
- ^ Brody, Richard (November 25, 2015). "Movie of the Week: "Heaven's Gate"". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on September 26, 2020. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Holmes, Linda (October 19, 2010). "'My Year Of Flops': A Very Good Book About Some Very Bad Movies". NPR. Archived from the original on February 2, 2023. Retrieved January 22, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c "The Criterion Channel's March 2024 Lineup". The Criterion Channel. February 14, 2024. Archived from the original on March 1, 2024. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
- ^ Hoyle, Ben (October 1, 2012). "Heaven's Gate: box office turkey that sank a studio is a modern masterpiece". The Times. Archived from the original on August 26, 2016. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ "Heaven's Gate". The Criterion Collection. Archived from the original on November 16, 2018. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
- ^ Dargis, Manohla (March 15, 2013). "The Second Coming of 'Heaven's Gate'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 25, 2013. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
- ^ "Revisiting 1980, The Year the Movies Killed Disco". InsideHook. Archived from the original on October 10, 2022. Retrieved October 10, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Bailey, Jason (July 10, 2017). "Bad Movie Night: The Distinctive Disco Cheese of 'The Apple'". Flavorwire. Archived from the original on December 10, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2017.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d "The Apple". American Film Institute. Archived from the original on July 10, 2017. Retrieved January 31, 2016.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Harris, Blake (February 5, 2016). "The Apple Oral History: How Did This Get Made". /Film. Archived from the original on January 12, 2022. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
- ^ "Past Winners Database". Los Angeles Times. August 15, 2007. Archived from the original on August 15, 2007.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Q & A with the Stinkers". Stinkers Bad Movie Awards. Archived from the original on April 13, 2001. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ Brownfield, Troy (August 7, 2020). "The Worst Movie Musicals Ever". The Saturday Evening Post. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ "The Apple (1980)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Archived from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
- ^ Burns, Sean (July 12, 2006). "Summer Camp". Philadelphia Weekly.
- ^ Lowe, Kenneth; Vorel, Jim (February 19, 2020). "Bad Movie Diaries: The Apple (1980)". Paste. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "10 Really Bad Movies that Define "Bad Movies"". Mental Floss. September 6, 2012. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
- ^ "Inchon". tcm.com. Archived from the original on July 13, 2022. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ "Slate's Bad Movies: Oscar Slumming". March 3, 2008. Archived from the original on March 12, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2019 – via youtube.com.
- ^ s:U.S. v. Sun Myung Moon 532 F.Supp. 1360 (1982)
- ^ Vincent Canby (September 17, 1982). "Inchon (1981) – 'Inchon,' At Last". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2012. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
- ^ "Terence Young dies – Directed Bond movies". The Washington Post. September 9, 1994. p. B6.
- ^ "1982 Razzie Nominees & "Winners" – The Official Razzie Forum". Razzies.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ Mayo, Mike (April 13, 1997). "Hollywood's untapped resources – worthwhile movies don't always make it to video". The Washington Post. p. G7.
- ^ Boedeker, Hal (July 21, 1989). "The Magic of Olivier his film legacy sets standard for all actors". The Miami Herald. p. 36G.
The worst of his choices was probably taking on the role of Gen. Douglas MacArthur in 1982's Inchon. Newsweek called Inchon 'the worst movie ever made, a turkey the size of Godzilla.'
- ^ "Inchon Review". TV Guide. November 28, 2012. Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- ^ McKay, John (Canadian Press) (March 23, 2004). "Welch fleshes out worst in film". The Record (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada). p. E4.
- ^ Medved, Harry; Michael Medved (1984). The Hollywood Hall of Shame: The Most Expensive Flops in Movie History. New York, NY: Perigee Books. pp. 189–197. ISBN 0-399-51060-5.
- ^ Sauter, p. 197.
- ^ Leslie Halliwell, John Walker, Halliwell's Film Guide. HarperPerennial, 1996 (p. 1119).
- ^ Thomas S. Hischak, American Literature on Stage and Screen: 525 Works and Their Adaptations McFarland, 2012. ISBN 0-7864-9279-1 (p. 237)
- ^ "John Derek, Tarzan the Ape Man". Old School Reviews. Archived from the original on March 4, 2014. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ Brunson, Matt (June 16, 2004). "View From The Couch | View from the Couch | Creative Loafing Charlotte". Clclt.com. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ "Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on March 7, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2021.
- ^ Shapiro, Gregg (October 14, 2021). "Camp classic 'Mommie Dearest' turns 40". Archived from the original on October 22, 2021. Retrieved October 22, 2021.
- ^ "How 'Mommie Dearest' Went From Oscar Bait to Cult Classic|Collider". Collider. March 10, 2023. Archived from the original on July 22, 2023. Retrieved December 10, 2023.
- ^ "Meine liebe Rabenmutter". Archived from the original on January 29, 2019. Retrieved January 28, 2019 – via mubi.com.
- ^ "'Mommie Dearest' meets John Waters". Chicago Tribune. June 6, 2006. Archived from the original on July 31, 2021. Retrieved June 5, 2021.
- ^ "AFI|Catalog". catalog.afi.com. Archived from the original on June 5, 2021. Retrieved June 5, 2021.
- ^ Adams, p. 188.
- ^ Wilson, John (March 15, 1990). "Decade's Worst -The 80's". Golden Raspberry Awards. Archived from the original on May 11, 2013.
- ^ "Razzies still knocking Hollywood down a peg after 25 years". Associated Press / USA Today. February 24, 2005. Archived from the original on February 5, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ Wilson, John (2005). The official Razzie movie guide: enjoying the best of Hollywood's worst. Hachette. ISBN 0-446-69334-0.
- ^ Sauter, p. 189.
- ^ Crouse, Richard (2005). Reel Winners: Movie Award Trivia. Dundurn Group. p. 123. ISBN 1-55002-574-0.
- ^ Henderson, Eric (June 21, 2010). "Movie Blog: Best 'Worst Movies Ever'". CBS Minneapolis. Archived from the original on October 4, 2015. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1981). "Mommie Dearest movie review & film summary (1981)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2017. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ "Mommie Dearest Review – Read Variety's Analysis Of The Movie Mommie Dearest". Variety. January 1, 1981. Archived from the original on July 15, 2014.
- ^ Brody, Richard (May 26, 2017). "Joan Crawford's Explosive Offscreen Life". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on January 16, 2021. Retrieved October 11, 2020.
- ^ "Mommie Dearest (1981)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on April 16, 2019. Retrieved January 30, 2021.
- ^ "There Is No Try...: Foleyvision does the Turkish 'Star Wars' Austin Screens". AustinChronicle.com. February 20, 2004. Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ "The Turkish Star Wars". Film Threat. May 18, 2005. Archived from the original on March 12, 2010. Retrieved January 17, 2011.
- ^ Goldweber, David Elroy (2015). Claws & Saucers: Science Fiction, Horror, and Fantasy Film 1902-1982: A Complete Guide. Lulu Press, Inc. p. 1773. ISBN 978-1-312-28803-4. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
- ^ "Contour2002.org". Archived from the original on August 10, 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2014.
- ^ "News article from Sabah newspaper" (in Turkish). Archived from the original on May 30, 2016. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- ^ "News article from Hürriyet" (in Turkish). April 7, 2012. Archived from the original on March 2, 2016. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- ^ "Dollar-store Star Wars". Toronto Standard. May 4, 2012. Archived from the original on September 26, 2018. Retrieved August 24, 2013.
- ^ "News article from Sabah newspaper" (in Turkish). Archived from the original on August 8, 2009. Retrieved July 29, 2006.
- ^ Weinberg, Marc (1986). "Out-Foxed". Orange Coast Magazine. Vol. 12, no. 9. pp. 143–144.
- ^ Maltin, Leonard (2008). "H". Leonard Maltin's 2009 Movie Guide. Penguin Group. p. 641. ISBN 978-0-452-28978-9.
- ^ Stanley, John (2000). Creature Features: The Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Movie Guide. Berkley Boulevard Books. p. 253. ISBN 0-425-17517-0.
For one, the duck costume and makeup are phony — Howard looks like a midget in a Halloween costume.
- ^ Hunter, Lew (2004). "Nothing in the Mind, Please". Lew Hunter's Screenwriting 434: The Industry's Premier Teacher Reveals the Secrets of the Successful Screenplay. Perigee. p. 21. ISBN 0-399-52986-1.
Because we all know what a duck looks like, Lucas could not get an audience to suspend their belief that Howard was a little person in a duck suit.
- ^ Kehr, Dave (August 1, 1986). "UNLOVABLE DUCK MAKES 'HOWARD' AN UNLOVABLE FILM". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved May 13, 2021.
- ^ Carr, Jay (August 1, 1986). "They Don't Get Much Worse Than 'Howard'". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on October 18, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
- ^ "Summer of '86: Tarred and Feathered: Howard the Duck". Slant Magazine. July 28, 2011. Archived from the original on March 16, 2014. Retrieved March 14, 2014.
- ^ "Howard the Duck". TV Guide. Archived from the original on September 30, 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2014.
- ^ "Howard the Duck (1986)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Archived from the original on August 3, 2014. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
- ^ Wilson, John. "1986 Archive". Golden Raspberry Award. Archived from the original on June 2, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2009.
- ^ "1986 9th Hastings Bad Cinema Society Stinkers Awards". Stinkers Bad Movie Awards. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 17, 2006. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Kendrick, Ben (November 13, 2015). "25 Worst Movies in Film History". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on August 11, 2017. Retrieved August 11, 2017.
- ^ Thompson, Lea; Jones, Jeffrey; Gale, Ed (2009). Releasing the Duck (DVD). Universal Home Video. UPC 025195052306.
- ^ Chipman, Bob. "Duck Fails Hollywood Bets It All on Duck Boners". Primer&Co. Archived from the original on September 27, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
- ^ Alter, Ethan (October 11, 2019). "Role Recall: Tim Robbins on being in the first Marvel movie, where his 'Bull Durham' character is now and the one thing he still has from 'The Shawshank Redemption'". Yahoo. Archived from the original on May 11, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
- ^ Dirk Libbey (June 12, 2018). "Lea Thompson Is Pitching A Howard The Duck Movie To Marvel". CINEMABLEND. Archived from the original on January 11, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- ^ Eisenberg, Eric (August 1, 2014). "Guardians Of The Galaxy End Credits Sequence Explained". CinemaBlend. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ "Seth Green would voice Howard the Duck in the MCU again 'anytime they asked'". SYFY Official Site. July 20, 2020. Archived from the original on October 25, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Grisar, PJ (November 4, 2019). "Elaine May, Mounting A Comeback At 87, Is Directing A New Film". The Forward. Archived from the original on November 5, 2019. Retrieved April 28, 2020.
- ^ "The Not-So-Savage Messiahs". MUBI. August 5, 2013. Archived from the original on August 17, 2022. Retrieved August 2, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Brody, Richard (August 6, 2015). "Movie of the Week: "Ishtar"". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on January 9, 2019. Retrieved February 11, 2019.
- ^ "Review: 'Dinner for Schmucks' a savory comedy". San Jose Mercury News. May 1, 2011. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
- ^ "Ishtar". Time Out. Archived from the original on November 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
- ^ Morrissey, Ed (February 22, 2009). "What were the worst movies of all time?". Hot Air. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
- ^ Sauter, p. 213–216.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Richard Roeper, 10 Sure Signs a Movie Character is Doomed and Other Surprising Movie Lists, New York: Hyperion Books, 2003, pp. 66–67
- ^ Ryder, Alistair (August 6, 2015). "10 Movies With Low Ratings That Are Actually Good". Film Inquiry. Archived from the original on January 12, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
- ^ Brueggemann, Tom (May 17, 2020). "'Ishtar': How Hollywood Decided That One Box-Office Flop Spoke for All Female Directors". IndieWire. Archived from the original on July 5, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2022.
- ^ McGuire, Liam (December 1, 2022). "Gary Larson Names the One Far Side Comic He Wants to Apologize For". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on December 9, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2022.
- ^ "Worst of 1987 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org. Archived from the original on January 9, 2022. Retrieved January 9, 2022.
- ^ Kempley, Rita (December 19, 1987). "Leonard Part 6 (PG)". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 21, 2013. Retrieved June 27, 2012.
- ^ Weinberg, Scott (April 26, 2005). "Leonard Part 6". DVD Talk. Archived from the original on November 6, 2012. Retrieved June 27, 2012.
- ^ King, Dennis (July 6, 1990). "Ghost Dad". Tulsa World. Archived from the original on May 7, 2019. Retrieved January 27, 2019.
- ^ Broeske, Pat H. (December 20, 1987). "Leonard RIP?". The Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2010.
- ^ Feran, Tim (April 26, 1992). "Section: Features – Accent & Arts – Intermission". Columbus Dispatch. Columbus, Ohio. p. 01F.
- ^ "Stars take critics with a grain of salt". The Daily Union. May 12, 1991. Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
- ^ Seibold, Witney (January 13, 2023). "The Nukie Controversy Explained: Destroying Crappy Movies For Charity". /Film. Archived from the original on January 14, 2023. Retrieved January 16, 2023.
- ^ Trinos, Angelo Delos (August 15, 2022). "10 Copycat Films That Are Worse Than What They're Ripping Off". Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- ^ Phalin, Mike (August 26, 2016). "Schlock and the Snob: An Interview With Brad Jones". Dread Central. Archived from the original on January 1, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- ^ Newgent, Sean (January 10, 2023). "VHS copy of forgotten 'E.T.' knock-off 'Nukie' sells for $80,600". KGUN-TV. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Winning, Joshua (November 8, 2011). "50 Worst Kids Movies". Total Film. GamesRadar. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- ^ Winning, Joshua (June 30, 2014). "25 Worst Science-Fiction Films". Total Film. GamesRadar. Archived from the original on July 14, 2017. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
- ^ Balmont, James (January 30, 2023). "Nukie: the strange story behind the forgotten ET knock-off". Dazed. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
- ^ The Garbage Pail Kids Movie at Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m "Best Movies of All Time". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
- ^ James, Caryn (August 28, 1987). "Movie Review – The Garbage Pail Kids Movie". New York Times. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved June 6, 2010.
- ^ "Trashy 'Garbage Pail Kids' Has No Value". Sun-Sentinel. September 5, 1987. Archived from the original on January 13, 2012. Retrieved September 29, 2010.
- ^ "Doug Walker on The Garbage Pail Kids Movie - YouTube". YouTube. December 16, 2012. Archived from the original on May 17, 2024. Retrieved May 17, 2024.
- ^ "The Garbage Pail Kids Movie > Overview". AllMovie. Archived from the original on June 1, 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2010.
- ^ "The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987) – Box Office Mojo". Boxofficemojo.com. Archived from the original on March 23, 2011. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ DiVincenzo, Alex. "Blu-ray Review: Hobgoblins". Broke Horror Fan. Archived from the original on April 27, 2019. Retrieved April 16, 2019.
- ^ "Episode Guide". Archived from the original on October 13, 2008.
- ^ "Mad Monster Rally : DVD Talk Review of the DVD Video". Dvdtalk.com. Archived from the original on February 24, 2014. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ "Hobgoblins 2". Archived from the original on September 27, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2020 – via mubi.com.
- ^ "Advertising is so much a part of life that it's understandable to find familiar products in films. But sometimes it goes too far". Los Angeles Times. August 29, 1999. Archived from the original on December 4, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2012.
- ^ Mac and Me at Box Office Mojo
- ^ "Mac and Me". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Archived from the original on April 28, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Mac and Me at Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ "Movie Review Mac and Me Takes a Big McBite Out of E.T." Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 7, 2011. Retrieved December 5, 2010.
- ^ McGranaghan, Mike (March 21, 2017). "15 Movies With Bizarre Source Material". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on June 24, 2018. Retrieved June 23, 2018.
- ^ Millican, Josh (August 8, 2018). "Alternate Mac and Me Ending Unearthed and It's Insane". MovieWeb. Archived from the original on September 11, 2018. Retrieved December 15, 2018.
- ^ "Top 20 aliens in the movies". The Telegraph. December 19, 2017. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
- ^ Crow, Jonathan (April 22, 2011). "Morgan Spurlock Dubs 'Mac and Me' the Worst Film Ever Sold". Yahoo! Movies. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012. Retrieved August 29, 2013.
- ^ "Mac and Me". San Francisco Chronicle. January 22, 2017.
McDonald's created an 'E.T.' rip-off called 'Mac and Me' in 1988... It's the worst movie ever made.
- ^ "Paul Rudd and Chris Evans interviewed by Simon Mayo". BBC Radio 5 Live. April 29, 2016. Event occurs at 10 minutes. Archived from the original on May 10, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
Mac and Me... we're talking about the worst film ever made.
- ^ Lindelof, Damon (March 14, 2011). "Damon Lindelof's Open Letter to Paul the Alien". GQ. Archived from the original on April 28, 2018. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
- ^ Hayden, Michael (November 10, 2011). "The 6 best bad films". GQ India. Archived from the original on May 12, 2018. Retrieved May 11, 2018.
- ^ Patches, Matt (April 3, 2017). "How McDonald's Bizarre 'E.T.' Knockoff Got Made". Thrillist. Archived from the original on December 11, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
- ^ McNally, Victoria (April 24, 2017). "Mac and Me Finally (?) Gets Figure and Pin Collection". Nerdist. Archived from the original on May 12, 2018. Retrieved May 11, 2018.
- ^ "'Mystery Science Theater 3000' Will Tackle 'Mac And Me' In Season 2". November 12, 2018. Archived from the original on January 3, 2020. Retrieved January 3, 2020.
- ^ Faraci, Derek (June 12, 2022). "10 MST3K Movies You Should Watch Without The Riffing". CBR. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- ^ "Things review". Canuxploitation. Archived from the original on September 29, 2013. Retrieved December 28, 2013.
- ^ "Films on the Fringe: Things (1989)". Critic Online. Archived from the original on April 15, 2009. Retrieved June 7, 2009.
- ^ Symchuk, Adam (September 30, 2020). "It Came From The North: 10 Great Monster Movies From Canada". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on July 26, 2022. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- ^ Kirschner, Jeff (December 10, 2015). "Things: The Worst Movie Ever Made". Dread Central. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- ^ Pfeifer, Will (October 17, 2008). "Will Pfeifer: Monsters, mullets meet for snoozefest". Jackson Newspapers. Archived from the original on September 2, 2021. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- ^ Nelson, Mike J.; Murphy, Kevin; Corbett, Bill (March 4, 2022). "Things". Rifftrax. Archived from the original on March 5, 2022. Retrieved July 26, 2022.
- ^ Janet Maslin, The New York Times, January 17, 1986; Patricia Smith, The Chicago Sun-Times, January 20, 1986; Alan Carter, The New York Daily News, January 17, 1986; Rex Reed, January 17, 1986
- ^ "The Beauty Of The 'Best Worst Movie'". NPR. Archived from the original on June 20, 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2009.
- ^ "Best Worst Movie uncovers the heartbreaking psychodrama in a memorably insane B-movie". The A.V. Club. March 29, 2013. Archived from the original on May 16, 2014. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
- ^ "Troll 2". Not Coming to a Theater Near You. March 23, 2009. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 28, 2015.
- ^ "Movie Review: Troll 2 | Mountain Xpress". mountainx.com. July 23, 2008. Archived from the original on October 19, 2013. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ "Troll 2 Review". TV Guide. Retrieved March 5, 2014.
- ^ "Best Worst Movie" – via rottentomatoes.com.
- ^ "Troll 2". Know Your Meme. November 23, 2014. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Bad Movies: The 100 Worst Movies of All Time". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ I. G. N. Staff (June 16, 2000). "Highlander 2: Renegade Version". IGN.
- ^ Williams, Isaac (January 5, 2022). "The 10 Worst Movie Sequels Ever, Ranked". Comic Book Resources. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (November 1, 1991). "Highlander 2: The Quickening movie review (1991)". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved October 10, 2020.
- ^ "Highlander 2: Renegade Version Review". IGN. June 16, 2000.
- ^ "Highlander II: There can be only four cuts!". JoBlo Movie Network. November 24, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2013.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Russell, Jamie (April 23, 2012). "Why the Super Mario Movie Sucked". Wired. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b "Worst Movies of All Time Top 10". RiffTrax. 2012. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Grierson, Tim (May 26, 2020). "This week in genre history: Super Mario Bros. the movie gets an instant 'game over'". SyFy Wire. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ Siskel, Gene; Ebert, Roger (August 18, 2008). Siskel & Ebert Review "Super Mario Bros.". YouTube. Archived from the original on August 10, 2016. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
- ^ Walsh, Michael (June 22, 2022). "8 Things Fans Want To See In The Super Mario Movie". Collider. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
- ^ Shanfield, Ethan; Lang, Brent (April 4, 2023). "Mario Powers Up: How Nintendo Visionary Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination's Chris Meledandri Plan to Super Smash Hollywood". Variety. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
- ^ Bodanis, David (November 2020). "Directors". The Art of Fairness: The Power of Decency in a World Turned Mean. Abrams Books. ISBN 9781647003869.
The result was 1941, and while it's not the worst movie ever made—not when Super Mario Bros. is still available—it's definitely a contender.
- ^ Hattenstone, Simon (August 3, 2007). "The Method? Living it out? Cobblers!". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 16, 2016. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
- ^ Greenstreet, Rosanna (June 17, 2011). "Q&A: Bob Hoskins". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 10, 2013. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
- ^ Vary, Adam (December 11, 2014). "Sony Pictures Lands "Mario Bros." Movie Rights From Nintendo, Leaked Emails Show". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on December 12, 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
- ^ Malkin, Marc (April 5, 2023). "'Super Mario Bros. Movie' Star Seth Rogen Calls Original 1993 Adaptation 'One of the Worst Films Ever Made'". Variety. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
- ^ "North Movie Reviews, Pictures – Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ "Worst of 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org.
- ^ "The Client, Lassie, It Could Happen to You, North, Barcelona, 1994 – Siskel and Ebert Movie Reviews". siskelebert.org.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Ebert, Roger (July 22, 1994). "North movie review & film summary (1994)". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
- ^ "The Official Site of Gene Siskel". Cmgww.com. Archived from the original on February 26, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2011.
- ^ LaSalle, Mick (January 8, 2011). "Rob Reiner's 'North' Is Distastefully Bad". The San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on November 13, 2003.
- ^ Кристофферсен, Мариус Вартдал (3 мая 2011 г.). — Что случилось с Дисом? . Журнал Z Film (на норвежском языке) . Проверено 14 июля 2014 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Самый большой индейка Норвегии снова летает» . Афтенпостен (на норвежском языке). 28 июня 2012. Архивировано из оригинала 14 августа 2012 года . Проверено 14 июля 2014 г.
- ^ Педерсен, Брент Эрик. «Почитает критика Дагсависена» . Ежедневная газета (на норвежском языке). Архивировано из оригинала 17 июня 2014 года . Проверено 14 июля 2014 г.
- ^ «Мясник норвежский фильм» . Дагбладет (на норвежском языке) . Проверено 14 июля 2014 г.
- ^ Персалл, Стив (25 марта 1996 г.). « Шоугелз» разозлили». «Санкт-Петербург Таймс» . п. 2Б.
- ^ «Шоугелз – Обзоры фильмов» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 5 марта 2014 г.
- ^ «Архив кинорепортажей, том 1» . TheMovieReport.com . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с Уайт, Адам (18 марта 2020 г.). «Шоугелз: замечательное возрождение худшего фильма, когда-либо созданного» . Независимый . Проверено 17 апреля 2020 г.
- ^ Стивен Линч (3 октября 2001 г.). «Критик выбирает худшие фильмы всех времён» . Бартоу Пресс . Проверено 12 июня 2014 г.
- ^ Бояр, Джей (13 октября 1995 г.). « Алая буква» не соответствует сказке Хоторн» . Орландо Сентинел . Проверено 1 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Парди, Алисия (26 мая 2012 г.). «20 книг-бестселлеров, которые не получили такого признания, как экранизации» . Новости Дезерета . Архивировано из оригинала 13 декабря 2013 года . Проверено 26 сентября 2018 г.
- ^ «Алая буква (1995)» . Касса Моджо . Проверено 12 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Хикс, Крис (22 декабря 1995 г.). «Лучшие и худшие фильмы 1995 года» . Новости Дезерета . Проверено 1 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ ЛаСалль, Мик (30 декабря 1995 г.). «Так плохо, что их нельзя ненавидеть» . Хроники Сан-Франциско . Проверено 6 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ «Худший фильм 1995 года» . Побережье . Проверено 6 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Шварц, Эми Э. (24 октября 1995 г.). «Даже Хоторн рассмеялась бы» . Вашингтон Пост . Проверено 1 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Уильямсон, Кевин (19 февраля 2009 г.). «Ненавижу не соглашаться с теми, кто лучше меня…» National Review . Проверено 1 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Тромбетта, Сэди (5 ноября 2015 г.). «9 книг, которые никогда не должны были стать фильмами» . Суета . Проверено 1 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Хеллманн, Либби Фишер (7 августа 2016 г.). «5 великих книг, которые были отвратительны в кино» . LibbyHellmann.com . Проверено 6 ноября 2020 г.
- ^ Снайдер, Эрик (19 июня 2008 г.). «Плохие фильмы Эрика: Био-Купол (1996)» . Новости МТВ . Архивировано из оригинала 10 июля 2022 года . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Уорд, Кэссиди (13 января 2021 г.). «Био-Купол» оказался провальным фильмом, но «Биосфера 2» стала настоящим экспериментом» . Сифай провод . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б О'Брайен, Джон (17 января 2021 г.). «Как научно-фантастическая комедия 90-х стала одним из худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных» . Инверсия . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Брамеско, Чарльз (12 января 2016 г.). «20 лет спустя чистая глупость «Био-Купола» остается непревзойденной» . Упрокс . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Рабин, Натан (27 августа 2008 г.). «Я специально посмотрел это: Биокупол» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Смит, Джоди (21 января 2015 г.). «Rifftrax собрал 20 худших фильмов 90-х: вы с ними не согласны?» . Паджиба . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ «В кино это были худшие моменты 1996 года» . Тампа Бэй Таймс . 25 марта 1997 года . Проверено 10 июля 2022 г.
- ^ «Бэтмен и Робин» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 6 июля 2019 г.
- ^ «Бэтмен и Робин (1997): Рецензии» . Метакритик . CBS Интерактив . Проверено 17 апреля 2010 г.
- ^ Нельсон, Майкл Дж. (20 июня 2000 г.). Фильм Майка Нельсона «Мегасыр» . Харпер Коллинз. п. 79 . ISBN 978-0-380-81467-1 .
- ^ Джоэл Шмахер (2005). «Создание» Введения (DVD). Уорнер Бразерс.
- ^ Шарф, Зак (5 октября 2021 г.). «Джордж Клуни отказывается показывать жене «Бэтмена и Робина»: «Я хочу, чтобы она уважала меня» » . ИндиВайр . Проверено 13 июля 2023 г.
- ↑ Джордж Клуни говорит, что в мире «недостаточно наркотиков», чтобы заставить его снова сыграть Бэтмена, даже после камео «Флэша» — разнообразие
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с Джейд Линдгаард и Ксавье Де Ла Порт, «Самозванец: BHL в стране чудес» (перевод Джона Хоу), Лондон; Версо, 2012. ISBN 978-1-84467-748-1 (стр. 48-9).
- ^ Дальбург, Джон-Тор (28 марта 1997 г.). «Фильм, который не снимал Платон» . Лос-Анджелес Таймс . Проверено 14 октября 2013 г.
- ^ Адамс, Тим (8 декабря 2011 г.). «Враги общества Мишеля Уэльбека и Бернара-Анри Леви – обзор» . Хранитель . Проверено 10 мая 2023 г.
- ^ «Вулкан – это муха слона» . Человечество . 19 февраля 1997 года . Проверено 14 октября 2013 г.
- ^ « День и ночь», худший фильм в истории... Правда?» . Сланец . 3 октября 2010 г. Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ Тиллемент, Пакоме. «Фильм, который БХЛ не понял (хотя это его любимый!)» . Взорвите дыхание информации (на французском языке) . Проверено 10 мая 2023 г.
- ^ Пирсон, Бен (30 октября 2018 г.). «Би-би-си опросила критиков и опубликовала список 100 величайших иностранных фильмов» . /Фильм . Проверено 10 мая 2023 г.
- ^ «БХЛ и кинокритика, это было день и ночь» . 20 минут . 11 октября 2010 года . Проверено 14 октября 2013 г.
- ^ Чешир, Годфри (17 августа 1998 г.). «Мстители – бесполезные шпионы: Стид и Пил непривлекательны» . Разнообразие . Проверено 27 июня 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Маслин, Джанет (15 августа 1998 г.). « Мстители»: Тсс! Они стараются, чтобы их не заметили . Нью-Йорк Таймс . Проверено 27 января 2015 г.
- ^ «Фильм- Мстители ». Бирмингем Пост . 19 августа 1998 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Джонс, Алан. «Рецензия: Мстители» . Радио Таймс . Проверено 27 января 2015 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Бьянкулли, Дэвид (18 августа 1998 г.). «Не такие уж и отличные Мстители» . Нью-Йорк Дейли Ньюс . Проверено 27 января 2015 г.
- ^ «Двойные катастрофы достигают вершины провалов». Западная почта . Кардифф. 1 декабря 2003 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Лонерган, Эйдан (16 августа 2018 г.). «Окончательный рейтинг 7 худших ирландских фильмов всех времен» . Ирландская почта . Проверено 9 марта 2019 г.
- ^ Лайнс, Крейг (4 ноября 2015 г.). «Знакомьтесь: Fatal Deviation, единственный в Ирландии фильм о боевых искусствах» . Логово Компьютерщика . Архивировано из оригинала 7 июня 2019 года . Проверено 7 июня 2019 г.
- ^ МакКинни, Люк (3 июля 2010 г.). «Единственный в Ирландии фильм о кунг-фу (худший фильм из когда-либо созданных)» . Cracked.com . Проверено 9 марта 2019 г.
- ^ «Вестлайф: что дальше?» . Ирландская независимая газета . 22 октября 2011 года . Проверено 9 марта 2019 г.
- ^ Бем, Саймон (15 марта 2021 г.). «Первый ирландский фильм о боевых искусствах невероятно плох» . Ресурсы по комиксам . Проверено 13 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Ллойд, Брайан (12 марта 2018 г.). «10 таких плохих фильмов, которые нужно посмотреть, прежде чем умереть» . развлечения.т.е . Проверено 9 марта 2019 г.
- ^ Ворел, Джим; Лоу, Кеннет (31 июля 2018 г.). «Дневники плохого кино: Фатальное отклонение (1998)» . Вставить . Проверено 7 июня 2019 г.
- ↑ Эндрю Коллинз, «Как стрелять в настоящую индейку» The Observer , 28 марта 1999 г. Экран наблюдателя , стр.6.
- ^ «У Winner's Turkey неприятное послевкусие» . The Sunday Herald , 2 мая 1999 г. (стр. 7)
- ^ Майлз Кингстон, «Один или два сюжета, которые займут мои последние годы». The Independent , 3 мая 2005 г. (стр. 30).
- ^ Глейберман, Оуэн (11 июня 1999 г.). «Кинообзор андеграундной комедии» . Развлекательный еженедельник . Проверено 3 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ Каргер, Дэйв; Чанг, Суна (16 октября 1998 г.). «Монитор: Новости о знаменитостях за 16 октября 1998 года» . Развлекательный еженедельник . Проверено 3 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ Ван Гелдер, Лоуренс (28 мая 1999 г.). «Рецензия Лоуренса Ван Гелдера на подземную комедию » . Нью-Йорк Таймс . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ Дреер, Род (28 мая 1999 г.). « Комедия действительно похоронена под своим мусором». Нью-Йорк Пост .
- ^ «Уголок критика СЗ» . Премия Stinkers Bad Movie Awards . Архивировано из оригинала 12 апреля 2001 года . Проверено 9 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Рабин, Натан (4 сентября 2018 г.). «Это выглядит ужасно! Подпольная комедия (1999)» . nathanrabin.com . Проверено 23 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Беннетт, Том. «Андеграундная комедия» . Международный киножурнал . Архивировано из оригинала 5 ноября 2013 года . Проверено 7 марта 2012 г.
- ^ Янг, Питер (26 марта 2013 г.). «Комедийный фильм лучше держать в подполье» . Центральная Вестерн Дейли . Проверено 6 марта 2018 г.
- ↑ Поле битвы Земля в Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Худшая из худших картин» . Гнилые помидоры . 21 сентября 2009. Архивировано из оригинала 23 ноября 2010 года . Проверено 17 января 2011 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Эберт, Роджер (12 мая 2000 г.). «Рецензия на фильм «Поле битвы: Земля» (2000)» . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . Проверено 11 октября 2020 г.
- ^ Рабин, Натан (11 сентября 2007 г.). «Дело № 66 «Мой год провалов: Поле битвы: Земля»» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 27 января 2019 г.
- ^ «Награды за Battlefield Earth» . IMDB . Проверено 27 июня 2008 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Раззи номинирован на худший фильм десятилетия» . Razzies.com . Проверено 2 февраля 2010 г.
- ^ «Фонд премии «Золотая малина» . Razzies.com . Архивировано из оригинала 21 марта 2013 года . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Фильм Адама Сэндлера «Джек и Джилл» получает награду Раззи» . Новости Би-би-си . 2 апреля 2012 года . Проверено 17 мая 2012 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с д и ж г час я дж к «50 худших фильмов» . Механизм запросов к обзорам фильмов . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с д и ж Никол, Уилл (10 мая 2017 г.). «10 худших фильмов, которые вы можете посмотреть» . Цифровые тенденции . Проверено 28 июля 2017 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с д и Лиси, Брайан (5 декабря 2017 г.). «Худшие фильмы, когда-либо созданные» . Нью-Йорк Дейли Ньюс . Проверено 14 марта 2018 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Хейнс, Лестер (20 апреля 2012 г.). «Поле битвы: Земля» признано худшим фильмом всех времен» . Регистр . Проверено 5 апреля 2018 г.
- ^ Дембров, Дилан (28 января 2018 г.). «15 вещей, которые вы не знали о катастрофическом поле битвы на Земле» . Экранная ругань . Проверено 5 декабря 2020 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с д «12 худших анимационных фильмов всех времен» . Экранная ругань . 15 января 2017 года. Архивировано из оригинала 8 января 2022 года . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Мэттсон, Келси (11 сентября 2023 г.). «Я смотрел анимационный мюзикл «Титаник», так что вам не обязательно» . Коллайдер . Проверено 3 мая 2024 г.
- ^ «Титаник: Анимационный фильм» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 28 января 2022 г.
- ^ Брайтон, Тим (20 мая 2020 г.). «Титаник: Легенда продолжается... (2000) – Рецензия на фильм» . Альтернативная концовка . Проверено 28 января 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Росадо, Рикардо (1 октября 2020 г.). «20 худших фильмов в истории кино: дань уважения» . Рамки (на европейском испанском языке) . Проверено 26 января 2022 г.
- ^ Робертс, Уилл (15 января 2017 г.). «10 худших анимационных фильмов всех времен» . Шпаргалка по шоу-бизнесу . Архивировано из оригинала 22 января 2022 года . Проверено 28 января 2022 г.
- ^ Рензетти, Джеки (16 апреля 2014 г.). «Это не ваш Кэмерон «Титаник» » . Миннесота Дейли . Проверено 26 января 2022 г.
- ^ Клинтон, Пол (19 апреля 2001 г.). « Фредди перебрали» — очень плохой фильм» . CNN . Архивировано из оригинала 30 декабря 2006 года . Проверено 11 октября 2020 г.
- ^ Уоррен Эпштейн (26 апреля 2001 г.). «Задача перебрать худшие фильмы всех времен» . Газета . Колорадо-Спрингс, Колорадо. Архивировано из оригинала 19 марта 2018 года.
- ^ Хьюз, Скотт (26 апреля 2001 г.). «Самый худший фильм на свете?» . Хранитель . Лондон . Проверено 9 февраля 2011 г.
- ^ Эберт, Роджер (20 апреля 2001 г.). Рецензия на фильм «Фредди перебрали» (2001) . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . Проверено 11 октября 2020 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Фредди возглавляет номинацию Раззи» . Новости Би-би-си . 11 февраля 2002 года . Проверено 9 февраля 2011 г.
- ^ Уотерс, Даррен (23 марта 2002 г.). «Грин щупают за Раззи» . Новости Би-би-си . Проверено 9 февраля 2011 г.
- ^ «Фредди тронули пальцами» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Мастерс, Тим (7 марта 2010 г.). «Сандра Буллок получила награду за лучшую женскую роль на фестивале Razzies» . Новости Би-би-си . Проверено 9 февраля 2011 г.
- ^ Цвекер, Билл (22 января 2002 г.). «Мэрайя продолжает сделку по записи, выздоровление» . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . Проверено 16 июня 2011 г.
- ^ «Номинанты и «победители» RAZZIE® 2001 года » . Награда «Золотая малина» . 4 декабря 2005 г. Архивировано из оригинала 3 марта 2016 г. Проверено 30 июня 2012 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с д Шайо, Лукас (12 ноября 2022 г.). «10 фильмов, получивших отрицательную оценку 10 из 10 по версии Reddit» . ЭкранРант .
- ^ «Провальный фильм Мэрайи Кэри «Блеск» чуть не убил ее». Индостан Таймс . 4 ноября 2009 года.
39-летний Кэри был госпитализирован из-за эмоционального срыва после того, как почти все критики раскритиковали «Глиттер» как худший фильм за всю историю.
- ^ «30 худших тщеславных проектов всех времен» . Fadeinonline.com . Постепенное появление . 2 июня 2013. Архивировано из оригинала 8 сентября 2015 года . Проверено 23 августа 2015 г.
- ^ Боб, Макканн (2009). Энциклопедия афроамериканских актрис кино и телевидения . Нью-Йорк: Исполнительское искусство. п. 70. ИСБН 9780786458042 .
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Стивенсон, Элисон (13 ноября 2013 г.). «Абсолютные мерзавцы: 15 худших фильмов всех времён» . News.com.au. Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Худшие фильмы всех времен: Блеск» . Привет . Архивировано из оригинала 24 сентября 2015 года . Проверено 23 августа 2015 г.
- ^ Хайатт, Брайан (25 марта 2002 г.). «Том Грин и Эстелла Уоррен — победители Раззи » . Развлекательный еженедельник . Проверено 23 августа 2015 г.
- ^ Рейнольдс, Саймон (26 января 2010 г.). «Кэри винит 11 сентября в провале «блеска»» . Цифровой шпион . Hachette Filipacchi Médias . Проверено 23 августа 2015 г.
- ^ «Блеск (2001)» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 3 июня 2017 г.
- ^ «СПИСОК Раззи Чам-Пинов за все время - Официальный форум Razzie®» . Награда «Золотая малина» . 21 февраля 2012. Архивировано из оригинала 21 февраля 2012 года . Проверено 3 сентября 2020 г.
- ^ Пул, Оливер (11 октября 2002 г.). «Мадонну и Гая смела волна критики» . «Дейли телеграф» . ISSN 0307-1235 . Архивировано из оригинала 11 января 2022 года . Проверено 28 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ «Не сметенная Мадонной» . Нью-Йоркский обозреватель . 21 октября 2002 года . Проверено 28 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ «Унесенные – Рецензии на фильм» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 28 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ «Унесенные (2002)» . Касса Моджо . Проверено 28 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Худшие фильмы, когда-либо появлявшиеся на экране» . После Эллен.com . 8 сентября 2009 года. Архивировано из оригинала 22 апреля 2019 года . Проверено 30 января 2019 г.
- ^ Фрагосо, Сэм (2 августа 2002 г.). Рецензия на фильм «Мастер маскировки (2002)» . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . Проверено 5 марта 2014 г.
- ^ «Рецензия на фильм «Мастер маскировки» - фотографии фильма «Мастер маскировки», трейлер фильма «Мастер маскировки» . Viewlondon.co.uk . 16 октября 2006 года . Проверено 5 марта 2014 г.
- ^ «Мастер маскировки» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 24 июля 2014 г.
- ^ «Обзоры фильмов Дэвида Хантера» . Гнилые помидоры . Архивировано из оригинала 17 декабря 2021 года . Проверено 21 июня 2022 г.
- ^ Хантер, Стивен (20 сентября 2002 г.). « Дурашка Люси: «Баллистика», много шумной думдум » . Вашингтон Пост . Архивировано из оригинала 28 июня 2011 года . Проверено 17 января 2011 г.
- ^ Эберт, Роджер (20 сентября 2020 г.). «Баллистика: Рецензия на фильм «Экс против Севера» (2002)» . Проверено 11 октября 2020 г.
- ^ «ГРУХЛЫЕ ПОМИДОРЫ: Худшая из худших картин» . Гнилые помидоры . Архивировано из оригинала 3 марта 2009 года . Проверено 11 октября 2020 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с Вуд, Дженнифер М. (10 августа 2017 г.). «15 худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных» . Ментальная нить . Проверено 11 августа 2017 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Пайцман, Луи (5 сентября 2014 г.). «Человеку, стоящему за «худшим гей-фильмом всех времён», всё равно, если вы его ненавидите» . БаззФид . Проверено 15 марта 2018 г.
- ^ Грант, Джафи (20 февраля 2009 г.). «Бен и Артур: худший гей-фильм всех времен» . Странно . Проверено 25 января 2015 г.
- ^ Клемм, Майкл Д. (июль 2004 г.). «9 мертвых геев/Бен и Артур» . Синемавир . Проверено 25 января 2015 г.
- ^ Адамс , с. 301.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Приключения Плутона Нэша и 13 других критически оклеветанных провалов, которые взорвали, потому что они чертовски отстой» . Счастливое место Натана Рабина . 23 марта 2021 г.
- ^ «От Джастина до Келли» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 24 июля 2014 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Тирангиэль, Джош (5 февраля 2006 г.). «Мисс Независимость» . Журнал «Тайм» .
- ^ "Готовим!" The Free Lance – Star , 9 июля 2003 г. (стр. 56).
- ^ Рабин, Натан (11 ноября 2009 г.). «Дело № 150, выигравшее конкурс: от Джастина до Келли» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Джильи считает Razzie Dishonors худшим за год», Reading Eagle , 1 марта 2004 г. (стр. 20)
- ^ Коллис, Кларк (20 июля 2009 г.). «Безумный культ «Комнаты» » . Развлекательный еженедельник . Проверено 3 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ «Коуч-серфер: «Может быть, это и величайшая чушь, но «Комната» делает публику счастливой » . Независимый . Лондон. 20 июля 2009 года . Проверено 23 ноября 2009 г.
- ^ Коллис, Кларк (30 декабря 2008 г.). « Комната»: худший фильм на свете? Не говорите этого его внезапно ставшей востребованной звезде» . Развлекательный еженедельник . Проверено 3 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ Роуз, Стив (9 сентября 2009 г.). «Это худший фильм, когда-либо созданный?» . Хранитель . ISSN 0261-3077 . Проверено 18 марта 2020 г.
- ^ Романо, Ая (2 декабря 2017 г.). «Комната: как худший фильм в истории стал легендой Голливуда, такой же причудливой, как и его создатель» . Вокс . Проверено 18 марта 2020 г.
- ^ Пак, Джин (30 ноября 2017 г.). «Перспектива | «Комната» — худший фильм, когда-либо созданный, но я видел его сто раз — без иронии» . Вашингтон Пост . Проверено 18 марта 2020 г.
- ^ Донохью, Пол (5 декабря 2017 г.). «Объяснение худшего фильма из когда-либо созданных» . Новости АВС . Проверено 18 марта 2020 г.
- ^ Графф, Бернд (28 мая 2013 г.). « Комната», худший фильм всех времён . Süddeutsche.de (на немецком языке) . Проверено 18 марта 2020 г.
- ^ Вишневецкий Игнатий (30 ноября 2017 г.). «Художник-катастрофа» — это паршивая дань уважения величайшему плохому фильму нашего времени» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 4 января 2019 г.
- ^ Гудвин, Кристофер (12 апреля 2009 г.). «Культовый хит (Даже «М» — это переработанная сексуальная сцена). «Комната» — лучший худший фильм» . Таймс . Лондон. Архивировано из оригинала 15 июня 2011 года.
- ^ Сибло, Мэтт (12 июня 2010 г.). «Томми Визо и Комната в AFI Silver Theater: с пятницы, 11 июня, по воскресенье, 13 июня» . Вашингтонская городская газета . Архивировано из оригинала 28 июня 2011 года . Проверено 17 января 2011 г.
- ^ « Зови меня своим именем» получил награду за лучший адаптированный сценарий | 90-я церемония вручения премии «Оскар» (2018)» . 17 апреля 2018 г. – через youtube.com.
- ^ «90-я церемония вручения премии Оскар | 2018» . Оскар.орг | Академия кинематографических искусств и наук . 15 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Джеймс Франко стал лучшим актером мюзикла или комедии на церемонии вручения премии «Золотой глобус» 2018 года» . 7 января 2018 г. – через youtube.com.
- ^ «Художник-катастрофа» . goldglobes.com .
- ^ «50 лучших хороших плохих фильмов» . Звонок . 19 июня 2017 г.
- ^ «Взгляд назад на печально известный фильм «Джильи» с Беннифером в главной роли, посвященный его 10-летию» . Ежедневный зверь . 1 августа 2013 года . Проверено 20 сентября 2013 г.
- ^ «Джильи поднялся» . Фокс Ньюс . 30 июля 2003 года . Проверено 20 сентября 2013 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Кошачье фиаско Галле и Женщина-кошка по Фаренгейту» президента на 25-м мероприятии Razzie Dis-Honors» . Razzies.com . Архивировано из оригинала 15 марта 2011 года . Проверено 7 марта 2011 г.
- ^ Джильи в Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Критики считают «худший фильм всех времен» » . Небесные новости . 23 февраля 2004 г. Архивировано из оригинала 12 октября 2013 г.
- ^ Кевин О'Салливан, The Daily Mirror , 5 марта 2004 г. (стр. 14)
- ↑ Генри Фицгерберт, The Sunday Express , 22 февраля 2004 г. (стр. 67).
- ↑ Кэтрин Шоард, The Sunday Telegraph , 22 февраля 2004 г.
- ^ «Обзор: Сексуальная жизнь картофельных мужчин . Daily Record , 20 февраля 2004 г.».
- ^ Дональд Кларк, «Вне офиса: Интервью с Маккензи Крук». Журнал «The Ticket», The Irish Times , 25 апреля 2008 г. (стр. 6).
- ↑ Майк Дэвис, The Birmingham Post , 24 апреля 2008 г. (стр. 13).
- ↑ Мэтью Белл, Independent on Sunday , 8 февраля 2009 г., (стр. 42).
- ^ «Сексуальная жизнь картофельных мужчин на тухлых помидорах» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 12 января 2015 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Холли Берри получила премию Раззи | официальный канал Раззи на YouTube .
- ^ Женщина-кошка в Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ Лоурисон, Джин. « Женщина-кошка: Кот и Брэтт» . Метрополитен Сан-Диего. Архивировано из оригинала 24 июля 2011 года . Проверено 17 января 2011 г.
- ^ Ахсан, Садаф (27 февраля 2018 г.). «Сценарист худшего фильма всех времен согласен, что это действительно был худший фильм всех времен» . Национальная почта . Проверено 19 марта 2018 г.
- ^ Ким, Джанет (20 июля 2004 г.). «Я-ой – Страница 1 – Кино – Нью-Йорк» . Деревенский голос . Архивировано из оригинала 29 июня 2011 года . Проверено 17 января 2011 г.
- ^ «Погружение в фильмы с худшим рейтингом на IMDb» . Ежедневная точка . 11 декабря 2015 года . Проверено 14 марта 2018 г.
- ^ «Кинорежиссер Улли Ломмель скончался от сердечного приступа» (на немецком языке). н-тв . 4 декабря 2017 г. Проверено 14 марта 2018 г.
- ^ «Дэниел – Волшебник – Фильм 2004» . Filmstarts.de . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ «Даниэль Кюбльбёк сейчас из Висбадена» . Frankfurter Rundschau (на немецком языке). 15 февраля 2009 года . Проверено 13 сентября 2013 г.
- ^ Астинус, AD (30 сентября 2015 г.). Девять худших фильмов в истории кино: Весь мир худших фильмов кино - От волшебника Даниила до картофельного салата - Не спрашивайте! (на немецком языке). необуки. ISBN 978-3-7380-4159-0 .
- ^ «Кинотеатры отменяют «Волшебника Даниила»: Кюбльбек как суперпровал» . RP ONLINE (на немецком языке). 17 сентября 2004 года . Проверено 4 октября 2019 г.
- ^ «25 худших фильмов всех времен» . Filmstarts.de . 31 июля 2015 года . Проверено 8 марта 2019 г.
- ^ "Die schlechtesten Filme | moviepilot.de" . Moviepilot.de (на немецком языке). Архивировано из оригинала 11 сентября 2018 года . Проверено 8 марта 2019 г.
- ^ «Худшие фильмы всех времен — фильм Кюбльбека проходит в программе SchleFaZ» . Moviepilot.de (на немецком языке). 23 марта 2016 года . Проверено 4 марта 2024 г.
- ^ «Исповедь PopWatch: худший фильм, который заставил вас высидеть ребенок» . Развлекательный еженедельник . 16 января 2015 года . Проверено 3 апреля 2018 г.
- ^ Лонг, Том (17 ноября 2004 г.). «СуперБэбис: Малыши-гении 2» . Новости Дезерета . Архивировано из оригинала 24 июня 2018 года . Проверено 3 мая 2012 г.
- ^ « Женщина-кошка» борется с президентом Бушем за приз за худшую актёрскую игру» . Ежедневные Таймс . 26 января 2005 года. Архивировано из оригинала 11 ноября 2013 года . Проверено 3 мая 2012 г.
- ^ «50 худших сиквелов всех времен» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 8 января 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Один в темноте в Rotten Tomatoes
- ^ Alone in the Dark , получено 24 марта 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с Линкольн, Кевин (20 сентября 2017 г.). «Что общего между 19 фильмами, получившими оценку F CinemaScore» . Стервятник . Проверено 17 января 2019 г.
- ^ Мур, Роджер (28 января 2005 г.). «Один в темноте» . Орландо Сентинел . Архивировано из оригинала 29 июня 2011 года . Проверено 13 июня 2014 г.
- ^ Штейн, Рут (28 января 2005 г.). «Клипы / Также открывается сегодня» . Хроники Сан-Франциско . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ «Обзор десятилетия: выбор фильмов Хартлауба» . Хроники Сан-Франциско . 30 июля 2010 г.
- ^ « Темнота – это тоскливо» . Газетт (Мэриленд) . 2 февраля 2005 года. Архивировано из оригинала 12 ноября 2013 года . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Эриксон, Блэр (2 февраля 2005 г.). «За кулисами: Уве Болл и «Один в темноте» Уве Болла» . Что-то ужасное.
- ^ Вайнберг, Скотт (3 марта 2006 г.). «Объявлены награды Stinker Awards 2005!» . Гнилые помидоры . Архивировано из оригинала 12 декабря 2010 года . Проверено 17 января 2011 г.
- ^ «Обзор: РГВ Ки Ааг — это РГВ ка дааг» . Архивировано из оригинала 22 июля 2009 года.
- ^ «Десятилетие декаданса» . Таймс оф Индия . 31 декабря 2010. Архивировано из оригинала 20 октября 2013 года . Проверено 25 августа 2013 г.
- ^ «Обзор: Рам Гопал Варма Ки Ааг» . Индостан Таймс . 31 августа 2007. Архивировано из оригинала 17 ноября 2011 года . Проверено 25 августа 2013 г.
- ^ «57 худших фильмов всех времен – II» . ФХМ (Индия) . Архивировано из оригинала 12 сентября 2012 года . Проверено 25 августа 2013 г.
- ^ «Амитабх Баччан: «Рам Гопал Варма Ки Ааг — ошибка» » . Цифровой шпион . 11 июля 2011 года . Проверено 25 августа 2013 г.
- ^ Эпический фильм (2007) , получено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Эпический фильм , получено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ «12 худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных» . Вечерний стандарт . 15 мая 2018 г. . Проверено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Рабин, Натан (29 января 2007 г.). «Эпический фильм» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ «Рецензия на фильм: Эпическое кино» . austinchronicle.com . Проверено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ «BBC – Кино – обзор – Эпическое кино» . Би-би-си . Проверено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Сим, Дэвид; Уотлинг, Ева (14 августа 2018 г.). «Худшие комедийные фильмы всех времен, от «Очень страшное кино 5» до «Красотка и дурочка» » . Newsweek . Проверено 25 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Леопольд, Тодд (23 февраля 2008 г.). «"Убила меня" Лохан установила рекорд худшего фильма » CNN . Проверено 12 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ «Я знаю, кто меня убил» . Как это было сделано? . Ушной волк . 18 октября 2011 года . Проверено 12 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Элли, Крофт (2012). История Линдси Лохан . Издательская группа «Орион» . ISBN 978-1409136378 .
- ^ Делахай, Гейб (23 июня 2008 г.). «Охота на худший фильм всех времён: Я знаю, кто меня убил» . Стереогум . Проверено 12 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ «Фильм-катастрофа – Тухлые помидоры» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 3 июня 2013 г.
- ^ Соломонс, Джейсон (6 сентября 2008 г.). «Фильм-катастрофа» . Хранитель . Лондон . Проверено 3 июня 2013 г.
- ^ Тобиас, Адам (5 сентября 2008 г.). «Фильм-катастрофа — один из худших фильмов всех времен» . Уотертаун Дейли Таймс . Проверено 3 июня 2013 г.
- ^ Флиман, Майк (21 января 2009 г.). «Ким Кардашьян: Спасибо за номинацию на Раззи!» . Люди . Архивировано из оригинала 28 сентября 2013 года . Проверено 3 июня 2013 г.
- ^ «Знакомство со спартанцами (2008)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Знакомство со спартанцами» . Метакритик . CBS Интерактив . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Левин, Джош (30 января 2008 г.). «Знакомьтесь, спартанцы: еще один ужасный фильм-пародия от негениев, которые подарили вам Date Movie и Epic Movie» . Журнал «Сланец» . Проверено 4 марта 2019 г.
- ^ «Красотка и дурочка (2008)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 12 июля 2018 г.
- ^ «Красотка и Nottie Review». Люди . Лондон, Англия. 23 марта 2008 г.
Катастрофа в Париже; Бимбо - худшая актриса на свете
- ^ Натан Ли (29 января 2008 г.). «Деревенский голосовой обзор» . Villagevoice.com. Архивировано из оригинала 30 октября 2012 года . Проверено 6 декабря 2012 г.
- ^ «Обзор Джеймса Берардинелли» . Reelviews.net. 13 мая 2007 года . Проверено 6 декабря 2012 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Красотка и Нотти» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 25 октября 2014 г.
- ^ «По мнению Рохадта Критикусока, Паппа Пиа зашел слишком далеко» . 444.hu (на венгерском языке). 20 августа 2017 г. Проверено 1 февраля 2022 г.
- ^ «Álom.net исполнилось 10 лет, и Кристоф Штайнер «хотел показать кривое зеркало поколению того времени » . 24.hu (на венгерском языке). 16 апреля 2019 года . Проверено 1 февраля 2022 г.
- ^ Давид, Сайо (26 ноября 2014 г.). «Готовится продолжение худшего венгерского фильма всех времен» . Index.hu (на венгерском языке) . Проверено 1 февраля 2022 г.
- ^ Кларк, Дональд (19 апреля 2011 г.). «Какой худший фильм всех времен?» . Ирландские Таймс . Архивировано из оригинала 3 февраля 2012 года . Проверено 1 февраля 2022 г.
- ^ «Десять худших фильмов всех времен» . fmc.hu (на венгерском языке) . Проверено 1 февраля 2022 г.
- ^ «В Birdemic есть романтика, саспенс и все такое» . Вайсленд сегодня. 12 февраля 2010. Архивировано из оригинала 14 сентября 2012 года . Проверено 16 апреля 2011 г.
- ^ Паркер, Итан (30 октября 2020 г.). «Birdemic делает «У ворон есть глаза 3» похожим на шедевр Хичкока» . ЦБ РФ .
- ^ «Является ли Birdemic худшим фильмом, когда-либо созданным?» . Новости Би-би-си . 6 апреля 2010 года . Проверено 16 апреля 2011 г.
- ^ Перьера, Фабио (9 марта 2010 г.). «Обзор: Birdemic: шок и ужас» . ХаффПост . Проверено 3 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ «Бирдемика: шок и ужас, еще один на свалку мусора» . Деревенский голос . 30 марта 2010 года. Архивировано из оригинала 20 марта 2011 года . Проверено 16 апреля 2011 г.
- ^ Вайнер, Иона (6 апреля 2010 г.). «Худшие фильмы, когда-либо созданные» . Сланец . Проверено 16 апреля 2011 г.
- ^ « Birdemic»: магия жестокой компьютерной графики подтверждена» . Салон . 25 февраля 2011. Архивировано из оригинала 28 февраля 2011 года . Проверено 6 мая 2011 г.
- ^ Шейб, Ронни (29 марта 2010 г.). «Обзоры разнообразия – Birdemic: Шок и ужас» . Разнообразие . Архивировано из оригинала 29 июня 2011 года . Проверено 6 мая 2011 г.
- ^ eas106 (25 октября 2012 г.). «RiffTrax Live: Birdemic (2012) Билеты в кино, обзоры и фотографии» . Фанданго.com . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: числовые имена: список авторов ( ссылка ) - ^ Харви, Деннис (29 апреля 2013 г.). «Обзор фильма: «Бирдемик 2: Воскрешение» » .
- ^ Грэм Макмиллан (17 декабря 2008 г.). «Кастинг аватаров заставляет фанатов увидеть… белое» . ио9 . Гоукер Медиа . Проверено 19 декабря 2008 г.
- ^ Онда, Дэвид. «Последний маг воздуха» . Комкаст . Архивировано из оригинала 24 декабря 2013 года . Проверено 22 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ Эберт, Роджер . «Последний маг воздуха» . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . Проверено 22 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ Райан, Майк (1 июля 2010 г.). «25 вопросов, которые могут у вас возникнуть о последнем маге воздуха» . Ярмарка тщеславия . Проверено 22 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Последний маг воздуха М. Найта Шьямалана получил премию Razzie Awards» . Новости Би-би-си . 27 февраля 2011 года . Проверено 27 февраля 2011 г.
- ^ «31-я ежегодная премия Раззи» . Награда «Золотая малина» . Архивировано из оригинала 3 января 2013 года.
- ^ Уилсон, Наташа. «Худшие фильмы всех времен: Последний повелитель воздуха» . Привет . Архивировано из оригинала 8 августа 2014 года . Проверено 29 июня 2014 г.
- ^ Коуч, Аарон (1 декабря 2016 г.). «Дев Патель о сожалении о «Последнем маге воздуха»: я «видел незнакомца на экране» » . Голливудский репортер . Архивировано из оригинала 2 декабря 2016 года . Проверено 1 декабря 2016 г.
- ^ «Круглый стол актеров полного Оскара THR: Эндрю Гарфилд, Кейси Аффлек, Дев Патель и другие» . Ютуб . 23 января 2017 года. Архивировано из оригинала 28 октября 2021 года . Проверено 23 января 2017 г.
- ^ Кук, Линда (12 сентября 2011 г.). « Баки — худший из худших» . Квад-Сити Таймс . Проверено 11 августа 2017 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Д'Алессио, Джефф (16 апреля 2023 г.). «Главные критики: худший фильм, который я когда-либо рецензировал» . Газета «Новости» . Проверено 11 июня 2023 г.
- ^ Лоу, Кеннет; Ворел, Джим (30 августа 2018 г.). «Дневники плохого кино: Баки Ларсон: Рожденный быть звездой (2011)» . Вставить . Проверено 12 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Мусто, Майкл (12 июня 2014 г.). «10 худших комедий, когда-либо созданных» . Журнал «Блот» . Проверено 11 августа 2017 г.
- ^ Эггерс, Тоф (14 ноября 2011 г.). «Трагедия Адама Сэндлера» . Салон . Проверено 23 августа 2013 г.
- ^ Ропер, Ричард. «Свободный, как сумасшедший, Джек и Джилл» . Ричард Ропер и кино . Проверено 25 апреля 2013 г.
- ^ Сетуде, Рамин (11 ноября 2011 г.). «Обзор фильма: «Джек и Джилл» Адама Сэндлера — худший фильм из когда-либо созданных» . Ежедневный зверь . Проверено 25 апреля 2013 г.
- ^ Майк Стокласа, Джей Бауман (20 ноября 2011 г.). «Половина в мешке: Джек и Джилл» . РедЛеттерМедиа. Архивировано из оригинала 23 января 2020 года . Проверено 25 апреля 2013 г.
- ^ «Джек и Джилл (2011)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 10 июня 2019 г.
- ^ МакГранаган, Майк (1 ноября 2011 г.). «Джек и Джилл» . Сиденье у прохода . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Маккей, Холли (30 апреля 2012 г.). «Комедия об изнасиловании в средней школе? Не заходит ли фильм Адама Сэндлера «Это мой мальчик » слишком далеко?» . Фокс Ньюс . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Адам Сэндлер серьезно относится к тому, что это мой мальчик? | DrJays.com Live | Мода. Музыка. Образ жизни» . Live.drjays.com . 21 мая 2012. Архивировано из оригинала 12 декабря 2013 года . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Новый фильм Адама Сэндлера «Это мой мальчик» эксплуатирует детей, ставших жертвами сексуального насилия. Пожалуйста, бойкотируйте фильм. | Национальная коалиция мужчин» . НКФР. 2 мая 2012 года . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Адам Сэндлер тебя ненавидит» . Салон.com . 16 июня 2012 года . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Извращенцы будут извращенцами в «Это мой мальчик » – Chicago Sun-Times» . Suntimes.com . Архивировано из оригинала 17 июня 2012 года . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Рецензия Ричарда Хариди «Это мой мальчик»» . Квикфликс . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Это мой мальчик - Обзоры фильмов» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Это мой мальчик (рецензия)» . FlickFilosofer.com . 23 января 2013 года . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ Лак, Джонатан Р. (15 июня 2012 г.). «Это обзор моего мальчика» . Wegotthiscovered.com . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Ох-поднос (2 октября 2012 г.). «Рецензия на фильм: Это мой мальчик» . Ох-поднос . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Победители Раззи» . Razzies.com . Архивировано из оригинала 27 февраля 2013 года . Проверено 19 декабря 2013 г.
- ^ «Это мой мальчик» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «100 лучших фильмов категории «Б» всех времен» . www.pastemagazine.com . 8 мая 2014. Архивировано из оригинала 24 июня 2018 года . Проверено 29 июня 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с Хоукс, Ребекка (2 августа 2017 г.). «Забудьте о фильме «Эмодзи»: откройте для себя Foodfight!, худший детский мультфильм всех времен» . «Дейли телеграф» . Архивировано из оригинала 24 июня 2018 года . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Рабин, Натан (27 февраля 2013 г.). «Дело № 34, спонсируемое брендами супермаркетов: ! » Foodfight АВ-клуб . Архивировано из оригинала 26 августа 2017 года . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Шерлок, Бен (30 июня 2020 г.). «5 лучших (и 5 худших) анимационных фильмов 2010-х годов» . Экранная ругань . Проверено 7 января 2020 г.
С заявленным бюджетом в 65 миллионов долларов и кассовыми сборами менее 74 000 долларов Foodfight! стал разрушительной финансовой катастрофой, и с тех пор его назвали одним из худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных.
- ^ Россен, Джейк (9 августа 2013 г.). «Размещение продуктов? Попробуйте их отлить» . Нью-Йорк Таймс . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Рабин, Натан (12 февраля 2019 г.). «Это выглядит ужасно! Foodfight! (2012)» . nathanrabin.com . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Николсон, Том (10 июня 2020 г.). «Лучшие фильмы, которые стоит посмотреть, будучи очень, очень под кайфом» . Эсквайр . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ «Фудфайт! Обзор» . Голливудские новости . 25 октября 2012 года . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ «Фудфайт! (2012)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Брайтон, Тим (24 апреля 2015 г.). «Фудфайт! (2012) – Кинообзор» . Альтернативная концовка . Архивировано из оригинала 7 января 2022 года . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Шарлебуа, Матье (29 ноября 2018 г.). «Худшие фильмы всех времен» . МСН . Архивировано из оригинала 6 января 2022 года . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Грег Эрбар (8 мая 2013 г.). «DVD ОБЗОР: «FoodFight!» » . Индивайр . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ Венегас, Жасмин (18 августа 2021 г.). «10 фильмов с менее чем тонкой рекламой» . Ресурсы по комиксам . Проверено 7 января 2022 г.
- ^ «Фильм может быть самым большим в Турции», Daily News , Южная Африка, 21 февраля 2013 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Худший фильм в истории?» . Брифинг студии . 21 февраля 2013. Архивировано из оригинала 26 февраля 2013 года . Проверено 13 февраля 2015 г.
- ^ Дрейк, Мэтью (6 октября 2013 г.). «Кинокомпания Дэнни Дайера обанкротилась из-за долга перед налогоплательщиком в 25 000 фунтов стерлингов» . Зеркало . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ « Беги за женой» — это худший фильм, когда-либо снятый?» . uk.movies.yahoo.com . 16 февраля 2013 года . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ Брэдшоу, Питер (14 февраля 2013 г.). «Беги за женой – рецензия» . Хранитель . ISSN 0261-3077 . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Рецензия на фильм: Беги за женой (12А)» . Независимый . 15 февраля 2013 года . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Беги за женой – смешно, как проказа » . «Индепендент» (Лондон) . 30 января 2015 г.
- ^ Эдвардс, Дэвид (15 февраля 2013 г.). «Рецензия на фильм: Беги за женой (12А)» . Ежедневная запись . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Беги ради жены: в этом фильме самая большая индейка, когда-либо снятая?» . Независимый . 15 февраля 2013 года . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Беги за своей женой», Berkhamsted & Tring Gazette , 11 марта 2013 г.
- ^ «Беги ради жены» Дэнни Дайера берут в прокате всего 602 фунта . Радио Таймс . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Беги ради жены» Дэнни Дайера провалился в прокате с 747 фунтами стерлингов» . Цифровой шпион . 20 февраля 2013 года . Проверено 30 января 2015 г.
- ^ «Беги за женой (2013)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Ходжес, Майк (27 мая 2013 г.). «Роковые находки» . Фильм Угроза . Архивировано из оригинала 22 февраля 2014 года . Проверено 1 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ Рабин, Натан (8 декабря 2015 г.). «Почему роковые находки заслуживают культового статуса» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 1 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ Калан, Эллиот; Маккой, Дэн; Веллингтон, Стюарт (19 сентября 2015 г.). Эп. #187 – Роковые находки . Флоп Хаус . Событие происходит с 50:22 до 50:55 . Проверено 1 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ Оллер, Джейкоб (1 сентября 2023 г.). «Роковые находки: комната для следующего поколения любителей плохого кино» . Журнал «Паста» . Проверено 26 октября 2023 г.
- ^ Кинг, Сьюзен (1 марта 2014 г.). « Муви 43» назван худшим фильмом 2013 года на 34-й церемонии вручения наград Razzie Awards . Лос-Анджелес Таймс . Проверено 1 марта 2014 г.
- ^ Хауэлл, Питер (25 января 2013 г.). «Рецензия на фильм 43: худший фильм в истории не получает ноль звезд» . Торонто Стар . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Фильм 43» . Обзоры Мерфи. 30 января 2013. Архивировано из оригинала 20 октября 2013 года . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Ропер, Ричард (25 января 2013 г.). «Это ужасно, а ПОТОМ есть Фильм 43 » . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . Архивировано из оригинала 29 января 2013 года . Проверено 18 ноября 2013 г.
- ^ Тобиас, Скотт (28 января 2013 г.). «Кассы выходного дня: Гонка ко дну» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 16 марта 2024 г.
- ^ Вайцман, Элизабет (26 января 2013 г.). «Рецензия на фильм: Фильм 43» . Нью-Йорк Дейли Ньюс . Нью-Йорк . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ «Гумшакалы (2014)» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 10 июля 2017 г.
- ^ Двиведи, Саураб (20 июня 2014 г.). «Рецензия на фильм: Гумшакалы — трижды мусор» . Индия сегодня .
- ^ Фрэнсис, Снеха Мэй (29 июня 2014 г.). «Поступок Саифа Али Кхана с «Хумшакалами» может поставить Карину в неуверенность» . Эмирейтс 24/7 . Проверено 22 октября 2014 г.
- ^ Сайед, Итрат (25 июня 2014 г.). «Хумшакалы дают новое определение ужасу» . Джорджия Стрит . Проверено 10 июля 2017 г.
- ^ ПТИ (17 февраля 2015 г.). «Хумшакалы лидируют в списке номинаций на премию Golden Kela Awards» . Индус . Ченнаи, Индия . Проверено 22 октября 2014 г.
- ^ МАНС (15 марта 2015 г.). «Сонакши и Арджун получили высшие награды Golden Kela» . Национальный . Проверено 17 августа 2015 г.
- ^ Мехта, Анхита (9 марта 2015 г.). «Полный список победителей Ghanta Awards 2015: Сонакши Синха, Аджай Девгн получили награду за худшего актера; Фарах Хан - худший режиссер» . Интернэшнл Бизнес Таймс . Проверено 17 августа 2015 г.
- ^ МАНС (8 августа 2014 г.). «Хумшакалы Саджида Хана встревожили меня: Бипаша Басу» . Индостан Таймс . Мумбаи. Архивировано из оригинала 9 августа 2014 года.
- ^ «Бипаша: Хумшакалс был худшим опытом в моей жизни» . Rediff.com . 26 августа 2014 г.
- ^ «Хумшакалс: Я просила отца не смотреть фильм, — рассказывает Эша Гупта» . Времена Индии . 2 июля 2014 г.
- ^ «Саиф Али Хан: Хумшакалы были ошибкой» . Времена Индии . 18 июля 2014 г.
- ^ Кенигсберг, Бен (13 ноября 2014 г.). «Чтобы спасти нас всех от власти сатаны» . Нью-Йорк Таймс . ISSN 0362-4331 . Проверено 8 июня 2020 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б с «Кирк Кэмерон спасает Рождество» . Гнилые помидоры . Проверено 17 декабря 2020 г.
- ^ «25 худших рождественских фильмов всех времен» . Биллингс Газетт . 12 декабря 2016 года . Проверено 28 июля 2017 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Кон, Эрик (19 июня 2017 г.). «Критики выбирают худшие фильмы, которые они когда-либо рецензировали» . ИндиВайр . Проверено 28 июля 2017 г.
- ^ «Кирк Кэмерон спасает Рождество» . Кристи Лемир . 21 ноября 2014 года . Проверено 9 сентября 2018 г.
- ^ Кунсе, Эмма (21 ноября 2014 г.). «Кирк Кэмерон призывает фанатов улучшить рождественский рейтинг «Спасение»: «Помогите мне штурмовать ворота гнилых помидоров» » . Христианская почта . Проверено 28 июля 2017 г.
- ^ «Кирк Кэмерон пытался обмануть Rotten Tomatoes, но получилось не очень» . СинемаБленд . 25 ноября 2014 года . Проверено 28 июля 2017 г.
- ^ О'Нил, Шон (5 декабря 2014 г.). «Кирк Кэмерон распят от рук пользователей IMDb и воскрес с кофе Иисуса» . АВ-клуб . Проверено 9 декабря 2014 г.
- ^ Кинг, Сьюзен (21 февраля 2015 г.). Кирка Кэмерона « Спасение Рождества доминирует на 35-й церемонии вручения премии Razzie Awards» . Лос-Анджелес Таймс . Проверено 28 июля 2017 г.
- ^ «Тим Рот называет свой фильм «United Passions» про FIFA «ужасным», говорит, что он сделал это только для того, чтобы оплатить обучение своих детей в колледже» . Метро.ко . 23 декабря 2015 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Идато, Майкл (26 февраля 2017 г.). «Razzie Awards: Америка Хиллари разносит золотую малину на фестивале позора перед вручением Оскара» . Сидней Морнинг Геральд . Проверено 6 января 2020 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Проверьте, Фрэнк. « Объединённые страсти»: Рецензия на фильм» . Голливудский репортер . Проверено 4 июня 2015 г.
- ^ Паркер, Грэм (2 июня 2015 г.). «Зепп Блаттер: история скандала» . Аль Джазира . Проверено 4 июня 2015 г.
- ^ Койлу, Энис. «Является ли United Passions худшим фильмом всех времен? Пропагандистский фильм ФИФА изображает Блаттера как оплот морали» . Goal.com . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Филд, Пол (3 июня 2015 г.). «Обзор United Passions: ужасный фильм ФИФА стоимостью 16 миллионов фунтов стерлингов стал непреднамеренной золотой комедией» . Ежедневное зеркало . Проверено 25 июня 2015 г.
- ^ Келли, Дес (27 октября 2014 г.). «Засахаренный фильм FIFA распространяется по Европе, как вирус» . Лондонский вечерний стандарт . Проверено 25 июня 2015 г.
- ^ Шон Махони (8 июня 2015 г.). «Худший фильм всех времен: фильм ФИФА «United Passions» назван «несмотрибельным» и «кинематографическим экскрементом» » . Инквизитор .
- ^ Дэниел М. Голд (4 июня 2015 г.). «Обзор: в« United Passions », вымышленной ФИФА, подписанной Soccer Group» . Нью-Йорк Таймс . Архивировано из оригинала 5 июня 2015 года . Проверено 25 июня 2015 г.
- ^ « United Passions» не получает хороших отзывов» . Си-Эн-Эн. 14 июня 2015 года . Проверено 4 сентября 2015 г.
- ^ «Объединённые страсти (2015)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго Медиа . Проверено 28 сентября 2019 г.
- ^ Райф, Кэти (19 июня 2015 г.). «Тщеславный проект ФИФА United Passions бьет рекорд кассовых сборов (не из лучших)» . АВ-клуб . Лук . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Остин Кноблаух (25 июня 2015 г.). « United Passions», который обошелся ФИФА в 29 миллионов долларов, собрал в прокате 607 долларов» . Лос-Анджелес Таймс . Проверено 8 июня 2015 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Фильм ФИФА «Объединённые страсти» — один из худших в истории кассовых сборов США» . ЭСПН ФК . ( ЭСПН ). 25 июня 2015 года . Проверено 21 июня 2015 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Скотт Роксборо и Ронда Ричфорд (17 июня 2015 г.). «Кинорежиссер ФИФА нарушает молчание по поводу бомбы: «Это катастрофа; Меня зовут повсюду [Этот беспорядок]" " . Голливудский репортер . Проверено 25 июня 2015 г.
- ^ «Razzie Awards высмеивает «Пятьдесят оттенков серого» и искупает Сильвестра Сталлоне» . Голливудский репортер . 28 февраля 2016 г. Проверено 6 января 2020 г.
- ^ Ховард, Кортни (22 января 2016 г.). «Как ГРЯЗНЫЙ ДЕДУШКА ранил мой феминизм: разоблачение» . Сасси Мама в Лос-Анджелесе . Архивировано из оригинала 27 декабря 2018 года . Проверено 28 сентября 2019 г.
- ^ Ланг, Нико (10 февраля 2016 г.). «В некоторых из самых успешных голливудских комедий есть проблема «хипстерской гомофобии»» . Журнал «Сланец» . Проверено 28 сентября 2019 г.
- ^ Мурти, Викрам (22 января 2016 г.). «Рецензии: «Грязный дедушка» — худший фильм Роберта Де Ниро?» . ИндиВайр . Проверено 26 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ Райан, Майк (21 января 2016 г.). « Грязный дедушка: самый важный фильм из когда-либо созданных» . Упрокс . Проверено 16 января 2018 г.
- ^ Хаммонд, Пит (22 января 2016 г.). « Рецензия на «Грязный дедушка»: худший фильм в карьере Роберта Де Ниро (или, может быть, любого другого)» . Крайний срок . Проверено 26 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ Макдональд, Гленн (22 января 2016 г.). «Обзор фильма: Ужасный, уродливый грязный дедушка — комедийный эквивалент порно-пыток» . ИНДИ-неделя . Архивировано из оригинала 27 декабря 2018 года . Проверено 26 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ « Грязный дедушка»: Роберт Де Ниро заслуживает лучшего, чем это придурок» . Чикаго Сан-Таймс . 6 марта 2016 г. Проверено 26 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ Рецензии Ричарда Ропера на "Dirty Grandpa" , 21 января 2016 г., заархивировано из оригинала 28 октября 2021 г. , получено 29 сентября 2019 г.
- ^ kermodeandmayo (29 января 2016 г.), «Грязный дедушка», рецензия Марка Кермода , заархивировано из оригинала 28 октября 2021 г. , получено 27 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ kermodeandmayo (30 декабря 2016 г.), Десять худших фильмов 2016 г.: Часть вторая , заархивировано из оригинала 28 октября 2021 г. , получено 27 декабря 2018 г.
- ^ «Грязный дедушка (2016)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго Медиа . Проверено 18 ноября 2021 г.
- ^ «Грязные дедушкины отзывы» . Метакритик . CBS Интерактив . Проверено 28 сентября 2019 г.
- ^ Коуч, Аарон (26 августа 2016 г.). «Трейлер российского супергеройского фильма «Стражи» настолько странный, что может оказаться хорошим» . Голливудский репортер .
- ^ «Хранители» – через mubi.com.
- ^ «Хранители (2017)» . Почтовый ящик . Проверено 17 апреля 2019 г.
- ^ Дерьмо на экспорт . кг-портал.ру (на русском языке). 23 октября 2017 года . Проверено 19 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Ослик, суслик, Андреасян . Rossiyskaya Gazeta (in Russian). February 24, 2017 . Retrieved February 23, 2019 .
- ^ Фильмы на неделю: патриотические (и ужасающие) "Защитники", а также "Джеки", "Тони Эрдманн" и "Слишком свободный человек" . Медуза (на русском языке). 23 октября 2017 года . Получено 19 , февраля
- ^ "Защитники" Сарика Андреасяна: наш ответ Говарду-утке . Афиша (на русском языке). 23 октября 2017 года . Проверено 19 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Защитите нас от "Защитников" . Ivi, Inc. (на русском языке). 23 октября 2017. Архивировано из оригинала 20 февраля 2019 года . Проверено 19 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Самый худший фильм: какие картины последних лет разочаровали зрителей (на русском языке). РИА Новости . 28 ноября 2017 г. Проверено 19 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Худшие фильмы (на русском языке). Критиканство . Проверено 19 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ "Guardians (Zashchitniki)" . Rotten Tomatoes . Fandango . Retrieved November 18, 2021 .
- ^ Козлов Владимир (23 февраля 2016 г.). «Российский фильм о супергероях времен холодной войны будет выпущен в Китае по импортной квоте» . Голливудский репортер . Проверено 23 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Рабин, Натан (1 августа 2022 г.). «Локиша почему-то намного хуже, чем кажется» . Счастливое место Натана Рабина . Проверено 3 августа 2022 г.
- ^ Грэм, Адам (13 мая 2019 г.). «Фильм «Локиша», снятый в Детройте, вызвал ажиотаж в социальных сетях» . Детройтские новости . Проверено 8 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Ричардс, Брайан (11 мая 2019 г.). « Локиша» — фильм, который действительно существует в 2019 году, и этот трейлер тревожит больше, чем любой фильм ужасов» . Паджиба . Проверено 8 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Ллойд, Брайан (11 мая 2019 г.). «Вот трейлер «Локиши», худшего фильма этого десятилетия» . Развлечения.ie . Проверено 8 июля 2022 г.
- ^ «Локиша» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 9 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Голби, Джоэл (8 июня 2019 г.). «Является ли «Локиша» худшим фильмом, когда-либо созданным?» . Хранитель . Проверено 8 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Кахан, Дэн (23 июня 2019 г.). «Удалите этот фильм: «Локиша» — действительно худший фильм, который я когда-либо смотрел» . Попдаст . Проверено 8 июля 2022 г.
- ^ Кей-Б (5 июня 2019 г.). « Локиша», самый осуждаемый фильм года, теперь транслируется на Amazon Prime . Решай . Проверено 8 июля 2022 г.
- ^ «Эндрю Ллойд Уэббер раскритиковал фильм и режиссера «Кошек»» . ХаффПост . 3 августа 2020 г.
- ^ «Эндрю Ллойд Уэббер раскритиковал экранизацию «Кошек»» . EW.com .
- ^ « Фильм «Кошки» может случиться, говорит лорд Эндрю Ллойд Уэббер» . Обертка . 3 декабря 2013. Архивировано из оригинала 20 июля 2018 года . Проверено 21 февраля 2019 г.
- ^ Рамос, Дино-Рэй (2 августа 2020 г.). «Эндрю Ллойд Уэббер говорит, что экранизация «Кошек» была «смешной » . Крайний срок . Проверено 3 августа 2020 г.
- ^ О'Мэлли, Шейла. «Обзор фильма «Кошки» и краткое содержание фильма (2019) | Роджер Эберт» . РоджерЭберт.com .
- ^ «Кошки (2019)» – через Letterboxd.com.
- ^ Рамос, Дино-Рэй (2 августа 2020 г.). «Эндрю Ллойд Уэббер говорит, что экранизация «Кошек» была «смешной» » . Крайний срок . Проверено 23 сентября 2020 г.
- ^ «В The Verge – Cats вносится патч с «улучшенными визуальными эффектами» » . 23 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ « 1917» победил в номинации «Лучшие визуальные эффекты» . 11 марта 2020 г. – через youtube.com.
- ^ «Кошачьи шутки Оскара поставили Академию в тупик с Обществом визуальных эффектов – CINEMABLEND» . 11 февраля 2020 г.
- ^ «Кошки (2019)» . Гнилые помидоры . Фанданго . Проверено 10 июня 2024 г.
- ^ «Список победителей Razzie 2020: «Кошки» получили худший фильм на Razzie Awards» . Развлекательный еженедельник .
- ^ Лодж, Гай (18 декабря 2019 г.). «Кошки уверены в себе? Кошки в последнюю минуту спешат в кино» . Хранитель . ISSN 0261-3077 . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Звездные войны и кошки: приходят первые реакции» . Новости Би-би-си . 17 декабря 2019 года . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ Конвери, Стефани (19 декабря 2019 г.). « 'Мешистая оргия на помойке': что говорят о Котах отзывы» . Хранитель . ISSN 0261-3077 . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ Роби, Тим (19 декабря 2019 г.). «Обзор кошек: зловещая, небывалая катастрофа, из которой никто не выйдет невредимым» . Телеграф . ISSN 0307-1235 . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ «Звезда «Кошек» Джейсон Деруло говорит, что «рецензии не имеют значения» после того, как критики раскритиковали фильм» . Телеграф . 19 декабря 2019 г. ISSN 0307-1235 . Проверено 27 февраля 2024 г.
- ^ Роби, Тим (19 декабря 2019 г.). «Обзор кошек: зловещая, небывалая катастрофа, из которой никто не выйдет невредимым» . Телеграф – через telegraph.co.uk.
- ^ Грэм, Адам (19 декабря 2019 г.). «Рецензия: Ох! Киноверсия «Кошек» — катастрофа Второзакония» . Детройтские новости . Архивировано из оригинала 19 декабря 2019 года . Проверено 20 декабря 2019 г.
- ^ « Кошки»: критики раскритиковали экранизацию мюзикла Эндрю Ллойда Уэббера» . Вашингтон Пост .
- ^ « Кошки»: бродвейская музыкальная адаптация прямо из туалетного лотка» . Роллинг Стоун .
- ^ Майор, Уэйд (20 декабря 2019 г.). «ТОМАТНЫЙ СЛЕМ: КОШКИ» .
- ^ Чилтон, Луи (15 мая 2020 г.). «Сценарист «Поля битвы: Земля» назвал «Кошек» новым худшим фильмом всех времен» . Независимый . Проверено 16 марта 2024 г.
- ^ Спенсер, Эшли (2 июля 2020 г.). «Как «365 дней» стал одним из самых популярных хитов Netflix с худшими рецензиями» . Нью-Йорк Таймс .
- ^ «365 дней: софткорный порнофильм Netflix, который люди не могут перестать смотреть» . Хранитель . 23 июня 2020 г. Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б «Спорный эротический триллер, названный одним из худших фильмов всех времен, становится мировым хитом» . www.thefirstnews.com . Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ 365 дней (2020) , получено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ Тейлор Эндрюс (8 июня 2020 г.). «Пожалуйста, умоляю вас: не смотрите «365 ДНИ» ради чего-либо, кроме сексуальных сцен» . Космополитен . Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ Махер, Кевин (19 июня 2020 г.). «Обзор 365 дней — этот польский софт-порнофильм отвратительный» . Таймс . ISSN 0140-0460 . Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ «27 причин, почему «365 дней» — худшее, что когда-либо создавал Netflix» . Великобритания . 16 июня 2020 г. Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ Кианг, Джессика (10 июня 2020 г.). « '365 дней': Рецензия на фильм» . Разнообразие . Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ Боллинг, Гай (12 марта 2021 г.). «Номинации на Раззи: Дулиттл и 365 дней» признаны лучшими в году» .
- ^ "РАЗЗ НЬЮЗ" . Раззи! . Проверено 7 августа 2021 г.
- ^ «Победители Razzie Awards 2021: Music, 365 Days выиграли по-крупному на 41-й церемонии вручения наград Golden Raspberry Awards» .
- ^ Обзор «Винни-Пуха: Кровь и мед»: Ой (не надо) беспокоиться | Collider
- ^ Нойенкирхен, Андреас (10 февраля 2023 г.). «Винни-Пух: Кровь и мед создают антидиснеевскую вселенную ужасов» . Ресурсы по комиксам . Проверено 10 марта 2024 г.
- ↑ «Винни-Пух: Режиссер «Крови и меда» все еще шокирован, что Дисней не подал в суд на фильм ужасов: «Компания такая офигенная» - Screen Rant
- ^ Харви, Деннис (16 февраля 2023 г.). « Рецензия на «Винни-Пух: Кровь и мед»: невыносимый ужастик-дешевка» . Разнообразие . Архивировано из оригинала 16 февраля 2023 года . Проверено 17 февраля 2023 г.
- ^ Аллен, Ник (16 февраля 2023 г.). «Винни-Пух: Кровь и мед» . РоджерЭберт.com . Архивировано из оригинала 16 февраля 2023 года . Проверено 17 февраля 2023 г.
- ^ Перейти обратно: а б Рабин, Натан (20 февраля 2023 г.). «Я ненавидел, ненавидел, ненавидел Винни-Пуха: Кровь и мед» . Плохие идеи Натана Рабина . Проверено 11 марта 2024 г.
- ^ Вуд, Шон Пол (12 ноября 2023 г.). «Медвежий смотрибельный фильм «Винни-Пух: Кровь и мед» заставил Диснея остановить это» . Кинотеатр . Проверено 10 марта 2024 г.
- ^ Виллеи, Мэтт (16 февраля 2023 г.). «Первые реакции на фильм «Винни-Пух: Кровь и мед» называют его «задушенным», «настолько плохим, что это хорошо» и худшим фильмом на свете» . Коллайдер . Проверено 10 марта 2024 г.
- ^ Кэмбелл, Скотт (16 марта 2023 г.). « Винни-Пух: Кровь и мед» официально — и заслуженно — назван одним из худших фильмов, когда-либо созданных» . Мы позаботились об этом . Проверено 10 марта 2024 г.
- ^ Филлипс, Зои Г. (9 марта 2024 г.). «Razzie Awards: «Винни Пух: Кровь и мед» побеждает в пяти номинированных категориях» . Голливудский репортер . Проверено 10 марта 2024 г.
Цитируемые работы
- Адамс, Майкл (2010). «Шоугелз», «Волчонки» и «Астрозомби»: многолетний поиск кинокритика худшего фильма из когда-либо созданных . Нью-Йорк: Itbooks. ISBN 978-0-06-180629-2 .
- Мальтин, Леонард (2003). Путеводитель по фильмам Леонарда Малтина . Печатка. ISBN 0-451-20940-0 .
- Медведь, Гарри (1978). Пятьдесят худших фильмов всех времен: (и как они к этому пришли) . Популярная библиотека . ISBN 0-445-04139-0 .
- Медведь, Михаил (1980). Премия «Золотая Турция» . Сыновья ГП Патнэма . ISBN 0-399-50463-Х .
- Заутер, Майкл (1999). Худшие фильмы всех времен, или О чем они думали? . Издательская группа Кэрол . ISBN 0-8065-2078-7 .
- Валлечински, Дэвид ; Уоллес, Ирвинг ; Уоллес, Эми (1977). Книга списков . Уильям Морроу и компания . ISBN 978-0688031831 .
- Уилсон, Джон (2005). Официальный путеводитель по фильмам «Раззи»: наслаждаемся лучшим из худшего Голливуда . Издательство Гранд Сентрал . ISBN 0-446-69334-0 .
Внешние ссылки
- Тухлые помидоры: 100 худших фильмов всех времен
- Самый ненавистный Эберт
- Нижнее 100 IMDb (оценки пользователей)